2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences
The Study and Application on Safety Management Assessment Model of Oil &
Gas Drilling Troop
LIU Ju-mei
PetroleumGas Engineering College
Chongqing University of ScienceTechnology
Chongqing 401331, China
e-mail:cpnsljm66@126.com
AbstractIn the field-work, the study on safety assessment
of oil & gas drilling troop management is limited. Aiming at
the characteristics of oil & gas drilling troop management,
this paper uses the Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy comprehensive
judgment method to set up the safety management
assessment model of oil & gas drilling troop. Select a drilling
troop of Changqing petroleum bureau, the model is tested
and is similar with the fact. So it is indicated that the model
is worthful and practicably in a way.
Keywords-oil & gas drilling troop; safety management
assessment; Fuzzy-AHP method; Fuzzy comprehensive
judgment
Introduction
The safety assessment is according to the content of the
feasibility study report of the construction project,
analysising and forecasting the risk of the construction
project , the sort and degree of the harmful factors, and
puting forward the reasonable safety measures and
recommendations. Safety assessment is aim to safety by
applying the theory and method of the safety system
engineering, identifying and analysising the risk and
harmful factors, to judge the severity and possibility of
accident and occupational risk, provide a scientific basis to
preventive measures and management decision. This paper
on the basis of the leadership attention, management
system and its implementation, security funds, safety
education and training , management organizations to
assess.
978-0-7695-4789-3/12 $26.00 2012 IEEE
DOI 10.1109/ICCIS.2012.350
XIA Xiao-lan
Drilling Training Centre
Shengli Drilling Engineering Technology Company
Dongying257000, Shandong, China
e-mail: 403049518@qq.com
. SETTING UP THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT INDEX SYSTEM ON DRILLING TROOP
Determining the membership of the evaluation index
is the core of the safety management assessment of oil &
gas drilling troop. Because of the nonlinearity of the
evaluation index, safety management assessment index of
each oil & gas drilling troop needs careful study, and
needs completing a large number of experiments by large
amounts of expert experience and knowledge. The safety
management assessment index of the oil & gas drilling
troop mainly includes the leadership attention,
management system and its implementation, security
funds, safety education and training , management
organizations.
A. Leadership Attention
The safety awareness of the charge decides the
emphasis on security of the corporate, related to the
prestige of safety management departments across the
enterprise. Leaders influence enterprise directly,without
the support of leaders, the result will be in vain. The
requirement of top managements in IS09000 standards
and the occupational safety and health management
system implementation audit specification has indicated
this. Safety production responsibility system confirm the
function of leadership in safe production process,
therefore, the leadership attention will be part of the
safety assessment.
B. Management System and Its Implementation
The so called "the laws are followed, the laws must
1277
be", only the safety management rules and regulations are the comparison of the relative importance of the n
made and strictly carried out, the quality of the safety elements is to get a pairwise comparison and judgment
management can be guaranteed. matrix

C. Security Funds A = ( aij ) nn

(1)
In order to realize safe production process, certain safe
Calculate the relative weight of the elements in a
investment is necessary. Security funds index mainly
depends on whether their input is in time and earmarked. single criterion. According to the
u1 , u 2 ,"u n , for the

D. Safety Education and Training judgment matrix in one criterion , using the eigenvalue
The purpose of safety education is to train qualified method to calculate the relative weight vector of the
drilling personnel. All drilling operation accidents were
criteria
W = ( w1 , w2 ," wn ) T .
eventually can be attributed to people, therefor, safety
education is extremely significant. Lack of employee Consistency test. As the result of the judgment matrix
safety education and training is the potential cause of is quanified fuzzily by experts with experience, complete
accident. The safety education and training of employee consistency is impossible. Only when C R 0.1, there
not only refers to the training of the new employee, but consistency is. When C R 0.1, it needs modifying the
also includes the continuous training of the staff, daily judgment matrix until the consistency come true.
safety education, special skills training and popularization CI
CR =
RI (2)
of knowledge of the security technology.
And R I means scale factor, which is related to n
E. Management Organizations
and obtained by checking the table 4. C I is consistency
Full-time safety management organization is the index, its computational formula is:
foundation of drilling site safety management, directly max n
CI =
affects the quality of the safety management. A drilling n 1 (3)
troop usually sets the HSE management group and the
charge is the captain. It includes the camp HSE group, And the
max means the maximal characteristic root
drilling site HSE group and the emergency leadership of the judgment matrix.
group, the cadres of the team are in charge of them. Table 1 Average random consistency index
. THE WEIGHT OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT Order of matrix 1 2 3 4 5

ASSESSMENT INDEX ON DRILLING TROOP R.I . 0 0 0.52 0.89 1.12

Order of matrix 6 7 8 9 10
Analysis the problem, determine the relationship
between each element in the system, to establish the R.I . 1.26 1.36 1.41 1.46 1.49
Order of matrix 11 12 13 14 15
hierarchical structure of the system. The number of layers
can not be restricted, but the number of the element R.I . 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.59

dominated by each element not more than nine, it will
give the pairwise comparison and judgment difficult
because of too many dominated element.
Construct a pairwise comparison and judgment matrix:
A means goal, the elements of the next layer are
u1 , u 2 , " u n , a ij means the ratio scale that the element
u i and u j relative to the importance of the target, and
using the one to nine scale to assign it. For the target A,
Calculate the synthetic weight of elements of every
layer related to target layer. Calculate the synthetic weight
should from top to bottom, combine the weight in each
criterion until the lowest layer.
THE FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE JUDGMENT MODEL OF
THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT ON DRILLING TROOP
Several factors of the second layer (the bottom layer)
determine the factor of the first layertherefore, the single
factor evaluation of every factor of the first layer, should

