A CENTENNIAL BOOK
(One handed books
publish benwen 990 and 1997
‘a this pimpin of
the Universi of Clini Pres
We have chosen ech Centennial Book
‘an example ofthe Pret fest
publishing and bookmaking raion
we celebrate che beginning of|
‘urscond exntiy
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Founded in 895
VICTORIA E. BONNELL
Iconography of Power
Soviet Political Posters
under Lenin and Stalinseein an ha
Sey dopa
iia
SiR ey of ee
gt
porn
Se eeemerseatom
vonage “tan
Sere
aa ea Rac
pate somr
“hep unin penance iu gino Ann
tc Menmsie Someone nd
Ui Mensa
‘nf trnpmat mae tealight os
ro se a
tamara fh Wk iS i a Mag ob Sia
‘Rosa ly oe Stone ans any Oe
‘Satta en Udy tone ee
~The el Tin AS ce npg of ne
‘nae yn Ree pe
Hate
roa any Rin wpm a be sian
“etsy amen Soe lA” nn
oat ye a Ue rs een
For Geshe“The publisher gral acknowledges the conrbution
provided bythe General Endownent Fane, which i supported
‘by ganerous gifs from the members of he
Associates ofthe Universi of California Pres.
CONTENTS
Linofltertons x
Key Abbreriions x
Neteon Traieion xxi
Tntrasioa
PEASANT WOMEN IN POLITICAL POSTERS OF THLE 19308Bilger 395
wsaon ies 345
Inder 47
ILLUSTRATIONS
Falowing pe 108
Aleksandr Apt, "Goa prea’ dkcary obi’ 1917~okib
toi” (ew ofthe rleeian Dicutorship, October ity October
918). 198
1 Nila Kochergn, "oe main 920 goa” (Mar 1920) 1920
4. Nikole Mikhail, “V nam kolloze nex mest pop klk
‘Theres No Room in Our Calleive Fam for Pst and Kus),
19%
4 Koastantn Zoo “Liub kas ann Lahore il edinoichaae
ieee ipo vomochton shi? porcheloecek” (Every Collective
Fam Peano Indvidal Farmer Now Har the Opportunity to Live
Like Human Being 1934
45 Gustae Klis, "Ve namia Makes Engels Lenina Sina”
{Raise Higher the Banner of Mas, Engels Lenin and alin) 955
6. Vilar Deni Vag piles” (Enemies of dhe Five Yer Pl) 1929
7 A Law, Sbyl mech mandayel” (The People's Decams Have
Come Tied, 1950
8. Bods Berea, Mikhail Soloed Fa Shag, “Pod
‘ditt vom logo Stana-—vpetd khommaniens!” (Unde
the Leader of the Great Stalin—Forvard ro Cornnunisn), 951Faloing page 46
‘4. Nikolai Kagout, "Oruhiom my dob vag (We Defeed the
Enemy with Weapon) 1920
1. Rikhand Zin, “Puech i vpgodne Polite voeany
xem? (Pai std Poel! Buy the 3% War Bond
4-197
13, "Tovah (Comrade) 9
14 Vaso lig stropeaa smb. Golosuite a spisok
17° (AlPRusian League for Womens Equa Vote for List No 7),
wr
15. “Olan aa sevemom Kavksze (October in she Norcherm
Cauca, 3937
16, Aleks Matec, Otiabrias olin (Octobe Revolution)
on
x. “Da deenseruc pobeda da” (Long Liv he Victory of Later)
18, Boss Zrorpkin, “Borba kesnogo saris smo loi” (Seuge
ofthe Re Kaige wih the Dark Force) 199
19, Aleks Marenkor, "man zalogosobedhdenia mieovogo
‘rude (May 1—The Peg of Weld Labor Liberion, 1921
120, Petr Kinda "Belogvardist Bhishchnik eae lo aback
lretan” (The White Guard Beas of Preys Teasing the Body of
Workers and Pessnts ro Pees), 1920
at “ohiabrs-—yacnieny den wane” (October The Al
Union Dayo the Shock Worker) 38
11, "Blem poshewdaaikam” (Dove wih the Pale Shock Workers),
3
135. Gus Klis, “Dadi illony kaifisirvannyth abchikh
aro” (We Wil roduc Millions of Qualted Woekes' Cates),
93
