Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1989-3
Received: 10 January 2013 / Accepted: 29 November 2013 / Published online: 20 December 2013
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract This study proposes and tests a model of the Keywords Ethical climate Perceived importance of
relations among corporate accountants perceptions of the ethics and social responsibility Earnings management
ethical climate in their organization, the perceived impor- Hong Kong
tance of corporate ethics and social responsibility, and
earnings management decisions. Based on a field survey of
professional accountants employed by private industry in Introduction
Hong Kong, we found that perceptions of the organiza-
tional ethical climate were significantly associated with This paper examines the relations among industry
belief in the importance of corporate ethics and responsi- accountants perceptions of the ethical climate in their
bility. Belief in the importance of ethics and social organization, their views toward the importance of corpo-
responsibility was also significantly associated with rate ethics and social responsibility, and earnings man-
accountants ethical judgments and behavioral intentions agement decisions. Prior studies have documented the
regarding accounting and operating earnings manipulation. effects of a variety of influences on earnings management,
These findings suggest that perceptions of ethical climate, but have largely ignored the potential influence of both
usually presumed to reflect the tone at the top in the organizational ethical climate and views toward corporate
organization, lead accounting professionals to rationalize ethics and social responsibility.
earnings management decisions by adjusting their attitudes We adopt the classic Victor and Cullen (1987, 1988)
toward the importance of corporate ethics and social conceptualization of organizational ethical climate, which
responsibility. This is the first study to document a rela- views the perceived climate as a reflection of manage-
tionship between organizational ethical climate and pro- ments attitudes and behaviors toward ethics. We argue
fessional accountants support for corporate ethics and that, when employees perceive an unethical climate or tone
social responsibility, and also the first study to document at the top in the organization, they are likely to minimize
that industry accountants views toward corporate ethics the importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility
and social responsibility are associated with their willing- in order to justify or rationalize aggressive earnings man-
ness to manipulate earnings. The findings have important agement decisions. In contrast, if employees perceive that
implications, suggesting that organizational efforts to the ethical climate in their organization is relatively posi-
enhance the ethical climate and emphasize the importance tive or supportive of ethical/socially responsible behavior
of corporate ethics and social responsibility could reduce this should increase their perceptions of the importance of
the prevalence of earnings manipulation. ethics and social responsibility and accordingly lead to
more ethical reporting decisions.
In addition to enhancing our theoretical understanding
of the relationships examined, the current research has
W. E. Shafer (&)
practical implications for improving ethical behavior. For
Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, NT
Hong Kong instance, organizational characteristics such as the ethical
e-mail: weshafer@ln.edu.hk climate are at least somewhat malleable and may be
123
44 W. E. Shafer
improved through ongoing efforts that place greater favorably than accounting manipulations. Managers
emphasis on the importance of ethical behavior. The explained to the researchers that they considered account-
importance of ethical reporting decisions that serve the best ing manipulations to be purposeful distortions of truth.
interests of external stakeholders may also be emphasized On the other hand, the managers thought that even though
through internal training programs for professional operating manipulations involve modifying business deci-
accountants. Consequently, the quality of professional sions, the facts will still be reported accurately.
accountants ethical decisions may be improved by efforts Merchant and Rockness (1994) administered the Mer-
to align the values and ethical standards of the organization chant (1989) questionnaire to general managers, staff
more closely with the espoused values of the accounting managers, operating unit controllers, and internal auditors
profession. in the U.S. Based on data from 308 respondents, the
The next section will provide an overview of relevant researchers found significant relationships between ethical
literature on earnings management, organizational ethical judgments and manipulation characteristics, such as the
climate, and the perceived importance of corporate ethics type, size, timing, and objective of the actions. More spe-
and social responsibility. This is followed by the devel- cifically, they empirically identified the following rela-
opment of the research hypotheses. The paper then sum- tionships: (1) consistent with Bruns and Merchant (1990),
marizes the research method and findings, and provides the participants judged accounting manipulations more harshly
discussion and conclusions. than operating manipulations; (2) no significant differences
in judgments were found between manipulations that
increased earnings and those that decreased earnings; (3)
Literature Review earnings management of material amounts were judged to
be less acceptable than manipulations of immaterial
Earnings Management amounts; (4) year-end manipulations were judged to be
significantly less acceptable than quarter-end manipula-
Earnings management has long been recognized as a crit- tions; and (5) actions with primarily selfish purposes such
ical ethical issue for the accounting profession, and has as achieving profit targets (as opposed to continuing
been investigated by accounting researchers for many product development projects) were judged more harshly.
years. The current section provides a general discussion of In a survey of 265 members of a regional organization of
earnings management and reviews selected behavioral/ accountants in the U.S., Rosenzweig and Fischer (1994)
attitudinal studies of earnings management in accounting. found that accountants with more experience and at higher
In a widely cited study, Merchant (1989) reported results position levels were more tolerant of earnings manage-
from a survey using a questionnaire to measure attitudes ment. In another study, Fischer and Rosenzweig (1995)
toward earnings management. This questionnaire, which surveyed undergraduate accounting students, MBA stu-
became influential in the accounting literature, contained dents, and practicing accountants. Consistent with Bruns
thirteen earnings management scenarios. The scenarios can and Merchant (1990), the study found that all three groups
be categorized into two basic types of earnings manipula- adopted more lenient attitudes toward operating manipu-
tion, namely accounting manipulations and operating lations than accounting manipulations. Indeed, they
manipulations. Accounting manipulations involve situa- reported that most respondents did not consider operating
tions that violate Generally Accepted Accounting Princi- manipulations to be of significant ethical concern.
ples (GAAP) in order to achieve desired results. Operating Greenfield et al. (2008) surveyed 375 senior-level
manipulations involve modifying earnings through oper- undergraduate business students to investigate the impact
ating decisions, such as intentionally delaying expenditures of ethical orientation (idealism and relativism) and pro-
for repairs and maintenance to reduce current year expen- fessional commitment on earnings management behavior.
ses, or running sales promotions near year end to boost They found that individuals with higher professional
reported sales and income. In contrast to accounting commitment were less likely to express an intention to
manipulations, operating manipulations do not involve engage in earnings management, though the size of this
violations of accounting rules or regulations. effect was quite small. The results also indicated that
Bruns and Merchant (1990) conducted a follow-up participants who scored higher (lower) on idealism (rela-
survey of 649 U.S. managers to assess their attitudes tivism) expressed a lower (higher) likelihood of engaging
toward earnings management using the Merchant (1989) in earnings management behavior.
instrument. Participants ethical judgments lacked a high As illustrated by the foregoing discussion, most prior
degree of consensus regarding the acceptability of earn- behavioral studies of earnings management have focused
ings management practices. The researchers also found primarily on assessing attitudes toward various types of
that participants judged operating manipulations more manipulations and the effects of personal characteristics on
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 45
such attitudes. Elias (2004) appears to be the first behav- content.2 They proposed that the ethical climate in an
ioral study to address the effects of the organizational organization would reflect the attitudes and behaviors of
ethical environment on decisions regarding earnings man- management; thus, employee perceptions of ethical climate
agement.1 Elias (2004) conducted a survey of 583 CPAs in in their organization or organizational subunit will be
public accounting, industry, and academia that examined influenced by the tone at the top.
