Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Franz Steiner Verlag is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Archiv fr
Musikwissenschaft
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Archiv fur Musikwissenschaft AfMw Band 70 2013 Heft 2
Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart
by
DEENA WEINSTEIN
Sharing in the romantic ideology of the 1960s, the "guitar god" (the virtuoso lead rock guitar
by Clapton, Townshend, and Hendrix, emerged as a result of technologythe electrification
and high-powered amplificationwhich made the instrument a competitor to the singer and
the creation of a mystique of musical prowess fused with effects of emotional authenticity
ism. As a romantic hero, the guitar god presents a case that contests egalitarianism and pro
of power based on personal distinction and exceptionalism in skill and dramatic perform
by a complex commercial support system. The guitar virtuosi of the sixties provided a mod
generations of lead guitarists in rock bands and an inspiration to fans who buy their gui
accompany their heroes on air guitar and Guitar Hero. The guitar god both challenges and
sixties youth culture.
Guitar gods. Guitar heroes. Guitar virtuosi. These are not simply descrip
they betray a cult of the guitarist in rock. Not the rhythm guitarist, but the
soloing lead guitarists, who are usually the most accomplished musicians in r
and are expected to evince artistry. Guitar gods are absent from genres that
least in nameromantic ideology and artistry, especially punk. They are ubi
blues-rock and the genres it sired, from psychedelia, through hard rock, heav
all of their offspring. In those genres, the lead guitarist is the prime focus o
Guitar gods were born of the sixties and could not have appeared as cultural
then. This figure is also a phenomenon of that much storied decade, integra
ing romantic ideas. Guitar gods represent a strand of romanticism that is of
by or altogether absent from accounts of the culture of the sixties, teaching
latter is polysmie and cannot be understood adequately in terms of any sin
or grand narrative. How did the guitar god come to be? What are the compon
icon? What does the guitar god tell us about sixties culture and its legacy th
through the present?
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
140 Deena Weinstein
Technology
One of the conditions that made guitar gods possible, though not inevitable, was a
complex of guitar-related technological innovations. The electrification of the guitar
precedes rock's origins, having come into its own during the 1940s, especially in styles
of music that had been marginalized by the mainstream mediablues and country. Due
to its volume level, one of the electric guitar's main impacts during that decade was to
allow small combos to replace big bands. With a guitar and amplifier, groups of four to
six musicians could somewhat inexpensively take to the road.
The development of many major and ancillary features of electric guitars was cre
ated in interaction with guitar players. For instance, it was guitarist Les Paul who "took
the pickup of an electrified phonograph and jammed it into the strings of a guitar to
amplify the sound of the strings."1 In the early stages of rock 'n' roll, guitars vied with
saxophones and pianos as the key instrument of the emerging genre. (It was rock 'n'
roll's hillbilly element, represented especially by Chuck Berry and Carl Perkins, that
gave the electric guitar its victory.) Once the guitar was electrified, it no longer needed
its resonating box. Inventive entrepreneur Leo Fender created the solid body electric
guitar as a mass produced item. Among other things, the more compact form of solid
body instruments enabled guitarists to move about on stage more easily. Yes, Chuck
Berry managed a great deal of movement with his hollow-bodied Gibson ES-355 and
Buddy Holly mainly stood still playing his Fender Stratocaster. Nonetheless, the Stra
tocaster model and its solid-body brethren made possible the dramatic moves of the
guitar heroes of the following decades.
The solid-body guitar, although built on a slab of wood, lent itself to a host of fin
ishes that no longer evoked its original material. Fender's first model, the Telecaster,
displayed the wood grain, but the next one, the Stratocaster, obscured it with finishes
that had metallic or plastic looks, resembling automobiles or children's toys. Still today,
at stores like Guitar Center, one can find guitars with colors called "chrome red," "me
tallic red," and "candy-apple red." The electrified sound also permitted an alteration in
the solid-body's shape from the traditional curved box. Some of the designs were made
to enhance dramatic impact, such as Gibson's Flying V. Others expanded the range of
sound, especially the radical cutaways which allowed playing frets at the neck's base.
The high register of sound produced there became a trope of guitar gods.
