SHREE SINGAJI THERMAL POWER PROJECT STAGE II (2 660 MW)

VILL.: DONGALIA , DISTT.: KHANDWA, MADHYA PRADESH

Owner:
MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING COMPANY
LTD.

Owners Consultant:

LAHMEYER INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

EPC Contractor:

LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED

EPC Contractors Consultant:

L&T SARGENT & LUNDY LIMITED

Vendor Job No.: ICT/-16063 L&T Job No.: MALWA-II

Title:
REPORT ON GEO-HYDROLOGICAL STUDY AND
RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR SSTPP-STAGE-II

Doc/Drg No.: MALII-903724-DF04-00-ZEN-170001 Rev No.: 02 Total No. of Pages: 45

Independent Consultants & Technocrates

Revision Status:
Prepared Reviewed Approved
Rev
No. Name Name
Date Date Name Date
Mech. Elec. Civil C&I SES
1 NG 22.12.2016 25.12.2016 SZ 25.12.2016
2 SM 22.04.2017 23.04.2017 SZ 23.04.2017
 SHREE SINGAJI THERMAL POWER
PROJECT STAGE-II ( 2 X 660 MW )
MADHYA PRADESH LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.
POWER GENERATING
COMPANY LTD.
REPORT ON GEO-HYDROLOGICAL
Rev: 2
L&T Job No.: MALWA-II STUDY AND RAINWATER
HARVESTING FOR SSTPP-STAGE-II Date: 22.04.2016
Doc. No.: MALII-903724-DF04-00-ZEN-
Vendor Job No.: ICT/-16063 Page 2 of 45
170001

REVISION SUMMARY SHEET

Rev No. Details / Description Date

0 First Submission 25-12-2016

Table 5.3B Revised and revised coordinates of Recharge well
1 09-03-2017
locations are given
Table 5.1 Revise rainwater available data for harvesting is
2 22-04-2017
calculated are given Revision no. 2
 INDEX
Sr. No Description Page No.
1 Introduction 2-6
1.1 General 1
1.2 Location 1-3
1.3 Company Background 4
1.4 General Geology & Stratigraphy 4-5
1.5 Geomorphology 6
1.6 Soil 6
1.7 Drainage 6
1.8 Hydro meteorology 6
2 Methodology 7-9
2.1 Introduction 7
2.2 Data collection 7-9
3 Electrical Resistivity Study 10-16
3.1 Introduction 10
3.2 Method 10-11
3.3 Result & Discussion 11-16
4 Geo Hydrology 17-27
4.1 Introduction 17
4.2 Water Level 17-18
4.3 Groundwater Quality 18-23
4.4 Aquifer Parameters 24-27
5 Rainwater Harvesting 29-33
5.1 Introduction 29
5.2 Water Available for Harvesting 29
5.3 Rainwater Harvesting Plan 29-33
6 Conclusion 34-35
-- List of Annotations and Symbols 36
-- Annexure-1:Chemical Analysis Data 37
-- Annexure-2:Calibration certificate of Resistivity Meter 38
-- References 39-40
-- Plant Layout --
-- Application Latter for Report Technical Clearance by ICT --
-- Approved latter from CGWB --

Page 1 of 40
 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General:
The Larsen & Toubro Limited proposed to establish 2 X 600 MW thermal power plant at village
Malwa near Khanwa, Madhya Pradesh. The work of study of hydro geological and rain water
harvesting of the project area is awarded to Independent Consultants & Technocrates (ICT).
Measurement of water table in existing wells
Collection of secondary data for Geology, hydrology and meteorology
Collection of groundwater samples from the existing wells
Marking of locations of existing wells from where samples collected
Chemical analysis of groundwater samples collected
Electrical Resistivity at 5 locations
Short duration pumping test
1.2 Location:
The study area is located at Malwa village near Khandwa of Madhya Pradesh state. Figure 1.1
shows the location map of study area.
The district is bounded by Devas in the north Harda and Burhanpur district in eastern, western &
southern directions respectively. The district lies between north latitude 210 31 and east longitude of
750 57 27 and 770 13 Falling in survey of India toposheet No. 55 B, 55C. E.

Page 2 of 40
 Figure 1.1: Location map of study area

Plate 1.1: Photograph of plant

1.3 Company Background:

Shree Singaji Thermal Power Project is a coal-fired power plant located near Dongaliya village
near by Mundi of Khandwa District in Madhya Pradesh state of India. This project is owned by
MPPGCL (Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company limited). The water required is taken
from Indira Sagar Reservoir on Narmada River.
1.4 General Geology & Stratigraphy
Khandwa district is underlain by various geological formation, forming different types of aquifers in
the area. Main geological units of the area are Archaean, upper vindhyan, Bagh beds, Deccan traps
and alluvium.
Shale & Sandstone (Vindhyans):
The upper vindhyan sandstone shale and are exposed in northern part of the district all along the
Narmada river falling in Punasa block. The total area occupied by the vindhyans formations, is about
1115 sq. km which included part of Baldi block in the district. The sandstone and shale of vindhyan
formations are compact and having poor permeability
Basalt (Deccan trap):
The Khandwa district is underlain by 13 basaltic flows, which are distinguished by either foresence
of reg bole, vesicular zone or break in slope. Most of .the lava flows are Aa type bad thickness of
Page 3 of 40
flows varies from 7 to 35m. These flows are confined between 265 and 698 m amsl. The Deccan trap
flow, basic intrusion and the calcite veins at some place constitutes the basaltic terrain ground water
generally occur under pheratic condition in shallow weathered, jointed and fractured horizons. Basalt
does not exhibit uniform nature, both vertically and laterally.
Figure 1.2 and Table 1.1 shows the general geology of the study area.

Table 1.1: General Geology of the study area

Lithology Geological Age

Shale & Sandstone Proterozoic
Basalt Upper Cretaceous to Eocene

The study area is a part of Deccan trap geological formation consists of volcanic igneous
consolidated rocks of basalt. Plate 1.2 shows the exposure of consolidated igneous geological
formation in the study area.

Plate 1.2: Geological Exposures

Page 4 of 40
 Figure 1.2: General Geology of the study area
(Source: District Brochure,Central Groundwater Board, 2013)

1.5 Geomorphology
Structural hills of vindhyans, denudation hills of Deccan traps are predominant in Khandwa district.
Apart from these above geomorphic features like flood, plain, alluvial plain, valley fills,
intermountain depressions, pediment (Volcanic) are also sees in the district.

1.6 Soil
The nature & Characteristics of soils is dependent primarily on Relief of the area which influences
the variation in soil formation. The soil of Khandwa district is classified on medium black soils under
the broad classification of soil of India & is low fertility soils. There are alluvial deposits constitute
gravel sand, silt or clay sized unconsolidated alluvium found along the narrow strips of rivers.

