Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dbendorf,
Switzerland
Abstract
The sulfate resistance of concrete was tested with an accelerated method using drying-
immersion cycles in Na2SO4 solution. The measured expansion corresponds with the sulfur
ingress in the test specimens. The microstructural analysis indicates that the phase conversion
from monosulfate/monocarbonate to ettringite is related to the observed expansion. However,
the C-S-H of the slag cement system seems to adsorb more sulfur than the C-S-H of the OPC-
system possibly reducing the amount of ettringite formed. The sulfur content in the specimens
and the mineral assemblage present are similar to the ones found in on-site concrete and
specimens used for long-term tests with relatively low concentrated sulfate solution.
Therefore, the test method seems to be applicable for assessing the sulfate resistance of
concrete.
1. INTRODUCTION
External sulfate attack can be defined as the interaction between concrete and sulfate-
bearing groundwater usually leading to a degradation of the cementitious building material. It
is a widely studied reaction in cement and concrete research [e.g. 1-3]. The majority of studies
about sulfate attack on concrete concentrates on laboratory experiments. There are relatively
few studies characterizing sulfate attack on real structures [4-7]. External sulfate attack is a
common phenomenon in Swiss tunnels [7-9]. It mainly occurs at weak areas of the concrete
lining like cracks, cold joints, etc. At these locations, the sulfate reacts with the hydrates
forming ettringite. This reaction leads to expansion and a reduction in the strength of the
concrete eventually causing cracks and spalling. It must be noticed that the failure of the
concrete is always the failure of a system and not the failure of one of its specific components.
Testing the sulfate resistance of concrete usually involves the immersion of specimens in
sulfate solution allowing its ingress by diffusion. The disadvantage of such an approach is a
typical test durations of several months. The determined parameters are generally length and
mass change complemented with a visual assessment and, in the case of research, with
microstructural analysis. These tests are mainly suited to study the mechanisms of sulfate
Table 2: Composition and workability of the concrete mixtures (agg: aggregate, s/g:
sand/gravel-ratio, SP: superplasticizer, VOP: volume of paste).
mixture agg. s/g CEM I CEM III/B water w/b SP VOP flow
3 3 3 3
[-] [kg/m ] [-] [kg/m ] [kg/m ] [kg/m ] [-] [kg/m ] [l/m3] [cm]
3
After production, the specimens (cubes 150 x 150 x 150 mm3) were stored at 20C and
90% relative humidity for 24 hours. Afterwards, they were demolded and stored again in the
same climate. At the age of 26 days, seven cores with a diameter of 28 mm und a length of
148 mm were taken from a cube of each mixture. A plug gauge for strain measurements was
3. RESULTS
3.1 Expansion
While concrete PC45, PC60 and SL45 show little expansion during the drying-immersion
cycles (0.21-0.27 ), concrete SL60 expands considerably (0.89 / Figure 1). However, its
length increase during the additional immersion is in the range of concrete PC45 and SL45
(0.56 compared to 0.27 and 0.77 , respectively). Concrete PC60 expands rapidly in this
period, leading to the failure (breaking apart) of single cores after an additional immersion of
three weeks.
3.0
PC45
2.5 PC60
SL45
2.0 SL60
expansion []
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cycles weeks
(additional immersion)
Figure 1: Expansion of the concrete mixtures PC45, PC60, SL45 and SL60.
3.2 Profiles
The differences in the sulfur profile after four drying-immersion cycles and after the
additional immersion are small for all investigated samples (Figures 2a-d). Concrete PC60
S (4cy+im) S (4cy+im)
7 7 Na (4cy+im)
content [mass-%]
Na (4cy+im)
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
depth [mm] depth [mm]
2c 2d
SL45 SL60
10 10
S (4cy) S (4cy)
9 9
Na (4Cy) Na (4Cy)
8 S (4cy+im) 8 S (4cy+im)
content [mass-%]
content [mass-%]
7 Na (4cy+im) 7 Na (4cy+im)
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
depth [mm] depth [mm]
Figures 2a-d: Sulfur (S) and sodium (Na) profiles in the concrete mixtures PC 45, PC 60, SL
45 and SL 60 after 4 drying-immersion cycles (cy) and after the additional immersion of 8
weeks (4cy+im).