age Adal Stroy, “Daeprosro’ postoen” (Dacproneo! Has Ben
Bail 932
‘Vikuor Govorkos “Visa ipa, tarsi rahene” (Yous Lamp,
Comal Engine 193)
136, Vern Mulhin,Rabohkltbenine (Worker and Collective Pam
Woman) 1937
137. A Renicheno, “Stathanorsho viene” (The Stakhanovite
Movement) 935
Foloing pe 85
2b L Rein, “Selo rnc v gu!” (Baldy, Comtaden March
in Seep, 115
2.2, "Soiurrabocith naka” (The Union of Workers and Science,
99
25. Alkan Api, “Obmanuyes brian” (To Our Desived
Brother) 5ck
24, "Roms ice oi” (Rusia and Her Soler, 0
2. “Rostia—za raed” (Rusin—for Truth), ote
2.6 Alea Maks, “Golouite Pati Narodooi Sabo” (Vor
forthe Paty of People Freedom) 987
2.7, Aleksandr Apsc “Intemational” Unteracionad, rat
{LR Serrano, “Toe na, Da adem pnd rua
vsokh stan” (May Long Live che Holiday of Woking People of
All Counties, pat
24g, Dat Moos, "poe mala vere abbotsil” (May 1 Al
Russian Voluntary Work Day, 920
2.40, “Che dal lasts revoiai ecotnitve besa” (What
‘he Oaber Revolucion Gave he Woman Worker and the Peasant
Woman), 20
sun, "Vee oy! Podpsyats ma wocnny ae” (Evething
forthe Wat Subcribe the 3h War Bond) 1914-1907
2.12, Adal Sukh, “Raskeposichennaia shenshina seo}
ommaiz!” (Emancpsted Woman Build Cnmmnis), 1936
215, Kuimie Malevich, "She aves Rady da opal ma bab’ wy”
(The Austrian Soldier March o Rav bu Got lena on
Bab Pechfor 1984—987
2.14 Mita Chersmayk, sora po bali ipo babu (Stey af he
Budi sod the Babe), 1920
Folin page 23
1s L Mescheriaoy, "Nz kala abo” (To Clete Woe,
94.2 ZakhrPichugi, “Kolthoew ot" (Collective Farm at Wo)
1930
44. Ves Korablea, “i, ovaieh, kam allo!” (Come,
Comrade, Join Urin the Callie Fara, 1990
44 Nikolai Tepsitheroy, “Id holo" (Go and Join the Coleive
Farm) ign0
3.5, "Krein iy klthoa!” (Peasant Woman, Jin the Callie
ara, 1930
1.6, Alene Dene, "Kallcborae bd fkulnikom”(Colesive
Farmer—Bean Able), 3930
3.7 “Kiet iakl Poni arabs Obfinim keane dry
ella” (Peasant Wornen! Lee Us Inte the Harvest! Let Us
Unie Pesan Hoascholds ino Costin) 1930
38. Natalia Pius, “Koltoznits bud udanie bork rosa”
(Goleive Faren Woman, Bea Shock Woke f che Harve 953
3.9. Alki Sito, "K sachicohno! leno hin Toward
Prosperous Cuba Li) 954
$10, Mata Voron, "Unis bork —boleissloma roca”
(Shock Work at Reaping efits aBobhevik Harve), 1934
sa Nala Pits, "Zhenshchiny vkaoza— bai
(Women in he Coleive Fats Are Great Forse) 1933
2.2, lui Tishesi, “Shite aly stakhanovser suialiichekih
poe (Expand the Ranks of he Seances of che Socialist
Fi 95
Foling page 188
442, Mithsl Cheremayhh and Viktor Deni, "Ti Lenin achischace
seni ot nhs" (Comvade Lenin Cleanses the Ean of Sou),
20
43 "Pra brodi po Evrope,riaak Kommuninma” (A Specter
Hains Europe, the Specie of Commie), 1920
43: A Sokol, "Pus gospodsevaisee Mas odoin per
omnmunisticheso! revise” (Lc che Ruling Clases Shudder
bef the Communist Revolution), 3922
44 Adolf Seakion, "i014 V- Uno Lenin.” 1904
445. "Nelda mol (The Gree Tomb), 1924 o 1935
46. “Lesin~sal i gant’ (Lenin Stel and Gani) 135 06926
449. Sen Bscey and Vladimir Shoko, Sate of Leia Filand
Sation, Leningrad 1926
‘+4 ‘Danka nh pana Cong
Lie the Inerstional Polen Revolution)
49, “Torben ii" (Cceion of Orbe, 926