1.7 Drainage
Entire Khandwa district falls under the Narmada basin Narmada and its trubitaries form the main
source of surface water in the area. Narmada flows along the northern boundary of the district

Page 5 of 40
 main rivers which drains the area of the district which drains the area of the district are Chhota
Tawa, Sukta & Bhim Nadi.

1.8 Hydro meteorology:

The climate of Khandwa district, MP is characterized by hot summer and general dryness except
during the south west monsoon season. The year may be divided into four seasons. The cold
season, December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of
June. The period from the middle of June to September is the south west monsoon season.
October and November form the post monsoon or transition period.
The normal annual rainfall of Khandwa District is 1211 mm computed for last five years. The
district receives maximum rainfall during south west monsoon period i.e. June to September.
About 90.5% of the annual rainfall received during monsoon season. Only 9.5% of the annual
rainfall takes place between October to May period. Thus surplus water for ground water
recharge is available only during the south west monsoon period.
The normal maximum temperature received during the month of May is 41.80 C and minimum
during the month of January 11.20 C. The normal annual means maximum and minimum
temperature of Khandwa district is 340 C & 19.50 C respectively.

Figure 1.3: Average Annual Rainfall

Page 6 of 40
 2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction:
For the proposed study, the approach and methodology adopted, and various equipments and
instruments used are discussed below. The methodology adopted for the study is shown
diagrammatically in the Figure 2.1.

Figure 2.1: Flow chart showing methodology adopted for the study

Page 7 of 40
2.2 Data collection:
During study the data collection process was divided into:
i) Primary Data Collection and
ii) Secondary Data Collection
Primary Data Collection was done in the field and secondary data was collected from previous
works such as published and unpublished reports and maps, etc.
i) Primary Data Collection
During study various primary data such as static water level in various wells, chemical analysis
of the water samples, geological and geophysical data, etc. were obtained during the fieldwork.
Various methods and materials used during the fieldwork are discussed below.
a) Materials and Methods
Groundwater level Measurements:
To detect fluctuations in the groundwater table, groundwater levels in the tube wells and dug
wells were measured. In order to get as correct levels as possible, an interruption in pumping for
at least two hours is necessary. The measurement of SWL (Static Water level) was done with the
help of Water level Indicator. Its mechanism works on the principle of sensing when the sensor
comes in contact with water. Simultaneously an odometer is present within the instrument which
helps us to determine the depth in m.
Equipment: Water Level Indicator (IGIS, Hyderabad)

Plate 2.1: Water Level indicator

Global Positioning System (GPS): Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite based
navigational system. GPS calculates the position of a certain spot by registering pulses from

Page 8 of 40
satellites. GPS is used to assign Easting and Northing co-ordinates to a specified point, i.e.,
existing structures, wells and other important features.
Equipment: Silva Garmin make GPS

Plate 2.2: GPS 76 CSx

Electrical Resistivity Meter: SSR-MP-1 microprocessor based digital electrical resistivity
meter of IGIS, Hyderabad make is used for collection of electrical resistivity values by VES
method.

Plate 2.3: Photograph shows Electrical Resistivity Meter

ii) Secondary Data Collection

The secondary data was collected from various government agencies like Government Census
Department, Groundwater Department, Geological Survey of India (GSI), etc.

Page 9 of 40
 3. ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY STUDY
3.1 Introduction:
Surface electrical resistivity surveying is based on the principle that the distribution of electrical
potential in the ground around a current-carrying electrode depends on the electrical resistivities
and distribution of the surrounding soils and rocks. The usual practice in the field is to apply an
electrical direct current (DC) between two electrodes implanted in the ground and to measure the
difference of potential between two additional electrodes that do not carry current. Usually, the
potential electrodes are in line between the current electrodes, but in principle, they can be
located anywhere. The current used is either direct current or AC of low frequency. All analysis
and interpretation are done on the basis of direct currents.
The ultimate objective of a Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) at some locality is to obtain
apparent resistivity log similar to, for example, the induction log of a well at the locality, without
actually drilling the well. However, because of inherent limitations, the resolution of the VES
methods is not as high as that of the induction log.
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of using one of the VES methods-the
Schlumberger array to pin point the feasible location for construction of bore well.
3.2 Method:
Resistivity survey has been carried out for delineating the deeper sub surface aquifer based on
surrounding hydrological conditions, five locations were selected for conducting vertical
electrical sounding (VES) using Schlumbergers Configuration of electrode separation to
estimate thickness of sub surface layer and there possible thickness.

SCHLUMBERGER CONFIGURATIONS:-
This array is also most widely used in electrical prospecting. Four electrodes (A, M, N and B) are
placed along a straight line, symmetrically, over center point O. Current is sent generally
through the outer electrodes A & B and potential across M & N (the inner electrodes). In
Schlumberger configurations, the separation between potential electrodes (MN) is kept small
compared to the current electrode separation AB.

The configuration factor (K) for Schlumberger array is:

K = L2 / 2l

Page 10 of 40
 Figure 3.1: Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) Electrode arrangement
Resistivity sounding is used to make investigations along the depth. In this method the center of
configuration is kept fixed and measurements are made by successively increasing electrode
spacing. The apparent resistivity values obtained with increasing values of electrode separations
are used to estimate the thickness and resistivities of subsurface formations.

In Schlumberger array all the four electrodes are kept in a line but the two inner electrodes
(potential electrodes) are kept closer (potential electrode distance MN less than 1/5 current
electrode distance AB). For increasing the depth of investigation, the current electrodes A and B
are moved apart symmetrically about the center point O, keeping the potential electrodes fixed.
Whenever potential electrodes are shifted measurements are repeated, keeping the current
electrodes same to get overlapping section of the curve. The apparent resistivity for each current
electrode separation is calculated by multiplying the resistance value by Schlumberger
Configuration Factor

3.3 Result & Discussion:

As mentioned above the Resistivity data taken from five locations with the help of SSR-MP-
ATS, IGIS Hyderabad make Resistivity instrument. The Resistivity data of various locations
represent more or less uniform Resistivity value at all places. The Resistivity data interpreted
with the help of software of IGIS i.e. inverse slope method. Table 3.1 and Figure 3.2 shows the
locations (L-1 to L-5) where the electrical resistivity sounding were taken for approximate 200m
current electrode spacing.