the effects of perceived corporate ethical values [using the The ethical climate construct developed by Victor and
Hunt et al. (1989) scale] on ethical judgments of earnings Cullen (1987, 1988) may be depicted by a widely recog-
manipulations. The results indicated that respondents who nized two-dimensional matrix, which captures both the
perceived the ethical standards of their organization to be ethical criteria and locus of analysis involved in decision
relatively high (low) regarded earnings management as less making. The ethical criteria, derived from theories of moral
(more) ethical. However, this study adopted an one- philosophy, include egoism, benevolence, and principle.
dimensional measure of corporate ethical values, focused The locus of analysis specifies the focal point or scope of
on ethical judgments to the exclusion of other key deci- consideration when making ethical decisions, which may
sions such as behavioral intentions, and did not recognize be at the individual, local, or cosmopolitan levels. The
potential mediating variables or mechanisms through cross section of the ethical criteria and locus of analysis
which ethical culture may influence ethical decisions. forms a 3 9 3 matrix consisting of nine ethical climate
The current paper proposes an integrated model in dimensions, depicted in Fig. 1.
which professional accountants perceptions of the ethical In the ethical criteria component, egoistic climates focus
climate in their organization influence their beliefs on self-interest and self-interest maximizing behavior,
regarding the importance of corporate ethics and social benevolent climates on what is best for the parties under
responsibility, and such beliefs in turn influence their eth- consideration, and principled climates on following rules,
ical decisions regarding operating and accounting earnings laws, and professional codes of conduct. An individual
management. The model incorporates the Victor and Cul- locus of analysis is focused on the self; accordingly, an
len (1987, 1988) multi-dimensional conceptualization of egoistic/individual climate emphasizes the pursuit of self-
organizational ethical climate, and includes multiple mea- interest, a benevolent/individual climate places priority on
sures of ethical decisions and behavioral intentions to friendship or personal relationships, and a principled/indi-
provide a more refined assessment of accountants ethical vidual climate focuses on following ones personal moral
decision-making processes. We now turn our attention to principles or beliefs (also referred to as an independence
detailed discussions of organizational ethical climate and climate). The local level of analysis is usually inter-
the perceived importance of corporate ethics and social preted as an emphasis on the company or organizational
responsibility. subunits. Thus, in an egoistic/local climate the primary
concern may be on what is considered best for the com-
Ethical Climate pany, such as profitability. In a benevolent/local climate the
focus may be on what is best for an organizational subunit,
Victor and Cullen (1988) defined organizational ethical such as caring for the interests of all team members. In a
climate as the prevailing perceptions among employees of principled/local climate the primary emphasis will be on
organizational practices and procedures that have ethical following internal company rules and regulations. A
2
Victor and Cullen (1987, 1988) assumed that, although individual
differences in climate perceptions will exist, in a given organization
1
Archival studies have addressed the relationships between certain there will be one or more dominant ethical climate dimensions. Most
aspects of organizational governance and earnings management. For studies of organizational ethical culture/climate fall into one of two
instance, Klein (2002) found that abnormal accounting accruals (a categories: (1) studies that focus on one or a few organizations and
measure of earnings management) were significantly higher when attempt to identify dominant or influential climate dimensions within
either the audit committee or the board of directors lacked indepen- these organizations (e.g., Victor and Cullen 1988); and (2) studies that
dence. Xie et al. (2003) found that when members of corporate boards survey employees from many organizations in an attempt to identify
of directors and audit committees had more extensive corporate or relationships between ethical climate perceptions and other variables
financial backgrounds (a measure of financial sophistication), com- of interest (e.g., Trevino et al. 1998). Studies of the first type allow for
panies were less likely to engage in earnings management. Earnings comparisons of the dominant climate dimensions across different
management was also less likely to occur when boards or audit types of organizations or organizational subunits. Studies that are
committees met more frequently. Garca-Meca and Sanchez-Ballesta based on surveys of employees from a relatively large number of
(2009) concluded based on a meta-analysis of 35 studies that when organizations (including the current study) do not allow for the
audit committees and boards of directors are more independent, categorization of organizations or organizational subunits according
earnings management is less likely to occur. Such studies provide to their climate dimensions, but provide a basis for identifying
support for the general contention that the tone at the top in an relationships between climate perceptions and other variables that are
organization may influence earnings management. generalizable across multiple organizations.
123
46 W. E. Shafer
Self-Interest Company Profit Efficiency the studies reviewed in Martin and Cullen 2006). Conse-
quently, we would not necessarily expect this typical pat-
ETHICAL CRITERION
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 47
LOCUS OF ANALYSIS conduct (and laws), as well as acting in the public interest.
Individual Local Cosmopolitan Indeed, in a recent study of management accountants
employed by private corporations in mainland China,
Shafer and Wang (2011) documented the presence of both
Egoism
Social
itan, principled/cosmopolitan, and instrumental climates to
Friendship Team Interest Responsibility
professional accountants ethical views, as well as the fact
(6) (5,6) (1,2,3,4,5.6)
that these three climates have emerged in most prior studies
of ethical climate perceptions among accountants, they are
the focus of our study.
Laws and
Personal Company Rules
Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social
Principle
Professional
Morality and Procedures Responsibility
Codes
(4,6) (6)
(1,2,3,4,5,6)
Singhapakdi et al. (1996) developed a scale to measure the
perceived role of ethics and social responsibility (PRES-
Notes: OR) in organizational success. The PRESOR instrument
a. The parenthetical references in the above figure correspond with the following has been used widely in studies of business ethics, and
studies: (1) Shafer, Poon and Tjosvold (2013a); (2) Shafer, Poon and Tjosvold
several studies have concluded that the scale has two
(2013b); (3) Shafer (2009); (4) Shafer (2008); (5) Parboteeah et al. (2005); (6) Cullen
separate dimensions: the stockholder view and the stake-
et al. (2003).
holder view (see Appendix 2) (Shafer and Simmons 2008).
b. According to Martin and Cullen (2006), most studies have found instrumental
climates that combine elements of the egoistic/individual and egoistic/local types.
The stockholder and stakeholder views are alternative
Some accounting studies have concluded that separate egoistic/individual or
perspectives or attitudes toward the importance of ethics and
egoistic/local climates existed, but even in some of these cases the climate factors social responsibility to organizational success. People who
that emerged combined some items from both sub-scales. Thus, we have combined score highly on the stockholder view dimension tend to regard
these two climate types, and the parenthetical references in the Instrumental cell organizational profitability (serving the best interests of the
above should be interpreted to indicate that the studies found either an stockholders to the exclusion of others) as the overriding
egoistic/individual climate, an egoistic/local climate, or some combination of both. responsibility of business, in line with Friedmans (1962)
classic argument. Those who score highly on the stakeholder
Fig. 2 Climate types emerging in studies of public accounting firms
view dimension, in contrast, recognize that the organization
has a responsibility to a variety of stakeholder groups and
all documented elements of the three climate dimensions accordingly should act in an ethical and socially responsibility
proposed, and other climate dimensions have not been fashion. They also consider ethical and socially responsible
documented frequently. The six studies have also included behavior to be not only compatible with but also critical to the
public accounting firms from the U.S., Japan, Singapore, long-term success of business enterprises.
