You are on page 1of 10

Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Scientia Horticulturae
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti

Changes in leaf morphology, antioxidant activity and photosynthesis


capacity in two different drought-tolerant cultivars of
chrysanthemum during and after water stress
Jing Sun 1 , Jing Gu 1 , Jun Zeng, Shuang Han, Aiping Song, Fadi Chen, Weimin Fang,
Jiafu Jiang, Sumei Chen
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Two chrysanthemum cultivars, drought tolerant Nannong Xuefeng and drought sensitive Nannong
Received 9 January 2013 Jingyan were subjected to 7-day drought stress by withholding irrigation, followed by re-watering for 3
Received in revised form 22 June 2013 days. We analyzed the biomass, morphological characteristics, physiological changes, and transcription
Accepted 12 July 2013
proles of genes involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. The biomass of Nannong Xuefeng
increased 67.5% by 7-day drought, while little increase was observed in drought sensitive Nannong
Keywords:
Jingyan. It showed that Nannong Xuefeng had denser trichomes, lower stomata density and greater
Drought stress
quantities of wax on leaf surfaces, i.e., 2.3- and 3-fold of wax in Nannong Jingyan, respectively. Leaves of
Chrysanthemum
Antioxidant enzyme
Nannong Jingyan had a higher concentration of superoxide anion radicals, malondialdehyde, and proline,
Photosynthesis however, these indicators in Nannong Xuefeng were stable throughout the duration of drought stress
Leaf surface morphology and rehydration. Other important factors leading to drought tolerance in chrysanthemums are associated
with reduced ROS damage; these factors include higher activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD
(EC 1.15.1.1), POD (EC 1.11.1.7), and CAT (EC 1.11.1.6), and induced expression of genes encoding these
enzymes and APX (EC1.11.1.11). Although stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration
rate, chlorophyll concentration, and chlorophyll uorescence of the two cultivars both decreased with the
reduced soil water content, the decreases occurred earlier and were more apparent in Nannong Jingyan
that in Nannong Jingyan. In addition, Nannong Xuefeng had a higher photosynthetic capacity during the
stress. Our ndings provide new insights into the mechanisms of drought tolerance in chrysanthemum
plants.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction differences found between species with respect to growth and sur-
vival can be attributed to different abilities for water acquisition,
During their life cycle, plants may experience frequent periods transport and conservation, as well as differences in metabolism
of water decit, and drought is one of the major abiotic stresses (de Carvalho et al., 2011).
affecting plants (Farooq et al., 2009). The capacity of withstanding Plants exploit morphological characteristics of drought adapta-
a water limitation period and the capacity for rapid recovery after tion that ensure maximum water absorption during dry conditions.
rewatering may be adaptive to plants (Galms et al., 2007). Some For example, the cuticle serves creating an effective barrier against
water loss (Mackov et al., 2013). When stomata are closed during
drought stress, however, plant survival depends on the amount of
water lost through the cuticle. The interplay between stomatal and
Abbreviations: APX, ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, catalase; Ci , intercellular CO2 cuticular water loss regulation is thus essential for plants coping
concentration; F m , maximum uorescence in light-adapted state; Fs , steady-state
with water shortages (Mackov et al., 2013). Transpiration through
uorescence in light-adapted state; Fv /Fm , maximum quantum efciency of PSII
photochemistry; Gs , stomatal conductance; H2 O2 , hydrogen peroxide; MDA, malon-
the cuticle is dependent on physical and chemical properties of the
dialdehyde; O2 , superoxide anion radical; Pn , net photosynthetic rate; POD, leaf surface, especially wax content.
peroxidase; PSII, actual photosynthetic efciency of PSII photochemistry; ROS, When higher plants are exposed to exogenous environmen-
reactive oxygen species; RWC, relative water content; SOD, superoxide dismutase; tal stresses, ROS are frequently generated (Munne-Bosch and
SWC, soil volumetric water content; Tr , transpiration rate.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 2584399670; fax: +86 2584395266.
Penuelas, 2003), leading oxidative modications to proteins, lipids,
E-mail address: chensm@njau.edu.cn (S. Chen).
and DNA, and impair normal cell functions (Sairam et al., 2005).
1
These authors contributed equally to this work. To remove ROS, plants have evolved a well-developed antioxidant

