1 views

Uploaded by Anonymous b2k9ABe7e

drake

- Conflicts Part 7
- Talk Astrobiologia Ifusp2007
- A Galactic Fairy Tale
- The Strange - The Estate Dossiers (2015)
- conversation paper - astronomy
- Effect Part 46
- Origin of the Universe
- P.T. Mistlberger-Essays III.pdf
- thornywayoftruthpart1maririch
- Sociable Part 4
- ONA - Dark Gods
- Love Part 30
- Management
- Astronomy OP
- Birdman From Io Synopsis Companion
- The 13 Most Important Numbers in the Universe - James D. Stein's Cosmic Numbers
- SC.eu.Eng April 2019 v5
- June 12 2016 DLS Notes
- Gravitational Waves Discovery
- Sense Part 23

You are on page 1of 4

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

DOI: 10.1089/ast.2015.1418

of Technological Species in the Universe

Abstract

In this article, we address the cosmic frequency of technological species. Recent advances in exoplanet studies

provide strong constraints on all astrophysical terms in the Drake equation. Using these and modifying the

form and intent of the Drake equation, we set a firm lower bound on the probability that one or more

technological species have evolved anywhere and at any time in the history of the observable Universe. We

find that as long as the probability that a habitable zone planet develops a technological species is larger than

*10-24, humanity is not the only time technological intelligence has evolved. This constraint has important

scientific and philosophical consequences. Key Words: LifeIntelligenceExtraterrestrial life. Astrobiology

2016, 359362.

1. Introduction 2. Method

sights into a problem can sometimes be acquired by

setting order-of-magnitude estimates of scales, limits, and

Our approach asks a very different question from the

usual treatment of the subject. Standard astrobiological

discussions of intelligent life focus on how many techno-

boundaries via combinations of constants or parameters. This logical species currently exist with which we might com-

approach can be particularly effective for problems in which municate (Vakoch and Dowd, 2015). But rather than asking

few empirically derived constraints are available, such as the whether we are now alone, we ask whether we are the only

derivation of the quantum gravitational Planck length, that is, technological species that has ever arisen. Such an approach

lp = (hG/c3)1/2, or early studies using the cosmic density pa- allows us to set limits on what might be called the cosmic

rameter (O = r/rc). Here we adopt such an approach to ad- archaeological question: How often in the history of the

dress an overarching goal of astrobiology: understanding if Universe has evolution ever led to a technological species,

humanity is alone (Sullivan and Baross, 2007; Impey whether short- or long-lived? As we shall show, providing

et al., 2012). One way of framing this question is to ask if constraints on an answer to this question has profound

other technology-building species exist now, or have ever philosophical and practical implications.

existed at any time, in the Universe. Given that we have only We first modify the Drake equation in order to address

one known example of a planet where such evolution has how many technological species have formed over the his-

occurred (and also only one example of where even microbial tory of the observable Universe. We call this number A (for

life has evolved), there seems to be little hope in determining archaeology) and use it to investigate the probability that

the fecundity of the Universe in producing technological humanity is unique (i.e., A = 1). Note that we are explicitly

species. This conclusion, however, ignores the rapid and not concerned with the average lifetime CLD of such species

substantial progress astrobiology has made in the last two or if they still exist such that we could receive their signals

decades. In particular, the empirical determination of exo- or signal them. This is in contrast to the usual Drake

planet statistics has radically changed the nature and quality equation formulation, which calculates Nc, the number of

of constraints astrobiologists now have at their disposal when technological species now existing (hence its concern with

considering the prevalence of life in the Universe. In this CLD). Given this approach, effects of time are removed where

article, we employ these new constraints to set a lower limit they normally appear in the form of star-formation rates,

on the probability that technological species have ever stellar lifetimes, technological species lifetimes, and distri-

evolved anywhere other than on Earth. bution of epochs of arising. As usual for the Drake equation,

1

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

2

Department of Astronomy and Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

359

360 FRANK AND SULLIVAN

we assume that technology is associated with planets and suring that Earth is the only location in the history of the

their host stars. cosmos where a technological civilization has ever evolved.

