Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tic surfaces with many lines, studying their group of linear automor-
phisms. In particular, we find two of the three still unknown quartics
with more than 52 lines. We relate certain automorphisms to particular
configurations of lines, such as twin lines and special lines. We answer
a question by Oguiso on a determinantal presentation of the Fermat
quartic surface.
1. Introduction
1.1. Principal results. All algebraic varieties are defined over C. If X P3
is an algebraic surface, we denote the number of lines on X by (X).
While it is classically known that a smooth cubic surface contains exactly
27 lines, the number of lines on a nonsingular quartic surface X is finite, but it
depends on X. If X is general, then (X) = 0. B. Segre first claimed in 1943
that (X) 64 for any surface [15]. His arguments, though, contained a
flaw which was corrected about 70 years later by S. Rams and M. Schtt [11].
Their result was then strongly improved by A. Degtyarev, I. Itenberg and
A. S. Sertz [6], who showed that if (X) > 52, then X is projectively
, X , X ,
equivalent to exactly one of a list of 10 surfaces called X64 , X60 60 60
X56 , X56 , Y56 , Q56 , X54 and Q54 whose Nron-Severi lattices are explicitly
known. The subscripts denote the number of lines that they contain. The
pairs (X60 , X ) and (X , X ) are complex conjugate to each other, so these
60 56 56
10 surfaces correspond to 8 different line configurations.
Seven of these 10 surfaces are already known in the literature. The surface
X64 which as an immediate corollary of this list is the only surface up to
projective equivalence which contains 64 lines was found by F. Schur in
1882 [14] and is given by the equation
x0 (x30 x31 ) = x2 (x32 x33 ).
The surfaces with 60 lines were found by Rams and Schtt. An equation
is contained in [11]. It was found while studying a particular 6-
for X60
dimensional family Z of quartics containing a line intersecting 18 or more
other lines (see 4.4).
The surfaces X60 and X were found by using positive characteristic
60
methods [12]. These surfaces are still smooth and contain 60 lines when
reduced modulo 2. According to Degtyarev [4], 60 lines is the maximal
2. Lattices
Let R be Z, Q or R. An R-lattice is a free finitely generated R-module L
equipped with a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form h , i : L L R.
Let n be the rank of a Z-lattice L and choose a basis {e1 , . . . , en } for L.
The matrix whose (i, j)-component is hei , ej i is called a Gram matrix for L.
The determinant of this matrix does not depend on the choice of the basis.
It is called the determinant of L and denoted det L.
2.1. Positive sign structures. By a well-known theorem of Sylvester, any
R-lattice admits a diagonal Gram matrix whose diagonal entries are 1.
The numbers s+ of +1 and s of 1 are well defined and the pair (s+ , s )
is called the signature of L. A lattice is positive definite if s = 0, negative
definite if s+ = 0, or indefinite otherwise. It is hyperbolic if s+ = 1.
A positive sign structure of L is the choice of a connected component of
the manifold parametrizing oriented s+ -dimensional subspaces of L such
that the restriction of h , i to is positive definite.
By definition, the signature and the positive sign structure of a Z- or
Q-lattice L are those of L R.
2.2. Discriminant forms. Let D be a finite abelian group. A finite sym-
metric bilinear form on D is a a homomorphism b : D D Q/Z such that
b(x, y) = b(y, x) for any x, y D. A finite quadratic form on D is a map
q : D Q/2Z such that
(i) q(nx) = n2 q(x) for n Z, x D;
(ii) the map b : D D Q/Z defined by (x, y) 7 (q(x + y) q(x)
q(y))/2 is a finite symmetric bilinear form.
A finite quadratic form (D, q) is non-degenerate it the associated finite sym-
metric bilinear form b is non-degenerate. We denote by O(D, q) the group
of automorphisms of a non-degenerate finite quadratic form (D, q).
Let L be a Z-lattice. The dual lattice L of L is the group of elements
x L Q such that hx, vi Z for all v L. The dual lattice L is a free
Z-module which contains L as a submodule of finite index. In particular, L
and L have the same rank.
