Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Robertson, 2014
CPT Guide
5th Edition
www.greggdrilling.com
www.cpt-robertson.com
www.geologismiki.gr
Robertson 5th Edition
& Cabal (Robertson) 2012
1
Webinars
Recordings of previous webinars are available on
YouTube: search for CPT Robertson or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alrzeelWpZc
qt = qc + u2(1-a)
a = 0.60 to 0.85
In sands: qt = qc
In very soft clays:
correction to qt is important
2
Role of CPT
CPT has three main applications:
Determine sub-surface stratigraphy and identify
materials present (Soil Type SBT)
Estimate soil parameters
Provide results for direct geotechnical design
Robertson, 2014
CPTu Interpretation
Soil Type
Soil behavior type (SBT) & stratigraphy
In-situ State
Relative density (Dr) or State Parameter (and OCR
Strength
Peak friction angle () and undrained strength (su)
Stiffness/compressibility
Shear (Go), Youngs (E) and 1-D constrained (M)
Consolidation/permeability
Coeff of consolidation (cv) and permeability (k)
Robertson, 2014
3
First CPT soil classification chart
CPT-based classification
CPT measurements are influenced by in-situ behavioral
characteristics, such as strength, stiffness and compressibility.
These characteristics are controlled primarily by soil state, in-situ
effective stresses, stress history, age, and cementation, as well as
mineralogy.
Traditional soil classification systems are based on physical
characteristics obtained on remolded samples, such as
grain size, fines content and plasticity. These characteristics are
controlled primarily by depositional environment and geology.
4
Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) Chart
Zone Soil behaviour type
1000
1 Sensitive fine grained
2 Organic material
(qt/pa)
3 Clay
4 Silty Clay to clay
100
Sand 5
6
Clayey silt to silty clay
Sandy silt to clayey silt
7 Silty sand to sandy silt
8 Sand to silty sand
9 Sand
10 Gravelly sand to sand
10 11 Very stiff fine grained*
Clay 12 Sand to clayey sand*
* Overconsolidated or cemented
SBT
1
Robertson & Campanella, 1986
= 100 (fs/qt)
10 12
CPT SBT based on in-
11 situ soil behavior
9
(strength, stiffness,
100
Sand 8
7 compressibility) - not
the same as
Cone Resistance (bar) qt
classification based
5
4
1
Clay grain size carried out
2 on disturbed samples
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
5
CPT Data Presentation
SAND
Mixed Soils
CLAY
Robertson, 1990
6
Dimensionless SBT chart
In 2010 Robertson
(CPT10) updated the
SBT chart to use
dimensionless
parameters and to
simplify the chart to 9
zones to be consistent
with the normalized
SBT chart (Robertson,
Limits of CPT
1990)
Robertson, 2014
Robertson, 2010
Robertson, 2014
7
Why Friction Ratio (fs/qt)?
Qt = (qt-vo)/vo Qt = (qt-vo)/vo
Fr = 0.1%
OC OC
Fr = 10%
NC NC
Fr = 100[fs/(qt-vo)] F = 100(fs/vo)
Normally to OC consolidated clay, friction ratio, Fr ~ constant
Applies
fuzzy
logic to
SBT
Robertson, 2014
8
Schneider et al (2008) chart
Qt = (qt-vo)/vo
Example NC Clay
Combines normalized cone resistance (Q) and excess pore pressure (u/v)
Good offshore less effective on-shore, where saturation can not be assured
Robertson, 2014
NC clay NC clay
9
Generalized CPT Soil Behaviour Type
A A: Coarse-grain-dilative
B: Coarse-grain-contractive
B C
C: Fine-grain-dilative
D
D: Fine-grain-contractive
Function primarily of
Soil Compressibility
Increasing compressibility
Ic > 2.60 predominately
CLAYS fine grained clay-like soil
Robertson, 2014
10
SBT from CPT
Plasticity Index as
function of SBT Ic
Non Plastic
Boundary between
sand-like and clay-like
soils is PI ~ 10
Plastic
Data from Cetin & Ozan, 2009
Robertson, 2014
CPT Normalization
Early normalization based on theory for clays
Qt = (qt v) / 'v
11
CPT Normalization
Qtn = [(qt v)/pa] (pa/'vo)n
where n 1.0
Robertson, 2014
Robertson, 2014
12
Example CPT - UBC Fraser River
Fraser River Delta, Vancouver, BC (UBC)
Campanella & Robertson, 1983
Organic SILT
Clean Sand
silty sand
NC Clay
Organic SILT
Clean Sand
silty sand
NC Clay
13
Example CPT Amherst UMass
Connecticut Valley Lacustrine Varved Clay
DeGroot & Lutenegger, 2003
Clay Crust
Varved Clay
Dissipation tests
Clay Crust
Varved Clay
14
Example CPT Venice Lagoon
Venice Lagoon, Treporti Test Site
Simonini et al, 2003
Samples
Sand
Sandy Silt
Sand
Silt
Sand
Interbedded Silt
Samples
Sand
Sandy Silt
Sand
Silt
Sand
Interbedded Silt
15
Example CPT
Mixed soil profile
San Francisco Bay area, USA
Soft Clay
Stiff Clay
Dense Sand
Holocene/Pleistocene-age deposit
Example CPT
Mixed soil profile
San Francisco Bay area, USA
Soft Clay
Stiff Clay
Dense Sand
16
How deep can you push the CPT?
Depends on:
1 - amount of reaction
push force
2 - amount of rod
friction
17
Example CPT Mine Tailings
Deep Mine Tailings
Southwest, USA
Stiff Silt
Weak Sandstone/Siltstone
SPT (N)60 ~100
Pleistocene/Tertiary-age deposits
18
Example CPT Soft Rock
Very stiff soil soft rock
Newport Beach, CA, USA
Stiff Silt
Weak Sandstone/Siltstone
SPT (N)60 ~100
Summary
CPT is a fast, reliable method to determine soil
stratigraphy and soil type in a cost effective
manner.
CPT-based Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) charts
available to estimate soil type, based on either
tip-friction and/or tip-pore pressure
measurements
CPT equipment can be used to take small
diameter push-in soil samples to verify soil
type
19