and China, which lends credibility to the robustness of the Individuals who minimize the importance of corporate
findings. ethics and social responsibility should primarily view
These findings raise an important issue regarding the issues from the perspective of the effects on the companys
extent to which these climate dimensions will also be bottom line profitability, with ethical issues being given
present in accounting departments within corporations. We a lower priority (note in Appendix 2 that the stockholder
argue that, from a conceptual standpoint, they should be view items prioritize issues such as profitability and com-
present in this context. All licensed or certified accoun- petitiveness over considerations of ethics and social
tants, regardless of where they are employed, are bound by responsibility). In contrast, for individuals who believe
codes of professional conduct, and such codes emphasize more strongly in the importance of ethical and socially
the importance of acting in the public interest. Thus, given responsible behavior, the moral aspects of business deci-
that the more senior employees in most corporate sions should be more salient. Thus, attitudes toward the
accounting departments are likely to be certified, one could importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility
easily argue that the ethical climate in such departments provide a lens through which business decisions are viewed
should ideally reflect concerns for following codes of (Singhapakdi et al. 1996).
123
48 W. E. Shafer
It appears that most prior studies of the perceived influenced by contextual factors such as the organizational
importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility ethical culture.
have focused on the antecedents rather than the conse- Recent empirical research also generally supports the
quences of PRESOR attitudes. For instance, Singhapakdi argument that socialization processes influence attitudes
et al. (2001), Ahmed et al. (2003), and Axinn et al. (2004) toward corporate ethics and social responsibility. For
document cross-cultural differences in PRESOR responses. instance, Lamsa et al. (2008) found that business education
Other variables found to influence PRESOR responses was associated with increased student support for the
include ethical orientation (idealism and relativism), age, shareholder model (similar to the stockholder view), using
and gender (see Singhapakdi et al. 2001; Axinn et al. a survey instrument developed by the Aspen Institute.
2004). Singhapakdi et al. (1996) suggest that PRESOR Waldman et al. (2006) found that perceptions of visionary
attitudes may influence the ethical decisions of a variety of leadership by CEOs were associated with increased
business professionals including accountants, and called (decreased) management perceptions of the importance of
for future research to test this proposition. However, the the stakeholder (shareholder) view. Groves and LaRocca
impact of PRESOR attitudes on ethical decision making in (2011) found that organizational leaders who were rated
accounting has received little attention. As discussed highly by their employees on deontological ethical values
below, both conceptual and empirical support exists for this such as altruism and universal rights were viewed as pos-
relationship. sessing transformational leadership styles, which were
associated with employee support for the stakeholder view
of corporate ethics, as measured by the PRESOR scale.
Hypothesis Development Consistent with these arguments, in the literature on
organizational ethical culture/climate it has traditionally
Though no prior accounting study has addressed the issue, been proposed that employee perceptions of ethical culture
a sound argument can be made for the existence of a influence decisions by establishing organizational expec-
relationship between the perceived ethical climate in ones tations for what is considered acceptable or unacceptable
organization and belief in the importance of ethical and behavior (Trevino et al. 1998; Victor and Cullen 1987,
socially responsible behavior. The PRESOR scale is a 1988). Thus, the organizational expectations embodied in
measure of attitudes, and it is well established that attitudes ethical climates set standards that employees are encour-
are subject to change due to a variety of influences aged to follow, and are part of organizational socialization
including persuasion processes (Petty et al. 1997). Fishbein processes designed to influence employee attitudes.
and Ajzen (1975, 6, emphasis added) define an attitude as Accordingly, in Fig. 3 we explicitly recognize the rela-
a learned predisposition to respond in a consistently tionship between organizational ethical climate and atti-
favorable or unfavorable manner with respect to a given tudes toward the importance of corporate ethics and social
object. Since attitudes are learned, it seems quite logical responsibility in our conceptual model.6
that they may be modified through organizational sociali- If perceived organizational expectations dictate aggres-
zation processes. Lamsa et al. (2008, p. 46) define social- sive or unethical behavior, employees should seek a
ization as a process by which an individuals attitudes, mechanism for rationalizing their participation in such
values, motives and behavior are influenced to conform to behavior. The adjustment of ones attitudes toward the
what is seen as desirable in a particular socio-cultural importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility
context.5 They summarize Berger and Luckmanns seems to be a likely rationalization mechanism in this
(1966) view of socialization as the internalization of context. For instance, if the organizational climate places
institutional attitudes and values that effectively assimilate an inordinate emphasis on achieving company profitability
individuals into a given social or organizational setting. (an egoistic/local climate), professional accountants may
These arguments clearly suggest that PRESOR attitudes justify aggressive reporting methods as being in line with
may be influenced by organizational socialization pro- the traditional stockholder view and minimize the impor-
cesses. Indeed, in their seminal paper, Singhapakdi et al. tance of the stakeholder view of corporate ethics and social
(1996, p. 1138) suggested that PRESOR attitudes may be responsibility.
Organizational contexts that normalize the aggressive
pursuit of self-interest (egoistic/individual climates) may
5
Lamsa et al. (2008) argue that the three primary sources of
6
socialization are education, peer groups, and organizational work The questionnaire items that measure support for the stockholder
settings. Due to the business focus of PRESOR attitudes, we feel that view dimension are reverse-scored; consequently, in Fig. 3 higher
the two most influential sources of socialization or learning processes scores for both the stockholder view and stakeholder view dimensions
are likely to be formal education (particularly business education) and of the PRESOR scale represent stronger belief in the importance of
work settings. corporate ethics and social responsibility.
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 49
Instrumental H1-
Climate
also lead employees to justify unethical behavior through clearly consistent with the stakeholder view of corporate
their attitudes toward the importance of corporate ethics ethics and social responsibility. In contrast, the stockholder
and social responsibility, particularly in the context of view would prioritize the pursuit of goals such as profit-
earnings management. For instance, earnings management ability and competitiveness over these concerns.
activities that increase ones personal salary and/or bonus If the organization de-emphasizes the importance of
will often also increase the reported profitability of the acting in the public interest and following rules or pro-
company. Thus, they may easily be rationalized by fessional codes of conduct and employees face pressure to
decreasing ones support for the perceived importance of acquiesce in earnings management schemes, again it seems
corporate ethics and social responsibility. Consequently, likely that they will adjust their attitudes toward the
we propose the following hypothesis.7 importance of ethics and social responsibility in order to
rationalize or justify unethical actions. This line of rea-
Hypothesis 1 A stronger perceived emphasis on corpo-
soning leads to the following hypothesis.
rate profitability and the pursuit of self-interest (collec-
tively, an instrumental climate) will lead accountants to Hypothesis 2 A stronger perceived emphasis on serving
less strongly support the importance of corporate ethics and the public interest (benevolent/cosmopolitan climate) and
social responsibility. following laws or professional codes of conduct (princi-
pled/cosmopolitan climate) will lead accountants to more
If the organizational culture emphasizes protection of
strongly support the importance of corporate ethics and
the public interest (benevolent/cosmopolitan climate) and
social responsibility.