A Z-lattice L is even if hx, xi 2Z holds for any x L. Given an even
Z-lattice L, the discriminant form (DL , qL ) of L is the finite quadratic form
on the group DL := L /L defined by qL (x) = hx, xi mod 2Z, where x DL
denotes the class of x L modulo L.
2.3. Genera. Let (s+ , s ) be a pair of non-negative integers and (D, q) be
a non-degenerate finite quadratic form. The genus G determined by (s+ , s )
and (D, q) is the set of isometry classes of even Z-lattices L of signature
sign(L) = (s+ , s ) and discriminant form (DL , qL )
= (D, q).
or
The oriented genus G determined by (s+ , s ) and (D, q) is the set of
equivalence classes of pairs (L, ), where L is a lattice whose isometry class
belongs to G, and is a positive sign structure on L. We say that (L, ) and
4 DAVIDE CESARE VENIANI
(L , ) are equivalent if there is an isometry L
L which maps to .
There is an obvious forgetful map G or G.
3. Fano configurations
A d-polarized lattice is a hyperbolic lattice S together with a distinguished
vector h S such that h2 = d, called the polarization. A line in a polarized
lattice (S, h) is a vector v S such that v 2 = 2 and v h = 1. The set of
lines is denoted by Fn(S, h). A configuration is a 4-polarized lattice (S, h)
which is generated over Q by h and all lines in Fn(S, h). A configuration is
rigid if rank S = 20.
Let X P3 be a nonsingular quartic surface. The primitive sublattice
F(X) of H 2 (X, Z) spanned over Q by the plane section h and the classes
of all lines on X is called the Fano configuration of X. The plane section
defines a polarization of F(X). A configuration is called geometric if it is
isometric as a polarized lattice to the Fano configuration of some quartic
surface.
This number does not depend on the T and chosen. The number of
projective equivalence classes is equal to
[2, 0, 38]
Y48 48 48 24 76 no
[8, 2, 10]
[2, 1, 40]
Y48 12 12 6 79 [4, 1, 20] no
[8, 1, 10]
Q48 128 16 8 80 [8, 4, 12] no
SYMMETRIES AND EQUATIONS OF SMOOTH QUARTICS WITH MANY LINES 7
n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
fn 8 6 4 4 2 3 2
Two disjoint lines l , l on X are twin lines if there exists 10 other distinct
lines on X which intersects both l and l .
Proposition 4.3. If l , l are two disjoint lines on X, then the following
conditions are equivalent:
(a) l and l are twin lines;
(b) there exists a non-symplectic symmetry : X X of order 2 such
that Fix(, X) = Fix(, P3 ) = l l .
8 DAVIDE CESARE VENIANI
Proof. The implication (a) = (b) follows from [18, Remark 3.4].
Suppose that (b) holds. Up to coordinate change we can suppose that l , l
are given by x0 = x1 = 0 and x2 = x3 = 0, respectively. Then, necessarily
1
1
= .
1
1
Imposing that is a non-symplectic symmetry of X leads to the vanishing
of nine coefficients, so X belongs to the family A in [18, Proposition 3.2].
By the same proposition, l and l are twin lines.
Corollary 4.4. Suppose that l , l are twin lines and that the residual cubic
in a plane containing l splits into three lines m1 , m2 , m3 . If m1 intersects
l , then the intersection point of m2 and m3 lies on l .
Proof. The non-symplectic symmetry fixes m1 as a set, but not pointwise.
Moreover, exchanges m2 and m3 , otherwise there would be at least 3 fixed
points on m1 . As l is fixed pointwise, the intersection point of m2 and m3
lies on l .
4.4. Symmetries of order 3 and special lines. In a similar way as for
order 2, we can prove the following lemma.
Lemma 4.5. Let : Pn Pn be an automorphism of order 3.
(a) If n = 2, then Fix() consists of the disjoint union of either one
point and one line, or three points.
(a) If n = 3, then Fix() consists of the disjoint union of either one
point and one plane, or two lines, or two points and one line.
A line l on a smooth quartic X is said to be special, if one can choose
coordinates so that l is given by x0 = x1 = 0 and X belongs to the following
family found by RamsSchtt [11]:
(1) Z : x0 x33 + x1 x32 + x2 x3 q(x0 , x1 ) + g(x0 , x1 ) = 0,
where q and g are polynomials of degree 2 and 4, respectively.