0304-4238/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.015
250 J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

defense system. Previous studies have shown that drought tol- plants per treatment. Samples were harvested 0, 3, 5, and 7 days
erant cultivars generally have enhanced constitutive antioxidant after drought stress, and also post-drought after 3-day re-watering.
enzyme activity under drought stress in comparison with sensi- Fully expanded leaves at the third or fourth positions from the apex
tive cultivars. This has been demonstrated under water-limiting of the shoot were sampled.
stress in numerous plant species, such as Pinus densata (Gao et al.,
2009), mulberry (Guha et al., 2010) and woody karst species (Liu 2.2. Soil water status and leaf water status
et al., 2011). Little research, however, has been carried out on gene
expression levels associated with antioxidant defense systems. Soil water status and leaf water status were determined by mea-
Osmotic adjustment, accomplished via compatible solute accu- suring soil volumetric water content (SWC) and leaf relative water
mulation, is a major process in postponement of dehydration stress content (RWC), respectively, in the morning (9 a.m.10 a.m.). SWC
during water-scarce conditions (Morgan, 1990). Proline is one of of soil in a 010 cm from the soil surface of each pot was mon-
the most important cytosolutes, and its concentration has been sug- itored by time domain reectometry (Soil Moisture Equipment
gested as a general indicator for drought tolerance (Ahmed et al., Corp., Santa Bar-bara, CA). RWC was determined according to Guha
2009; Liu et al., 2011). et al. (2010). RWC (%) = [(fw dw)/(sw dw)] 100, where fw is
The limitation of plant growth imposed by low water availabil- fresh weight of sampled leaves, sw is the mass after rehydration by
ity is mainly due to reduction of plant carbon balance, which is soaking sampled leaves in distilled water for 24 h, and dw is oven
largely dependent on photosynthesis (Flexas and Medrano, 2002). dry weight (105 C) of leaves. Each data point represented the mean
Photosynthesis is one of the most sensitive processes in response to of three independent samples.
drought stress. During drought stress, the rst response of almost
all plants is stomatal closure to prevent transpirational water loss 2.3. Measurement of root/shoot ratio
(Alscher and Cumming, 1990). Stomatal closure limits CO2 absorp-
tion and leads to a parallel decline in photosynthesis. When drought In order to determine biomass accumulation, roots and shoots
stress is more severe, non-stomatal limitations on photosynthe- of two cultivars were sampled on 7 days after drought stress. Dry
sis are observed, including protein degradation, declining Rubisco mass of shoots and roots was determined after being dried at 105 C
activity, and reduced photosystem II quantum efciency (Reddy until constant weight. Root/shoot ratio was calculated as total root
et al., 2004). During initial stages of drought stress, rapid stomatal biomass divided by shoot biomass. Changes in root/shoot ratio
closure is conducive both to water conservation and maintenance was expressed in [(R:S(drought) R:S(control) )/R:S(control) ] 100%. The
of higher photosynthetic and metabolic activity (Hu et al., 2010). changes in root/shoot ratio of each cultivar were a mean value
Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium), an important obtained from 5 individual plants.
ornamental plant native to China, is widely cultivated for orna-
mental purposes around the world (Li, 1993). Chrysanthemum 2.4. Morphological characteristics of chrysanthemum lower leaf
production is highly labor-intensive in terms of water manage- epidermis
ment; because of water scarcity, the breeding of drought tolerant
chrysanthemums is thus highly desirable. To the best of our The surface structure of the lower leaf epidermis was observed
knowledge, however, little information on mechanisms of drought by scanning electron microscopy. Specimens were prepared
tolerance in cut chrysanthemums is available. In this study, in order according to He et al. (2011). To calculate trichome density and
to illustrate the inter-linked mechanisms underlying chrysan- stomata density, each sample was observed under 10 different
themum drought tolerance, we evaluated leaf epidermal surface microscope visual elds. Wax extraction and estimation followed
morphology, antioxidant activity, and photosynthetic characteris- the protocol of Russin et al. (1997). For the extraction, 1-g leaf
tics in two cultivars. We also examined the expression of genes samples were immersed in 50 ml of chloroform for 60 s at room
encoding antioxidant defense systems in chrysanthemums. The temperature. The wax content of each cultivar was a mean value
present research inferred that a comprehensive adaption was obtained from 20 independent samples.
employed for chrysanthemum to cope with drought stress.
2.5. Measurement of enzymatic antioxidants and protein content

