Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
1. Theoretical frameworks that underpin research.
2. Alternative research methodologies.
3. Selected key contemporary issues in the field of business and management.
For this assignment, you will need to select one of the options below for your assignment:
There have been some surprising changes in a number of countries over recent years including
the election of Donald Trump, continued conflict in Syria, growing pressure on the Greek
economy and the UK choosing to leave the EU. These have led to some surprising policy
decisions and a rapidly changing environment for businesses that operate in these and similar
countries
/conversion/tmp/scratch/362168076.doc 02/08/2017
Select a large business which will be, or has been affected by current environmental turbulence
and identify what analytical tools you would recommend the company use to fully explore the
current risks it faces.
Detail and justify the teams of staff that should be responsible for monitoring the environment
and gathering the information needed to inform future decision making.
Note that at the end of your essay you must include a reflection on how the feedback
from your first assignment has informed the preparation of your second assignment.
Issues that you might want to reflect on could include;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further guidance
Guidance for option 1:
In order to write a fully rounded assignment you must explore the reasons why the company
has selected the differing market entry methods that it has. For example a business may select
franchising to reduce their own financial risk and overcome host country cultural issues rapidly,
whereas they may have selected a greenfield venture in a highly attractive, stable country
because of the long term benefit offers.
Please ensure that simple exporting is not considered viable for this assignment as one of the
methods.
Before selecting your company, research carefully to ensure you can discuss at least two
distinct and varying methods of entry in detail, considering it against the choices made by
competitors and whether this has offered any advantages or risks to the business.
Ensure you critically analyse the choices made for the business and the risks of these
approaches along with the benefits it has offered.
It is quite feasible to select a business which has experienced a market entry failure which has
led to withdrawal as this allows you a good opportunity to explore why the entry method failed
and how the company has attempted to overcome it. Should you select this route, please
ensure the second market entry discussion is a success.
There have been some surprising changes in economies over recent times including the
election of Donald Trump as US president, unrest in Syria, the political turbulence in France,
/conversion/tmp/scratch/362168076.doc 02/08/2017
continuing terrorism, pressure in the Greek economy and the UK leaving the EU. These have
led to some surprising policy decisions and a rapidly changing environment for businesses.
In order to identify the key risks you think the business is facing, briefly discuss the top
analytical tools you would recommend it to use to effectively scan this changing environment.
Such tools could include Porters, BCG, PESTLE, 5 Ms, 3Cs etc. You will need to research and
identify common analytical tools used within industry. When you discuss the tools, tie them
back directly to the benefit offered to your business, rather than having a generic discussion
about the tools.
Select a large business which will be, or has been affected by current environmental turbulence
and ensure you research it sufficiently well that you can identify how it has/will affect the
business as well as addressing the key issues it needs to try to influence to improve its
position.
When considering the teams of people that should gather and report on the environment,
consider how businesses commonly manage this. Customer facing teams (sales staff) will
gather some customer and market information, the marketing or analytics team may gather
macro environmental data, while internal sales scan competitors (but consider the ethics of
this).
Students should identify and justify how your company should/does collect their information,
identify the key information areas that are the most important for your company to collect along
with an explanation of why. Discuss the frequency with which it needs to be updated to keep it
current and valid and the key decision making areas that the information should support.
1. Clear identification of sources using Harvard referencing system as you are required to
read widely on your chosen topic.
2. Ensure you critically analyse the companys approach to the issue under review.
You may wish to check your draft for plagiarism by using the Turnitin system. This checks the
originality of your work. Instructions will be provided on Studynet Module site in the Assignment
section. University regulations are strictly applied in the area of plagiarism. When you submit
your essay you will confirm the following: I certify that this piece of assessment is my own work
that it is has not been copied from elsewhere, and that any extracts from books, papers, or
other sources have been properly acknowledged as references or quotations.
/conversion/tmp/scratch/362168076.doc 02/08/2017
Assessment and grading criteria
ESSAY Presentation & structure Use & presentation of Harvard Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Business Application & Integration Discussion /Analysis /Critical Reflective element
Referencing Definitions/ Calculations of Data/Literature evaluation &/or Reflection
Task details Follows essay structure & Follows Harvard style for in-text Content included Full exploration Integration & application of Line of argument, development Ability to reflect on assignment
keeps to word limit of 2,000 citation & Reference of industry context and information Thorough review of of discussion Critical one feedback and how it
with evidence of an articulate List Students should critical detail of company key constraints/issues that affected review of the has informed approach
and fluent writing style. minimally use 15-20 actions/decisions in relation the organisation and the decisions success/failure or the to assignment two.
sources including at to the key topic. made in relation to the topics main topic area.
least TWO textbooks
and TWO journal
article
/marks / 5 Marks / 10 Marks / e.g. 25 Marks /e.g. 25 Marks /e.g. 25 Marks /e.g. 10 Marks
80-100 Outstanding... Presentation & Outstanding... Standard of Outstanding... Exploration of topic Outstanding... Business insight Outstanding... Level of
essay structure, with numbered referencing within text & showing excellent knowledge & & application. discussion/analysis/ critical
Outstanding paragraphs, list of consistent use of Harvard understanding through thorough & Breadth, depth & integration of evaluation &/or reflection.
contents/figures &appendices. referencing system. appropriate research. literature/data into work. Highly developed/ focused work.