Proposition 4.6. If l is a line on a smooth quartic surface X, then the
following conditions are equivalent:
(a) the line l is special;
(b) there exists a symplectic symmetry : X X of order 3 which pre-
serves each plane containing l as a set.
Proof. If (a) holds, then
1
1
(2) = ,
2
where is a primitive 3rd root of unity, is the required symmetry.
Conversely, suppose that (b) holds. Since is symplectic, Fix(, X) con-
sists of 6 distinct points. As preserves l as a set, exactly two fixed points
on l, say P1 and P2 . As all ramification points of l are fixed, P1 and P2 are
SYMMETRIES AND EQUATIONS OF SMOOTH QUARTICS WITH MANY LINES 9
The richness of the geometry of special lines comes from the presence of a
3-torsion section on a certain base change of the fibration induced by l. We
will use the following fact.
Proposition 4.7 ([11]). If l is a line of type (6, q), with q > 0, then l is
special. Moreover, each 1-fiber intersects l at a single point.
(1, 0, 0, 0)
(0, 1, 0, 0)
(0, 0, 1, 0) (0, 0, 0, 1)
Figure 1
(, 0, 1, 0)
(0, , 0, 1)
(0, 1, 0, )
(1, 0, , 0)
Figure 2
2 3 w2 + 2 4 + 2 1 wz 2 3 z 2 .
l3
(1, 0, abp, 0)
l2
(p, 0, 1, 0)
l1 (0, a, 0, bq)
(0, q, 0, 1)
l0
Figure 3
If is a primitive 12th root of unity, the lines in the plane x0 = 3 x1 are all
defined over Q(). One can check that the three lines other than l0 in this
plane have type (2, 8).
All lines intersecting both l0 and l1 (for instance, the line given by x0 x1 =
x2 + x3 = 0) are of type (4, 6).
for some a, b C {0}. The residual conics in the coordinate planes are
irreducible. Hence, there is a plane containing l0 different from x0 = 0 and
x1 = 0 where the residual cubic splits into three lines. We let m1 be the line
intersecting l2 , which must be of type (5, 3). By Corollary 4.4, the point of
intersection of the other two lines lies on l0 . We introduce two parameters
p, q C, so that m1 is given by x0 px1 = x2 qx3 = 0. After imposing
all conditions, we normalize all remaining coefficients except a by rescaling
variables. We find that X is given by a polynomial of the form
= t4 P Q2 R 3 ,
a4 3 a3 + 2 a2 + 3 a + 1,
a4 + 3 a3 + 2 a2 3 a + 1, or
a12 4 a10 + 2 a8 + 5 a6 + 2 a4 4 a2 + 1.
tion Y52 . Then X contains two intersecting lines l and l of type (4, 6).
0 1
We let l0 and l1 be their respective twin lines. As these lines form a quad-
rangle, we can choose coordinate so that l0 : x0 = x1 = 0, l0 : x2 = x3 = 0,
l1 : x0 = x3 = 0, l1 : x1 = x2 = 0. The residual conics in the coordinate
planes are irreducible. Moreover, there exists a unique symplectic symmetry
of order 2 which fixes these four lines. It follows that the two lines fixed in
P3 by must be the only two lines not contained in X joining two vertices
of the quadrangle, namely x0 = x2 = 0 and x1 = x3 = 0, so is given by
the matrix in (3).
Let be one of the two symplectic symmetries of order 4. We have
(l0 ) = l1 and (l0 ) = l1 and 2 = . After rescaling variables, is given by
1
1
= ,
1
m
Q3
P Q0
Figure 4
list of values for p. Looking also at the determinant of m, it turns out that
p is a root of
11 2 7
p3 p p 1.
9 3
Since Cl(Y52 ) = 3, each root corresponds to a different projective equiv-
alence class. In particular, the real root corresponds to the surface with
transcendental lattice [2, 0, 38].