We define the A-form of the Drake equation, which Adopting A = 0.01 means that in a statistical sense were we

describes the total number of technological species that have to rerun the history of the Universe 100 times, only once

ever evolved anywhere in the currently observable Uni- would a lone technological species occur. A lower bound fbt

verse: on the probability is then

Nast fbt

Thus only for values of the product fbt lower than

where N* is the total number of stars, fp is the fraction of 2.5 10-24 are we likely to be alone and singular in the

those stars that form planets, np is the average number of history of the observable Universe. This limiting value of fbt

planets in the habitable zone of a star with planets, fl is the can be considered to define a pessimism line in discus-

probability that a habitable zone planet develops life, fi is the sions of the prevalence of technological civilizations on a

probability that a planet with life develops intelligence, and cosmic scale. On the other hand, if evolutionary processes

ft is the probability that a planet with intelligent life devel- lead to higher values, we can be assured that we are not the

ops technology (of the energy intensive kind such as that only instance in which the Universe has hosted a techno-

of our own civilization). logical species.

The second version of Eq. 1 reduces the right-hand side to We can generalize these results for structural scales (of

two factors, the first of which, Nast, includes all factors in- size Rs) within the Universe: galaxies, clusters of galaxies,

volving astrophysics and represents the total number of and superclusters of galaxies (Fukugita and Peebles, 2004).

habitable zone planets. The second factor, fbt, gathers the Table 1 provides typical values for these entities and lists

three factors involved with biology, evolution, and planetary the corresponding values of fbt for each of them, as well as

sociology, and represents the total biotechnical proba- for the entire Universe. For instance, for our own galaxy fbt

bility that a given habitable zone planet has ever evolved a is 1.7 10-11, meaning that another technical species has

technological species. The factor fbt = flfift is extremely un- likely occurred in the history of the Milky Way if the

certain because (a) we have no theory to guide any estimates probability of a technological species arising on a given

and (b) we have only one known example of the occurrence planet in a habitable zone is greater than one in 60 billion.

and history of life, intelligence, and technology. In what Figure 1 presents these results for given values of fbt. The

follows, we leave fbt as statistically unknown at this time and figure allows one to see the corresponding number of

examine the consequences of its taking on various values technological species that have ever arisen on various scales

depending on ones pessimism or optimism. for various assumptions of the difficulty of biology and

The key development that enables our new approach is technology to evolve.

that observations now provide accepted or statistical well-

determined values for all factors contributing to Nast. The 4. Discussion and Conclusions

importance of this accomplishment cannot be overstated

These results have wide implications. First, the long his-

until recently only one factor (N*) was known, and it was

tory of debate over extraterrestrial intelligence can be char-

entirely possible that habitable zone planets might have

acterized as one of pessimists versus optimists relative to

been extremely rare (Nast/N* << 1). But the combination of

choices for the various factors in the Drake equation (Vakoch

radial velocity, transit, and microlensing based methods

and Dowd, 2015). These debates have, however, been un-

now yields statistically well-constrained values for both fp

constrained in terms of how pessimistic one can be. With our

and np.1

approach we have, for the first time, provided a quantitative

We adopt the values fp * 1.0 (Cassan et al., 2012) and np

and empirically constrained limit on what it means to be

* 0.2 (Petigura et al., 2013); therefore Nast/N* = 0.2. Note

pessimistic about the likelihood of another technological

that the number of stars N* is also an observable quantity,

species ever having arisen in the history of the Universe. We

which depends on the size of the region being considered.

have done so by segregating newly measured astrophysical

factors from the fully unconstrained biotechnical ones, and by

3. Results

shifting the focus toward a question of cosmic archaeology

We now turn to the specific question, Has even one and away from technological species lifetimes. Our constraint

other technological species ever existed in the observable addresses an issue that is of particular scientific and philo-

Universe? We take N* = 2 1022 for the total number of sophical consequence: the question Have they ever ex-

stars in the observable Universe (Silburt et al., 2015) To isted? rather than the usual narrower concern of the Drake

address our question, A is set to a conservative value en- equation, Do they exist now? Perhaps in the long term we

should contemplate undertaking a field survey in cosmic ar-

chaeology, seeking possible evidence for such past technical

1

Rather than fp and np, some authors focus on ZE, defined as the species (Stevens et al., 2015).