compliance with laws and professional codes of conduct
(principled/cosmopolitan climate), this should reinforce In light of the foregoing discussion, we clearly antici-
commitment to professional values, increasing support for pate that attitudes toward the importance of corporate
the stakeholder view and reducing support for the stock- ethics and social responsibility will impact ethical deci-
holder view of corporate ethics and social responsibility. sions. Although the evidence is mixed, some empirical
Serving the public interest, or doing what is best for the support also exists for this proposition. For instance, Shafer
collective welfare of society, is consistent with the stake- and Simmons (2008) found highly significant correlations
holder view, which explicitly acknowledges that corpora- between both the stockholder and stakeholder views and all
tions have obligations to external stakeholders their measures of ethical decision making among tax pro-
organizations or groups other than the companys share- fessionals employed by CPA firms. Elias (2002) examined
holders. In contrast, according to the stockholder view the the direct relationships between PRESOR attitudes and
interests of external stakeholders should be subordinated to ethical judgments for the thirteen Merchant (1989) earn-
those of shareholders. Similarly, a focus on following ings management scenarios. The sample consisted of over
professional codes of conduct, which emphasize serving 700 participants including public accountants, industry
the public interest and behaving in an ethical fashion, is accountants, accounting faculty, and accounting students.
For the sample of industry accountants, none of the rela-
7
Since most ethical climate studies, including some accounting tionships between PRESOR attitudes and ethical judgments
studies, have found an instrumental climate dimension that combines
were significant at conventional levels. However, for the
elements of the egoistic/individual and egoistical/local climates
(Martin and Cullen 2006), we are proposing one hypothesis that public accounting sample, both the stockholder view
includes both these climate dimensions. and stakeholder view dimensions in general exhibited
123
50 W. E. Shafer
significant associations with ethical judgments for operat- behavior as important, essential to long-term profit-
ing and accounting manipulations.8 In the current study we ability, central to organizational effectiveness, critical
refine Elias (2002) approach using a multi-item measure to the survival of a business enterprise, compatible
of ethical judgments and also eliciting participants with profitability, and good business. Thus, it appears
behavioral intentions in an effort to document significant that attitudes toward the stakeholder view may also have a
relationships between PRESOR attitudes and ethical deci- relatively strong impact on behavioral intentions.
sions among management accountants. In light of the above discussion, one can surmise that
Indeed, most prior studies adopting the Merchant (1989) support for the stockholder view of corporate ethics and
earnings management scenarios have examined only ethical social responsibility will result in more lenient ethical
judgments. In the current paper we argue that the perceived judgments of aggressive actions and a higher estimated
importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility will likelihood of engaging in such actions. Individuals who
have significant effects on behavioral intentions as well as feel that unethical and socially irresponsible behaviors are
ethical judgments regarding earnings management. sometimes necessary and in the best interests of a company
In this respect, it is important to recognize that the prac- should make relatively favorable teleological evaluations
tical focus of attitudes toward corporate ethics and social of such issues, resulting in such actions being viewed as
responsibility, as reflected in the PRESOR instrument (see more ethical or moral. As argued previously, such indi-
Appendix 2), suggests that their greatest impact may be on viduals should also be more likely to establish intentions to
behavioral intentions. If one considers the attitudes that engage in similar actions. On the other hand, individuals
comprise the stockholder view, this practical focus is par- who support the stakeholder view feel that unethical/
ticularly evident. The statements give priority to corporate socially irresponsible actions are antithetical to the long-
profitability, efficiency, competitiveness, and survival over term success of business enterprises; consequently, their
considerations of ethics and social responsibility. Essen- teleological evaluations of such issues should be relatively
tially, this view holds that questionable or aggressive actions harsh, leading them to judge such actions as unethical or
may be necessary to serve the best interests of the stock- immoral. This should result in a lower likelihood of
holders. It does not explicitly deny that the actions are developing intentions to engage in such actions. More
unethical from a deontological point of view; it simply generally, stronger belief in the importance of corporate
maintains that they may be required for success or survival in ethics and social responsibility (rejection of the stockholder
a competitive business environment. The practical focus of view and acceptance of the stakeholder view) should lead
this view suggests that its primary impact should be on tel- professional accountants to make more ethical decisions, as
eological evaluations of ethical issues; consequently, its reflected in the following hypothesis.10
greatest effect is likely to be on behavioral intentions.9
Hypothesis 3 Stronger support for the importance of
A practical focus is also evident in the stakeholder view.
corporate ethics and social responsibility will lead profes-
These items describe ethical and socially responsible
sional accountants to judge aggressive actions as more
unethical and decrease the likelihood that they will express
8
Following the early results of Singhapakdi et al. (1996), Elias an intention to engage in similar actions.
(2002) grouped the PRESOR items into three factors: (1) social
responsibility; (2) long-term gains; and (3) short-term gains. The In accordance with well-established theoretical models
social responsibility and long-term gains factors roughly correspond
of ethical decision making in organizations (e.g., Hunt and
with our measure of the stakeholder view, while the short-term gains
factor corresponds with our stockholder view. Elias (2002) results for Vitell 1986, 1991) and the results of recent accounting
the sample of public accountants indicated that five of six possible studies (e.g., Henderson and Kaplan 2005; Shafer 2008),
relationships between the three PRESOR factors and earnings
manipulations (operating and accounting) were significant at con-
ventional levels. The only relationship that was not significant was 10
Note that we are not proposing separate hypotheses for the
that between long-term gains and operating manipulations. associations between PRESOR attitudes and operating versus
9
As recognized in the influential HuntVitell theory of ethical accounting manipulations, because we do not expect these relation-
decision making in organizations (Hunt and Vitell 1986, 1991), ships to differ across manipulation types. Accountants attitudes
decision makers make both deontological (based on moral principles) toward the importance of corporate ethics and social responsibility
and teleological (based on practical consequences) ethical evaluations should exhibit the same basic relationships with ethical decision
of issues, both of which should directly affect overall ethical making, regardless of the specific types of ethical transgressions
judgments of an issue, which in turn affect behavioral intentions. involved. This argument is supported by the findings of Elias (2002),
However, the HuntVitell model also posits that practical or who documented that PRESOR attitudes were associated with ethical
teleological evaluations of ethical issues (in contrast to deontological judgments for both operating and accounting manipulations. Indeed,
evaluations) have additional direct effects on behavioral intentions. because PRESOR attitudes are not specific to any particular business
Thus, ethical evaluations that are highly dependent on practical or discipline, they have the potential to influence ethical decision
teleological considerations should have relatively large impacts on making across a wide variety of business situations (Singhapakdi
behavioral intentions. et al. 1996).
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 51
we also anticipated that ethical judgments would directly judgments of the likelihood that they would personally engage
influence expressed behavioral intentions. This proposition in similar actions.12 The instrument was administered in
is reflected in the following hypothesis.11 English, which was considered appropriate given the common
use of English in the Hong Kong business community.
Hypothesis 4 Accountants ethical judgments regarding
Responses to the ethical judgment measures were pro-
earnings management will influence their expressed
vided on seven-point scales, with higher numbers indicat-
intentions of engaging in similar behavior.
ing that the action was considered less moral or ethical.