‘410, Alebande Geasinoy, "Vladimir ich Lenin (UVa, 930
{HH Gusev Klutis, "Pod snamenem Lenina a stsiaiacheskoe
stots (Under Lenin’ Banner for Soil Consrron, 3930
41. Gusta Klis, “Pobeds onlzma vn strane obec
(Tae Vizory of Social in Out County Is Gusraten), 1932
4455 Gas Kluss, “Da ndastrac ase chansons
sodina” (Loag Live Our Hap Socilic Mobeni, 3935
414 Ina Brod, ToifVisartonovich Sein” 991
1435. Gus Kluss “Real's nase pogrammy-—
dex, or ethnic, was o serve asthe hss for social and polis oli
‘ary, Dating dhe immediate posrevolionary years ard well ino the
19208 the Bolshevik party wresced with the problem of defining ol-
lective denies and making policies consistent with these definitions
Tavented tricone perform a second fasesion of “estblishing or
legtimirng insinstions, tru or relions of authority” Revolutions,
sch s the one in Rusia in October 97, dscedi and destroy exiting
insiacions and rclaions of author, opening up the discursive Fld
fran ently new definition of the social order of politcal power The
ley problem fr the Bolsheviks in che months fllowing the revolution
wast legitimize the new parry-sate and a novel se of relations be
fest subordinate and superordinate groups. The former dominant
clases, and the Provisional Government that had ruled Russi since
ebruary i917, lost powers a consequence ofthe October Revolusion
Inch place was the Bolshevik pare and the new Soviet state, with cs
commissrs, secret police, Re Army. and a small ut vociferous hand
(oF tre believers, fallow cavers, opportunist, and henchmen. The
Bolsheviks recognize very ealy that power without legitimacy pro-
vided precarious basis for anew regime. A ky element in dei gi
imation srategy was the formulation and diseminaion of thee wn
master nanative of woud histo, which justified che eaishment of
4 “ctarorahip ofthe proeeara” under Bolshevik leadership and for-
‘fed the partys authority among the population
‘A third major function of invented traditions sto promote “sxial-
ization, the inculcstion of belie, value systems and conventions of
lohan” In the years before siting power, the Bolsheviks, under
Leni edetp wee ding fom mos or e-wig ni
{pus and ope a Rua yeh pfu commitment
tonal of he ruth, fe the October Revolution, hei
ranted ino sn elon v0 roe all of inddal aed socal Li
in acndnce ma eslogc preps procaine bythe Bev
trip: Aktoogh compere salon a oc re
trained beyond eb rack nt he 393, cen che wey inepion che
Bolhrsaimed at consi th india cae oat ce
tual eenjoe woul nk se ad: lho el
inna oso he cv abe ara and epee
an hey 5 sin wn hall competes cote
inca aulcncs. In he coune of inthe Devs put ino me
fons propa spd owas che uy es
the popu by cas of words th pena we) andi
‘pes By any pres anda the ef was impose ad exe
he Witnaeref eng powes sey hd eed compeling en
rs nd sete or example he ames ile ch ree
tn the mage the he wre) nen ones the
Novemier# fess an May Dayco nd oe de
Siw waiting the sage at is a sip lage ea
ing rooms, inentok) Tn ation, they wed pall pose
Inenunenal pts, books neways and al sd nw
ings au co ata saioce Nec Foch Reon
fF ya sere on» gine so teal comied wo the
trasfematon of hanin beng tough plc elton.