Page 11 of 40
 Figure 3.2: Locations of Electrical Resistivity
Figure 3.3 show the graph for Electrode spacing versus resistivity on logarithmic scale. Figure
3.8 and Figure 3.12 show the software generated graph of inverse slope method for locations L-1
to L-5 respectively. The resistivity value of all the five locations vary among themselves, this
may be due to lithological contrast, varying degree of weathering or little unevenness in
topography. The sub surface lithology inferred as thin layer of soil underlain by volcanic basalt
rocks. The Table 3.2 shows the apparent resistivity for all the locations. Table 3.3 shows the
inferred lithology from the apparent resistivity values. Plate 3.1 shows the photographs of the
resistivity sounding survey.
Table 3.1: Resistivity Locations
Sr.No. Resistivity Location Coordinates
1 L-1 -2240.343,1246.224
2 L-2 -3006.111,1513.721
3 L-3 -3141.817,1878.623
4 L-4 -3592.562,1430.366
5 L-5 -3006.111,1513.721

Page 12 of 40
 Table 3.2: Apparent Resistivity
Location L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5
AB/2 MN/2 Approximate Apparent Resistivity
(m) (m) Depth (m) Rho(ohm-m)
5 1 3 557.42 157.53 10.07 46.83 67.32
10 1 7 652.36 198.90 5.50 43.36 28.94
15 3 10 536.22 124.94 8.30 41.63 34.57
20 3 13 370.86 114.14 2.18 39.42 40.35
25 5 17 238.91 128.96 4.96 38.57 41.60
30 5 20 123.87 140.33 5.60 53.18 47.92
35 5 23 122.11 149.84 6.71 65.83 50.63
40 5 27 104.60 166.22 6.18 75.36 53.86
45 5 30 109.15 177.97 6.57 84.55 61.80
50 10 33 111.52 272.09 24.23 62.32 5.91
55 10 37 115.10 221.64 --- --- ---
60 10 40 123.12 313.94 26.87 81.71 75.76
70 10 47 143.67 337.26 27.72 93.37 78.75
80 10 53 153.59 253.78 16.20 93.83 69.90
90 10 60 139.22 105.99 36.93 90.91 67.70
100 20 67 83.53 119.83 49.48 71.12 84.54
120 20 80 167.26 141.36 84.22 82.07 87.88
150 20 100 317.67 202.16 106.30 110.72 139.80
200 20 133 158.77 35.13 105.16 107.99 136.75

Table 3.3: Inferred lithology based on Electrical Resistivity Study

Depth (in m)
Thickness (in m) Inferred Lithology
From To
Location: L-1
0.0 1.0 1.0 Soil & Alluvium
1.0 15.0 14.0 Fractured Rock
15.0 20.0 5.0 Weathered Rock
20.0 40.0 20.0 Fractured Rock
40.0 48.0 8.0 Hard Rock
48.0 60.0 12.0 Fractured Rock
60.0 65.0 5.0 Weathered Rock
65.0 100.0 35.0 Hard Rock
100.00 -- -- Fractured Rock

Page 13 of 40
 Depth (in m)
Thickness (in m) Inferred Lithology
From To
Location: L-2
0.0 1.0 1.0 Soil & Alluvium
1.0 30.0 29.0 Fractured Rock
30.0 35.0 5.0 Hard Rock
35.0 40.0 5.0 Fractured Rock
40.0 52.0 12.0 Hard Rock
52.0 60.0 8.0 Fractured Rock
60.0 65.0 5.0 Weathered Rock
65.0 100.0 35.0 Fractured Rock
100.00 -- -- Hard Rock
Location: L-3
0.0 1.0 1.0 Soil & Alluvium
1.0 5.0 4.0 Weathered Rock
5.0 10.0 5.0 Hard Rock
10.0 12.0 2.0 Weathered Rock
12.0 22.0 10.0 Hard Rock
22.0 25.0 3.0 Weathered Rock
25.0 -- -- Hard Rock
Location: L-4
0.0 15.0 15.0 Weathered Rock
15.0 30.0 15.0 Hard Rock
30.0 32.0 2.0 Weathered Rock
32.0 45.0 13.0 Hard Rock
45.0 60.0 15.0 Fractured Rock
60.0 65.0 5.0 Weathered Rock
65.0 100.0 35.0 Hard Rock
100.0 -- -- Fractured Rock
Location: L-5
0.0 5.0 5.0 Weathered Rock
5.0 15.0 10.0 Fractured Rock
15.0 17.0 2.0 Weathered Rock
17.0 25.0 8.0 Fractured Rock
25.0 30.0 5.0 Hard Rock
30.0 32.0 2.0 Clay
32.0 -- -- Hard Rock

Page 14 of 40
Plate 3.1: Electrical Resistivity Survey

Page 15 of 40
Figure 3.3: Current Electrode Spacing vs Apparent Resistivity graph

Figure 3.4: Inverse slope method for RES-1,2,3,4 and 5

Page 16 of 40
 4. GEO HYDROLOGY
4.1 Introduction
Geologically, the study area comprises of volcanic igneous basalt rocks. The groundwater in the
study area occurs in unconfined to semi confined conditions at shallow depth of 5 to 10m depth
from the ground surface. The groundwater occurs in weathered and fractured zone of these
igneous rocks.
4.2 Water Level
Well Inventory was carried out at 8 locations of existing wells. Table 4.1 shows detail of the
locations of wells where the water level measured. The contour map of reduced water level is
prepared for determination of ground water flow direction. Reduced water level is groundwater
level height with respect to mean sea level.
Table 4.1: Well details
Sr. No. Location Id Coordinate SWL (in m)
1 MHPS Boilers BH-04 W-1 -3589.073 1407.832 13.10
2 L&T CHP Batching Plant BH-01 W-2 -2408.293 1408.582 9.00
3 PCT Cooling Tower BH-02 W-3 -2944.238 1503.790 13.20
4 CB 30 M-1 Near Quality Lab W-4 -2405.889 1371.506 9.70
5 DM Plant BH-05 W-5 -3179.013 1885.134 10.10
6 ESP Point BH-018 W-6 -3182.852 1822.761 11.80
7 PCTL office area BH-03 W-7 -2457.226 1920.964 12.90
8 LCR Plant BH-07 W-8 -2456.629 1855.922 10.80

The deepest water level encountered PCT Cooling tower i.e 13.20m and shallowest water level
encountered at 9.00m depth from the existing ground surface of Batching plant.
Plate 4.1 shows the measurement of water level in well. Figure 4.1 shows the satellite image of
locations of wells inventoried.

Page 17 of 40
 Figure 4.2: Reduced Water Level Map

Plate 4.1: Measurement of water level

Figure 4.1: Location map of wells inventoried

Page 18 of 40
4.3 Groundwater Quality:
The groundwater quality is tested by chemical analysis of the groundwater samples. The
groundwater samples collected and analyzed. The collected water samples are analyzed for its
suitability of drinking as per IS:10500:2012. The graphs are prepared for presentation of
groundwater quality.
pH (Hydrogen Ion Concentration):
pH is a hydrogen ion concentration. Generally, based on the pH value, water can be divided in to
three classes, namely: (1) If pH is less than 7, water is said to be ACIDIC in nature, (2) For
FRESH water pH is equal to 7 and (3) If pH is more than 7, water is classified as ALKALINE.
The maximum pH value was found at MHPS Boilers water sample, viz., 8.41 whereas the
minimum pH value was 6.07 at PCTL office area. Figure 3.3 shows the contour diagram of the
pH value in groundwater samples in study area. The pH value 6.5 to 8.5 is permissible as per
Indian Standard 10500:2012. All the groundwater samples are within the limit as per Indian
Standard of drinking water.