The original amplification devices were increased in number and modified to enable
a broader range of sound. For Fender, "adding more pickups was a concession to the
musicians who liked the different tones coming from each pickup position: brighter
and more metallic at the bridge and warmer and heavier toward the neck. Two pickups
gave more versatility and a broader range of tones to choose from."2 Other additions
included the tremolo and a wide assortment of effects pedals, such as those creating
1 Andr Millard, "Inventing the Electric Guitar," in: The Electric Guitar: A History of an American
Icon, ed. Andr Millard (Baltimore, 2004), p. 47.
2 Millard, "Solid body Electric Guitars," The Electric Guitar, p. 95.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 141
3 Rich Maloof, Jim Marshall: The Father of Loud (San Francisco, 2004), p. 39.
4 Ibid.
5 Robert Duncan, The Noise: Notes From a Rock 'n 'Roll Era (New York, 1984), p. 46.
6 Susan Schmidt-Horning, "Recording," The Electric Guitar, pp. 118-19.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
142 Deena Weinstein
Ideology
Rock music erupted within the last great wave of romanticism in the Westthe formation
of the "youth culture" of the sixties. Georg Simmel7 argued that as a cultural expres
sion of a social phenomenon, romanticism represented a compensatory reaction against
the impersonality and abstraction of modern metropolitan existence that privileged the
intellect over the emotions and objective functioning over subjective integrity. Roman
ticism, according to Simmel, only appears within the modern urban context, bringing
forward anything that modern society marginalizes: nonrational experience, individual
and group distinctiveness, and Dionysian excess over and rebellion against disciplinary
social forms. For Simmel, the apotheosis of romanticism is to plunge into the formless
stream of life-experience and to refuse to submit to any form that channels, contains,
or trims it. Short of that limit, the romantic impulse is concentrated on the vindication
of group or personal individuality, which is known and affirmed through intuition and
inspiration rather than abstract reason.
Since its appearance at the turn of the nineteenth century, romanticism has been
primarily associated socially with "youth." That term does not refer to a universal (bio
logical) age group but to a historically and socially specific category of adolescents who
experience a prolonged transition from childhood dependency to adult responsibility.
Structurally, youth is an effect of the need for a highly specialized industrial society
to train people to perform its functions and to submit to its disciplines. The period of
extended education opens up for the adolescents who, herded together in schools, claim
a space of relative freedom shadowed by the destiny of eventual induction into the disci
plines of the occupational system. The tension between present freedom and impending
discipline generates the panoply of self-assertive expressions, enthusiasms, acts and arts
of personal and group rebellion, and idiosyncrasies that define romanticism.8
As the modern period proceeded in time, with its intensive industrial and urban de
velopment, the proliferation of specialties, and a rising standard of living, the number
and proportion of adolescents who experienced youth steadily increased. What began
as the angst, dandyism, and heroic posturing of haut-bourgeois adolescents in the first
half of the nineteenth century spread in the twentieth to the broad middle classes and
then to the working class. The prosperity of the United States after World War II and the
European "economic miracle" opened up a mass youth market at the same time that it
created the conditions for romantic reaction on an unprecedented scale. Enter the sixties
"youth culture," of which rock music was an essential component.
7 Georg Simmel, "Individual and Society in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Views of Life"
(1917) and "The Metropolis and Mental Life" (1908), in: The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. & ed.
Kurt Wolff (New York, 1950).
8 See Deena Weinstein, "Rock: Youth and Its Music," Popular Music and Society IX (1983); id.,
"Expendable Youth: The Rise and Fall of Youth Culture," in: Adolescents and their Music: If It's Too
Loud, You 're Too Old, ed. Jonathon Epstein (Flamden, CT, 1994); id., "Alternative Youth: The Ironies of
Recapturing Youth Culture," Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research 3 (February 1995).