6.4. Configuration Q 52 . Let X be a quartic surface containing configura-
tion Q52 . Then X contains exactly 4 lines l0 , . . . , l3 of type (5, 0). Since these
lines intersect each other pairwise, they are coplanar. Moreover, there exists
a symplectic automorphism which fixes each li . It follows that l0 , . . . , l3
form a star, otherwise would fix three points on at least one li , so it would
fix the whole line, but this cannot happen, as is symplectic. By Lemma 4.1,
fixes two lines m , m in P3 pointwise. If P is the center of the star and
Qi is the other point on li fixed by for i = 0, . . . , 3, then necessarily all Qi
lie on one of the two lines, say m , and the other line m contains P . All
symmetries of X fix P .
There is a non-symplectic symmetry of order 3 which fixes each li and
commutes with ; hence, fixes each Qi . This means that, as an auto-
morphism of P3 , fixes m pointwise. Its invariant lattice has rank 4, so
by results of Artebani, Sarti and Taki [2], Fix(, X) consists of one smooth
curve C and exactly one point. By Lemma 4.5, the curve C must be the
intersection of X with a plane in Fix(, P3 ); moreover, necessarily con-
tains m , but not P , since C is smooth. Let R be the point of intersection of
and m . If R X, then , being of order 3, would fix at least three points
on m , so it would fix the whole line m pointwise. This is impossible since
Fix(, P3 ) = {P }, so R / X and m X consists of four distinct points.
There exists also a symplectic symmetry such that 2 = . Since
commutes with and , (R) = R, so fixes m pointwise. Up to
relabeling, (l0 ) = l3 and (l1 ) = l2 . We choose coordinates in such a way
that P = (0, 0, 1, 0), Q0 = (0, 0, 0, 1), Q3 = (0, 1, 0, 0), and R = (1, 0, 0, 0),
as in Figure 4. After rescaling, the automorphisms and are given by
1 1
1
and =
1
= ,
1
1 1
SYMMETRIES AND EQUATIONS OF SMOOTH QUARTICS WITH MANY LINES 17
= t3 (a3 t3 1)3 P,
where P is a polynomial in s = t3 of degree 4. As the line l1 is of type (3, 4),
the resultant of P must vanish. Knowing also that m is of type (2, 7), it
follows that a must be a root of the following polynomial:
11 2 10 1
a3 a + a .
3 9 9
Since Cl(X51 ) = 3, each root corresponds to a different projective equiv-
alence class. In particular, the real root corresponds to the surface with
transcendental lattice [6, 3, 16].
7.2. Models of the Fermat quartic surface. Let X48 be the Fermat
quartic surface (which is the only surface up to projective equivalence con-
taining configuration X48 ) and let X56 be one of the two surfaces containing
configuration X56 (which are complex conjugate to each other). Shioda first
noticed that X48 and X56 are isomorphic to each other as abstract K3 sur-
faces. An explicit equation for X56 and an explicit isomorphism between
X48 and X56 were found by Shimada and Shioda [16]. The two surfaces are
not projectively equivalent to each other, but they form an Oguiso pair.
According to Degtyarev [5], there are no other smooth quartic models
of the Fermat quartic andcuriously enough(X56 , X56 ) is also an Oguiso
pair, but (X48 , X48 ) is not (cf. [5, 6.5]).
7.3. A determinantal presentation. Oguiso asked in his paper [10] for
explicit equations defining the complete intersection S in P3 P3 projecting
onto X48 and X56 . Here we provide such equations. In what follows we let
be a primitive 8th root of unity.
The explicit isomorphism f : X48 X56 can be found in [16, Table 4.1].
The surface S is the graph of f .
Generically, a hypersurface of bidegree (1, 1) in P3 P3 is defined by
16 coefficients. Choosing 12 closed points x1 , . . . , x12 on X48 in a suitable
way, one can find 12 linearly independent conditions on these coefficients by
imposing that (xi , f (xi )) belongs to S for each i = 1, . . . , 12. The points
chosen are
(0, 0, 1, ), (0, 0, 1, 5 ), (0, 1, 0, 5 ), (0, 1, 0, 7 ), (1, 0, 0, ), (1, 0, 0, 5 ),
(1, 0, 0, 7 ), (1, 0, 5 , 0), (1, , 0, 0), (0, 1, , 0), (0, 1, 3 , 0), (, 2 , , 1),
but of course this choice is quite arbitrary.