Figure 4.3: pH values graph of groundwater samples

TDS (Total Dissolved Solids):

The salt content in the water may be expressed in Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). TDS is the
amount of materials (inorganic salts and small amounts of organic material) dissolved in water
and is commonly expressed in terms of milligrams per liter. If the salt concentration in water
increases, it is difficult for plants to extract the water. The maximum TDS value found at LCR
Plant village well viz.300 mg/l and minimum 151 mg/l at PCT cooling area groundwater sample.

Page 19 of 40
The acceptable TDS limit is 500 mg/l and permissible TDS limit is 2000 mg/l. All the
groundwater samples collected and analyzed are found within the permissible limit. Figure 4.4
shows the TDS graph of the study area

Figure 4.4: TDS values graph of groundwater samples

Total Hardness as CaCO3:
Hardness of water is due to carbonates, sulphates and chlorides of calcium and magnesium.
The maximum value of hardness as CaCO3 found is 262 mg/l in LCR Plant groundwater sample
and minimum 50 mg/l in MHPS Boiler groundwater samples. As per the IS 10500:2012, 200
mg/l is acceptable limit and 600 mg/l is the permissible limit. Figure 4.5 shows the total hardness
concentration in the study area.

Figure 4.5: Total Hardness values graph of groundwater samples

Chloride (Cl):
The chloride content as per Indian Standards 10500:2012 acceptable limit is 250 mg/l and
permissible limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content above the desirable limit can cause the
change in taste of water, corrosion and potability. All the groundwater samples are within the
permissible limit of IS: 10500:2012. Maximum chloride content of 48 mg/l found at MHPS

Page 20 of 40
boiler area and minimum concentration of chloride content was found at near quality lab area
sample, i.e., 20 mg/l. Figure 4.6 shows the graph of chloride ion concentration in the study area.

Figure 4.6: Chloride values in groundwater samples

Sulphate (SO4):
The sulphate content in ground water generally occurs as soluble salts of calcium, magnesium
and sodium. Sulphate is having acceptable limit of 200 mg/l and permissible limit is 400 mg/l as
per Indian Drinking Water Standards 10500:2012. Above the desirable limit causes gastro
intestinal irritation particularly when magnesium or sodium is present. The minimum
concentration of sulphate was found at CHP Batching plant, cooling tower and LCR Plant water
sample which is 2.86 mg/l and maximum is 14.3 mg/l at the ESP Point. Figure 4.7 shows the
distribution of Sulphate ion.

Figure 4.7: Sulphate values in groundwater samples

Calcium (Ca):
Calcium above the desirable limit causes the encrustation in water supply system and adverse
effects on domestic use. The Calcium content is within the permissible limit of IS: 10500:2012

Page 21 of 40
in all the groundwater samples. The maximum 64 mg/l Calcium is found at ESP Point and
minimum 12 mg/l at MHPS Boilers. As per Indian Standards 75 mg/l is the acceptable limit and
200 mg/l is the permissible limit. All the groundwater samples are showing calcium
concentration above the permissible limit of Indian Standard 10500:2012.

Figure 4.8: Calcium values in groundwater samples

Magnesium:
Magnesium (Mg) is having a desirable limit of 30 mg/l and permissible limit is 100 mg/l as per
Indian Drinking Water standards 10500:2012. The effect of having above the desirable limit is
encrustation to water supply structure and adverse effect on domestic use.
The minimum value of Mg is 4.80 mg/l found in MHPS Boiler groundwater sample and
maximum value is 27.84 mg/l in LCR plant. Figure 4.9 shows the distribution of magnesium in
study area.

Figure 4.9: Magnesium values in groundwater samples

Page 22 of 40
Nitrate:
Nitrates having desirable limit of 45 mg/l and permissible limit are 100 mg/l as per Indian
Drinking Water Standards 10500:2012. The minimum concentration of nitrate is found water
sample of PCT Cooling tower and Quality Lab, i.e., 9.86 mg/l and maximum is 12.11 mg/l in
MHPS Boiler, CHP Batching plant and LCR Plant. Nitrate content in the study area is within the
permissible limit of the Indian Standards.

Figure 4.10: Nitrate values in groundwater samples

Fluoride:
Fluoride having desirable limit of 1 mg/l and permissible limit are 1.5 mg/l as per Indian
Drinking Water Standards 10500:2012. The minimum concentration of fluoride in water
samples was found in PCT Cooling tower, i.e., 0.49 mg/l and maximum is 0.82 mg/l in MHPS
Boiler. The Fluoride concentrations of all the water samples analyzed are within the acceptable
limit of Indian drinking water specification.

Figure 4.11: Fluoride values in groundwater samples

Page 23 of 40
 Total Alkalinity:
Total Alkalinity having acceptable limit of 200 mg/l and permissible limit are 600 mg/l as per
Indian Drinking Water Standards 10500:2012. The minimum concentration of total alkalinity is
found at the MHPS Boilers, i.e., 40.4 mg/l and maximum is 236.4 mg/l at ESP Point
groundwater sample.

Figure 4.12: Total Alkalinity values in groundwater samples

4.4 Aquifer Parameters:
To find out the aquifer parameters, short duration aquifer performance test in the existing tube well
conducted. Pumping test is an accurate method of determining the safe yield of the well. In this
method the water levels in the well is measured at regular time interval and pump speed or
discharge rate maintained constant. The rate of pumping, per hour, under this equilibrium
condition, gives the yield per hour (Q) of the well at a particular drawdown (s). The yield test
data and calculation is given in the following table and paragraphs.