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 143
9 Simon Frith and Howard Home, Art into Pop (London, 1988), p. 148.
10 Paul Stump, The Music s All That Matters: A History of Progressive Rock (London, 1997), p. 10.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
144 Deena Weinstein
Commercial Context
Beyond the technological innovations and Zeitgeist of the sixties, guitar gods appeared
in a commercial context. The post-war affluence and attendant baby boom in the U.S.
and the U.K. created a significant youth market, for which rock was emblematic. By
the 1960s, the older music industry, using those on its periphery and outsiders, had
adapted to this new market like a horde of pickpockets in a crowd of Christmas shop
pers. New kinds of mediators arose then too. Managers like Albert Grossman (Dylan),
Brian Epstein (the Beatles), and Andrew Oldham (the Rolling Stones) were sympathetic
to the romantic ideology. The changes in recording technology demanded and called
forth producers who were in tune with and wanted to cater to the artists. By the end of
1960s, specialized rock venues existed in the U.S. (from the start, the U.K. had the art
college circuit). Several festivals, notably the Monterey International Pop Festival in
1967 and Woodstock in 1969, elevated Jimi Hendrix to superstar status, and along with
him, enhanced the guitarist's role.
The rock press shared the romantic ideology, although it was more interested in
political progressivism. The blues-basis of sixties rock, referencing African-American
musicians (or in Hendrix's case, presenting one) allowed guitar gods to receive a posi
tive press. Starting with Led Zeppelin's massive popularity and especially in the mid
1970s when punk began to flourish, the mainstream rock press became antagonistic to
the "masturbatory," "boring" guitar solo. In contrast, media catering to forms of rock
that valorized the guitar godespecially hard rock and heavy metalcontinued to give
guitarists very positive coverage.
Dramatic Performance
Despite being celebrated for their musictheir soundlead guitarists are also required
to give a dramatic visual performance. This allows them to rival the band's singer for the
spotlight (those who do their own singing tend to be less visually dramatic than those
who play with flamboyant vocalists). Performance also reinforces the romantic myth of
the guitar hero. The dramatic guitar performance has its roots in three key sixties play
ers: Eric Clapton, Pete Townshend, and Jimi Hendrix. Clapton's look of concentration
and emotionality are one pole of the axis, the other end of which is the over-the-top
showmanship of Townshend and Hendrix.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 145
11 James Miller, Flowers in the Dustbin: The Rise of Rock and Roll 1947-1977 (N
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid., p. 268.
15 Fred Goodman, The Mansion on The Hill: Dylan, Young, Geffen, Springsteen, and the Head-On
Collision of Rock and Commerce (New York, 1997), p. 76.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
146 Deena Weinstein
Hero Worship
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 147
What Johnson represented to art school students like Clapton... was, to star
plexity of affect conveyed by guttural vocals, kinetic countermelodies, and a
lessly choppy that, on a recording like 'Walkin' Blues,' the singer and his
raw urgency rarely matched by later bands playing with amplified instrumen
artistry, a song like 'Walkin' Blues' was also a perfect expression of (among ot
love; desolation and abandonment; and the untrammeled freedom of a youn
'lonesome home.' For a generation bored by the complacency and comfort of
songs held out the image of another worldone that was liberated; fearful; t
18 Deena Dasein, "Yngwie Malmsteen: Still Mixing Fire and Ice," C.A.M.M
19 Andy Ellis, "Jumping at Shadows," Guitar Player 34 (November 2000)
20 Sheila Whiteley, "Progressive Rock and Psychedelic Coding in the Work o
Music 9 (1990), p. 40.
21 Miller, Flowers in the Dustbin, p. 190.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
148 Deena Weinstein
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 149
I used my Slash Marshall head and one 4x12 cabinetthe same rig I always pl
heads onstage and two 4x12s to switch from clean to dirty sounds, but only o
time. The head for the clean sound is set up with Groove Tubes KT88s, and the
Bass 9, Middle 3, Treble 514", Output Master 10, Lead Master 0, and Input Gai
The instruments' looks, not merely their sound, is also a crucial issue. Gorgeous
well-polished woods or bright metallic colors borrowed from hot-rod cars, some in
garish patterns, are staples for bringing out the dramatic dimension of the guitarist's
performance. For blues-rockers, like Rory Gallagher and Stevie Ray Vaughn, a well
worn look is preferred.