Behavioral intentions were also elicited on seven-point
scales anchored on unlikely (1) and very likely (7).
Research Method
Responses to the Ethical Climate Questionnaire were pro-
vided on the original six-point scale, anchored on com-
Instrument
pletely false (1) and completely true (6). PRESOR
responses were provided on a seven-point scale anchored
Participants responded to (1) four earnings management
on disagree strongly (1) and agree strongly (7). For
scenarios adapted from Merchant (1989); (2) sixteen items
the PRESOR scale, higher numbers are indicative of
from the Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ) (Cullen
stronger support for the stakeholder view dimension and
et al. 1993) designed to measure egoistic/individual, ego-
weaker support for the stockholder view dimension (as
istic/local, benevolent/cosmopolitan, and principled/cos-
previously discussed, this is due to the fact that the
mopolitan climates; (3) the Perceived Importance of Ethics
stockholder view items are all reverse-scored). More gen-
and Social Responsibility (PRESOR) scale (Singhapakdi
erally, higher scores on both dimensions of the PRESOR
et al. 1996); and (4) a demographic questionnaire. All these
scale indicate stronger belief in the importance of corporate
scales have been used in prior studies.
ethics and social responsibility.
The four scenarios taken from the Merchant instrument
(illustrated in Appendix 1) included two cases dealing with
Participants
operating manipulations and two cases dealing with
accounting manipulations. The cases were selected because
Access to participants was obtained through personal
they seemed representative of the types of manipulations in
contacts at companies in Hong Kong. A cover letter that
question. For each scenario, participants provided (1) overall
explained the nature of the study and assured the confi-
ethical judgments; (2) judgments on five items from the
dentiality of the information collected was attached to
Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES) (Henderson and Kap-
every instrument distributed. The letter also reminded
lan 2005) designed to measure moral equity (just, fair,
respondents to complete the instrument without assistance
and morally right) and relativism (culturally acceptable
and return it to a contact person in the company in a sealed
and traditionally acceptable); (3) judgments of the likeli-
envelope for collection by the researchers.
hood that their peers would engage in similar actions; and (4)
Approximately 700 instruments were distributed to accoun-
tants working in over 20 companies engaged in a wide variety of
11
As indicated by our research hypotheses and Fig. 3, we are private industries. A total of 211 respondents returned their
proposing that the two PRESOR dimensions will fully mediate the instrument, giving a response rate of approximately 30 percent.
relationship between ethical climate and ethical decisions (we have Five instruments were discarded because of incomplete infor-
not hypothesized any direct paths from ethical climate to ethical
mation given, resulting in a usable sample of 206 responses.13
judgments or behavioral intentions). This is because (1) relatively
little evidence exists on the direct relationships between ethical
climate/culture and ethical decision making in accounting; and (2) the 12
existing evidence does not provide robust or consistent support for the It is relatively common in the accounting ethics literature to
existence of such relationships. For example, Shafer (2008) found that measure behavioral intentions by asking participants to estimate the
only one of twelve possible direct relationships between ethical likelihood that (1) they themselves, and (2) their peers or professional
climate and ethical judgments was significant. Three of four colleagues would engage in similar actions (e.g., Shafer 2008).
13
relationships between ethical climate and behavioral intentions were Though it would have been desirable to have a larger sample size,
significant (p \ .05), but these results only held true for high we feel that the sample size is reasonable based on common
relativists. In addition, Shafer and Wang (2011) found that only one recommendations for SEM modeling and prior practice in accounting.
of ten potential direct associations between their ethical climate/ Smith and Langfield-Smith (2004, p. 66) note that there is variation in
culture measures and ethical judgments was significant. Also note that recommended minimum sample sizes in the SEM literature, with
we are proposing that the relationships among the PRESOR some authors suggesting a minimum of 100 participants and others a
dimensions and behavioral intentions will be partially mediated by minimum of 200. Thus, our sample size exceeds the larger of these
ethical judgments (we have proposed both direct links from the recommendations. Smith and Langfield-Smith (2004) also noted that
PRESOR dimensions to behavioral intentions and indirect links among the 20 studies they reviewed that used SEM in management
through ethical judgments). The validity of these assumptions is later accounting contexts, 11 had sample sizes below 200, and three had
addressed by testing alternative model specifications. samples smaller than 100 participants.
123
52 W. E. Shafer
As indicated in Table 1, the mean age of participants Table 1 Summary of demographic data
was approximately 35 (range of 22 to 56 years). They had Sample size by position
an average of 10 years of professional accounting experi- General staff 66
ence (range of 1 to 36 years), and 4.4 years of accounting
Senior staff 42
experience with their current organization (range of .5 to
Supervisor 45
26 years).14 Fifty-one percent of respondents were male.
Manager 49
Ninety percent had bachelors degrees or above. About 30
Type of current employment
percent of the respondents were general staff, 20 percent
Local company (non-listed) 113
senior staff, 20 percent supervisors, and 23 percent man-
Local listed company 20
agers.15 Approximately 56 percent worked in local non-
Multinational company 68
listed companies, 10 percent in local listed companies,
Mean age 35.1 (8.0)
and 34 percent in multinational companies. All partici-
Mean total experience 10.0 (7.2)
pants were ethnic Chinese. Finally, approximately half
Mean years of experience with company years 4.4 (4.2)
the sample held CPA or Chartered Accountant certifica-
Gender
tions, and 24 participants held management accounting
certifications.16 Male 101
Female 99
Scale Construction Degrees held
None/associate 12
Exploratory principal components factor analyses were Bachelors 120
initially performed for the ethical judgment, behavioral Masters 61
Other 5
Certification
Bookkeeping/technical 12
14
We asked participants to indicate their total number of years of CPA/chartered accountant 94
professional accounting experience, based on the expectation that
this term is commonly understood to include both public accounting Management accountant 24
experience and experience in accounting positions in other types of Others 25
organizations such as government and industry.
15
Notes (1) Numbers do not total 206 due to missing values. (2)
We were informed by accounting personnel in private industry in Numbers in parentheses are standard deviations
Hong Kong that the term general staff would be commonly
understood as relatively low-level positions in an accounting depart-
ment, while the terms senior staff, supervisor, and manager intention, ethical climate, and PRESOR measures.17 A
would be understood to be progressively higher position levels. This minimum cutoff for factor loadings was set at .4, a com-
information is supported by our data. The mean total professional monly used cutoff for exploratory factor analysis (Chur-
experience reported by general staff, senior staff, supervisors, and
managers was 5, 9, 11, and 15 years, respectively. The mean level of
chill 1979; Singhapakdi et al. 1996). Before conducting the
experience with their current employer reported by these respective factor analyses for ethical judgments and behavioral
groups was 2, 4, 5, and 6 years. intentions, we averaged responses to the scale items for the
16
We also conducted tests of the relations between the continuous two operating scenarios and also for the two accounting
variables in our conceptual model and the demographic measures. scenarios to develop combined measures of ethical judg-
These tests revealed relatively few significant relationships. Age, total
professional experience, and experience with the current employer
ments and behavioral intentions for both operating and
had little influence on the continuous measures. The only exceptions accounting manipulations.18
were that age was correlated (p \ .05) with ethical judgments and The factor analyses for ethical judgments indicated that,
intentions for operating manipulations, and total professional expe- for both operating and accounting manipulations, overall
rience was also correlated (p \ .05) with ethical judgments for
operating manipulations. Older participants tended to judge operating
ethical judgments and the five MES items all loaded on a
manipulations more leniently, and older participants and those with 17
more total professional experience indicated a higher likelihood of We initially analyzed the data using exploratory (rather than
engaging in such manipulations. Gender was significantly correlated confirmatory) factor analysis because (1) significant variations in
with behavioral intentions for operating manipulations (p = .01) and factor loadings for some of the instruments, in particular the ethical
with the stakeholder view (p = .003). Relative to males, females were climate and PRESOR scales, have been found in previous studies; and
less likely to express an intention to engage in operating manipula- (2) the instruments have had only very limited prior usage among
tions, and more likely to support the stakeholder view. Position had a Chinese management accountants; thus, it should not be assumed that
highly significant effect (p \ .0001) on behavioral intentions for their factor structure will be the same as that previously documented
operating manipulations, with employees in higher positions estimat- in other professional and national contexts.