Page 24 of 40
 Table 4.7: Pumping and recovery phase reading for Pump Test - 1
Pumping Phase Reading Recovery Phase Reading
Time since Time since Time since
PWL Drawdown Residual
Pump ON Pump OFF Pump ON t/t'
(in m) (in m) Drawdown(S2)
(t in min) (t' in min) (t in min)
1 9.04 0.04 1 481 7.33 481.00
2 9.10 0.10 2 482 6.97 241.00
3 9.14 0.14 3 483 6.66 161.00
4 9.19 0.19 4 484 6.32 121.00
5 9.24 0.24 5 485 6.06 97.00
6 9.30 0.30 6 486 6.83 81.00
7 9.34 0.34 7 487 5.81 69.57
8 9.36 0.36 8 488 5.37 61.00
9 9.40 0.40 9 489 5.15 54.33
10 9.44 0.44 10 490 4.65 49.00
12 9.49 0.49 12 492 4.83 41.00
14 9.56 0.56 14 494 4.10 35.29
16 9.68 0.68 16 496 3.82 31.00
18 9.85 0.85 18 498 3.69 27.67
20 9.99 0.99 20 500 3.40 25.00
25 10.50 1.50 25 505 3.19 20.20
30 10.90 1.90 30 510 2.94 17.00
35 11.24 2.24 35 515 2.71 14.71
40 11.64 2.64 40 520 2.53 13.00
45 11.98 2.98 45 525 2.40 11.67
50 12.20 3.20 50 530 2.80 10.60
55 12.40 3.40 55 535 2.04 9.73
60 12.68 3.68 60 540 1.95 9.00
70 13.16 4.16 70 550 1.87 7.86
80 13.56 4.56 80 560 0.44 7.00
90 14.06 5.06 90 570 0.21 6.33
100 14.43 5.43 100 580
120 14.76 5.76 120 600
140 15.08 6.08 140 620
160 15.50 6.50 160 640
180 15.70 6.70 180 660
200 15.95 6.95 200 680
220 16.45 7.45 220 700
240 16.77 7.77 240 720

Page 25 of 40
 Table 4.8: Pumping and recovery phase reading for Pump Test 2
Pumping Phase Reading Recovery Phase Reading
Time since Time since Time since
PWL Drawdown Residual
Pump ON Pump OFF Pump ON t/t'
(in m) (in m) Drawdown(S2)
(t in min) (t' in min) (t in min)
1 61.60 0.60 1 481 3.02 481.00
2 61.55 0.55 2 482 2.93 241.00
3 61.51 0.51 3 483 2.96 161.00
4 61.46 0.46 4 484 2.94 121.00
5 61.39 0.39 5 485 2.70 97.00
6 61.33 0.33 6 486 2.75 81.00
7 61.27 0.27 7 487 2.65 69.57
8 61.21 0.21 8 488 2.50 61.00
9 61.15 0.15 9 489 2.53 54.33
10 61.07 0.07 10 490 2.58 49.00
12 62.00 1.00 12 492 2.40 41.00
14 62.09 1.09 14 494 2.45 35.29
16 62.12 1.12 16 496 2.36 31.00
18 62.17 1.17 18 498 2.21 27.67
20 62.21 1.21 20 500 2.28 25.00
25 62.27 1.27 25 505 2.07 20.20
30 62.32 1.32 30 510 2.01 17.00
35 62.40 1.40 35 515 1.90 14.71
40 62.49 1.49 40 520 1.85 13.00
45 62.60 1.60 45 525 1.20 11.67
50 62.80 1.80 50 530 1.78 10.60
55 62.91 1.91 55 535 1.75 9.73
60 63.07 2.07 60 540 1.73 9.00
70 62.18 1.18 70 550 1.70 7.86
80 63.31 2.31 80 560 1.63 7.00
90 63.50 2.50 90 570 1.62 6.33
100 63.70 2.70 100 580 1.60 5.80
120 63.50 2.50 120 600 1.67 5.00
140 63.85 2.85 140 620 1.50 4.43
160 63.98 2.98 160 640 0.60 4.00
180 64.05 3.05 180 660 0.65 3.67
200 64.20 6.95 200 680
220 64.40 7.45 220 700

The recuperation test or recovery test is used when it is difficult to regulate the rate of pumping
in order to maintain constant discharge. In this method, the water level is depressed to any level
below the normal level and pump is stopped. The water level in the well starts rising. This rising
of water level is measured with specified time interval. The discharge should be constant and the
discharge will be measured every regular interval in liter per minute or liter per second or
m3/hour or m3/day

Page 26 of 40
 Figure 4.13: Time drawdown and Ratio (t/t) drawdown graphs for Pump Test - 1

Figure 4.13: Time drawdown and Ratio (t/t) drawdown graphs for Pump Test - 2
(A) Transmissivity:
Transmissivity of the aquifer is defined as the rate at which water prevailing kinematic viscosity
is transmitted through a unit width of aquifer under a unit hydraulic gradient
(B) Field permeability or Hydraulic Conductivity:
A medium has a unit hydraulic conductivity if it will transmit in unit time a unit volume of
groundwater at the prevailing kinematic viscosity (Kinematic viscosity equals dynamic viscosity
divided by fluid density). The Field permeability K can be determined by using following
equation.
K= T/M, Where T = Transmissivity and M = Aquifer thickness
(C) Specific Capacity:
The specific capacity is computed by dividing the discharge by drawdown. The larger the value
of specific capacity, the better the well. The values of Specific Capacity C is obtained by using
following equation

Page 27 of 40
 Q
C= -----------
s
Where, C = specific capacity in m3 / min / m, Q = Discharge in m3 / day, s = Maximum Drawdown, m

Table 4.9: Aquifer parameters summary

Transmissivity (m2/day) Permeability (m/day)
Specific
SWL Discharge Theiss Jacob Theiss
Sr. No. Jacob Cooper Capacity
(in m) (m3/day) Recovery Cooper Recovery
Method (m3 / day / m)
Method Method Method
Pump
9.0 480 17.49 20.46 0.25 0.29 61.77
Test - 1
Pump
61.0 470 34.19 71.81 0.48 1.02 63.08
Test 2

Page 28 of 40
 5. RAIN WATER HARVESYING
5.1 Introduction:
Geologically the area is composed of igneous volcanic rocks, mainly igneous & is overlain by
thin layer of alluvium (Clay, Sand, silt & Gravels). Ground water occurs in weathered portion,
cracks, fissures and joints. Excessive runoff causes soil erosion and less recharge
5.2 Water Available for harvesting:
The water requirement for various uses in the plant will be fulfilled by Indira sagar dam water
supply.
The effective area available for the rainwater harvesting is tabulated in the Table 5.1. The
effective area is considered on the basis of rain water harvesting comes in contact with other
possible contaminants.
Table 5.1: Rainwater available for harvesting

Average Water available for

Total Area
Sr. No. Description Annual Coefficient Rainwater
(m2)
Rainfall (m) Harvesting (m3)

1 Roof top area 49425 1.211 0.8 47883

2 Paved area 86767 1.211 0.6 63045

3 Green belt 714017 1.211 0.3 259402

4 Unpaved area 616502 1.211 0.3 223975

Total 594305

The rainwater available for harvesting is calculated 594305 m3 per annum (Table 5.1).
5.3 Rainwater harvesting plan:
The static water level in the study area varies between 9.0m to 13.20m and electrical resistivity
study indicates that the weathered and fractured rock depth is 100m from the existing ground
surface. The area is having potential to artificial groundwater recharge and hence it is advisable
to recharge the groundwater aquifer. Hence, the groundwater recharge structure artificial

