You are on page 1of 1

Case No.

28
Execution; Updating of Award
Metroguards Security v. Hilongo 279 of the LC. The re-computation of the consequences of illegal
G.R. 215630 Mar 9, 2015 dismissal upon execution of the decision does not constitute an
Facts: alteration or amendment of the final decision being implemented.
Apr 30, 2010 Decision: LA ruled respondent was illegally dismissed The illegal dismissal ruling stands; only the computation of
awarding him back-wages which includes Basic Salary, 13th Month monetary consequences of this dismissal is affected, and this is
Pay, Service Incentive Leave and Separation Pay. not a violation of the principle of immutability of final judgments.
Sept 30, 2010: NLRC reversed LA decision Nacar reiterated the Court's ruling in the earlier cases of Session
Sept 7, 2012: CA reversed the NLRC decision and reinstated LA Delights and Gonzales. We thus cannot agree with petitioners'
decision dated Apr 30, 2010. Petitioners MR was denied by the contention that a decision that has acquired finality becomes
CA and such was no longer appealed to SC. immutable and unalterable. The re-computation of the
Hilongo filed a motion for Entry of Judgment and motion for consequences of illegal dismissal upon execution of the decision
clarification of the decision praying that the CAs decision of Mar does not constitute an alteration or amendment of the final
26, 2013 be clarified and interpreted to include the amount of the decision being implemented. The illegal dismissal ruling stands;
award as states in the LA decision. only the computation of monetary consequences of this dismissal
CA granted the motion for entry of judgment and noted Hilongos is affected, and this is not a violation of the principle of
motion for clarification of Decision/Reso. CA held that when an immutability of final judgments
appellate court affirms LAs ruling, it is understood that awards we DENY the instant petition and AFFIRM withMODIFICATION the
due to the illegally dismissed employee shall be recomputed in Decision dated July 22, 2014 and Resolution dated
order to account for the period of time that has lapsed from the Novr 18, 2014 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 134501.
rendition of the LAs decision up to its finality. Hilongo filed a The dispositive portion of the Decision dated July 22, 2014 of the
motion for issuance of writ of execution alleging the the LAs Court of Appeals inCA-G.R. SP No. 134501 shall read as follows:
award is insufficient and there is a need to recomputed the award. WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the petition is GRANTED.
LA was ordered to award P170,520.31 as stated in its decision. The Decision dated November 29, 2013 and Resolution dated Jan
CA filed for certiorari before the CA. It was subsequently granted. 16, 2014 of public respondent NLRC, 2nd Division, in NLRC LER
Hence, this petition. N[o]. 11-322-13/NLRC LAC N[o]. 07-001-485-10 (NLRC NCR-10-
Issue: Whether CA erred in ordering the re-computation of Hilongos 14411-09) are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The case is
monetary award. NO. hereby REMANDED to the Labor Arbiter for the RECOMPUTATION
Ruling: of the total monetary benefits due to petitioner [Hilongo]. The
Nacar v. Gallery Frames: no essential change is made by a Labor Arbiter is further DIRECTED to incorporate the ff in the re-
recomputation as this step is a necessary consequence that computation: (1) Additional backwages and separation pay from
flows from the nature of the illegality of dismissal declared by May 1, 2010 to April 26, 2013, or the date when the April 30, 2010
the Labor Arbiter in that decision. A recomputation (or an Decision of LA Macam became final and executory; (2) Interest of
original computation, if no previous computation has been made) twelve percent (12%) per annum of the total monetary awards,
is a part of the law specifically, Art 279 of the LC and the computed from April 26, 2013 to June 30, 2013 and six percent . . .
established jurisprudence on this provision that is read into the (6%) per annum from July 1, 2013 until their full satisfaction.
decision. By the nature of an illegal dismissal case, the reliefs
continue to add up until full satisfaction, as expressed under Art

You might also like