“Mass propaganda took many difecent forms during de easly years of
Soviet porter, but chere was 2 psvileging of ee ee inthe ask polit-
ical eduction, This meant shata great deal of efforeandingenniy went
Ineo the production of visual propaganda of ll types. Visual method
for pasuasion and indocwination appealed co Bolshevik leaders be
‘ese ofthe low lve of lteray in the country and ehe strong vise
teations ofthe Rasian people‘When the Bolsheiks took power, a majority of the poplation was
scl lier, especially ouside major urban centers. Daa for 1917 are
not avalable, bu twenty yeas eater a national census dislosed chat
about 8 percent ofthe tual populion and about 35 percent of che
turban population was literate. Ava result of che widespread lneracy
‘campaign waged by the Bokheiks afer eking power (an adjuncs 10
their propaganda effors),oveal levels had substan improved by.
19267 Nevertheless, about half of the rural population and one-fifth
‘of the urbun population sil dd noe have even sudimentary literacy
skills The “literate” classification was applied in che 1926 w a range
‘of people, including some with only the most elementary able to read
and write, On che eve ofthe First Five Year Plan, «substan propor
tion of che population (specially peasan) was sill pooly equipped
to eead simple texts, such as newspapers. Vial propaganda, which
realy minimized the need r0comprchend the writen word, ofered a
meats of reaching broad stata of the population withthe Bolshevik
mesg
“The centrality of visual images and ritalin old esgime pageantry
and especlly the Rusian Orthodox Church made for highly visual
texdtional cular? The Rusia Orchodox icon occupies special
place ia Rusan religious pactiag.As Leonid Onspenshy observer ina
seudy of cons: “Ie can be sid that if Byzantium was prsminen in
ving the word theology expressed in words, theology expres in
the image was given prceminenly by Russa For the Orthodox be-
Tice, “the holy image, jus like the Holy Seriprurs, transits not
Jhuman ideas and conceptions of ruth, bus euth isthe Divine
revelation” The image isl had sacred powers forthe Osha be
Tiere. The power of uit, fr example, "was thought toe expecially
concentrated in their icons, sometimes refered 10 as “gods (he),
‘which in ine of eed or on real occsions were usd or special ble
ings." The prevalence of religious cons in Russian ife—vrzaly ev-
cry peasant hu had is own icon, as did many urban dwellings gave
Russians familiarity witha ean sype of imagery an an assumption
ofits sarednes.
‘The Bolsheviks appreciated the effectiveness of images for teaching
condinary people wih their message, Nadeehda Krups Lenin wile,
expressed the sentiments of many fellow party members in 1925, when
she observed: “For the present and the near fucur, a peasant ca ara
‘o improve his production ony if he seh by visual example. And
in general, che peasant, just like the workers in their mass think much
‘more in tems of images than abstaceformlas and visu ctecion,
‘even wen 2 high level of literacy is cached, wil aways play a major
role fr the peasant.”
"Anoher factor promoting the heay zinc on mass forme of isl
propaganda, such s politcal posers, was the disruption of che pricing,
indusey caused by the revolution and Civil War (9183904). Major
shortages of paper, breakdowns and closings of peiaing plants, and
‘eansportation problems sharply cae the printing nd dstbution
‘of newspapetsin these years. The main pary organ, Panda, hada dally
press run of only about 18,000 copies, ad al rwentyfve Red Army
rowspapers combined had a daily un oles than 20,000! Even tak-
ing ine acconne that a single newspaper was often shard by several
reader, this vas aot an impresve outreach in a population of many
nilions of people Pola posters displayed in public phces offered
amore elective way of using limiced supplies of paper an ink co each
‘vide audience.
