F. Limitations, L BR. No. 160758) ¥. Churchill vs. Concepcion (22 916: GR. No. 11572) vi. Tolentino eset ee GR. No. 115455) Vil, Tio vs Videogram Regulatory Board 8 June 1987) Vil. MCLAA vs. City of Lapudapu (15 June 2915: G R. No: 181756), in relation wn MOIRA ve ‘Marcos (11 September 1996; G.R. No. 1 ix, Sea-land Service vs. CA (30 Apnl 2001: GR. No. 12805) X. 31st Infantry Post Exchange vs. Posallas (04 September 1830: GR. No. 33403) xi. Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Marubeni Corporation (18 December 2001; GR. No. 137377) Y xii. Reagan vs, Commissioner of internal Revenue (27 December 1969: GR. No. L26378) xii Tiu ve. Court of Appeais (20 January 1999; G.R. No. 127410) xiv. John Hay People's Alternative Coalition vs. Lim (24 October 2003: GR. No. 118775) xv. Coconut Oil Refiners Association vq Torres (28 July 2005: G RNo. 132527) xvi. ABAKADA Guro vs. Ermita (01 2005; GR_No. 168056) xvi. Sison vs. Ancheta (25 July 1984; G.R. No. L-59431) xvill. Ormoc Sugar Company vs. City of Ormoc (17 February 1988; GR. No. 23784) xix. Lutz vs, Araneta (22 December 1955; G.R. No. L-7853) XX, Bishop of Nueva Segovia vs. Provincia! Gard (31 December 1827; GR. No. L-27588) 20, Amenican Bible Society vs. City of Manila (30 April 1957: GR. No. -9637) xxi, Commissioner of intemal Revenue vs. Couple! Appeais (14 Ociober 1985, GR. Ne. 124043) »aili. Lung Center vs. Quezon City (29 June 2004; GR. No. 144104) ‘ E |. Stages, Aspects, or Processes of Taxation: J. Basic Principles of Sound Tax System a ul‘nama Xi MCIAA vs. Marcos (14 av, MCIAA vs. Cty of Lapuriapu (15 June 2015: GR. Ne 181755) / 8 Commissioner of ipiema Revenu (28