2.0
2
1.5 PC 45 (4cy) PC 45 (4cy+im)
PC 60 (4cy) PC 60 (4cy+im)
1.0 1.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
depth [mm] depth [mm]
Figures 3a-b: Molar Ca/Si-ratio versus depth of the concrete mixtures PC45, PC60, SL 45 and
SL 60 after 4 drying-immersion cycles (cy) and after the additional immersion of 8 weeks
(4cy+im).
S/Ca
0.3 0.3
MS MS
0.2 0.2
In the centre of concrete SL60 monocarbonate, monosulfate and C-S-H are present. At a
depth of 10.5 and 7.0, monocarbonate starts to decrease and the S/Ca-ratio of the C-S-H starts
4. DISCUSSION
As concrete PC60 has a higher porosity and a higher permeability than concrete PC45 it
desiccates more in the drying step [11]. Consequently, it takes up more sulfate during the
immersion step resulting in a higher sulfur content of the paste. The same in regard to
desiccation and sulfate uptake applies to the concrete mixtures SL45 and SL60. Calculating
the sulfate uptake per volume, the concrete with w/c 0.60 takes up about 60% more sulfur
than the concrete with w/c 0.45 and the concrete produced with OPC about 120% more than
the concrete produced with slag cement. These differences are reflected in the measured
expansion after the additional immersion; the concrete with w/c 0.45 expands less than the
concrete with w/c 0.60 and the system with OPC shows more expansion than the system with
slag cement. However, it has to be pointed out that concrete SL60 already shows a relatively
high expansion during the drying-immersion cycles while its expansion during the additional
immersion is relatively low. The opposite applies to concrete PC60; after showing little
expansion during the drying-immersion cycles, it expands rapidly during the additional
immersion. Obviously, there already is a reaction between the hydrate phases and the sulfate
during the drying-immersion cycles leading to expansion. But the kinetics of the process are
too slow to allow a complete reaction. This completion is approached during the additional
immersion. As the amount of available aluminium is higher in the OPC-system it shows a
higher expansion during the additional immersion.
Based on the identification of the mineral assemblages in different depths of the cores the
reactions of the hydrates with the sulfates are comparable in the OPC and the slag cement
systems; monocarbonate and monosulfate are converted to ettringite. This reaction consumes
some portlandite [12]. In both systems the increasing occurrence of points indicating ettringite
goes together with an increase in the sulfur content. However, the higher capacity of the C-S-
H in the slag cement system to adsorb sulfur could have an effect on expansion [13]; due to
this relatively high adsorbtion, less sulfur might be available for the formation of ettringite
resulting in less expansion.
Gypsum is only found at the edge of the samples produced with OPC. However, its
formation is not likely to have a significant effect on expansion in the tested samples due to
its rarety. Based on thermodynamic modelling, gypsum starts to form at a sulfur content of
about 20 mass-% [14]. This value is not reached on average in these samples. Due to an
5. CONCLUSIONS
An accelerated test to assess the sulfate resistance was applied on concrete produced with
OPC and slag cement. In addition to expansion measurements the microstructure of the
concrete and the composition of the mineral assemblages were investigated. The following
conclusion can be drawn:
Expansion increases with increasing w/c.
Concrete with slag cement may expand more than concrete with OPC during the
drying-immersion cycles but expands less after the additional immersion.
The expansion in the OPC and slag cement systems can be attributed to the phase
conversion from monocarbonate/monosulfate to ettrigite.
The C-S-H formed in concrete with slag cement shows a higher capability to
adsorb sulfur than C-S-H formed in the OPC-system, possibly reducing ettringite
formation.