Post-sixties guitar mediathe innumerable books, magazines, and websitesprovide
enthusiasts with aesthetic guidance. They indicate who deserves to be in the pantheon
and what is worthy to emulate, with features like "100 Greatest Guitarists," "10 Famous
Guitar Intros," "100 Greatest Solos of All Time," "Best Solo of the Millennium," "Top
100 Guitar Solos of Ail-Time," and "The 50 Heaviest Riffs of All Time." Despite all
this encouragement to imitate, young guitarists are exhorted to "do their own thing," to
be romantic individualists. "Follow the music that you love, and work on what comes
natural to you. Don't try to shadow anybody else's style or jump on what's trendy,"
Slash advises.27
The guitar has become more than a sound-producing instrument. It is the icon of rock,
incorporated into the brand logos of rock museums, cafes, and musical equipment stores.
The whole guitar-destruction routine pioneered by Townshend and Hendrix underscores
the more-than-instrumental value of the instrument.
Cultural totem, phallic symbol, protest sign, hot rodthe guitar has always been rock's central figure.
Like the Old Testament sacrifice of the slaughtered lamb, smashing a guitar is really an act of faith and
loveor at least a crime of passion. Far from killing the instrument's honor, smashing adds to its glory
and instills a layer of political and cultural meaning to the act of playing.28
25 Ibid.
26 Millard, "Conclusion," The Electric Guitar, p. 213.
27 Sharken, "Slash & Burn," p. 72.
28 James Rotondi, "Is Rock Guitar Dead...or Does it Just Smell Funny?" Guitar Player 31 (September
1997).
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
150 Deena Weinstein
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 151
Masculinity
Where are all the guitar goddesses, the guitar heroines, the guitar virtuosas? "Just think
about it: how many women have actually been innovative, technically accomplished
lead guitarists?" John Strohm asks. "None! There aren't any."31 The pantheon of rock
guitar greats is a male club with a no-girls-allowed sign prominently displayed. It isn't
that women cannot play. But you can count the number of good female lead guitarists
on your fingers and have enough left to play an E7th chord: Heart's Nancy Wilson,
Nashville Pussy's Ruyter Suys, and only a few others. It is almost like that awful joke
about female preachers being like talking dogs: it isn't that they do it well, but that they
do it at all. In the United States, according to Music Trades Magazine, "women buy just
7 percent of all the electric guitars."32
Why are lead guitarists almost exclusively men? The masculinity built into that role
has several explanations. At the most basic level, it is because rock itself is masculinist.
Coates notes that "rock was mtonymie for authenticity and pop for artifice, authentic
rock became masculine and artificial pop became feminine. In the gender hierarchy of
rock culture, the masculine represented higher status and values and thus reinforced
traditional gender hegemony."33
Clawson analyzed the makeup of the bands appearing in Rolling Stone's "Top 100
Albums from 1967-1987." Only 6.6 percent of bands had female instrumentalists of
any type. Clawson accounts for the paucity of women instrumentalists in rock bands
by noting that "[t]he band is the elemental unit in rock as an ensemble music. It is the
critical institutional locus of learning and initiation; and significantly, the early band is,
both socially and culturally, a formation of masculine adolescence."34 She found that
in her sample of Boston bands, women first began to play a rock instrument at age 19,
males at age 13.35
A complex of explanations for the masculinism in the lead guitarist's role relates
directly to the electric guitar itself and its place in the band. The instrument is seen to
embody masculine traits. John Strohm, for example, states: "The amplified electric guitar
was perceived as an instrument of great power, and this was the main reason that its play
ing in public was restricted to males. Electric guitars were seen as a man's preserve."36
The term "lead guitar" aptly describes this position, because it is the dominant role in
the band. Western society may not be as patriarchal as it once was, but dominating roles
are still seen to be the province of men. "Women are the support players in life... I think
31 John Strohm, "Women Guitarists: Gender Issues in Alternative Rock," The Electric Guitar, p. 182.
32 David Segal, "The Great Divide: Fretting Over the Lack of Guitar Divas," Chicago Tribune (Sep
tember 15, 2004), p. 7.
33 Norma Coates, "(R)evolution now? Rock and the Political Potential of Gender," Sexing the Groove:
Popular Music and Gender, ed. Sheila Whiteley (London, 2000), p. 52.
