Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256118151
CITATIONS READS
7 1,013
6 authors, including:
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Abdulaziz M. Ghaleb
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 25 August 2016
Throughput Performance Insights of LTE Release 8: Malaysia's Perspective
Abdulaziz M. Ghaleb, David Chieng, Alvin Ting, Ayad Abdulkafi,
Wireless Communication Cluster, MIMOS Berhad, Malaysia.
{abdulaziz.saleh, ht.chieng, kee.ting, ayadatiyah.abdulkafi}@mimos.my
Kim-Chuan Lim, FKeKK, University Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, kimchuan@utem.edu.my
Heng-Siong Lim, FET, Multimedia University, Malaysia, hslim@mmu.edu.my
U Mobile 2x10MHz FDD
Abstract LTE wireless mobile broadband networks, in Redtone 2x10MHz FDD
particularly those based on 3GPP Release 8 (Rel. 8) P1 20MHz TDD
specification, have already made strong inroads into the YTL 20MHz TDD
commercial arena worldwide. In Malaysia, 8 companies have
been allocated spectrum in 2.6GHz Band (LTE band class 7). LTE Rel. 8, though marketed as 4G, is in fact only
This paper aims to provide some high level insights on the
3.9G. LTE Release 10 (Rel. 10) is the official 4G
throughput performance of these spectrums. Although a lot of
studies have been undertaken with regards to LTE network technology recognized by ITU/IMT-Advanced [3]. LTE
performances, various degrees of discrepancy still exist in and LTE-Advanced are primarily the same technology
particularly concerning network layer (IP) throughput. A wide family, with the Advanced label being added to draw
array of factors may contribute to these differences, which attention to the relation between LTE Rel. 10 and
include differences in methodology adopted, levels of ITU/IMT-Advanced. According to Rel. 8 specification, a
abstraction (or details) used in the simulation model, peak downlink rate of 299.6 Mbps for 4x4 antennas, and
environment and/or usage scenarios and so on. Using OPNETs 150.8Mbps for 2x2 antennas using 20MHz channel can be
latest LTE library, we study the effects of duplexing scheme provided. As for the uplink, the peak rate of about 75.4Mbps
(FDD vs. TDD), MCS, channel bandwidth, bearer's type (GBR
is expected using the same spectrum size. LTE supports
or non-GBR) for the allocated spectrums. The impact of
multiple users access on the throughput performance is also scalable carrier bandwidths ranging from 1.4MHz to 20MHz
analyzed. This work enables us to compare and contrast our and supports both frequency division (FDD) duplexing and
findings with the existing studies while providing more time-division duplexing (TDD) schemes. In terms of
accurate views on how the main system level configurations latency, LTE promises low latency in data transfer (<5ms in
may impact the network layer throughput performance of the optimal condition), handover as well as connection setup
emerging LTE networks in Malaysia. time. Due to that LTE has the ability to manage fast-moving
mobiles (between 350 km/h or 500 km/h). Application wise,
Keywords LTE, OPNET, Throughput, Performance. LTE generally supports all conventional multimedia
services with better QoS guarantee including multi-cast and
broadcast streaming services.
I. INTRODUCTION
A lot of studies have been undertaken in order to evaluate
LTE throughput performance. I. Vukovicv on [4]
LTE or Long Term Evolution UMTS networks, in investigated the performance of TDD LTE RACH (Random
particularly those based on 3GPP Rel. 8 specifications, have Access Channel) and computed the normalized throughput
already made strong inroads into the commercial arena under Poisson load. J. Zhu evaluated the PDSCH link and
worldwide. According to [1] global LTE subscribership is system level performance and provided a platform to
expected to skyrocket from 9 million in 2011 to more than estimate the performance for the different transmission
560 million in 2016. Global mobile Suppliers Association modes [5]. The work done by [6, 7] focused on the downlink
(GSA) recently announced that 145 LTE commercial control channel design to reduce the control overhead and
networks had been launched in 66 countries (as of January hence, to improve the throughput performance. To the best
2013) and that the number is expected to increase to 234 in of our knowledge, the most comprehensive work with
83 countries by the end the year. In Malaysia 8 companies regards to throughput performance, is done by [8]. The
have been awarded LTE spectrum at 2.6GHz band. Puncak authors provided performance analysis of LTE physical
Semangat received a lion share of 2x20MHz FDD, five layer characteristics by studying the maximum throughput in
companies received 2x10MHz FDD and the two WiMAX uplink and downlink for both FDD and TDD using different
mobile broadband providers received 20MHz TDD [2] Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) and channel
bandwidth sizes. From our investigation, various degrees of
Table I: LTE Spectrum Recipients in Malaysia[2] discrepancy still exist between the above findings. A wide
Licensee Allocation Type range of factors may contribute to these differences, such as
Puncak Semangat 2x20MHz FDD differences in methodology adopted; levels of abstraction
Maxis 2x10MHz FDD (or level of detail) used in the simulation model,
Celcom 2x10MHz FDD environment and/or usage scenarios and so on.
Digi 2x10MHz FDD
60
ranging from 0 to 28. Each MCS is mapped to what is
known as transport block size index ITBS ranging from 0 to
50
26 [12]. ITBS together with the number of RBs determine the
40 transport block size, in bits, that can be transmitted within
30
one TTI. In the downlink direction, MCS with the index 0 -
9 are modulated using QPSK, index 10 - 16 are modulated
20
using 16QAM and the rest are based on 64QAM. The
10 coding rate of each MCS is given in Table V as follows.
1.4MHz 3MHz 5MHz 10MHz 15MHz 20MHz Table V: MCS indexes and Coding Rates
Bandwidth
MCS Coding MCS Coding MCS Coding
Fig. 2: Effects of Channel Bandwidth on Throughput (FDD, MCS=28) Index Rate Index Rate Index Rate
50 0 0.16667 10 0.33333 20 0.55556
TDD 1 0.2 11 0.35 21 0.6
FDD
2 0.23333 12 0.41667 22 0.64444
40
3 0.26667 13 0.48333 23 0.71111
4 0.33333 14 0.51667 24 0.75556
5 0.4 15 0.58333 25 0.8
LTE Throughput (Mbps)
60
future LTE operators can provide differentiated services to
50
subscribers.
40
30
20
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LTE MCS index
Fig. 4: Effects of MCS index on Throughput (20MHz, FDD)
9.2
[6] M. Einhaus, et al., "Performance Study of an Enhanced
Multiple Users Efficiency