One ends up with a vector space of dimension 4 of polynomials of bidegree
(1, 1). The following four polynomials Q0 , . . . , Q3 form a basis of that vector
space.
Q0 = 3 x0 y2 + x3 y0 + x1 y0 x2 y2 ,
Q 1 = 3 x3 y 1 3 x0 y 3 + 2 x2 y 3 + x1 y 1 ,
Q 2 = 2 1 x2 y 0 2 + 2 1 x0 y 1 2 2 x1 y 1
+ 2 1 x2 y 1 + 2 1 x0 y 2 3 + 1 x1 y 2
3 + + 2 x3 y 2 3 + x0 y 3 3 + 1 x1 y 3
+ 2 + 1 x2 y 3 + x2 y 2 + x1 y 0 ,
1 1 3
Q 3 = 3 x3 y 3 4 3 + 3 2 2 + 1 x1 y 0
+ x2 y 0
6 2
1 3 2
1 3 1 2
+ 2 + + 1 x1 y 1 + x2 y 1 + + 1 x0 y 2
6 2 3
1 2 1 1 3
3 3 + 2 2 2 x2 y 2
+ + 1 x1 y 2 + + + 1 x0 y 3
2 6 3
1 2 1 3
+ 1 x1 y 3 + + 2 x2 y 3 + x0 y 0 .
2 6
20 DAVIDE CESARE VENIANI
References
1. Sang Yook An, Seog Young Kim, David C. Marshall, Susan H. Marshall, William G.
McCallum, and Alexander R. Perlis, Jacobians of genus one curves, J. Number Theor.
90 (2001), 303315.
2. Michela Artebani, Alessandra Sarti, and Shingo Taki, K3 surfaces with non-symplectic
automorphisms of prime order, Math. Z. 268 (2011), 507533.
3. Wolfram Decker, Gert-Martin Greuel, Gerhard Pfister, and Hans Schnemann, Sin-
gular 4-1-0 A computer algebra system for polynomial computations, 2016,
http://www.singular.uni-kl.de.
4. Alex Degtyarev, Lines in supersingular quartics, (2016), preprint, arXiv:1604.05836.
5. , Smooth models of singular K3-surfaces, (2016), preprint, arXiv:1608.06746.
6. Alex Degtyarev, Ilya Itenberg, and Ali Sinan Sertz, Lines on quartic surfaces, Math.
Ann. (2016), preprint, arXiv:1601.04238.
7. The GAP Group, GAP Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.8.7, 2017,
http://www.gap-system.org.
8. Viacheslav V. Nikulin, Finite groups of automorphisms of Khlerian K3 surfaces,
Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obshch. 38 (1979), 75137 (Russian).
9. , Integral symmetric bilinear forms and some of their applications, Math. USSR
Izvestija 14 (1980), no. 1, 103167.
10. Keiji Oguiso, Isomorphic quartic K3 surfaces in the view of Cremona and projective
transformations, Taiwanese J. Math. 21 (2017), no. 3, 671688.
11. Sawomir Rams and Matthias Schtt, 64 lines on smooth quartic surfaces, Math. Ann.
362 (2015), no. 1, 679698.
12. , At most 64 lines on smooth quartic surfaces (characteristic 2), (2017),
preprint, arXiv:1512.01358v2.
13. The Sage Developers, Sagemath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version
8.0), 2017, http://www.sagemath.org.
14. Friedrich Schur, Ueber eine besondre Classe von Flchen vierter Ordnung, Math. Ann.
20 (1882), 254296.
15. Beniamino Segre, The maximum number of lines lying on a quartic surface, Q. J.
Math. 14 (1943), 8696.
16. Ichiro Shimada and Tetsuji Shioda, On a smooth quartic surface containing 56 lines
which is isomorphic as a K3 surface to the Fermat quartic, Manuscripta Math. 153
(2016), no. 12, 279297.
17. Bert van Geemen and Alessandra Sarti, Nikulin involutions on K3 surfaces, Math. Z.
255 (2007), 731753.
18. Davide Cesare Veniani, The maximum number of lines lying on a K3 quartic surface,
Math. Z. 285 (2017), no. 3, 11411166.