occurrence rate of Earth-sized planets (12 Earth radii) in the Secondly, we note that sample sizes A of order 100 or

habitable zones of Sun-like stars. For example, one recent study 1000 have a particular importance in current discussions

based on Kepler mission transiting planets finds a value ZE * 0.06

(Silburt et al., 2015). For the purposes of our order-of-magnitude

over efforts to create a sustainable, energy-intensive, high-

estimates, which also include non-Sun-like stars, we stay with the technology civilization here on Earth (Frank and Sullivan,

factors in the conventional Drake equation. 2014). Given the challenges human society faces from

A CONSTRAINT ON TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIES IN THE UNIVERSE 361

Table 1. Limits on the Number of Technological Species Occurring on Different Scale Lengths

Scale length Size Rs (M lt-yr) No. galaxies Nast fbt for A = 1

Galaxy 0.1 1 6 10 10

1.7 10-11

Galaxy cluster 5 300 2 1013 5 10-14

Supercluster 300 3000 2 1014 5 10-15

Observable Universe 13,700 7 1010 4 1021 2.5 10-22

climate change, resource allocation, and loss of species di- changes, hydrological cycle disruptions, etc.; Frank and

versity, it is not clear if the kind of long-term global culture Sullivan, 2014). Thus modeling ensembles of such species

we hope to build is even sustainable. However A > 100 in to understand the broad classifications of their planetary

our formulation implies that the evolution of technological feedback histories is theoretically well-grounded for large-

species has occurred enough times that the ensemble of their enough values of fbt. Such a project would be an attempt to

histories (or trajectories in a suitably defined phase space) is understand both average properties like CLD as well as what

statistically meaningful. In particular, for large-enough led some trajectories to collapse and others to long-term

values of fbt, the average longevity CLD of such a sample of sustainability.

technological species does, in principle, exist. Thus if fbt is It is also possible to make the connection between our A

such that A 1000 (the statistically relevant population), it is form of the Drake equation and traditional SETI studies that

reasonable to consider that different versions of humanitys ask about Nc, the number of technological species existing

current technological experiment in the alteration of our in our galaxy now. The traditional form of the Drake

planetary system have occurred before. Note that many as- equation can be written

pects of the feedback between an energy-intensive, tech-

nological species and its host planet would depend solely on L

physical processes and constraints (atmospheric chemistry Nc Nast fbt

L

Thus Nc A L

L . As we have shown in Table 1, for each

astrophysical scale of interest s, we candefine a minimum

biotechnical probability via Asmin Nast

s s

fbt, min 1. Using

this, we can then ask at each scale how much does fbts have to

s s

be increased above fbt, min to get some desired value A

s

above Amin . Thus we can write

s s L

Ncs Nast fbt, min As

L

Table 1 for a single galaxy (our own), one has

L

Ncg 6 1010 1:7 10 11 As 10 10 As L

1010 yr

species in the Galaxy with which to make contact (Ncg 2),

the product AsCLD must be equal to 2 1010 yr. For an op-

timistic upper limit of CLD = 106 yr, As must be at least

2 104 (i.e., there must have been at least 20,000 techno-

logical species spawned across the lifetime of the Galaxy).

For a perhaps more realistic guess (based on our own civi-

FIG. 1. The number A of technological species that have lization) of CLD = 104 yr, As = 2 106.

ever occurred over the history of the Universe versus the Casting these results in a different way, one can imagine

scale size Rs of different hierarchical structures in which conducting a general Milky Way SETI search that might

their host stars are found: galaxies, clusters of galaxies, hope for one in every million stars to host a technical spe-

superclusters of galaxies, and the entire Universe. Reference cies today, which means Ncg 3 105 . To achieve this

values of A = 0.01, 1, and 100 are marked. The four curves number, if we very optimistically adopt fbt = 1, then CLD must

represent different values of fbt, the probability of a tech-

nological species arising on a given habitable zone planet. be 5 104 yr. More realistic lower values of fbt require

Only if fbt falls as low as 2.5 10-24 to 2.5 10-22 is it likely proportionately higher values for CLD to reach the desired

that no other technological species has ever arisen in the entire number of potential finds. Note that in all cases the number

Universe. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline of technological species that have ever existed in our galaxy

.com/ast) would be 6 1010 fbt.

