Professional Documents
Culture Documents
261
Table 1
Table 2
Evolution of Labor Force Participation by Economic Sectors and Sex (in Millions)
Table 3
Econornic Sector
1940:
Men ........... 70 10 20
Wornen ........ 47 11 43
1950:
Men ........... 65 13 22
Wornen ........ 30 16 54
1970:
Men ........... 51 20 29
Wornen ........ 20 10 70
Table 4
Stage of Developrnent
and Region 1940 1950 1970
Developed:
Southeast B .............. 2l.2 19.4 22.8
Interrnediate:
Subtotal ................. 16.4 11.2 17.2
South ................... 19.1 13.5 19.4
Southeast A .............. 15.0 10.2 15.6
Middle-West ............. 11.8 4.8 13.6
Underdeveloped:
Subtotal ................. 20.3 11.5 16.1
North ................... 2l.5 11.3 14.2
Northeast ................ 20.1 11.6 16.3
SouRcE.-Demographic Census of Brazilian Population. 1940, 1950, and
1970.
east B) shows the highest level of participation in all three census years,
the intermediate region had the lowest level of participation in 1940,
and the middle level in 1970 (17.2). The underdeveloped region, which
had levels almost similar to the most developed region in 1940, could not
sustain that rate of participation in 1970. Within the broad category of
intermediate development, the Southeast A and the Middle-West re-
gions showed lower levels of participation in the three census years,
which indicates a slow rate of industrial development, as compared with
the South. The Middle-West had a very large percentage increase in
1970 over 1950 (8.8 percent), because of the move of the federal capital
to Brasilia, but it still has the lowest rate of participation (13.6 percent).
Women's employment in the agricultural sector is inversely related
to regional development (see table 5). Whereas in 1940, 33 percent of
the women in the developed region were in rural labor, in the inter-
mediate region 50 percent of them were, and in the less developed, 55
percent. Regional variations in the forms of agrarian production and
patterns of landholdings always existed in Brazil. For example, in the
sugar plantations of the Northeast, pe asants worked for the landowner
in exchange for plots of land which they cultivated for personal con-
sumption. This type of latifundia system has persisted in the less de-
veloped regions, where agricultural technology is almost primitive. 16 In
these areas, therefore, there is a high percentage of women in agricul-
ture. In the Southeast and South, where commercial agriculture such as
coffee plantations dominated, women had fewer opportunities to work
Table 5
Development:
1940 ................. 33 14 53
1950 ................. 18 24 59
1970 ................. 5 17 78
Intermediate:
1940 ................. 50 7 44
1950 ................. 33 10 58
1970 ................. 24 6 70
U nderdeveloped:
1940 ................. 55 11 35
1950 ................. 43 11 46
1970 ................. 36 7 57
SoURCE.-Demographic Census 01" Brazilian Population. 1940. 1950, and 1970.
17. Ibid., p. 1.
18. Ibid., pp. 7-8.
19. See Verena Martinez Allier, "As mulheres do caminho de turma," Debate e critica,
no.5 (March 1975).
20. Madeira and Singer.
21. See P. Singer, "Forc;:a de trabalho e emprego no Brasil: 1920/69," Cadernos de
pesquisa, no. 3 (So Paulo: CEBRAP, 1970).
'"tj~'"
'-' '-'
2.
~
Q
(H
Table 6
t'> '":I
;;!
'"i
0 Percentage of Female Labor Force Participation in the Tertiary Economic Sector, by Region and Year
q,o
=
o...,t'> Private Consumption
rJ~
..=-'""'
~ :;0
= Stage of Development Collective Personal
~ '"i and Year Productive Consumption Professional Services Others Total
o 3
'":I~
;:: g. Developed:
~ =
~
1940 ................. 4.1 7.5 0.5 40.3 0.4 52.8
=
Cl.
1950 .................
1970 .................
6.7
11.3
12.9
18.8
0.8
1.6
37.9
43.5
0.3
2.8
58.6
78.0
rt'> Intermediate :
~
'"i 1940 ................. 2.0 5.7 0.3 35.1 0.4 43.5
=
S' 1950 ................. 4.7 12.3 0.5 39.6 0.4 57.5
~
1970 ................. 7.0 21.0 0.9 39.0 2.4 70.3
rJ
o Underdeveloped:
3 1940 ................. 1.7 2.7 0.2 29.7 0.4 34.7
"0
~ 1950 ................. 3.8 7.8 0.4 33.4 0.3 45.7
=
~ 1970 ................. 5.9 15.6 0.4 32.2 2.7 56.8
Brazil:
1940 ................. 2.5 5.0 0.3 34.4 0.4 42.6
1950 ................. 5.2 1l.l 0.6 36.9 0.3 54.1
1970 ................. 8.3 18.7 1.0 38.9 2.6 69.5
SouRcE.-Demographic Census 01 Brazilian Population. 1940. 1950. and 1970.
270 Glaura de Miranda
Table 7
ciS' ciS'
......
=- =-
~~
~~
e= QN
~. Q
~ (;J
~
CI>
"='
... Table 8
=.- 0
~,o
C
...,~ = Distribution of So me Occupations of Women in 1970, by Marital Status and Socioeconomic Status
(")~
;:;.=- =
= Q'
... Married Women, Husband Present Single Women Living with Parents
~
c
...3
Socioeconomic Status (%) Mean Socioeconomic Status (%) Mean
..."='=...
~ ~. Years of Years of
CI'
CI> =
C
=
Occupation Low Middle High Schooling Low Middle High Schooling
=
Q..
Farm laborer ................. 33.75 1.86 0.03 1.42 28.68 6.25 2.27
r
~ Domestic maid ................ 9.45 1.66 0.03 1.87 2.13 1.07 0.60 3.28
= Industrial worker ............. 17.51 11.65 0.97 3.19 14.09 8.89 2.21 4.03
~
S' Others ....................... 24.81 19.64 14.26 3.91 30.46 18.78 16.02 4.21
~ Commerical worker ........... 3.15 5.86 6.07 5.34
1.52 4.20 9.17 1.98
(")
c Personal services .............. 0.63 2.60 0.10 4.58 0.92 1.38 0.27 5.15
3 Nurses ....................... 1.51 4.06 1.81 5.83 1.49 1.82 0.23 5.65
'0
= Clerical worker ................ 1.64 15.38 15.97 7.79 8.13 24.66 34.01 7.92
=
~ Elementary teacher ............ 6.80 31.96 38.17 9.14 6.96 23.08 29.59 9.43
Secondary teacher ............. 0.63 4.26 17.04 11.42 0.78 3.56 10.91 11.94
Professional worker ........... 0.13 1.07 10.10 13.71 0.28 1.34 4.19 13.28
SOt:RCE.-Demographic Census of Brazilian Population, 1970, da ta aggregated by author.
272 Glaura de Miranda
Table 9
School of Education
Federal U niversity of M inas Gerias
Belo Horizonte, Brazil