The test specimens produced with slag cement are more prone to leaching during
the test procedure than their OPC counterparts.
The sulfur content in the paste and the formed mineral assemblages are comparable
with the ones in on-site concrete exposed to sulfate attack and mortar used in long-
term test with relatively low concentrations of sulfate solution.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The federal road authorities are acknowledged for financing this study, B. Lothenbach and
P. Lura for critically reviewing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
[1] Thorvaldson, T., 'Chemical aspects of the durability of cement products', Proceedings of the 3rd
International Symposium on Chemistry of Cement (London, 1952) 436465.
[2] Marchand, J. and Skalny, J (eds), 'Sulfate attack mechanism', Am. Ceram. Soc., (Westerville,
USA, 1999).
[3] Skalny, J., Marchand, J. and Odler, I. (eds), 'Sulfate attack on concrete', Spon Press (London,
2002).
[4] St John, D.A., 'An unusual case of ground water sulfate attack on concrete', Cem. Concr. Res. 12
(1982) 633-639.
[5] Diamond, S. and Lee, R.J., 'Microstructural alterations associated with sulfate attack in permeable
concretes', American Ceramic Society, Inc, Materials Science of Concrete: Sulfate Attack
Mechanisms (USA, 1999) 123-173.
[6] Sahu, S., Badger, S. and Thaulow, N., 'Evidence of thaumasite formation in Southern California
concrete', Cem. Concr. Compos. 24 (2002) 379-384.
[7] Leemann, A. and Loser, R., 'Analysis of concrete in a vertical ventilation shaft exposed to sulfate-
containing groundwater for 45 years', Cem. Concr. Compos. 33(2011) 74-83.
[8] Romer, M., Holzer, L. and Pfiffner, M., 'Swiss tunnel structures: concrete damage by formation of
thaumasite', Cem. Concr. Compos. 25 (2003) 1111-1117.
[9] Pfiffner, M. and Holzer, L., 'Schdigungsmechanismen der Betonkorrosion in Tunnelbauwerken',
Bundesamt fr Strassen, ASTRA Report 1999/145 (Bern, 2001).
[10] Richardson, I.G. and Groves, G.W. 'Microstructure and microanalysis of hardened cement pastes
involving ground granulated blast furnace slag', J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 6204-6212.
[11] Loser, R. and Leemann, A., 'The Influence of Mix Design on the Sulphate Resistance of SCC',
Proceedings of the 6th International RILEM Symposium on SCC (Montreal, 2010).
[12] Schmidt, T., Lothenbach, B., Romer, M., Neuenschwander, J. and Scrivener, K.L., 'Physical and
microstructural aspects of sulfate attack on ordinary and limestone blended Portland cements',
Cem. Conc. Res. 39 (2009) 1111-21.
[13] Cheng, Y. and Scrivener, K., 'A new mechanism of expansion in sulfate attack', Nanocem
Workshop, EPFL (Lausanne, 2011).
[14] Loser, R. and Leemann, A., 'Sulfatwiderstand von Beton: verbessertes Verfahren basierend auf
der Prfung nach SIA 262/1, Anhang D', ASTRA Report FGU 2010/001 (Bern, 2011).
[15] Tsui, N., Flatt, R.J. and Scherer G.W., 'Crystallization damage by sodium sulphate', J. Cult.
Heritage, 4 (2003) 109-115.
[16] Gollop, R.S., Taylor, H.F.W., 'Microstructural and microanalytical studies of sulfate attack. I.
Ordinary portland cement paste', Cem. Concr. Res. 1992, 22, 1027-1038.
[17] Gollop, R.S. and Taylor, H.F.W., 'Microstructural and microanalytical studies of sulfate attack.
IV. Reactions of a slag cement paste with sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions', Cem. Concr.
Res. 26 (1996) 1013-1028.
[18] Lothenbach, B., Bary, B., Le Bescop, P., Schmidt, T. and Leterrier, N., 'Sulfate ingress in Portland
cement', Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (2010) 1211-1225.