Articulate & fluent academic Accuracy of in-text references & Impressive choice and range of
writing style with ideas cross full details shown in Reference appropriate content.
referenced. No grammatical / list.
spelling errors.
70-79 Excellent ... Presentation & Excellent... Standard of Excellent ... Level of knowledge & Excellent ... Business insight & Excellent... Level of
essay structure, with numbered referencing within text & understanding demonstrated. application. discussion/analysis/ critical
Excellent paragraphs, list of consistent use of Harvard Evidence of appropriate reading. Breadth, depth & integration of evaluation &/or reflection clearly
contents/figures, appendices & referencing system. Covers all relevant points & issues. literature/data into work. developing points in the
cross referencing. Articulate & Accuracy of in-text references & appropriate way with thorough
fluent academic writing style. full details shown in Reference consideration of all possibilities.
Only a minor error. list.
60-69 Very good... Presentation & Very good... Standard of Very good... Level of knowledge & Very good... Business insight & Very good... Level of
essay structure, paragraphing, referencing within text & understanding demonstrated. application. discussion/analysis/ critical
Very Good use of numbering, list of consistent use of Harvard Covers most relevant points & Breadth, depth & integration of evaluation &/or reflection & a
contents/figures, appendices & referencing system. issues. literature/data into work. few ideas/points could benefit
cross referencing. Accuracy of in-text references & Few errors / omissions in from further development &/or
Fluent academic writing style. full details shown in Reference content/calculations. evaluation/comparison.
Very few grammatical errors & list.
spelling mistakes.
50-59 Good... Clear presentation & Good... Standard of Good... Grasp of the topic & some Good... Business insight & Good... Level of
essay structure, use of referencing within text & of its implications presented. application. discussion/analysis/ critical
Good numbering & appendices. consistent use of Harvard Knowledge & understanding is Breadth, depth & integration of evaluation &/or reflection but
Writing is mainly clear but some referencing system. demonstrated. Minor errors / literature/data into work. more ideas/points could be
spelling &/ or grammatical Accuracy of in-text references & omissions in content/ calculations. addressed /developed further.
errors. full details shown in Reference
list.
40-49 Satisfactory... Basic essay Satisfactory... Basic Satisfactory... Content / level of Satisfactory... Business insight & Satisfactory... Basic evidence
structure. referencing within text & knowledge of the topic. Addresses application. Limited integration of discussion/analysis/ critical
Satisfactory Not always written clearly & has consistent use of Harvard part of the task. Some errors / with literature/ data. evaluation &/or reflection but
grammatical & / or spelling referencing system. omissions in content/ calculations. Use of literature/data but limited some points superficially made
errors. Accuracy of in-text references & May benefit from further research. in breadth OR depth. so need further development.
full details shown in Reference
list.
30-39 Weak... Essay format, limited or Weak...Use of Harvard Weak... Limited content / Weak... Unsatisfactory evidence Weak... Limited evidence of
poor structure. referencing system with errors knowledge/ calculations. Limited or of business application & insight discussion/analysis/ critical
Marginal Muddled work with many & inconsistently applied. muddled understanding of the Work needs to show better links evaluation &/or reflection.
Fail spelling & / or grammatical Limited referencing within the topic/question. between practical application and More development & comment
errors. text. Limited accuracy of in-text Does not meet all the learning theory. needed. May need to do more
references compared to those outcomes. than describe.
in the final Reference list.
/conversion/tmp/scratch/362168076.doc 02/08/2017
Assessment and grading criteria
20 29 Inadequate... Essay format and Inadequate... Use of Harvard Inadequate... Lacking in relevant Inadequate... Lacks evidence of Inadequate... Lacking /
poor paragraphing / referencing with many errors content/ knowledge/calculations. business application & insight. inadequate level of discussion/
Clear Fail signposting. &/or inconsistencies. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Some literature irrelevant to topic. analysis/critical evaluation & /or
Inappropriate writing style Does not meet all the learning reflection. Descriptive.
Poorly written &/or poor spelling Must see ASU outcomes. Must see ASU
& grammar. Must see ASU
1 19 Nothing of merit... Poorly Nothing of merit... No or little Nothing of merit... Unsatisfactory Nothing of merit... No evidence Nothing of merit...
written work, lacking structure, attempt to use the level of knowledge demonstrated. of appropriate business Unsatisfactory level of
Little or paragraphing / signposting. recommended Harvard Content used irrelevant / not application & insight. discussion/analysis/critical
Nothing of Many inaccuracies in spelling & referencing system. appropriate/ to the topic. Does not evaluation &/or reflection
merit grammar. Must see ASU meet the learning outcomes.
Must see ASU Must see ASU
Feedback
from
lecturer
This form is used by staff & students to provide feedback to assist students future work.
/conversion/tmp/scratch/362168076.doc 02/08/2017