1278
be the result of the multiple factor comprehensive
lowest layer relative to the highest layer to be
i (x ) ,
evaluation of the second layer.
then the model of the system safety assessment to be:
Deem the judgment matrix
R i that composed of the
n
element of the second layer to be: Y = ri ( x ) i (x )
i =1 (5)
The final score of the system safety assessment can be
obtained from this model, so as to establish the theory
r i11 ri12 " ri1 p foundation of the safety assessment.
r ri 22 " ri 2 p
Ri = 7+((;$03/(
i 21

# # % #
One drilling troop of Changqing petroleum bureau is
rin1 rin 2 " rinp
tested, and there are a total of 42 operators, in which high
school or above a total of 27 person, 26 times each year
The number of j in u ij that is the "n" determines for training. And there are a total of 13management
people, in which university degree or above a total of 5
the number of matrix row, The " p " determines the
person, 9 times each year for training. For this drilling
number of matrix columns. Taking account of the weight
troop, applying the Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy comprehensive
to get the second fuzzy evaluation set that is the fuzzy
judgment method to assess the risk as follows:
comprehensive evaluation set Bi , Management factors include safety education and
training(D1), leadership attention(D2), management
Bi = Ai D Ri 4 system and implementation(D3), security funds input (D4)
and management organizations(D4).
ri11 ri12 " ri1 p
r ri 22 " ri 2 p
Table 2 The calculation of management factor index weight
= [ai1 , ai 2 ," ain ] D
i 21

# # # # D1 D2 D3 D4 D4

rin1 rin 2 " rinp D1 1 3 5 3 1/3
D2 1/3 1 3 3 1/5

[
= bi1 bi 2 " bip ] D3 1/5 1/3 1 1/3 1/7
D4 1/3 1/3 3 1 1/5
And the sign " D " is fuzzy operator in this formula. D4 3 5 7 5 1
In conclusion, multilevel comprehensive evaluation Characteristic -0.4213 -0.2298 -0.0777 -0.1456 -0.8616
model can reflect the level of evaluation factors of the vector
object, avoiding the disadvantage of assigning weight Weight 0.2427 0.1323 0.0448 0.0839 0.4963
when there are excessive factors. And this model is more
precise, and can reflect the relationship between factors max = 5.2768 C I = 0.0692 n =5 R I =1.12

more correctly than the single layer model. C R = 0 . 0618 0 . 1 matrix is provided with consistency.
Suppose the fuzzy membership functions of each index

to be
ri ( x ) , and suppose the weight that the index of the
Table 3 The membership of the single factor
Comments level
Factor Detailed examination item
1 2 3 4 5

safety Daily safety education 

education Safety education of special work 

1279
 and training Plan and implementation of the safety education 

Preventive safety education 

0. 0. 0.
Man Membership of safety education and training index 0 0
25 5 25
agement
Leadership attention 
factors
Safety production management system 

Managemen Safety production responsibility system of all


t system and levels

execution Operation procedure 

System implementation 

Rectification of the hidden dangers 

1.
management system and implementation 0 0 0 0
0

Safety The timely degree of safety funding 

funds
Security capital earmarking 

0. 0.
Membership of safety funds index 0 0 0
5 5
Management organizations 

(2) The proposed method is used to practice and it matches

0.25 0.5 0.25 0 0
0 the fact, to prove the feasibility of the method is better.
1.0 0 0 0
R= 0 1.0 0 0 0

0 0.5 0.5 0 0
0 1.0 0 0 0
Reference
A = (0.2427 0.1323 0.0448 0.0839 0.4963)
[1] Shi Shiliang.Study on non-linear dynamic safety
B = (0.061 0.837 0.102 0 0)
assessment models and application in coal
According to the principle of the maximum mines.[D].ChangshaZhongnan Uiversity2001
membership, the management index system belongs to the [2] He Ming.The Research of the Application of HSE
more security, basically similar with the fact. Management System in Petroleum
&21&/86,21 Industry[D].Xi'an:Xi'an Petrol Institute2002
[3] Yu Fengqing. Risk Management by Shell
(1) The safety management assessment of oil & gas
Refinery/Chemicals at Pernis, The Netherlands [J].
drilling troop in this paper can be used in the practical
8-10
Petrochemical safety technology2003196
work and provide scientific basis of decision making , and
[4] Christian Preyssl, Safety Risk Assessment and
can be applied to the assessment study of other factors in
Management ESA, Approach Reliability Engineering and
the oil & gas drilling operations.
System Safety, 1995(49):303-309
Combine the Fuzzy-AHP method with the expert's
[5] Usha Shama, Use of recursive methods in Fuzzy fault
idea, use the MATLAB procedures to calculate and
tree analysis: an aid to quantitative risk analysis,
determine the safety evaluation indexe weight. Apply the
Reliability Engineering and Safety, 41(1993):231-237
Fuzzy comprehensive judgment to evaluate the safety
managment assessment system of oil & gas drilling troop
roundly.

1280
[6] Liu Yuji. Petroleum Engineering Euzzy
Mathematics[M].Chengdu University of Science and
Technology Press1994
[7] Zhang Jijun.Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
FAHP[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics2000
80-88
142

1281