2. Materials and methods A 0.5-g leaf sample was ground to a ne powder in liquid
nitrogen and extracted by homogenization in 5 ml 50 mM potas-
2.1. Plant materials sium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA and 1%
(w/v) polyvinyl pyrrolidone 30. The homogenate was centrifuged
Cut chrysanthemum cultivars Nannong Xuefeng (drought tol- (12,000 g, 15 min, 4 C) and the supernatant used for subsequent
erant) and Nannong Jingyan (drought sensitive) were obtained enzyme assays. SOD, CAT, and APX activities were determined as
from the Chrysanthemum Germplasm Resource Preservation Cen- described in Yin et al. (2009). In particular, SOD activity was assayed
ter, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. Plants were grown in by the photochemical NBT method. 100 l supernatant was added
pots (15 cm in diameter 12 cm in depth) containing a mixture to 2.9 ml reaction mixture containing 50 mM potassium phosphate
of loamy garden soil, perlite, and vermiculite (3:2:1, v/v/v) and buffer (pH 7.8), 13 mM l-methionine, 75 M NBT, 2 M riboavin
maintained in a greenhouse with a mean temperature of 26/19 C and 1 mM EDTA. Then the reaction was illuminated for 10 min in
(day/night), relative humidity of 7585%, photon ux density of white uorescent light (100 mol2 s1 ), and the absorbance was
600700 mol m2 s1 . Morphologically uniform seedlings at the recorded at 560 nm. One unit of SOD activity was dened as the
810-leaf stage were selected for drought stress experiments. Well- quantity sufcient to inhibit the reduction of NBT by 50% per min
watered plants were used as controls. Control plants were watered per mg protein. CAT activity was determined by tracking the con-
every other day to eld capacity. Plants undergoing drought stress sumption of H2 O2 at 240 nm. Each reaction was initiated by adding
treatment were subjected to 7-day drought stress by withholding 100 l supernatant into 2.9 ml reaction mixture containing 50 mM
irrigation, then plants were rewatered to eld capacity and fol- potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 15 mM H2 O2 . One unit of
lowed by a recovery for 3 days. The experiment was carried out CAT activity was dened to be equivalent to the amount of enzyme
using a completely randomized split-plot design with three repli- required to degrade 0.1 mol of H2 O2 per min per mg protein. APX
cates. Each replicate consisted of ve plants, giving a total of 15 activity was assayed by monitoring the decline in absorbance in the
J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258 251

presence of ascorbic acid at 290 nm. Each reaction was initiated by Table 1
Primers and sequences used in this study.
adding 100 l supernatant into 2.9 ml reaction mixture containing
50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM ascorbate and Primer Sequence (5 3 )
15 mM H2 O2 . One unit of APX activity was dened to be equivalent POD-F TTGACACGAAGGTTAGCCAGAC
to the amount of enzyme required to degrade 0.01 mol of H2 O2 POD-R CCATCACCAGCCAACGACA
per min per mg protein. Following He et al. (2011), POD activity Cu-Zn SOD-F ATTCCCCACTTCAAATCCCA
was estimated from the absorbance change at 470 nm caused by Cu-Zn SOD-R AGTCCCTTTAAGCACAGCAACA
Mn-SOD-F TGTGAATCACTCAATTTTCTTGGAA
the oxidation of guaiacol. One unit of POD activity was dened to be
Mn-SOD-R GCACCTTCGGCACTCATTTT
equivalent to the amount of enzyme required to degrade 0.01 mol CAT-F ACTCATCCTTGACTGTTGGCACT
of substrate per min per mg protein. Protein concentration was CAT-R GCACGGAGAAAATCAGCACA
measured based on the method of Bradford (1976), using bovine APX-F CGCTTTGTGCTAACACGACAC
APX-R CAGATATTGCATTGCTGGATGAT
serum albumin as a standard.
CmGAPDH-F GCTGTATCCCCATTCGTT
CmGAPDH-R AGAAGGCAAGCTCAAGGG
2.6. Superoxide anion radical,oxidative damage to lipids and
proline concentration
PSII was calculated as (Fm F )/F  (Yang et al., 2011). For each
s m
Superoxide anion radical (O2 ) content in leaves was deter- treatment, Fv /Fm and PSII were obtained for 5 leaves at each time
mined according to Zhao and Zou (2002). A 0.5 g (fresh mass) leaf point.
sample was homogenized in 2 ml of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH Chlorophyll was extracted in 95% ethanol for 48 h and the
7.8) at 4 C. The homogenate was ltered through four layers of absorbance of the supernatant was recorded at 470, 649 and
cheesecloth and centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 min. A volume of 665 nm. Total chlorophyll (a + b) concentration was determined fol-
0.9 ml of 65 mM phosphate buffer and 0.1 ml of 10 mM hydroxyl- lowing Yang et al. (2011) and expressed in mg g1 fresh weight.
amine chloride reagent was added to 1 ml of the supernatant and
incubated in a water bath at 25 C for 20 min. A fresh mixture,
2.8. qRT-PCR analysis of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes
made by combining 0.5 ml of the incubated solution with 0.5 ml
of 17 mM p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid and 0.5 ml of 7 mM -
Total RNA was isolated from leaves using RNAiso reagent
naphthylamine, was incubated at 25 C for 20 min. After incubation,
(Takara, Japan) following the manufacturers instructions. Gene
the liquid became colored, and an equal volume of ether was added.
expression proles were obtained by real-time quantitative PCR
The mixture was stirred and then centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min,
(qRT-PCR) performed on an iQ5 PCR device (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR
and the absorbance of the pink layer was measured at 530 nm.
volumes and conditions were as reported in Lv et al. (2011). The
O2 content was calculated according to a NO2 standard curve and
chrysanthemum CmGAPDH (DK941612) gene was used as a con-
expressed as nmol mg1 protein min1 .
trol. Three biological replicates were included. Primer sequences
Lipid peroxidation was measured in terms of malondialdehyde
used for qRT-PCRs of POD, Cu-Zn SOD, Mn-SOD, CAT, and APX genes
(MDA) concentration. MDA concentration was determined using
are listed in Table 1. The identities of amplicons and specicity of
the thiobarbituric acid method according to Yin et al. (2009). The
reactions were veried by agarose gel electrophoresis and melting
level of lipid peroxidation was expressed as nmol g1 fresh weight.
curve analyses. The data were analyzed using Bio-Rad iQ5 optical
Proline concentration was determined by the ninhydrin method
system software v.1.0. The level of gene expression was given by
according to Guha et al. (2010) with minor modications. A 0.5 g
2Ct . All assays were performed at least three times. The Ct
leaf sample was homogenized in 10 ml 3% (w/v) aqueous sulfos-
(threshold cycle) values were calculated by subtracting the Ct value
alicylic acid, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 g
of GAPDH from the arithmetic mean Ct value of the target gene.
for 10 min. The supernatant was boiled in 3 ml acid ninhydrin
The Ct values were calculated by subtracting the Ct values
for 30 min, cooling to room temperature. The absorbance of the
of control plant from the Ct value of treatment plant (Livak and
supernatant was recorded at 520 nm. Proline concentration was
Schmittgen, 2001).
expressed as g g1 fresh weight.