34 Mary Ann Clawson, "Masculinity and Skill Acquisition in the Adolescent Rock Band," Popular
Music 18 (1999), p. 103.
35 Ibid., p. 106.
36 Strohm, "Women Guitarists: Gender Issues in Alternative Rock," p. 186.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
152 Deena Weinstein
The guitar is also seen as a phallic symbol. Segal states: "The paradigmatic rock pose
belongs to Chuck Berry: legs apart, instrument pointed straight at the crowd. Symbols
don't get more phallic."40 Some models of the guitar are more "masculine" than others.
Andr Millard contends that the Flying V is understood to be "the ultimate expression
of the electric guitar's phallic imagery."41 In a discussion of guitar heroes, Millard and
McSwain state: "In the world of rock 'n' roll the guitar was an inescapable symbol of
masculinity, and the dynamics of the performance were filled with sexually significant
actions and meanings."42 Hendrix's performance emphasized sexual symbolism, espe
cially his "physical interaction with his guitar rubbing it against his crotch, bumping and
grinding on it."43 Feminist theorist Camille Paglia proffers a psychological explanation
for the guitarist's masculine mystique:
For an adolescent boy, your guitar speaks for you, it says what you can't say in real life, it's the pain
you can't express, it's rage, hormones pumping. Women can be strangers and all of a sudden have an
intimate conversation. Boys can't do that. The guitar for a boy speaks to an aggressive sexual impulse
and suppressed emotionality, the things that boys can't share, even with other members of the band. It's
a combination of rage and reserve and ego.44
Conclusion
In his critical study of the politics of the sixties, David Burner notes: "A period with any
life and energy, of course, is going to breed conflicts, which in turn sharpen and further
invigorate ideas."45 As a time of significant social and cultural change, the sixties were
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rock's Guitar Gods - Avatars of the Sixties 153
rife with conflict within and between multifarious tendencies, not only
which achieved hegemony and the complex of which never attained re
synthesis. A familiar received narrative of the sixties presents it as a cu
dominated by political progressivism, protest against the establishmen
of participatory democracy, social justice, personal authenticity, comm
of ecstatic experience, and a return to simplicityall of which coexist i
under the sign of romanticism.
The figure of the guitar god shares in some of those themes, esp
placed on authenticity and ecstatic experience, but it contests some of
ing hero-worship against democracy, individualism against communalis
logical dependency against simplicity. The pursuit of personal authent
experience mark the guitar god as clearly within the romantic paradig
the received narrative, but the other elements lead in a different, stil
tion that resonates with major tendencies in the sixties beyond politic
and the counter-culture. Although political progressivism, egalitariani
advancing the causes of marginalized groups, and a participatory and c
were undeniably integral to the sixties, so was hero-worshiping. Ju
larger-than-life figures that paraded across the mediascape, consider,
Martin Luther King, Jr., Muhammad Ali, Bobby Fisher, and the Beatle
Although the idea of going "back to nature" surely played a role in
it is arguable that a fascination with technology was the dominant ten
the decadethe birth-control pill that sparked the "sexual revolution,
of television and the image culture, the man on the moon, and, of cou
culture's "conscious-expanding" drugs. Equality and the assertion o
ginalized groups were certainly popular ideals in the sixties, but patria
were entrenched in mainstream and counterculture alike during the d
only came into its own in the 1970s. The figure of the guitar god
components into a distinctive strand of romanticism that combines pe
ity and emotional sublimity and expressiveness with hero-worship, br
the nineteenth-century figure of the virtuoso and the embrace of indu
continuing the early twentieth-century futurist ideal of the fusion of
with an accent on the first term.
Since the emergence of the guitar god as an avatar of the sixties, that figure has been
challenged in music by the far more democratic ideals of punk rock, yet its corethe
marriage of flesh and technology in a personalized synthesishas arguably become a
dominant cultural tendency. And the sixties guitar gods still haunt contemporary culture,
as ghosts, as their acolytes, and for a few, as their aging selves. Websites devoted to
the gods proliferate, magazines publish lists of the greatest virtuosi, air guitar contests
abound, and a best-selling video game is Guitar Hero.
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
154 Deena Weinstein
This content downloaded from 143.239.102.1 on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:45 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms