You are on page 1of 2

WATER

Renew America’s Water


Why Minnesota Needs Federal Investment in Public Water to
Provide Safe Water for Generations to Come
Fact Sheet • August 2010

M innesota’s public water systems have provided reliable access to drinking


water and safe disposal of wastewater for decades, yet a crisis looms. When
Congress passed the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that
our waterways were protected and our drinking water safe, they provided increased
funding for community water systems to meet these more protective standards.
However, since the 1980s, the federal government has been cutting back funding to
communities for water infrastructure, with assistance falling to historic lows under
the Bush administration. At the same time, many of our nation’s water systems that
were built in the early 20th century are reaching the end of their lifespan. Without
dedicated federal funding, communities simply cannot afford to make the necessary
repairs to pipes and water systems that keep our waters clean and safe. This lack of
investment in communities’ water infrastructure poses a danger to the environment
and threatens the safety of our water for future generations.

The campaign to Renew America’s Water will create a As a result, even after state contributions, State Revolving
dedicated source of federal funding, which will improve Funds fall $2.6 billion short of what is needed to maintain
water quality, protect the environment, create good jobs Minnesota’s water and sewer systems, leaving local govern-
and ensure safe, reliable water for generations to come. ments with much of the financial burden. Additional fund-
ing is necessary to maintain and improve the state’s water
quality. We need to act now to Renew America’s Water and
Reliable Access to Safe Water Is close this funding gap.
Threatened
Minnesota’s drinking water and sewer infrastructure needs Protecting Our Beaches, Rivers and
dramatically outpace available funding. According to Min-
nesota’s latest project readiness list for the Drinking Water
Lakes
State Revolving Fund (SRF) program, the state’s public Aging water infrastructure does more than threaten our
water systems need $533 million to keep our water safe.1 future access to reliable drinking water — it also harms the
In 2010, the state’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund environment in our communities. Aging sewer pipes can
program, which provides low-interest loans and grants to burst and spill untreated waste into our rivers, lakes and
maintain safe drinking water, received $22.8 million in fed- streams. This is a problem in communities across the state.
eral funding — enough to finance only 4 percent of what is According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
needed.2 Minnesota 2008 Water Quality Assessment Report, 79 per-
cent of the state’s river miles, 97 percent of its lake waters,
Minnesota’s publicly owned wastewater systems need $2.1 and 100 percent of the wetlands assessed were impaired
billion to protect water quality and public health.3 In 2010, and too polluted to support their designated uses.5
the state’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund program,
which goes toward wastewater infrastructure, received Sewage overflows and stormwater runoff can also cause
$37.8 million in federal funding — enough to finance 2 waters to be unfit for recreational use. Minnesota had 38
percent of what is needed.4 closures and advisories at beaches in 2008.6 In addition,
analysis of beach monitoring data showed that 5 percent of state and municipal governments, create hundreds of thou-
samples in Minnesota exceeded national health standards. sands of good jobs, and ensure universal access to clean
In other words, the contamination could make beachgoers drinking water for generations to come.
sick.7

Furthermore, leaks in our aging pipes lose water, even in


Take Action
parts of the country facing water shortages. According to Get involved in the campaign to Renew America’s Water.
the U.S. Geological Survey, 1.7 trillion gallons of water are Visit us at www.foodandwaterwatch.org/renew to:
lost from distribution to consumer taps — equivalent to
one out of every five gallons of drinking water.8 • Sign the petition and endorse the campaign

Increased investment in water and sewer systems will bet- • Join our team of activists who blog or write letters to
ter protect our rivers, lakes, bays and beaches and reduce the editor about the campaign
loss of treated drinking water through leaky pipes.
• Host a house party movie screening about our water
needs
Creating Quality Jobs and Investing in
Our Future • Find out more ways to get involved
Renewing America’s Water will not just provide universal
access to water and an improved environment — it will
also create hundreds of thousands of quality jobs at a time Endnotes
when our communities need it most. Minnesota’s unem-
1 Minnesota Department of Health. “Minnesota Drinking Water Re-
ployment rate continues to hover around 6.8 percent with volving Fund – 2010 Project Priority List.” August 26, 2009.
202,100 people out of work.9 2 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
“Distribution of Drinking Water SRF Appropriation. 2010 DWSRF
Allotment based on 2007 SWINSA Results.” January 15, 2010.
According to the National Utility Contractors Association, 3 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. “Clean Water Revolving Fund –
for every $1 billion spent on water infrastructure, nearly 2010 Project Priority List.” August 20, 2009.
27,000 jobs are created.10 Fully addressing the state’s 4 FY 2010 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Title VI Allotments. Janu-
ary 15, 2010.
annual water funding shortfall would generate 69,544 5 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Watershed Assess-
employment opportunities not only in the water sector ment, Tracking & Environmental Results. “Minnesota 2008 Water
but throughout the local economies that benefit from the Quality Assessment Report Assessed Waters of Minnesota by Wa-
tershed.” Available at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_index.
increased employment. Therefore, every federal dollar in- control ?p_area=MN
vested in infrastructure yields a $1.59 return to our states.11 6 Dorfman, Mark and Kristen Sinclair Rosselot. National Resources
That could put one out of every three unemployed people Defense Council “Testing the Waters 2009: A Guide to Water Qual-
ity at Vacation Beaches.” National Resources Defense Council. 2009
in the state back to work.12 Water and sewer infrastructure at MN.5.
jobs are typically filled locally, and investing now in water 7 Dorfman, Mark and Kristen Sinclair Rosselot. National Resources
and sewer systems can generate solid economic growth Defense Council “Testing the Waters 2009: A Guide to Water Qual-
ity at Vacation Beaches.” National Resources Defense Council. 2009
and bring jobs into our communities.
at MN.1.
8 US Environmental Protection Agency. Water Research Adaptation
Fixing Water Infrastructure in Schools Program: Research Areas. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/
wswrd/wqm/wrap/research.html.
Schools across Minnesota have outdated water pipes and 9 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Economy at a Glance: Minnesota. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/
drinking fountains that have fallen into disrepair. As a eag/eag.mn.htm
result, children do not have access to safe drinking water 10 National Utility Contractors Association. [Press Release]. “New
at school. Currently, there is no federal funding devoted to CWC Report Demonstrates Immediate Economic Impact of Water/
Wastewater Infrastructure Investment?” January 28, 2009.
updating and repairing drinking water systems in schools. 11 Schwartz, Bernard L. and Schwenninger, Sherle R. “A Public Infra-
The campaign to Renew America’s Water would provide structure–-Led Economic Recovery Program.” December 4, 2008;
grants to schools to make the repairs needed to provide Zandi, Mark. Chief economist and co-founder, Moody’s Economy.
com. Testimony on Economic Stimulus For Small Business: A Look
safe, affordable tap water to students. Back and Assessing Need For Additional Relief. U.S. House Commit-
tee on Small Business. July 24, 2008.
It’s Time to Renew America’s Water 12 Food & Water Watch Calculation: 26,669 x 2.60768 = 69,544.22;
69,554/202,100 = 34.41% or 1 in 3
To Renew America’s Water, we need a comprehensive,
long-term solution that fully funds our water infrastruc-
ture needs. Funds must be dedicated for this purpose and For more information:
protected from yearly political decisions. Legislation to web: www.foodandwaterwatch.org
Renew America’s Water must include funds to assist rural email: info@fwwatch.org
and low-income communities, help large municipalities phone: (202) 683-2500 (DC) • (415) 293-9900 (CA)
and provide grants to improve water access in our public
schools. Such an investment would relieve overburdened Copyright © August 2010 Food & Water Watch

You might also like