‘Whatever the reason, che party accorded exceptional importance to
visual propaganda during che Civil Wa. The fs politcal posters p=
peared in August 918, 5 the Civil War was geting under way. Over
‘he next cree yeas, about 500 diferent posers were produced by
sre than 450 diflerene orginiztions and institutions." A massive
‘number of posters went ino circulation. Ltd, a major organization
for poser production operating under the Political Direcorae of the
Revoluionary Miltary Coun ofthe Rusian Union of Federated So
ilist Republics (RSFSR), diseibured a wal of 75 milion posers,
postal, and labok pictures Berween 199 and 1922, Gosia, cesta
publishing house etalished in 1919, printed 32 milion copies of
seventy-five separate poster in the course of 920, The Rosta (Rain
‘Telegraph Agency) collectives in Moscow, Petograd, and other na-
jor cities produced a unique form of poster tha combined the func
tions of newspaper, magazine and information bullein (led Oka
OSTA, or Rossa Windows) The Moscom Resta cllective alone pro
duced over two milion poser ames ding dhe Civil Wan” All a
net of public paces were decorated with posers, whose clot, design,and imaginative imagery calivened an otherwise drab society. “The
visitor to Rusia” wrote American journals Albert Rhys Wiliams
1935, "is eruck by dhe multirudes of posters—in Factories and barracks,
‘on wall and alway-cars,on telegraph poles—everywhere”*
‘Wigh dhe end of the Civil War and che introduction of the New
Economic Pliy in 192, the exhoratory fever of visual propaganda
became atemuated, only tobe fll restored eight years later, atthe vim
‘ofthe adoption ofthe Ftst Five Year Plan. The rol ofthe writen and
spoken word grew considerably in the 19208 with the spread of the
Bolshevik pros and the introduction of the radio, Bu the onset ofthe
Fire Five Year Plan brought resurgence in poiial posers and other
foxms of visual propagands, Now poi are was again accorded &
‘ental place in the Bolshevik strategy to mobilize the population on a
‘gand scale and implant new orienation toward the selfand the socal
and politcal wodld, The party lexdership understood that rational
‘ways ofchinking were deeply roored and revit to change and that
the transformation of mass conciousness would require extraordinary
measures. A new politcal at was created to couespond to the new
«epoch of cash eollectivztion and indusaliation
‘As the 1930s proceed, visual propaganda became more intensive
and widespread. For the ist time, in 193 al poste production was
Drought under the supervision of che Are Deparmentof dhe State Pub-
Thing Hous (Loo, whi operate under the dre supervision of
the Central Commitee. Hencforh, the themes, rests, and image of
posters were dictated to artists and closely regulated by ofc censors
‘This eentalzation and concol over poste production coincided with
tremendous expansion inthe volume of posers, Wheres Civil War
poster edions seldom exceeded 25.000 or 3,000, inthe 193 espe-
cially the second half) key posers appeaced in editions of 100,00 0
20,000. la dhe city and the counteyside, in che factory and cllectve
Fes ia tooms and partments and huts and dormitories, poses con-
frosted virually every Soviet citizen with an exhoraion, admonition,
or dedlamation,
[Rusia entry int the Second Woeld Was in 1941 coincided with yet
nother maja eff o use visual propaganda fr the purpose of mass
‘mobilization and indoctrination, World War postr, also prxlacd
in vast editions, presented 2 new see of images resutecingteitional
themes thar dated back to wari posters of Word War 1. A ptiod of
High Saliise (1946~1953 followed when pol are was once gai
twansfrmed ino 2 vehicle for an otherworldly socialist realism deper-
ing life in the Soviet Union a prsiiacl
Teach ofthese periods—the Civil War, he 1920s and nso, Wor
‘War I High Sainism—the syle of representation andthe visual vo-
cabulary and grammar changed insignificant ways. Where dd these
Alife visual languages come from? The Bolsheviks were commited
to the Mars paradigm thae at was part ofthe supenstactare dete
ined by the base (mode of prediction). Accordingly, some sought
to create a new, specifically prolearan cuture.® The problem was
thar the efccivenes of polvcal art depended on the ast’ ail to
“spel the Language” ofthe viewer, co we images symbols, and scx
of representation that people could understand, Tis meant desing
‘on familiar vocabularies and forms in order to convey a new message
‘The patern as Hobsbavim observes, was t0 use “ancient material to
construct invented tadions of «novel type for ite novel purposes.
