You are on page 1of 4

Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal 2009 2 ( 129 )

,
( , 266510)

: 2000 , ,
,
, ,
: ;
: H030 : A : 1002- 2643( 2009) 02- 0008-04

1. 0
( Semantic Prosody)
Sinclair( 1991)
Firth / 0 ( prosody)
Stubbs
( 1996) ( negative prosody)
( neutral prosody ) ( positive
prosody)
( , 2002a)
:
1
2000 , ,
:

,
2. 0
, 2. 1
,
, ( 2000) / :
0 ,
( 2002b) / 0
, / ,
0/ 0,
38
, , ,
: , , ,
2006 1 ( 2005) /

: / 0 ( Y06512 )
: 2009-01-20
: ( 1967- ) , , , , , , :
( 1983- ) , , , , :

8
0 happen 0;
( 2007) / A Corpus- based Study on ( 2007) /
the Colligation, Collocation and Prosody of Words0 0; ( 2007) /
OUTCOME CONSEQUENCE 0;
( 2008) / ( 2007) /
0, 0; ( 2007) /
0; ( 2008)
, / 0;
( 2008) /
) ) ) contribute 0;
( 2008) / fat
0( 2008) / -.
, 03)

( 2008) /
0, BNC (
, ( 2008) / ) CCL (
0 ) ,
promise, guarantee, pledge, assure swear
2. 2 , , ,
25 ( 2006) / happen occur
: 1) -. ) ) )
0 happenoccur
6 : ( 2006) / Commit / 04)
0; ( 2006) /
-. 0; ( 2006) /
( 2007) / ) ) ) -. 0,
) ) ) rather, fairly 0; ( 2007) / / 0
awfully bitterly 0 , / 0
( 2008) / 0 ( 2007) / - . - .
, ( 2006) / -AP 0, / 0
An NP1 of NP2. 0 BNC / 0
/ a hord of0 / a galaxy of0
/ an act of0 2. 3
2) 2. 3. 1
/
, 0, ( 2002a) JDEST ,
16 : ( 2004) /
0; ( 2004) / ,
0; ( 2005) , : , / cause0
/ CAUSE 0; ( 2006, 2007) ; / career0
/ ; / probability0
0/ 0; 2. 3. 2
( 2006) / ( 2008) /
0; ( 2006) / happenoc- 0,
cur -. ) ) ) , ,
0; ( 2007) /
9
, , ( 2008) /
0
2. 3. 3 ,
( 2006) /
0 ,
/ 0/ 0 3. 0
dealings, effect, happen incur ,
, :
/ 0,
(
, ( 2008) / - ) ,
. 0 , (
)
, / 0 , ,
( CENAC) , /
0: / FAMILY0 / LIFE0 / CULTURE0 4. 0
/ WORK0 , ,
, , ,
, / 0 ,
, ,
2. 3. 4
( 2006) / -.
0, [ 1] Sinclair, J. M. Corpus , Concordance, Collocation
, recover, decrease, de- [ M] . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
cline, expand, improve, fall, rise increase [ 2] Stubbs, M. Text and Corpus Analysis [ M] . Oxford:
, / 0 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. , 1996.
[ 3] . / 0
, [ D] . ,
2. 4 2008.
( 2003) [ 4] . [ D] .
, , 2008.
, [ 5] .
[ D] . , 2006.
( 2004) / [ 6] .
0, [ J] . ( ) , 2007,
24( 1) : 104- 107.
, [ 7] . happen [ D] .
, , 2007.
[ 8] . fat
[ J] . , 2008, 10( 2) : 12- 16.
( 2007) [ 9] , .
( 2007) / [ J] . ,
0, 2007, ( 7) : 29- 31.
[ 10] .
,
( 2007) [ J] . , 2007, 28( 4) : 57- 60.
, [ 11] , . :
10
[ J] . ( ) , 2000, , 2007, 28( 1) : 57- 61.
( 3) : 63- 68. [ 27] .
[ 12] . / 0 [ D] . , 2008.
[ D] . , 2006. [ 28] . Commit
[ 13] , . [ J] . ,
[ J] . , 2003, 5( 4) : 359- 366. 2006, 13( 1) : 54- 58.
[ 14] . [ J] . [ 29] . / 0/ 0
( ) , 2008, 48( 1) : 150 [ J] . ( ) ,
- 154. 2007, 29( 6) : 51- 53.
[ 15] , . [ 30] . [ J] .
[ R] . ( ) , 2008, 8( 2) : 95- 99.
, 2007. 398 [ 31] . / APAn NP1 of NP20
- 403. [ D] . , 2006.
[ 16] . [ 32] . awfully bitterly
[ J] . , 2004, 27( 4) : 410- [ J] . , 2007, 9( 6) :
418. 56- 61.
[ 17] . ) ) ) [ 33] . A corpus-based study on the colligation,
/ 0 [ J] . , collocation and prosody of words[ J] . (
2006, ( 3) : 67- 73. #) , 2007, ( 4) : 37- 40.
[ 18] , . CAUSE [ 34] , .
[ J] . , 2005, 28( 3) : 297- 307. ) ) ) contribute [ J] .
[ 19] . , 2008, ( 34) : 69- 71.
[ J] . , 2008, 23( 3) : 84- 87. [ 35] . OUTCOME CONSE-
[ 20] . QUENCE [ R] .
[ D] . , 2004. , 2007: 300- 304.
[ 21] , . [ J] . [ 36] , .
( ) , 2005, 16( 4) : 86- 93. [ J] . , 2008, 20( 2) : 54- 57.
[ 22] . [ 37] .
[ J] . , 2002a, 25( 2) : 165- 175. [ D] . , 2007.
[ 23] . [ J] . [ 38] .
, 2002b, 34( 4) : 300- 307. [ D] . , 2008.
[ 24] . [ 39] , . happenoccur / 0
[ J] . , 2006, ( 5) : 50- 54. ) ) )
[ 25] , , . [ J] . , 2006, ( 5) : 19
) ) ) rather, fairly [ J] . - 22.
, 2007, 19( 5) : 56- 60. [ 40] . [ J] .
[ 26] . [ J] . , 2007, ( 11) : 97.
Review of Domestic Research on Semantic Prosody
ZHAI Hong- hua, FANG Hong- xiu
( College of Foreign Languages, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266510, China)
Abstract: Ever since the concept of -semantic prosody. was introduced to China nearly a decade ago, it has
aroused great academic interest among Chinese scholars. As a result, large amounts of contributions emerged in this
f ield. Thus this paper intends to have a general review of the current studies with the coverage of their characterist ics and
domains as well. Meanwhile two points of inadequacy are pointed out for these studies, which will be of great value for
future research.
Key words: semantic prosody; review
11