18
ing higher likelihoods of committing such actions. Supervisors and Responses to both the operating and accounting scenarios factor
managers also believed less strongly in the stakeholder view analyzed the same regardless of whether the items for the two related
(p = .046). cases were analyzed individually or were averaged together.
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 53
single dimension, which will be referred to simply as PRESOR dimensions were also computed as the numerical
ethical judgments.19 The coefficient alpha for the ethical average of the individual items comprising each factor.20
judgment items for both the operating and accounting We conducted confirmatory factor analyses to validate
manipulations exceeded .90, indicating a very strong the scales.21 A confirmatory factor analysis for the three
internal reliability of the measures. Operating and ethical climate constructs (see Appendix 2) provided a
accounting ethical judgment scales were constructed by reasonably strong fit to the data. The root mean square
computing the mean responses for the six items comprising error of approximation (RMSEA) was .084, which is below
each scale (overall ethical judgments plus the five MES the recommended .10 cutoff (Hu and Bentler 1998). The
items). Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Incremental Fit Index
The factor analysis results for the two behavioral (IFI) for the model were both .94, which indicates a strong
intention measures [estimated likelihoods that (1) the model fit.22 A similar analysis for the two PRESOR con-
respondent and (2) their professional colleagues would structs (stock and stake) also provided a strong fit to the
commit similar actions] also indicated that these items data, with an RMSEA of .053 and CFI and IFI values both
loaded strongly on a single dimension. As in the case of the equal to .98. Since the confirmatory factor analyses pro-
ethical judgment measures, the internal reliability of the vided acceptable model fits, respecification of the models
two-item behavioral intention measures (whether calcu- was not necessary (Anderson and Gerbing 1988; Houghton
lated separately for each of the four cases or combined for and Jinkerson 2007).
the operating scenarios and the accounting scenarios) was To further validate the scales and model specification,
quite high, exceeding .85. Consequently, scales for we conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses for
behavioral intentions for accounting and operating manip- the model as a whole (Furr 2011). The first analysis
ulations were calculated as the mean response to the two included all the nine latent constructs (three ethical climate
related measures (self-reported and peer intentions). measures, two PRESOR measures, and measures of both
Three interpretable factors with Eigenvalues in excess of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions for accounting
one were identified for the ethical climate instrument: a manipulation and operating manipulations). This model
benevolent/cosmopolitan factor that included all four of the provided a reasonably good fit to the data, with an RMSEA
a priori items (see Appendix 2) and had a coefficient alpha of .086 and comparative and incremental fit indices both
of .834; a principled/cosmopolitan factor that included all equal to .91. We then compared this nine-factor model with
four a priori items and had a strong coefficient alpha of alternative model specifications. Specifically, we estimated
.875; and an instrumental factor that included seven of the two eight-factor models, one of which combined ethical
eight egoistic/individual and egoistic/local climate items judgments across the operating and accounting scenarios,
and had a coefficient alpha of .728. The factor loadings for
20
the ethical climate dimensions were reasonably strong, as As described in this section, we constructed scales for our
continuous measures by averaging the responses to individual items.
indicated in Appendix 2.
These scales were used for purposes of testing the potential effects of
The factor analysis for the PRESOR items revealed two demographic measures on responses and to provide a basis for
factors with Eigenvalues in excess of one representing the correlation analysis. In the structural equation models, the individual
stockholder view and stakeholder view dimensions (see items comprising each scale were used as the indicators for each
latent construct in accordance with standard practice. The individual
Appendix 2). The stockholder view factor included all five
indicators for the ethical climate and PRESOR constructs are
of the a priori items and had a coefficient alpha of .800. illustrated in Appendix 2. The individual indicators for the ethical
The stakeholder view factor included all eight of the a judgment constructs include the overall ethical judgments and
priori items and had a coefficient alpha of .857. Thus, the responses to the five MES items for each of the individual earnings
management scenarios, while the individual indicators for behavioral
PRESOR scale dimensions were found to possess high
intentions include the two behavioral intention measures for each of
internal reliability in the current study. The factor loadings the scenarios.
for the PRESOR items, as indicated in Appendix 2, were 21
The initial use of exploratory factor analysis followed by
also reasonably strong. Scales for the ethical climate and confirmatory factor analysis for scale validation is consistent with
the recommendations of Anderson and Gerbing (1988) in their
influential article. These authors suggest (p. 412) that, rather than
19
Note that this result contrasts with other recent empirical studies in viewing exploratory versus confirmatory analysis as a strict dichot-
accounting that have used the MES (e.g., Henderson and Kaplan omy, these approaches may be viewed as a part of an ordered
2005; Shafer 2008). Those studies found that the MES items loaded progression. This progression may begin with a strictly exploratory
on multiple factors generally corresponding with the a priori approach (in which there is no prespecification of the number of
dimensions of the scale such as moral equity and relativism. factors) as adopted in the current study, and proceed through a variety
Apparently, our Hong Kong participants did not make a clear of approaches that culminate with a confirmatory analysis of the
distinction among these aspects of ethical judgments. The failure of measurement model that achieves adequate model fit.
22
the MES items to load on distinct dimensions is later recognized as a Generally, goodness-of-fit indices in excess of .90 indicate a good
limitation of our study. model fit (Byrne 2001; Hu and Bentler 1999).