2.7. Photosynthesis related parameters and chlorophyll 2.9. Statistical analysis


concentration
The data were expressed as means standard errors. SPSS v13.0J
Net photosynthetic rate (Pn ), stomatal conductance (Gs ), tran- and Microsoft Excel 2003 were used for statistical analysis. To
spiration rate (Tr ), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci ) of determine differences among cultivars and treatments for each
fully expanded leaves were determined at 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. variable at each sampling time point, a one-way analysis of variance
using a LI-COR 6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR, (ANOVA) followed by Duncans multiple range test (with P = 0.05)
Lincoln, NE, USA). The CO2 concentration in the chamber was was employed.
380 10 mol mol1 , and a photosynthetic photon ux density of
800 mol m2 s1 at the leaf surface was provided by an LED red- 3. Results
blue light source (LI-COR 6400-02). For each treatment, Pn , and Gs
values were obtained for 10 leaves at each time point. 3.1. Soil water status, leaf water status and biomass changes
Maximum quantum efciency of PSII photochemistry (Fv /Fm )
and actual photosynthetic efciency (PSII) were determined At the beginning of drought treatments, soil volumetric water
using the LI-COR 6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR, content (SWC) of soil-grown Nannong Xuefeng (designated as NX)
Lincoln, NE, USA) in the morning (8:0011:30 a.m.). Measurements and Nannong Jingyan (designated as NJ) was 44.2% and 45.1%,
were made on the fully expanded leaves with the uorometer after respectively, while, it had declined to 6% and 5.7% at 7 days after
plants were adapted in darkness for 30 min. Determination of Fv /Fm drought stress (Fig. 1A). After re-watering, SWC of the two culti-
was based on the method of Liu et al. (2011). Steady-state uores- vars returned to control levels. There was no signicant difference
cence (Fs ) and maximum uorescence (Fm  ) of light-adapted leaves between SWC in the two cultivars under control, drought, or re-
were measured when uorescence reached a steady-state level. watered conditions.
252 J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

Fig. 1. Soil water content (A) and leaf relative water content (B) in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK:
well-watered; D: drought stress treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). **Signicant difference (P 0.01) based on Duncans multiple range
test, in comparisons between the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).