Page 29 of 40
recharge well is suggested. Moreover, there is good potential of groundwater recharge as the
pumping water level went below 70m from the existing ground surface.
The rain water can be collected and utilised for domestic, plantation and industrial use as the rain
water is having good quality of water. For this, they can collect the rain water through storm
water drainage system and an artificial recharge well for recharge of rain water at appropriate
location. The general design of the recharge well is given in the Figure 5.1. It is suggested that
100m depth and 150mm diameter with appropriate sedimentation tank can be constructed. The
numbers of recharge well may require which calculated as per the actual plant lay out plan.
No. of recharge well structures:
The number of recharge wells required to be constructed is computed and the detail given in the
following Table 5.2. The diameter of the recharge well is considered 150mm and depth is 100m
from the existing ground surface. The average permeability of the strata is computed from the
aquifer performance test 0.65 m/day and average rainy days is considered 60 days. The effective
zone for recharge is considered is 50m approximately inferred from the electrical resistivity
study. Hence, the total number of recharge well structures required will be 6.
Table 5.2: Number of recharge well structures

Gross Monsoon Rainwater available 9905 cum/day

Rainy days 60 days
Recharge period 120 days
Monsoon Rainwater available for recharge per day 83 cum/day
Rainfall intensity 0.021 m/day
Depth of recharge well 100 m
Fractured & Weathered Zone 50 m
radius of recharge well 0.075 m
Area of recharge well 47.13 m2
Effective area for recharge 23.58 m2
Permeability computed 0.65 m/day
Recharge Rate 15.33 cum/day

Recharge through 1 well 1839.65 cum/year

No. of recharge well 5.38 6

Page 30 of 40
 Table 5.3A: Recharge well design general parameters

Well out fit 4m deep 1500mm diameter

Reinforced concrete Rings 1350mm OD & 300 mm Height, 65mm Thick

1200mm in diameter, 65 mm thick,25 mm perforated- 8 mm mild
Reinforced concrete slab for well
steel rods used for reinforcement
150mm gravel and coarse sand, 100mm of 20mm size crushed
Filter Media stone, 100mm charcoal and activated carbon, 50mm of 40mm
size crushed stone
Total depth 100m
1200mm diameter, 1.5m depth, 1100mm diameter concrete
Silt trap/Sedimentation tank
rings,65mm thick 300mm height
1100 mm in diameter, 75 mm thick,25 mm perforated- 12 mm
Silt trap R.C.C.
mild steel rods used for reinforcement
Well Diameter 150mm
75 mm High density polyethylene pipe (HDPE) slotted casing
Casing pipe with 8 mm spirally perforated holes at 30mm intervals.10
kg/cm2 pressure with V wire screen

Table 5.3B: Location of Recharge Well along with sedimentation tank

Sr.No. Recharge Well Id Coordinates Location

1 RW No.1 -3580.158, 1131.889 Near Greet belt

2 RW No.2
3 RW No.3
4 RW No.4
5 RW No.5
-1407.428, 1122.35 Near Control room building
Near Existing drain
-2728.874, 1601.158
(CW Pipe corridor)
-2218.676, 1137.275 B/H Switchyard control room
-3213.892, 1863.992 Near Raw water reservoir

Near Existing drain

6 RW No.6 -2442.997, 1982.534
(Opp. Conveyor belt 26A/B)

Water Saving:
1. To the possible extent water is saved at each point of use by taking proper care in
maintenance of drain pipe, tap etc from leakage. There should be display board for optimum
use of water in wash room, toilet or at other appropriate locations.
2. Use of recycled water, if possible, in cleaning of toilets or gardening after proper treatment
and testing for its intended use.

Page 31 of 40
3. Use of sprinkler or drip irrigation method in garden irrigation
4. Adoption of machinery equipments, methods, if possible and economic viable, for
manufacturing

Maintenance of the recharging system:

Periodic maintenance required for reliable and higher quality water supply. During raining
season the entire system to be checked before and after rains and cleaned after every dry period.
Before first shower sedimentation tanks should be cleaned and flushed of all sediments and
debris. For the groundwater recharging purpose only roof top area runoff water will be used.
Also, the roof top will be cleaned before monsoon and coarse mesh is used to prevent the debris
on the entrance of the water at roof. The first shower should be flushed so the any sediment can
be washed away.

Page 32 of 40
Figure 5.1: General design of artificial recharge well

Page 33 of 40
 6. CONCLUSION

1. The study area is located near Village Mundi and Dongaliya, District Khandwa, Madhya Pradesh.
2. Geologically, the study area is comprises of igneous volcanic rocks of Upper Cretaceous to Eocene
geological age below thin layer of Alluvium
3. The study area is having rolling topography dotted with isolated inselbergs
4. Soil of the study area is Very medium black, gravelly loamy Soil influenced by underlying igneous
rocks
5. The principal rivers of the study area is Narmda and Tawa
6. Average annual rainfall of the study area is 1211mm
7. Well Inventory was carried out at 8 locations of existing wells
8. The shallowest water level encountered at CHP Batching plant well i.e 9.0m and deepest water level
encountered at 13.20m depth from the existing ground surface of PCT Cooling tower
9. The pH value of the study area varies between 6.07 and 8.41
10. The TDS value of groundwater samples collected are varies between 151mg/l and 300 mg/l
11. The value of hardness as CaCO3 groundwater samples varies between 50 mg/l and 262 mg/l
12. The chloride content of the study area varies between 20 to 48 mg/l
13. The minimum concentration of sulphate is 2.86 mg/l and maximum is 14.3 mg/l
14. The maximum 64 mg/l and minimum calcium is 12 mg/l found in the study area ground water
samples
15. The minimum value of Mg is 4.8 mg/l and maximum value is 27.84 mg/l found in the study area
ground water samples
16. The minimum concentration of nitrate is found water sample is 4.84 mg/l and maximum is 12.11mg/l
17. The minimum concentration of fluoride in water samples was found in study area is 0.49 mg/l and
maximum is 0.82 mg/l
18. The Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 value 236.4 mg/l and 40.4 mg/l in groundwater samples of study area
19. Electrical Resistivity carried out at 5 locations with the help of digital micro processor based
resistivity meter up to maximum 200m current electrode spacing.
20. The lithology inferred from the resistivity sounding is thin layer of soil and alluvium, followed by
weathered basalt rock (up to 100m from the existing ground surface) which again underlying by hard
basalt rock (beyond 100m depth). The resistivity data interpreted with the help of inverse slope
method IGIS software

Page 34 of 40
21. Short duration pump tests conducted in bore wells. The aquifer parameters computed are maximum
drawdown 7.77m and 7.45m, specific capacity 61.77 and 63.08 m3/day/m and permeability is 0.25
and 1.02 m/day
22. The rain water available for harvesting is 594305 m3/annum. The number of rainy days considered is
to be 60days and hence the numbers of recharge wells to be constructed are 6 of 100m depth and
150mm diameter with detail given.