Alarge ere of such materials is acamolted in che pas of any society,
and an elaborate lnguage of symbolic practice and communication is
aways available”
Political artis drew on the rich tions of Russian popula cu-
cure, commercial advertising, fine ars, religious an folk at, asc
nythology, ce imagery of Western European labor and revoluionsry
movements, and polite ar ofthe srs, Different elements were
incorporated at ilferent periods. Mythical ements fom thes various
sources were fused with contemporary ideology to ceateaspecal visi
guage. Mythology in combination with poi ideology, gave So-
vet propaganda a unique and compelling charscc
yg, Bobi oni ad ener inv mage tbat incor
porated elements from various waditions but were aio siimilly
expressive of the Bolshevik ethos. These were the new ions—stan-
Aandized images that depicedhezoes (sins) and enemies (he devil
and his accomplices) according oa fied patter (the socalled podlin-
niin church ar). The icons of Sovie politcal ar di ao refer thesocial instuions and relations of the soc, Rate, they were part
‘oF system of signs imposed by the authorities in an effort to cans
form mass consciousness. Like other “invented tditions” ds ieono
‘raph images were consent and incesanly epeated, and ehey es0-
ted strongly wich mythologies from the Rusia past.
"This study focuses on four ses of iconographic images that appeared
in poidcal posters, visual displays for holiday celebrations, nd moni-
rmenelsculpare. i begin by cscusing the con of the worker per
“sve image atthe very Gore of Bolshevik sherri. The worker icon
provides «verte symbol of changing offal conceptions of the pro
leatan has of political pve. Ie also conveys importa ides about
the locaton ofthe sacred in Soviet socey since the proleariat was
lsignazed asthe equivalent ofthe chosen cass in Bolshvil ideology
and postased supethuman powers capable of uansforming nature in
accordance withthe“ of Marxism-Lenini,
"Throogh the creation and recreation ofthe worker ion, the Bol-
shi sought eo ser hee continuity with che past and thi vision
‘of the fuse, From 1919 t0 1930, a single iconographic image of|
the worker blacksmith predominated in Bolshevik vissl propagand,
Afer 1930, however, the blacksmiths Seldor encountered in political
fat. Anew image of the worker takes its place. The wansformation of|
the woslericon in the 19308 cnincides with a gener dedine
inthe representation of workers in poltial art and the shift of the
sacred center toa new focus. The history ofshis imager is recounted
in chaper
‘Asecond theme centers azound the conography af women. As Jaan
‘Wallach Sco has persuasively argued, “ender isa primary way of
signifying eclaionsips of power. [i one ofthe recurrent rel
‘ences by which political power bas been conceived, legtimaced, and
citi Visual imagery of men and women thus convey impor
tant mowsiges about relations of domination and subordination, och
in the fal of socal interaction and in che broader sphere of politcal
life The depiction of gender has particular igtificance in perc when
thority etions are in as sch sche Cail War years andthe 19308.
‘Civil War posers depicted « predominanly male word, Women
were often tepresented alegricaly until 1920, when images of the
‘woman worker andthe pease wonran st become established. These
ew, more relic female images were yall depicted in a subordi-
‘ate relationship co male workers ad peasants, chery conveying the
dea that women had only a weak cm to membership in the pan
‘con of heroes. The implication of chee pans forthe emerging
Bolsherik discourse an power is exmined in chapter 2.
‘Whereas women occupy a postion af secondary im porance in visual
propaganda produced becween 197 and 1929, they appear very promi
‘endy in connection with the campaign forthe cllecivization of g-
ricuture beginning in 1930. Collciviration, one mighe sy. pre
send vill inthe female idiom. Chaper3 analyzes this important
«episode in visual representation as part ofthe new Stalinist idcolegy
and the broader changes taking place in che Function of pliteal ar
‘The thind theme eine in this study concer the iconography
ofthe roche (leader. Images of Lenin appear exty in plitcl poses,
increasing in frequency and prominence afr his deth in 1924 let
not unl dhe eal 19305 shat eepresenations of poli leaders pa
scully Sein—are centrally featured, Stalin, depicted asaliving goa
moves o center stage in visual propaganda, displacing boch his pede
cexsor Lenin and the proletariat asthe core elemens in Bolsbvik
nythology. These trends, which continued duzing Workl War Il and
reached their pel during che years of High Stalin, are dscusedin
chapter 4
CChapecr 5 focuses on the depiction of intemal and exe enemies,
In contast to other iconographic images examina inthis sad. the
representation of enemies shows agood dea of contin beeween 967,
and 1953, due tothe consistent appicton of sandandsples of satire
and carcatze. Bu begnsing in the 9308and continuing in the 1940,
the representation of enemies expands ro include a muliplcity of new
images coresponding tothe categories of tranegresors concurrently
incroduced inco verbal poliiesl discourse, These ate images of “the
othe,” she negative gues against which Bolshevistempeed to de-
Sine their postive heroes and create models or acceptable thought and
tion. Such images served 0 eiaforce a Manichean view chat divided
the word into evo camps analogous tothe for of good and evi,
which existed ina sae of erconclale coal.