Under control conditions, leaf relative water content (RWC) of A rapid increase in APX activity was observed in NJ from day 3
both cultivars was about 84% (Fig. 1B). Drought stress induced a pro- to day 7, being 2.8 times higher on day 7. In NX, there was a decline
gressive decrease in RWC of both cultivars during the 7-d drought in APX activity on day 5, but APX activity then increased rapidly
treatment period (Fig. 1B). At 7 days after drought stress, RWC was and peaked on day 7 (3.0 times higher than the background level)
reduced to 68.8% and 45.5%, respectively, in NX and NJ. RWC of NX (Fig. 3C). Moreover, APX activity was higher in NX than in NJ after
was restored to the control level after 3 days of re-watering, but 3 days of re-watering (Fig. 3C).
this was not the case for NJ. The RWC of NJ was signicantly lower Under drought treatment, CAT activity in NX signicantly
than that of NX after 5 days of drought stress and 3 days of water increased and peaked on day 7, reaching 2.4 times the control level
recovery. (Fig. 3D). Drought stress also elevated CAT levels in NJ, which were
Root/shoot ratio of Nannong Xuefeng increased by 67.5% which signicantly higher than in 5-d drought-stressed NX. Moreover,
was signicantly higher than that of Nannong Jingyan (by 0.5%) CAT activity in NJ was restored to control levels by re-watering,
by 7-d after drought, indicating that Nannong Xuefeng can still whereas CAT levels in NX remained signicantly higher than those
accumulated biomass under the 7-day progressive drought. of controls (Fig. 3D).
Drought stress signicantly increased Cu-Zn SOD and Mn-SOD
expression levels in both cultivars (Fig. 4A and B). On day 5, Cu-Zn
3.2. Variation in lower leaf epidermal morphology between the
SOD expression was 2.7 times higher than the control in NJ, and
two chrysanthemum cultivars
9.1 times greater in NX. Likewise, during the same period Mn-SOD
expression peaked at 2.0 and 7.6 times background levels in NJ and
A signicant difference was observed between the leaf surface
NX, respectively (Fig. 4A and B). After 3 days of re-watering, expres-
structures of the two cultivars. Trichome density in NX was greater
sion levels of Cu-Zn SOD and Mn-SOD in NX were still at higher levels
than in NJ (Table 2 and Fig. 2A and B). Furthermore, the leaf surface
compared with controls (Fig. 4A and B).
of NX was covered with a thick layer of wax crystals, while in NJ the
POD expression levels in NX reached a maximum on day 5, 3.0
surface was only sparsely covered (Fig. 2CF). NX had signicantly
times the background level, whereas those in NJ were 2.5 times
greater quantity of wax but lower stomatal density than NJ (18.9
the background level. POD expression levels in both cultivars were
vs 6.4 mg g1 FW; 95.58 vs 76.01 per mm2 , respectively) (Table 2).
decreased on day 7 after drought and day 3 after re-watering, with
POD transcript abundance being higher in NX than in NJ (Fig. 4C).
3.3. Antioxidant enzyme activity and qRT-PCR analysis of CAT expression was clearly induced by drought in both culti-
antioxidant genes vars (Fig. 4D). The rate of increase of CAT expression was more
pronounced in NX than in NJ. On day 5, CAT expression in both
SOD activity was greater in NX than in Nannnong Jingyan after cultivars reached a peak, to 1.8 times the control level in NJ and 2.6
3 days of drought stress (Fig. 3A). On day 7, SOD activity was 1.7 times the control level in NX (Fig. 4D). Moreover, CAT expression
and 1.4 times, respectively, higher than control levels in NX and NJ. levels were higher in NX than in NJ at 3 days after re-watering.
Moreover, NX had a signicantly higher SOD activity than NJ after Changes in APX expression in response to drought were similar
3 days of re-watering (Fig. 3A). to those in CAT (Fig. 4E). APX expression levels in NJ peaked at 2
There was a decline in POD activity on day 3, an increase on day times higher than the control level by day 3. In NX, APX expression
7, and a decline after re-watering in both cultivars (Fig. 3B). The levels peaked at 11.2 times higher by day 5. After re-watering, APX
greatest increase occurred on day 7 in NX (2.5 times higher than expression levels of NJ were restored to control levels, whereas in
the background level and 1.7 times the NJ level). After 3 days of re- NX this value was 1.7 times background levels.
watering, the POD activity in NJ was no different from background Variations in gene expression were similar to variation in
level, while in NX it was 1.5 times of the background level (Fig. 3B). antioxidant enzyme activity, although the increase in antioxidant

Table 2
Variation in lower leaf surface morphology in chrysanthemum cultivars Nannong Xuefeng and Nannong Jingyan.

Cultivar Epidermal trichome density (mm2 ) Waxiness content (mg g1 ) Stoma density (mm2 )

Nannong Xuefeng 132.0 8.1 A


18.9 1.5
A
76.01 6.03A
Nannong Jingyan 57.3 4.8B 6.4 0.9B 95.58 9.46B

Note: Values (given as mean S.E.) labeled with a different letter differed signicantly (P 0.01).
J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258 253

Fig. 2. SEM micrographs of leaf epidermis in Nannong Xuefeng and Nannong Jingyan. (A, C and E) Leaf of Nannong Xuefeng; (B, D and F) leaf of Nannong Jingyan; (A and
B) lower epidermis of leaf, showing trichome distribution; (CF) waxiness of leaf surface.