123
54 W. E. Shafer
Intent OM -.645
.000
Judge AM .433 -.267
.000 .000
Intent AM -.272 .601 -.456
.000 .000 .000
INST -.403 .362 -.270 .253
.000 .000 .000 .000
BCC .265 -.239 .225 -.181 -.147
.000 .001 .001 .009 .036
PCC .244 -.251 .123 -.201 -.103 .551
.000 .000 .079 .004 .142 .000
Stock .242 -.274 .287 -.282 -.321 .170 .267
.001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .015 .000
Stake .488 -.406 .298 -.251 -.311 .428 .365 .477
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Notes (1) Top numbers in each cell are Pearson correlation coefficients. Bottom numbers are significance levels based on two-tailed tests. (2) For
ethical judgments, higher numbers indicated that the actions were deemed more unethical; for behavioral intentions, higher numbers indicated a
higher likelihood of committing the actions. (3) For all ethical climate measures, higher numbers indicated a stronger perceived emphasis on the
related climate dimension. (4) For the Stock and Stake measures, higher numbers indicated a greater belief in the importance of ethics and social
responsibility
Judge OM Ethical judgments for operating manipulations, BCC Benevolent/cosmopolitan climate, Intent OM Behavioral intentions for operating
manipulations, PCC Principled/cosmopolitan climate, Judge AM Ethical judgments for accounting manipulations, Stock Stockholder view, Intent
AM behavioral intentions for accounting manipulations, Stake stakeholder view, INST instrumental climate
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 55
Accounting
Ethical
Judgments
Instrumental -.44**
Climate -.42**
-.25**
Stockholder
-.34** View
Accounting
Behavioral
-.16* Intentions
Benevolent/
Cosmopolitan .32**
Climate
.21*
Operating
Stakeholder Ethical
View Judgments
.32**
Principled/ .50** -.51**
Cosmopolitan
Climate
Operating
Behavioral
Notes: Intentions
1. Only paths with significant coefficients are displayed above.
2. *: p<.05; **:p<.01
judgments and lower estimated likelihoods of engaging in was significantly associated with the stockholder view but
similar actions. Finally, the strong correlations between not the stakeholder view. Taken together, these results
ethical judgments and behavioral intentions for both provide partial support for Hypothesis 2.
accounting and operating manipulations provide support The stockholder view was significantly associated with
for Hypothesis 4. behavioral intentions for both the accounting and operating
manipulations, but was not associated with ethical judg-
Structural Equation Analysis ments. The negative path coefficients from the stockholder
view to accounting and operating behavioral intentions
A structural equation model (SEM), presented in Fig. 4, indicate that participants who believed more strongly in the
was used to simultaneously analyze the relationships importance of ethics and social responsibility were less
among the variables of interest.23 Overall model fit tests likely to express intentions to manipulate earnings, as
were first conducted by reference to several key indices. hypothesized. In contrast, the stakeholder view was sig-
The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) nificantly associated with both accounting and operating
was .061, a value well below the desired .10 cutoff. The ethical judgments, but was not directly associated with
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Incremental Fit Index for behavioral intentions. This finding indicates that stronger
the model, both at .95, indicate a strong model fit. Col- support for the stakeholder view is associated with more
lectively, these results indicate that the model provided a harsh ethical judgments of both operating and accounting
good fit to the data. manipulations, but not directly associated with behavioral
After verifying the overall fit of the model, we examined intentions regarding such manipulations. Taken together,
the parameter estimates to test the research hypotheses. the findings for the associations between PRESOR attitudes
The instrumental climate dimension was associated with and ethical decisions provide partial support for Hypothesis
the stockholder view and stakeholder view at the .01 sig- 3. Hypothesis 4 was strongly supported, with highly sig-
nificance level or smaller. These results, consistent with nificant path coefficients from ethical judgments to
Hypothesis 1, indicate that perceived instrumental ethical behavioral intentions for both accounting and operating
climates are associated with diminished concern for cor- manipulations.
porate ethics and social responsibility. To summarize, our hypothesized model provided at least
The benevolent/cosmopolitan climate dimension was partial support for each of the hypotheses. Strong associ-
significantly associated with the stakeholder view, though ations were found between the instrumental climate and
it was not significantly associated with the stockholder both the stockholder and stakeholder views, which fully
view. In contrast, the principled/cosmopolitan dimension support Hypothesis 1. Hypothesis 2 was partially supported
by the significant associations between the public interest
23
To simplify the presentation, the model in Fig. 4 does not include (law and code) climate and the stakeholder (stockholder)
the correlations among the variables. The latent constructs at each view. Hypothesis 3 was also partially supported, with the
step in the model (i.e., ethical climates and stockholder/stakeholder
stakeholder (stockholder) view exhibiting significant rela-
views) were all significantly correlated with each other, and these
correlations were controlled for in the model. tionships with ethical judgments (behavioral intentions).
123
56 W. E. Shafer
Hypothesis 4 was fully supported, with strong relationships PRESOR dimensions to behavioral intentions (this assumes
documented between ethical judgments and behavioral that PRESOR is only associated with intentions through its
intentions for both operating and accounting association with judgments). This model provided a sig-
manipulations. nificantly poorer fit to the data (increase in v2 = 85.7,
p \ .01). Thus, the hypothesized partial mediation model is
Supplemental Tests preferred over a full mediation model.25
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 57
variety of ethical judgments among accountants in private judgments, also appears to have important practical
industry. In the accounting profession, discussions of implications. The ethical climate in an organization is
serving the public interest have traditionally been limited subject to at least some degree of control. Thus, the find-
primarily to the independent auditors role in certifying ings of the current study suggest that if corporations take
financial statements. However, the findings of the current proactive steps to enhance the ethical climate or tone at the
study indicate that an organizational emphasis on the top in the organization, this may increase professional
public interest may also discourage unethical behavior accountants belief in the importance of corporate ethics
among industry accountants. The significant relationship and social responsibility, and in the long-term discourage
between the principled/cosmopolitan climate and the earnings manipulations.
stockholder view implies that an organizational emphasis The results of the current study also provide some
on following professional accounting standards and codes interesting contrasts with the findings of Elias (2002) with
of conduct can reduce the negative influence of the tradi- respect to the relationships between PRESOR attitudes and
tional stockholder view on industry accountants ethical ethical judgments of earnings manipulations among
decisions. accountants working in private industry. In the Elias (2002)
Belief in the importance of corporate ethics and social study, none of these relationships were significant at con-
responsibility was also associated with ethical decisions ventional levels. In the current study, the stakeholder view
regarding both accounting and operating earnings man- was significantly associated with ethical judgments for
agement. As anticipated, there were no differences in the both accounting and operating manipulations. In addition,
nature of the relationships between PRESOR attitudes and we extended the Elias (2002) study to measure behavioral
operating versus accounting manipulations. This finding, intentions, finding that the stockholder view significantly
consistent with prior research (Elias 2002), indicates that affected participants expressed intentions to engage in
due to the relatively broad nature of PRESOR attitudes, both accounting and operating manipulations.
their associations with earnings management are robust This study is subject to a number of limitations; conse-
across manipulation types. quently, the results should be interpreted with caution. Per-
However, there was a significant difference in the pat- haps most importantly, the data are based on correlations and
terns of association between the stockholder versus stake- thus do not establish causality. Future experimental studies
holder views and ethical decisions. Contrary to our should be designed to provide a firm basis for conclusions
expectations, the structural equation results indicate that regarding causal relationships among the variables. Due to
the stockholder view was not associated with ethical practical constraints on the length of the research instrument,
judgments for either operating or accounting manipula- impression management was not measured in this study,
tions, but was significantly associated with behavioral which can be regarded as a limitation. Another limitation of
intentions. These findings may be due to the strong prac- the current study is that it relied on a convenience sample
tical or utilitarian focus of the stockholder view, as previ- obtained through a network of personal contacts. Further,
ously discussed. It appears that support for the primacy of since demographic information on the pool of potential
stockholder interests and company profitability is not respondents was not available, meaningful tests for possible
associated with beliefs regarding whether aggressive non-response bias could not be conducted.
