You are on page 1of 3

DESI AYU RAHMAWATI

K3-6D
0514040118

ABSTRACT

PT. IPMOMI is prayer one of private companies that produce an electrical


power which is the 5 hectare of its power plant area is located on sub-district
PAITON Company unit 7 and 8. Both generating unit has 615 MW of production
capacity, so the total of electrical power production from both generating unit is
1230. Purpose of this study is to identify, calculate risk and determine the types of
components that can cause damage to the turbine system Unit 8 Paiton Probolinggo.
This research applied risk management method to identify and evaluate the failure
risk. Every mechanism of its failure mode are analyzed by using FTA (Fault Tree
Anaysis). Then the causes and the effect from the system failure are analyzed by
using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis).To determine the risk value, the
risk management method uses two kinds of parameter such as likelihood and
consequences. Likelihood value is a failure frequency per year which is determined
by dividing the total time operating equipment in a year with MTTF (Mean Time
To Failure) value. Consequence value is the cost of failure risks for every single
component which are determined from cost repair, mechanic salary, operational
consequence, and loss based on times. Loss based on time is determined by using
MTTR (Mean Time To Repair) calculation. Based on the research result shown that
the total of risk value steam turbine system per year for company is Rp.
532.304.659.216,74. The equipment which has the highest risk value is control
valve with the risk value up to Rp. 72.375.127.114,70 per year. By knowing the
value and status of these risks can later be used as input for the company to prioritize
maintenance on equipment that has the highest risk value before switching to other
equipment.
Keywords: Risk, Management Risk, Reliability, FTA (Fault Tree anaysis), FMEA
(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis), Possibilities and Consequences.
DESI AYU RAHMAWATI
K3-6D
0514040118

IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF RISK STEAM TURBINE


SYSTEM USING RISK MANAGEMENT
Key Parts Abstract Official Statement
PT. IPMOMI is prayer one of Mostly,
private companies that produce background is same
an electrical power which is the with the content of
5 hectare of its power plant area final project but
is located on sub-district there is one data
PAITON Company unit 7 and that is not found in
Background 8. Both generating unit has 615 the content of final
MW of production capacity, so project (both units
the total of electrical power are operating with
production from both an average of
generating unit is 1230. 8,943,043 MW /
year.)

Purpose - There is no purpose


in abstract
Analyzed by using FTA (Fault It is same with the
Tree Anaysis). Then the causes content of final
Methods and the effect from the system project.
failure are analyzed by using
FMEA (Failure Mode and
Effect Analysis).
Based on the research result It is same with the
shown that the total of risk content of final
value steam turbine system per project.
year for company is Rp.
532.304.659.216,74. It is same
Result with the content of final
project.The equipment which
has the highest risk value is
control valve with the risk
value up to Rp.
72.375.127.114,70 per year.
With the risk priority, it is It is same with the
Conlusion hoped that the company could content of final
focus on component with the project.
highly value risk
DESI AYU RAHMAWATI
K3-6D
0514040118

ABSTRAK
PT. IPMOMI adalah salah satu perusahaan swasta yang bergerak di bidang energi
listrik dengan kawasan power plant yang berada di sub-district PLTU Paiton Unit
7 & 8. Total luas area sekitar 5 Ha, total kapasitas energi listrik yang dihasilkan
dua unit tersebut adalah 1.230 MW. Tujun dari penelitian ini adalah untuk
mengidentifikasi, menghitung nilai resiko dan menentukan jenis-jenis komponen
yang dapat menimbulkan kerusakan pada sistem Turbin Unit 8 Paiton-
Probolinggo. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Risk Management dalam
melakukan identifikasi dan evaluasi resiko kegagalan. Segala bentuk mekanisme
kegagalannya dianalisa menggunakan FTA (Fault Tree Anaysis). Sedangkan
penyebab dan dampak kegagalan sistem dianalisa menggunakan FMEA (Failure
Mode and Effect Analysis). Risk Management menggunakan parameter
kemungkinan (Likelihood) dan konsekuensi (Consequences) untuk memperoleh
nilai resiko. Nilai Likelihood adalah frekuensi kerusakan per tahun yang dicari
dengan membagi waktu equipment beroperasi selama setahun dengan nilai MTTF
(Mean Time To Failure). Nilai Consequence adalah biaya dari resiko kegagalan
untuk setiap equipment yang diperoleh dari biaya penggantian spare part (CF),
upah mainteneer, konsekuensi operasional (CO) dan kerugian berdasarkan waktu.
Kerugian berdasarkan waktu dicari berdasarkan perhitungan MTTR (Mean Time
To Repair). Nilai resiko diperoleh dari kombinasi nilai Likelihood dan
Consequences. Setelah itu nilai resiko tersebut diprioritaskan untuk mengetahui
equipment yang mempunyai nilai resiko tertinggi. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh
bahwa total nilai resiko steam turbine system yang diterima perusahaan selama
satu tahun adalah Rp. 532.304.659.216,74. Peralatan yang memiliki resiko paling
tinggi adalah Control Valve dengan nilai resiko sebesar Rp. 72.375.127.114,70
per tahun. Dengan diketahuinya prioritas resiko diharapkan perusahaan
memfokuskan pada equipment atau peralatan yang memiliki nilai resiko yang
paling tinggi.
Kata kunci: Resiko, Manajemen Resiko, Keandalan, FTA (Fault Tree Anaysis),
FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis), Likelihood dan Consequences.