Finally, chapcr 6 hifi in emphasis from a pancular iu deme
‘o an examination ofthe yeas 1945 t0 1953 Political rt rete dingthe fia yeas of Saline ule incorporated clement fom elie pe
tos and in some ways bought o 3 clminaion many eads ofthe
preceding decades, Nevethele, the postwar poster were dsincively
{ferent om anything chat ad pred ovew them 5 appre
te thet almost supieal qualities. Satu by a newfound inpetal
‘thor and an intensified Sain cl, thee posters coneyed 3 von oF
the “vine order” of Soi soe in which abrdance and haro-
sous wee the esence ofthe new Stalinist myer one. In he
Soviet paracie conjured up by poldeal ar, maay talon cas
snarkrs and atte foe Soviet cies had disppaed, o be te
placed by aac image of Hama rec
‘My overlay is ose an analytic framework based om Kin
ast analogy, eating images as pr of ial langage (wich ale
Con and sya) in which ll he cements are imtedependent. As we
Nave se ey Figures or example, the male worker, the Female pas
dn) in the Soviet vil ein change signicandy over sine. These
anges wil be analyze in deri the hope of dentin ee di
ince atebuts ofthese repens he appearance, pysig-
‘omy, ching, cv, etre, moons, and forth
Til ao pay close atetion wo wha a eling dhe vial yeux
of hepa: the positioning of ge an objets lation teach
thr andthe environment. As images changed, so did the ya By
‘ny of ilsteaton, the posianing ofthe female peasant sclaon
te other fre changed gical tthe sme me har the image
of peasant wor changed, rou 190. Forme she had bon pre
‘ented in eombinaon wih oer hei gues (workers ofboth sexes
oral ean) bu lly never lone thereby conveying the idea
that her incon among ee heroes depended on 2 elainship of
contiguity (metonymy) Tom 1930 on she apparel lone in posters
rin dominant postion, a shia the sax tha profoundly eed
Like books, images and their combinaons may he “read” i unpre
dicable ways. Pires meant ro emphasie cas identigy alo.
veyed—offen unintentionally and subliminally—ideas about gender
and gender relations, ethnicity, and other forms of cultural and seal
idenicaion. Though ics nor possible wo establish with cereainy how
various groups inthe population “read” visual material his study a-
tempts to map out the repertoie of rezences anilable in contempo-
rary culture and eo gest Some posible interpretations. We an uy
to comprehend che aims ofthe officals and arts who prodocd vs
tal propaganda. Bue whatever the intention, images ar alma ays
poljalent. Depending on context and audience, many diferent kinds
‘of messages may be exacted fom them [athe Civil War yes and
afrecward, visual symbolism constituted one ofa number of key aces
in which contemporaries struggled ver isues of meaning and iner-
pretation. Ukimatly, ches struggles wereabour the nauze and uses of
political power.