362 FRANK AND SULLIVAN

In conclusion, we have shown that recent advances in Fukugita, M. and Peebles, P.J.E. (2004) The cosmic energy

astrobiology and exoplanet studies mean that an empirically inventory. Astrophys J 616:643668.

derived lower limit can now be placed on the probabilities Impey, C., Lunine, J., and Funes, J., editors. (2012) Frontiers of

that even one other technological species has ever evolved Astrobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

in the Universe or in our galaxy. This limit provides a Petigura, E.A., Howard, A.W., and Marcy, G.W. (2013) Prev-

framework for discussions of both life in its cosmic context alence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars. Proc Natl

and questions about trajectories of technological species Acad Sci USA 110:1927319278.

relevant to our own issues of global sustainability. Silburt, A., Gaidos, E., and Wu, Y. (2015) Statistical recon-

struction of the planet population around Kepler solar-type

Acknowledgments

stars. Astrophys J 799, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/180.

Stevens, A., Forgan, D., and OMalley James, J. (2015) Ob-

We thank Dan Watson and David Catling for comments servational signatures of self-destructive civilisations. arXiv

on the text, and Matt McQuinn, Caleb Scharf, and Gavin 1507.08530

Schmidt for discussion. Sullivan, W.T. and Baross, J.A., editors. (2007) Planets and

Life: The Emerging Science of Astrobiology, Cambridge

References University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Vakoch, D.A. and Dowd, M.F., editors. (2015) The Drake

Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Dominik, M., Horne, K., Equation: Estimating the Prevalence of Extraterrestrial

Greenhill, J., Wambsganss, J., Menzies, J., Williams, A., Jr- Life through the Ages, Cambridge University Press, Cam-

gensen, U.G., Udalski, A., Bennett, D.P., Albrow, M.D., Ba- bridge, UK.

tista, V., Brillant, S., Caldwell, J.A.R., Cole, A., Coutures, Ch.,

Cook, K.H., Dieters, S., Prester, D.D., Donatowicz, J., Fouque, Address correspondence to:

P., Hill, K., Kains, N., Kane, S., Marquette, J.-B., Martin, R., A. Frank

Pollard, K.R., Sahu, K.C., Vinter, C., Warren, D., Watson, B., Department of Physics and Astronomy

Zub, M., Sumi, T., Szymanski, M.K., Kubiak, M., Poleski, R., University of Rochester

Soszynski, I., Ulaczyk, K., Pietrzynski, G., and Wyrzykowski, Rochester, NY 14620

q. (2012) One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from

microlensing observations. Nature 481:167169. E-mail: afrank@pas.rochester.edu

Frank, A. and Sullivan, W. (2014) Sustainability and the as-

trobiological perspective: framing human futures in a plane- Submitted 5 October 2015

tary context. Anthropocene 5:3241. Accepted 16 February 2016

- Conflicts Part 7Uploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- Talk Astrobiologia Ifusp2007Uploaded bygtponte
- A Galactic Fairy TaleUploaded byJAYAKUMAR
- The Strange - The Estate Dossiers (2015)Uploaded byJosh N Oregonia
- conversation paper - astronomyUploaded byapi-302708462
- Effect Part 46Uploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- Origin of the UniverseUploaded bypianomagician
- P.T. Mistlberger-Essays III.pdfUploaded bySkyhigh101
- thornywayoftruthpart1maririchUploaded byHughe Chung
- Sociable Part 4Uploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- ONA - Dark GodsUploaded byFrater Asg
- Love Part 30Uploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- ManagementUploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- Astronomy OPUploaded byLeonardo Alves
- Birdman From Io Synopsis CompanionUploaded byBruce Edwin J Sinski
- The 13 Most Important Numbers in the Universe - James D. Stein's Cosmic NumbersUploaded byEmerson Novais Oliveira
- SC.eu.Eng April 2019 v5Uploaded byMladen Lazić
- June 12 2016 DLS NotesUploaded byDon Sandusky
- Gravitational Waves DiscoveryUploaded bySugat Srivastava
- Sense Part 23Uploaded byArdelean Gheorghe Cornel
- Geometry and DestinyUploaded byJoana Creel Saenz
- Global Emergencies and Solution to It From a New PerspectiveUploaded byJohn Paily
- Your Story 1Uploaded byVenu
- PWDs Quality of Life Trend_17July2012 Media ReleaseUploaded byVladymir Joseph Licudine
- Herzberg 2006Uploaded bykristeg
- The Formation and Early Evolution of the Milky Way GalaxyUploaded bysilverpieces
- ZoneUploaded byDFJohnso
- Quantum Jumping 1-TranscriptsUploaded bycmramos
- OptimismoUploaded byLeonardoSierra
- !Spectral Properties of the Quantum Mixmaster Universe 1703.08462Uploaded byforizsl

