Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Final Judgment in AgedDebt - Net Scheme

    Uploaded by

    George Sharp
    479 views22 pages
    Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

    Original Title

    Final Judgment in AgedDebt.net Scheme

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    479 views22 pages

    Final Judgment in AgedDebt - Net Scheme

    Uploaded by

    George Sharp
    Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 22

    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 22

    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 2 of 22


    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 3 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 4 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 5 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 6 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 7 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 8 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 9 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 10 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 11 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 12 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 13 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 14 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 15 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 16 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 17 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 18 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 19 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 20 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 21 of 22
    Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 22 of 22

    You might also like