Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: Boiler supporting structure is one of the most important structures employed in any power plant project. A typical boiler
supporting structure will be of 100m height subject to a concentrated load in the range of 15000tons to 20000tons hung from the top.
The distributed loads attached to the rest of the portion (i.e. from 0m to 100m) are comparatively less and therefore, this type of structure
is typically like an inverted pendulum with huge mass attached at the top. These kinds of structures are highly sensitive to lateral and
dynamic loads. In the present day Indian scenario, the boiler supporting structures are designed using huge Plus columns made with
two major I-sections in the order of 1.0m to 1.2m web depth with a typical web and flange thicknesses in the order of 16mm to 63mm. As
a typical once through supercritical boiler supporting structure consists of around 25 to 45 columns of such mega size, such structures
becomes more expensive in terms of money and fabrication time. In view of optimizing the structural steel usage and to develop an
efficient structural system, a theoretical attempt is made in this study through design of such structures using concrete filled square steel
tubular column. Typical boiler structure is modeled using structural analysis program and analyzed for various conditions such as
various seismic zones, wind zones, different load combinations and various section sizes. Dynamic response of the structure is studied.
The story drift of the structure is estimated at various levels and compared with that of structure made using Plus I-column. Typical cost
comparison also made to study the effectiveness of the project. This paper describes the complete analytical procedure along with results
and conclusions.
Keywords: Boiler supporting structure, concrete filled square steel tubular column, Plus-I column, wind, seismic, power plant
Type of Loads
1. DL: Dead Load including self weight
2. LL: Live Load
3. WL: Wind Load ( in both directions) Figure 3: 3D Boiler Structural model in Staad.Pro
4. SL: Seismic Load (corresponding to DL+50%LL)
5. TL: Secondary loads like Climatic temperature
effect. ( 25C)
Load Combinations
1. DL + LL
2. DL + LL WL/SL
3. DL + LL + TLWL/SL
4. 0.75 DLWL/SL
4. Design Methodology
Comparison of maximum lateral drift of boiler structure Figure 7:Comparison of Total Steel Weight for Columns
along X-axis is done at Main Brace Levels. The Figure 5
shows the maximum lateral drift of the boiler structure along
From Figure 7, Total steel weight of boiler columns using
X-axis is reduced by 37, 36, 39, 39, 39, 37 & 36% plus-I columns is 3704.80 MT. Total steel weight and
respectively at seven MBLs from bottom elevation to top concrete weight of boiler columns are 2799.79 MT and 3380
elevation, by replacing the Steel plus-I columns with CFST
MT respectively, using CFST columns. Hence, there is a
columns. saving of 905 MT of structural steel and an addition of
3379.25 MT of M30 concrete.
References
[1] Bridge, R. Q. (1976). Concrete filled steel tubular
columns. School of Civil Engineering, The University
of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Research Report
No.R283.
[2] Matsui, C., Tsuda, K. and Ishibashi, Y. (1995).
Slender concrete filled steel tubularcolumns under
combined compression and bending. Proceedings of
the 4th Pacific Structural Steel Conference, Singapore,
Pergamon, 3(10), 29-36.
[3] Chung, J., Tsuda, K. and Matsui, C. (1999). High-
strength concrete filled square tube columns subjected
to axial loading. The Seventh East Asia-Pacific
Conference on Structural Engineering & Construction,
Kochi, Japan, 2, 955-960.
[4] Mursi, M. and Uy, B. (2006a). Behaviour and design
of fabricated high strength steel columns subjected to
biaxial bending part I: Experiments. Advanced Steel
Construction, 2(4), 286-313.
[5] Nonlinear analysis of axially loaded concrete-filled
tube columns with confinement effect, Hsuan-The Hu,
Chiung-Shiann Huang, Ming-Hsien Wu, and Yih-Min
Wu, J.Struct.Eng, Volume 129, Issue 10, October 2003,
Pages 1287-1430.
[6] Ehab Ellobody, Ben Young, Dennis Lam (2006) :
Behaviour of normal and high strength concrete filled
compact steel tube circular stub columns. Journal of
constructional steel research- J CONSTR STEEL RES,
Vol.62, no.7, PP.706-715, 2006.
[7] L.Guo, Sumai Zhang, Wha-Jung Kim, Gianluca Ranzi
(2007)- Behaviour of square hollow steel tubes and
steel tibes filled with concrete. ELSEVIER Journal,
Thin-walled structures 45 (2007), PP. 961-973.
[8] Liang, Qing Quan (2009) Strength and ductility of high
strength concrete-filled steel tubular beam-columns.
Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65 (3). pp.
687-698. ISSN 0143-974X
[9] Code and Commentary on Eurocode 4, 2004, Design
of composite steel and concrete structures - Part 1-1:
General rules and rules for buildings.