- Sanwellw and Smith 2008Uploaded byGiulia Licoccia
- kloosterman.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- kloosterman.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Alzofon - Anti-Gravity wth Present Technology - Implementation and Theoretical Foundation - 1981.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Alzofon - Anti-Gravity wth Present Technology - Implementation and Theoretical Foundation - 1981.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- J Phys Ther Sci_26(12)_1871-1874Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Myositis Core Set Measures of Activity Including the Mmt8 and Preliminary Definitions of Improvement 508Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Gravity DummiesUploaded byRicardo Caffe
- 0602041Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 0602041Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Alzofon - Anti-Gravity Wth Present Technology - Implementation and Theoretical Foundation - 1981Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- RH25- MelbournUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- gravitational waveUploaded byManodeep Mondal
- Klooster ManUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 81056578Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- phy2.232Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 10Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 166-179Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Testing existence of antigravity (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)Uploaded byFausto Intilla
- 9710562Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Amman and Labruyere 2017 Letter to the EditorUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- Femtosecond Laser Structuring of Janus Foam: Water Spontaneous Antigravity Unidirectional PenetratioUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 10.1.1.1009.4389Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 29_jpts-2017-158Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 24d2441437d7c2c1cae68bff934c25b9615fUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- a-0578-8081Uploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 29_jpts-2017-158.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 29_jpts-2017-158.pdfUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- CherninUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e
- 399477.fullUploaded byAnonymous b2k9ABe7e

- Ch05_SSMUploaded bylizsatoshi
- 14nopakitl Maths InvestigationUploaded byNopakit Lerthirunvibul
- Huizenga, L.a. - Mt 1,1, 'Son of Abraham' as Chris to Logical Category - HBT 30(2008), 103-113Uploaded bySteveMTN
- A Software Development ProcessUploaded byhimanshi
- ANT 3930 ReligionHealing Wright Fall2012Uploaded bysatuple66
- Darren Ambrose - Levinas, Illeity and the Persistence of SkepticismUploaded byDarren Ambrose
- Baptists and Their DoctrinesUploaded bySheni Ogunmola
- praise and worship songsUploaded byshandawanda
- Muhammad Baqir as-Sadr - Iqtisaduna (Our Economics) - Volume 02 - IUploaded byCairoden S. Dimasangca
- First Year 2 SemesterUploaded byDinesh Kumar
- Acct 530Uploaded bysocalsurfy
- Land Navigation Reaction Paper CalamUploaded byRamon Cristopher M. Calam
- collocations, modal verbsUploaded byValeria Evi
- PED4_1042Uploaded bykeethan
- 1.System Civil Engineering InformationUploaded byﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ
- 03 nam-lin_hurUploaded byAndrew Kim
- Habib on Al KawtharUploaded byDawudIsrael1
- OperationalismUploaded bythadikkaran
- priyanka becgUploaded byPriyanka Maheshwari
- periodic table text setUploaded byapi-328902337
- Basic Statistics lecture NotesUploaded byKit Lara
- Introduction(1)Uploaded bywrosman@gmail.com
- comparative study of culture of indian oil R oilUploaded byBhavani Shankar Nadavaluru
- FederalismUploaded byRachelle Ramos
- 3 Seconds to Being Your Higher - Arielle HechtUploaded byHumberto
- Selections Cicero on FateUploaded byUnknown
- Chapter 16Uploaded byArthur
- 58795973-Expert-System-for-Flexible-Manufacturing-Systems.pdfUploaded byMadan Kaushish
- The Effect of Social Media in the Studies and Lifestyle ....Uploaded bymelchie
- JD Curtis' Opening StatementUploaded byJustin Vacula