activity lagged behind the related gene expression. Peak expression (Fig. 5A). In drought-stressed NJ plants, O2 concentration was sig-
in SOD, POD, CAT and APX in NX and SOD and CAT in NJ occurred dur- nicantly higher than in control plants throughout the drought
ing 5 days drought stress, while the highest POD and APX expression stress period, and it increased to levels 2.81 times higher on day 7
levels in NJ emerged on day 3 of drought stress. compared with controls, about two-fold that of NX on day 7; after
re-watering, it declined and remained at a higher level than that of
3.4. Superoxide anion radical and oxidative damage to lipids controls (Fig. 5A). NX accumulated less O2 than in NJ. In drought-
stressed NX plants, O2 concentration reached a maximum on day
In both cultivars, O2 concentration remained low under con- 7 (2.0 times background level), and it decreased to control levels
trol conditions, and O2 production was sensitive to drought stress after recovery from drought (day 10).

Fig. 3. SOD, POD, APX, and CAT activity in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D: drought
stress treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). * and ** signicant differences (respectively, P 0.05 and P 0.01) based on Duncans multiple
range test, in comparisons between the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).
254 J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

Fig. 4. Gene expression of (A) Cu-Zn SOD, (B) Mn-SOD, (C) POD, (D) CAT, and (E) APX in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and
re-watering. CK: well-watered; D: drought stress treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days).

MDA concentration in NX remained at low levels during the less in NX (Fig. 7A). On day 7, Pn in NJ was a negative value, while Pn
whole drought period (Fig. 5B). In contrast, MDA concentration in was 17.6% of the control level in NX. After recovery, Pn was restored
NJ increased to 1.4 and 2.6 times background levels on days 3 and 7, to 69.5% and 37.4% of control levels in NX and NJ, respectively.
respectively. After re-watering, this value was signicantly higher Reduction in Gs was more apparent in Nannong Jingyan than in
than in the control. NX (Fig. 7B). On day 7, Gs in NJ had declined to almost zero, while
the corresponding value was 7.9% of control levels in NX.
3.5. Proline concentration
3.7. Chlorophyll uorescence and concentration
During drought stress, proline concentration uctuated in NJ
and rose gradually in NX (Fig. 6). On day 7 of drought stress, pro-
There was a progressive drop in chlorophyll concentration in
line concentration in NX and NJ had increased to 1.9 and 3.1 times
both cultivars over the entire course of the drought treatment,
background levels, respectively. After 3 days of re-watering, proline
although the two cultivars differed signicantly from one another
concentrations of stressed plants in both cultivars were restored to
with respect to the induced level of this parameter (Fig. 8). On day 7,
control levels.
the leaf chlorophyll concentration of NX and NJ decreased to 49.7%
and 25.4% of the background levels, respectively. After re-watering,
3.6. Photosynthetic parameters chlorophyll concentration was restored to 92.8% of background lev-
els in NX and to 68.4% in NJ (Fig. 8).
Signicant reductions in Pn and Gs in both cultivars were Leaf Fv /Fm and PSII in control plants of both cultivars were con-
induced by drought (Fig. 7). The extent of the decrease in Pn was stant throughout the experiment (Fig. 9A). On day 5, Fv /Fm began to

Fig. 5. Superoxide anion (O2 ) and MDA content in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D:
drought stress treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). * and ** signicant differences (respectively, P 0.05 and P 0.01) based on Duncans
multiple range test, in comparisons between the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).
J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258 255

Fig. 6. Protein content in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) sub- Fig. 8. Chlorophyll (a + b) concentration in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong
jected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D: drought stress Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D:
treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). **Signicant drought stress treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10
difference (P 0.01) based on Duncans multiple range test, in comparisons between days). * and ** signicant differences (respectively, P 0.05 and P 0.01) based on
the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3). Duncans multiple range test, in comparisons between the two cultivars at a given
day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).