“The artists who produced posters inthe early Soc pio were &
divers group, with tsningin panting and poi and eigious art
“Theic backgrounds and retions eo the Bolihevik rogime also vid
great Some sich as dhe masefl arti Diitii Moor (1883-1046),
had profesional carers a satiicalaniss under the old regime, but
immediately threw in thee lot with the Bolsheviks afer che October
Revolution, Moor creaed some of the mastrpiens of Soviet politcal
a and served for many decades asthe unoficil “ommissar of pro-
pagans revolutionary att" Aleksandr Apsie(80~1544) was one
of the east and most influential political aries of dhe Civil War
yes, Originally ersined as anion painter, he had been politi arise
‘ander the ol regime. In 1921 Apt enigrated ois native Lavi and
‘never returned tothe Soviet Union, Af he revolution, schools were
ceetblihed to erin poliveal artes, and hy the 19308 there was
4 new generation of pople—sich a8 the three Kukryiky (Miki
‘Kuprianoy,Porii Krylov, and Nikolai Sokolon)—whas arctic ex-
perience wis acquired under Bolshevik auspices *
Prot to 193, dhe dispersion of poser production among many di.
ferent onganzatons and insiutions presided say centalned dire
tives eonceming content or exccuton, though s we shall se, cere
nonetheless remarkable consistency in the creation and dissemination
of cerain iconographic images. From 1931 on, however, visual pro
paganda was highly centralized, and poster production eciginated in
{single goverment department. Due tothe exteme seasiiviry of|poi are and i eel sole in indoctrination, it was supervised by
the Central Commince and other top pary and goverment organ
[Aer 93, poste artists wee invited to submit sketches appropriate foe
puciculr slogans and texts prepared by loge and is counterparts in
‘he replies. Poster proton was monitored closely and from the
19928 0n, most posters were published wich the ame ofboth the artist,
and che official response forthe poste’ ultimate content.
"The audience for political are was highly variegated. Ieeseompassed
‘ducted groups who had raved tp Bertin and Parisand peasants who
had never stayed far fom their But, hase who visited muscums and
those who knew only the dubai (illustrated broadside). What they all
had in common, however, was exposure ta highly visual culture
‘dominated, above all, by the icons ofthe Rusian Otodox Church.
‘Until the end of the Fist Five Year Plan in 1932, the audience for
poli posers, monumencal seule, and holiday displays was pre-
‘dominanly urban. Bue even within the urban popelaton, there were
many dren groups, set apareby education, sil background, goo-
sraphial location, cthicty, gender, and rigon. Given this diversi,
itis imposible to speak about a single inerpretation of the images
discussed in this sty; there were many possible ways of undestand-
ing these pictures,
‘Whar abou the reception of posters and ocher visual propaganda by
onlinary people? The content of mages canbe described and analyzed,
but this tls us lite if anything, abour the way contemporaries may
have izerpreted whac they saw Unforeanaely the evidence concerning,
contemporary reactions to posters is quite iniced. Wha we have ap
plies mainly tothe fist half ofthe 190s, when journals wer published
‘vith extensive reviews of posters and occasional reports of meetings
hid among workes or peusanes to evaluate posers. Memoiss, ne
pipers, and unpublished documents provide sonal material on
‘his subje
Inthe absence of direct prs of popular eacions, che sociologist
‘nse look atthe cual repestizes ofthe viewers. By cultural reper:
totes Ihave in mind, st the habs of Seing and ncerpreting images
that people brought to sul marci In Ras, this was Bas on
viewing some combination of religious cons, a commercial adver
sing, Western European and tit are of al kinds, and by che end of
she Girl War, the accumulated legacy of Bose In this highly
vial cure people had considerable opportunity o lok a pictues
and lean the convensions for comprehending them. “Take the case of|
religous icons, undoulvedly the most familar visual medium heore
eons ured cera key levis, uch color symbolism, co convey
smeaning. People accustomed vewingicons knew that ed wasabaly
colo, used in conection with fines worthy of venetian. Whe
Bolshevik ants uscd red to represent worker, they were invoking a
long-standing convendon in color symbols fair to most Rus
sias, OF course, red ad al heen associated with revolution since
792, when che Jacobs raiser flag. symbol of ebelion 2
‘A scond aspect of whar I am elling cultural repertoires centered
around the context fr interpreting polial ar, Viewers apprehended
images in eli to relevant pam and creat exe i
point of view. the depiction of « woman black
must have struck contemporary elteingly
ciry notin che countryside did women cisomaty