For, Independent Consultants & Technocrates

Authorized Signatory

Page 35 of 40
 List of Annotations and Symbols
Annotation Description
Sq. km Square Kilometer
EGL Existing Ground Level
AGL Above Ground Level
MP Measuring Point
SWL Static Water Level
TD Total Depth
m3/day Cubic meter per day
m/day Meter per day
T Transmissivity
S Storativity
C Specific Capacity
B Drainage Factor
D/d Drawdown
mcm Million cubic meter
m Meter
MSL Man Sea Level
BGL Below Ground Level
RL Reduced Level
RWL Reduced Water Level
mm Millimeter
LPM Liter Per Minute
m2/day Square meter per day
K Permeability/Hydraulic Conductivity
Sy Specific Yield
c Hydraulic Resistance
s Slope of the drawdown between the two log cycles
Q Discharge
PPM Parts Per Million
Mg/l Milligram per liter
AC Alternate Current
DC Direct Current
VES Vertical Electrical Sounding
CGWB Central Groundwater Board

Page 36 of 40
 ANNEXURE-1: CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA
SWL
Location Coordinate pH TH Cl TDS Ca Mg SO4 NO3 F TA
(in m)
W-1 76.52889 22.11084 13.10 8.41 50 48 181 12.0 4.8 14.3 12.11 0.82 40.4
W-2 76.52933 22.10283 9.00 6.82 212 28 260 52.8 19.2 2.86 12.11 0.51 197.2
W-3 76.53068 22.10867 13.20 7.25 56 24 151 12.0 6.24 2.86 4.84 0.49 73.6
W-4 76.52907 22.10271 9.70 7.29 156 20 159 33.6 17.28 8.58 4.84 0.61 166.8
W-5 76.53482 22.10991 10.10 7.42 156 28 175 40.8 12.96 8.58 9.69 0.56 125.6
W-6 76.53751 22.10045 11.80 6.72 256 36 285 64.0 23.04 14.3 9.69 0.65 236.4
W-7 76.53473 22.10323 12.90 6.07 214 32 195 48.0 22.56 11.44 7.27 0.55 153.2
W-8 76.53327 22.10052 10.80 6.73 262 28 300 58.4 27.84 2.86 12.11 0.60 218.8
*All the values are in mg/l except pH
TH Total Hardness
Cl Chloride
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
Ca Calcium
Mg Magnesium
SO4 Sulphate
NO3 Nitrate
F Fluoride
TA Total Alkalinity

Page 37 of 40
ANNEXURE-2: CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE OF RESISTIVITY METER

Page 38 of 40
 References
B. Gurugnanam et al. GIS based micro level approach for hydro geochemical studies in upper
Manimuktha sub basin, Vellar, South India, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume
2 No.11, November 2009, pp.5-10
District Brochure Godda, Central Groundwater Board, September 2013
Ige O.O. et al., Preliminary assessment of water quality in Ayede Ekiti, South western
Nigeria, Journal of Geology and Mining Research, Volume 3(6), June 2011, pp.147-152
IS 10500:2012 Drinking water specification
IS 14476 Part 1 to 9:1998, Test pumping of water wells
IS 15792:2008 Artificial Recharge to Ground Water - Guidelines
IS 15896:2011 Manual Methods for Measurement of Ground Water Level in a Well
IS 15897:2011 Surface Geophysical survey for Hydrological studies
IS 2800:1991 (Part1 & 2) Code of practice for construction and testing of tube well/bore well
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 2) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water pH Value
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 21) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Total Hardness
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 23) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Alkalinity
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 24) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Sulphate
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 32) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Chloride
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 34) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Nitrogen
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 40) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Calcium
IS 3025: 1983 (Part 46) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Magnesium
Page 39 of 40
 IS 3025: 1983 (Part 60) Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and
waste water Chloride
IS 4097:1967 Specifications for Gravel use as pack in Tube wells
IS 795:1976, Guide for preparation of abstracts
IS 8010:1976 Guidelines for preparation of technical reports Research and Development
reports
L. Belkhiri et al Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use Ain
Azel plain, Algeria, Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, Volume 3(6), June 2010, pp.
151-157
Manual on Artificial Recharge of Groundwater, Central Groundwater Board, September 2007
Sudarshan Raju G. et al. An evaluation of aquifer characteristics in and around Kadiri Schist
belt of Anantpur district, Andhrapradesh, International Journal of Geomatics and Geo sciences,
Volume 3, No.1, 2012, pp.229-238
S.N. Dwivedi et al., Determining the recharging capacity of an injection well in a semi confined
alluvial aquifer, Current Science, Volume 109, No.6, September 2015 pp. 1177-1181

Page 40 of 40
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

2100

2000
7

7
PLANT NORTH PLANT NORTH

ORTH
N ORTH
N
TRUE N TRUE N

N
FUEL OIL PRESSURISING
PUMP HOUSE

H H G F E D C B A
H H

41500 E 2100
UP

500 6000 6000 6000 4000 6500 6500 6500

PLINTH BEAM
(REFER DWG NO.
UEL-160202)

F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3
F1

PCC (TYP)
C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3

100
2 E 2000
VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT
C1 C1

10@

2100

2000
G (REFER COLUMN SCHEDULE) G

COLUMN
TIES

N
ELECTRICAL ROOM FOUNDATION
FOR DETAIL REFER DRAWING NO.
UEL-160204 (TYP)
KEY PLAN

300
6500

(SCALE 1:3000)

2
B/FDN
2200 NOTES:

DET
Tf = 500
= =
01. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM, ELEVATIONS AND CO-ORDINATES ARE IN METRES UNLESS

SEE
500
DETAIL 1 NOTED OTHERWISE.
C2 C2
13000

02. THIS DRAWING SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONTRACT TERMS,

2200

=
=
1.1 CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SCHEDULE OF ITEMS.

=
=
03. EL()0.000 REFERS TO RL 282.500 M. ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL) WHICH CORRESPONDS
TO FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL OF GROUND FLOOR OF MAIN POWER HOUSE BUILDING.
F 04. ALL WORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT F
F2 F2
CONDITIONS, ANY DIFFERENCE SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF
500
ENGINEER-IN-CHARGE/DESIGN OFFICE.
= =
05. CONCRETE SHALL BE POURED ONLY AFTER SITE CIVIL ENGINEER GIVES INSPECTION
CLEARANCE FOR REBAR LAID IN COMPLIANCE TO DESIGN DRAWING.
6500

06. THE ROUGH EXCAVATION MAY BE CARRIED OUT UPTO 300MM ABOVE FOUNDING LEVEL. THE
PERIPHERAL TIE ONLY
REMAINING SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH CARE IF LOOSE SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED DURING
2000 (TO BE PROVIDED AT SITE
2700 EXCAVATION BELOW FOUNDING LEVEL, SAME SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LEAN CONCRETE
SUITABLY TO HOLD THE
= = = = FILL OF 1:4:8
COLUMN REINFORCEMENT)
07. NET SAFE BEARING CAPACITY HAS BEEN CONSIDERED AS 25 T/SQ.M AT EL(-)4.000 M.
F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 F3 FOUNDATION
IN CASE OF ANY LOOSE MATERIAL FOUND AT THE FOUNDING LEVEL,
MKD F1
COLUMN THE SAME SHALL BE REMOVED COMPLETELY AND MADE UP WITH 1:4:8 GRADE PCC.
C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 COLUMN MKD C1 REINFORCEMENT 08. THIS DRAWING SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING NO. UEL-160202.