financial reporting is moral or ethical, but is associated This study is also limited by the fact that very few prior
with the likelihood of engaging in such actions. studies of this nature have been conducted in China; thus,
In contrast, the stakeholder view was not directly asso- there could be differences in the interpretation of certain
ciated with behavioral intentions in the SEM model, but measures. For instance, the fact that overall ethical judg-
was significantly associated with ethical judgments for ments and the five Multidimensional Ethics Scale items
accounting and operating manipulations. With the benefit loaded on a single factor rather than the distinct dimensions
of hindsight, it appears that the stakeholder view should be documented in prior accounting studies (e.g., Henderson
more likely to influence ethical judgments than the stock- and Kaplan 2005) indicates that the distinctions among the
holder view, given its inclusion of idealistic statements dimensions of the MES were not clearly recognized by
regarding the importance of corporate ethics and social accountants in Hong Kong. An explanation for this finding
responsibility. Future researchers may wish to further is not readily apparent; thus, future research could seek to
investigate the differential impacts of the stockholder and clarify this issue.
stakeholder dimensions of the PRESOR scale on accoun- The ethical climate questionnaire explicitly focuses on
tants ethical decision processes. participants perceptions of the ethical environment in their
The finding that organizational ethical climate is asso- current organization, and directs them to respond to the
ciated with attitudes toward corporate ethics and social questions in terms of how the climate really is in their
responsibility, which in turn are associated with ethical current organization, rather than how it should be.
123
58 W. E. Shafer
Nevertheless, there is a possibility that prior experience in Action: Mr. Tsang implemented his strategy of record-
other organizations (such as public accounting firms) could ing excess inventory reserves. The division still met its
influence participants perceptions of the climate in their 2011 profit targets, and had some excess inventory reserves
current organization. We did not collect detailed informa- that could be used to increase reported profits in the future.
tion regarding the extent of our participants prior experi-
ence in other types of work organizations; consequently,
we were unable to address this issue in the current study. Appendix 2: Scale Items and Reliabilities
The inability to address this issue should also be recog-
nized as a limitation of the current study.
Factor
loadings
Appendix 1: Earnings Management Scenarios
Instrumental climate: (a = .728)
Case 1: In September 2011, Mr. Chan, the General Man- 1. In this organization, people are mostly out for .553
ager of a large division of a multinational company, real- themselves
ized the division would need strong performance in the 2. In this organization, people protect their own interest .693
fourth quarter to reach its budget targets. He decided to above other considerations
implement a sales program offering liberal payment terms 3. People in this organization are very concerned about .746
what is best for them
to pull some sales that would normally occur next year into
4. People are expected to do anything to further the .600
the current year; customers accepting delivery in the fourth
organizations interests
quarter would not have to pay the invoice for 120 days.
5. Work is considered sub-standard only when it hurts the .531
Action: Mr. Chan implemented the sales program, and as a organizations interests
result the division was able to meet its budget targets. 6. People are concerned with the organizations .458
Case 2: Mr. Zhou is the head of a division of a multinational intereststo the exclusion of all else
company that was straining to meet its earnings forecasts 7. Decisions here are primarily viewed in terms of .680
during late 2011. Mr. Zhou decided to call the engagement contribution to profit
partner of a consulting firm that was doing some work for the Benevolent/cosmopolitan climate: (a = .834)
division and ask the consulting firm to not send an invoice 1. It is expected that you will always do what is right for .695
until next year, although the consulting fees had already been the public
incurred in 2011. The consulting partner agreed. 2. People in this organization have a strong sense of .778
responsibility to the outside community
Action: Mr. Zhou did not record the consulting expenses
3. People in this organization are actively concerned .752
until the following year; as a result, the division met its about the public interest
earnings forecasts for 2011.
4. The effects of decisions on the public are a primary .771
Case 3: Mr. Zhu serves as the manager of a small manu- concern in this organization
facturing company that has recently been experiencing Principled/cosmopolitan climate: (a = .875)
financial difficulties. In order to help the company meet its 1. The first consideration is whether a decision violates .827
annual budget targets, he ordered the employees to defer all any law or professional standard
discretionary expenditures (e.g., maintenance, advertising, 2. People are expected to comply with legal and .797
and hiring) into the next accounting period. professional standards over and above other
Action: Mr. Zhus plan was implemented, and as a result considerations
the company was able to meet its budget goals. 3. In this organization, people are expected to strictly .819
follow legal or professional standards
Case 4: Mr. Tsang, the manager of a large division of a
4. In this organization, the law or ethical code of ones .821
retailing firm, realized near the end of 2011 that his divi- profession is the major consideration
sion would significantly exceed its budgeted profit targets PRESOR Scale:
for the year. As a result, he ordered his controller to Stockholder view: (a = .800)
develop a rationale for increasing the reserve for inventory
1. The most important concern for a firm is making a .707
obsolescence. By taking an overly pessimistic view of profit, even if it means bending or breaking the rulesa
future market prospects, the controller was able to identify 2. To remain competitive in a global environment, .673
a significant amount of finished goods to be fully reserved business firms will have to disregard ethics and social
or written off; even though Mr. Tsang was fairly confident responsibilitya
the inventory in question would still be sold at a later date 3. If survival of a business enterprise is at stake, then you .802
must forget about ethics and social responsibilitya
at close to full price.
123
Ethical Climate, Social Responsibility, and Earnings Management 59
123
60 W. E. Shafer
Japanese accounting firms. Management International Review, Singhapakdi, A., Karande, K., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2001). How
45, 459481. important are ethics and social responsibility? A multinational
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Market-
attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609647. ing, 35, 133153.
Rosenzweig, K., & Fischer, M. (1994). Is managing earnings ethically Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C., & Kraft, K. L. (1996).
acceptable? Management Accounting, 75, 3134. The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale
Shafer, W. E. (2008). Ethical climate in Chinese CPA firms. development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 11311140.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 825835. Smith, D., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2004). Structural equation
Shafer, W. E. (2009). Ethical climate, organizational-professional modeling in management accounting research: Critical analysis
conflict and organizational commitment: A study of Chinese and opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 4986.
auditors. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22, Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The
10871110. ethical context in organizations: Influence on employee attitudes
Shafer, W. E., Poon, M. C. C., & Tjosvold, D. (2013a). An and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447476.
investigation of ethical climate in a Singaporean accounting Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1987). A theory and measure of ethical
firm. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26, climate in organizations. Research in Corporate Social Perfor-
312343. mance and Policy, 9, 5171.
Shafer, W. E., Poon, M. C. C., & Tjosvold, D. (2013b). Ethical Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical
climate, goal interdependence, and commitment among Asian work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101125.
auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28, 217244. Waldman, D., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., & House, R. (2006).
Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsi-
Machiavellianism and tax avoidance: A study of Hong Kong Tax bility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15
professionals. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, countries. Journal of International Business, 37, 823837.
21, 695720. Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings
Shafer, W. E., & Wang, Z. (2011). Effects of ethical context and management and corporate governance: The role of the board
Machiavellianism on attitudes toward earnings management in and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9,
China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26, 372392. 295316.
123
Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Science & Business Media
B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.