3000

3000
800

800
=

=
09. FOR CONRETE GENERAL NOTES. REFER DRG. NO. L797000-UV01-00-ZEN-160201.
1

=
10. CLEAR COVER
C1
FOUNDATION - SIDE - 50MM
COLUMN (BELOW GROUND) - SIDE - 50MM
- TOP - 50MM - TOP - 50MM
- BOTTOM - 50MM
COLUMN (ABOVE GROUND) - SIDE - 40MM
E 500 500 E
N 2077.150 - TOP - 40MM
= = Tf = 600 = = E 2073.500
DETAIL 2 11. WHEREVER EXCAVATED LEVEL IS BELOW FOUNDING LEVEL, LEAN CONCRETE FILLING SHALL
Tf = 600 BE DONE UPTO FOUNDING LEVEL.
(SCALE : NONE)
FOUNDATION & COLUMN LAYOUT 12. COMPACTION AND BACKFILLING FOR FOUNDATION SHALL BE AS PER CLAUSE 2.3.8 OF
SECTION-2, VOLUME-V OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR CIVIL & STRUCTURAL WORKS.
B/FDN EL(-)4.000 UNO
13. FOR SPECIAL CONFINING REINFORCEMENT UPTO PLINTH LEVEL REFER DETAIL 1 & FOR
DUCTILE DETAILING OF COLUMN ABOVE PLINTH LEVEL REFER DETAIL 203.05 AND
DETAIL 203.06 OF DWG NO. L797000-UV01-00-ZEN-160203.

SCHEDULE OF COLUMNS
WRITING.

MARK C1 C2 C3

LOCATION T/FOUNDATION TO T/CONC EL(+)7.700 T/FOUNDATION TO T/CONC EL(+)7.769 T/FOUNDATION TO T/CONC EL(+)7.700 FOUNDATION SCHEDULE
IN
PERMISSION

3
PARAPET WALL
2 3 2
D D
1 1
2
LCOL/FDN
C 1
ROOF SLAB
T/CONC
THEIR

4 3 REFERENCE DRAWINGS:
4
800

500

800

SECTION DRAWING NO. DRAWING TITLE

WITHOUT

ROOF BEAM 5 5 4 L797000-UC07-00-ZEN-110001 PLOT PLAN

L797000-UV01-00-ZEN-160201 TO
CONCRETE STANDARD DRAWINGS
500 L797000-UV01-00-ZEN-160216
LENT

500 500 L797000-VW00-00-UEL-170101 FUEL OIL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE FLOOR AND ROOF PLAN

LINTEL BEAM FUEL OIL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE

L797000-VW00-00-UEL-170102
ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS
OR

(SCALE 1:25) (SCALE 1:25) (SCALE 1:25)

FUEL OIL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE DOOR, WINDOW
COPIED

B/CONC L797000-VW00-00-UEL-170103
8-T20( )+ 8-T16( ) 8-T32( )+ 8-T25( ) AND FINISHING SCHEDULE AND TOILET DETAIL
REINF 18-T16
L797006-UE00-00-ZEN-120002 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF FUEL OIL PRESSURISING
C C
TIES @ SPACING 4 TIES + 1 LINK OF T8@250 3 TIES + 2 LINKS OF T8@250 4 TIES OF T8@250 PUMP HOUSE
BE

L797006-YD16-00-ZEN-140516 CABLE RACEWAY LAYOUT - FUEL OIL STORAGE AND

NOT

SPECIAL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE

SEE NOTE 13 SEE NOTE 13 SEE NOTE 13
CONFINING REINF L797000-XB02-00-UEL-160202 FUEL OIL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE LAYOUT AND RC
MUST

LINTEL BEAM
DETAILS OF PLINTH BEAM

NO. OF COLUMNS 4 2 12
AND

B/CONC
LIMITED

C
LCOL/FDN
OUTSIDE INSIDE
LUNDY

FFL
COLUMN
EL(-)2.000/ C
L COL/FDN PLINTH BEAM
EL(-)1.000
GRADE (REFER DWG NO.
&

SLAB UEL-160202) 0 01FEB2016 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL AN JD MKA ABD - - RDS

SARGENT

T/CONC
B (REFER LAYOUT) FFL REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY MEC. ELE. CIV. C&I SES APPD. B
PCC (TYP)

COLUMN SHREE SINGHAJI THERMAL POWER PROJECT STAGE II( 2X660MW)

PROJECT:
c
-

PLINTH PROTECTION VILL.: DONGALIA , DISTT.: KHANDWA, MADHYA PRADESH

L&T

TIES (REFER COLUMN SCHEDULE)

(REFER ZEN-160104)
PLINTH a
BEAM A A VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD.
OF

OWNER:
C (REFER COLUMN SCHEDULE)
L COL/FDN JABALPUR - INDIA.
PROPERTY

CJ
c OWNERS
300
d LAHMEYER INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
CONSULTANT:

B/FDN
b (MIN) EPC
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
THE

(SEE LAYOUT) CONTRACTOR:

d
Tf

Ld
75 L&Ts
IS

75 THK B/FDN CONSULTANT:

L & T - SARGENT & LUNDY LTD
(TYP) PCC
AND DESIGN

75 DATE NAME TITLE:

a 75 THK
A b FFL A
TYPICAL COLUMN ELEVATION (TYP) PCC PREPARED 01FEB2016 AN

594mm)
EL(-)1.000 (RL 281.500) FUEL OIL PRESSURISING PUMP HOUSE
(REBAR NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) CHECKED 01FEB2016 SKB/ABD
PLAN SECTION A

500
LEGENDS: GA AND RC DETAILS OF
(SCALE : NONE) FGL
APPROVED 01FEB2016 RDS
DRAWING

EL(-)1.500 (RL 281.000)

x
TOP REBAR FOUNDATION AND COLUMN
L&T JOB NO. MALWA-II

(841mm
500
TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL BOTTOM REBAR
FFL L&T-S&L JOB NO.: L797000
(SCALE : NONE) EL(-)2.000 (RL 280.500)
THIS

SCALE: 1:100 DRG. NO.: L7 97000-XB02-00-UEL-160201 SHT: 01 OF 01 REV. 0

A1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

FILE NAME: L797000-XB02-00-UEL-160201-01.DGN