decline in both cultivars. On day 7, Fv /Fm in NX and NJ had decreased


to 66% and 45.7%, respectively, of background levels (Fig. 9A). After trichome density. Trichome density may thus be a useful selec-
recovery, Fv /Fm was 92% of the control level in NX and 52% of the tion criterion for improving chrysanthemum drought tolerance. It
control level in NJ. PSII was negatively affected by drought stress has also been suggested that cuticular waxes are mainly responsi-
in both cultivars (Fig. 9B). On day 7, PSII was 48.5% and 25.2% of ble for cuticular barrier properties during drought stress (Riederer
the background levels in NX and NJ, respectively. On day 3 after and Schreiber, 2001). We found that NX also had larger amounts
recovery, PSII was restored to 56.9% and 80.1% of the background of cuticular wax and less stomatal density than NJ (Table 2). All
levels in NX and NJ, respectively (Fig. 9B). these features of leaves contribute to reducing water loss capabil-
ities of NX. Our research found that NX had a higher RWC than NJ
4. Discussion under drought stress (Fig. 1B), which is in agreement with their
morphological symptoms. The water situation is one of the most
We monitored the soil volumetric water content (SWC) of soil- important plant physiological parameters, and RWC is indicative
grown NX and NJ, and found that there was no signicant difference of a relationship between physiological traits and level of drought
between SWC in the two cultivars under control, drought, or re- tolerance (Farooq et al., 2009).
watered conditions. The consistency of the experimental setup was As is well known, drought stress causes a marked increase in
therefore ensured. After 7-day drought stress, the growth was ham- oxidative damage to plants (Bartoli et al., 2004; Sairam et al., 2005).
pered in drought sensitive NJ but not in drought tolerant NX in We observed O2 concentration increased signicantly and pro-
terms of changes in root/shoot ratio, it inferred a 7-day drought gressively during the duration of drought stress in both cultivars.
could be an appropriate stress dose for testifying drought tolerance The relative magnitude of this increase was lower in NX than in NJ
of chrysanthemum. during 7 days of drought stress (Fig. 5A). High ROS levels are known
Lower leaf epidermal surfaces differed signicantly between to increase lipid peroxidation, allowing MDA concentration to be
the two cultivars, as did their levels of drought tolerance. It has used as an indicator of oxidative stress peroxidation of membrane
been proposed that leaf trichomes function as a physical barrier to lipids (Wu et al., 2003). The MDA content of NJ was higher than NX
drought and heat stress (Sandquist and Ehleringer, 2003). In our during the entire drought stress and re-watering period (Fig. 5B),
study, the drought-tolerant cultivar (NX) had consistently higher showed a similar trend to their O2 concentration.

Fig. 7. Levels of (A) Pn and (B) Gs in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D: drought stress
treatments of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). * and ** signicant differences (respectively, P 0.05 and P 0.01) based on Duncans multiple range
test, in comparisons between the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).
256 J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

Fig. 9. Fv /Fm and PSII in Nannong Xuefeng (NX) and Nannong Jingyan (NJ) subjected to drought stress and re-watering. CK: well-watered; D: drought stress treatments
of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days, and 3 days after re-watering (10 days). * and ** signicant differences (respectively, P 0.05and P 0.01) based on Duncans multiple range test, in
comparisons between the two cultivars at a given day of treatment. Values are means SD (n = 3).

Plants have evolved a well-developed antioxidant defense sys- our research, proline concentration was signicantly higher than
tem to keep ROS under control (Gill and Tuteja, 2010). In the present control levels in both cultivars during the drought stress period.
study, progressive drought stress generally caused an increase in Proline concentration appeared to increase sharply, however, in NJ
activity of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX enzymes that coordinate ROS after 3 days of drought treatment (Fig. 6). This indicates that pro-
concentration (Fig. 3). The role of this enzymatic antioxidant sys- line does not bolster drought tolerance in chrysanthemums, but
tem has been investigated in several other species (Sairam et al., rather is increased in response to damage, and is thus not a use-
2005). In the diploid hybrid Pinus densata, drought stress induced ful selector for chrysanthemum drought tolerance. Similar results
an increase in SOD, POD, and CAT activity for 14 days, with a sub- have been observed in warm-season turfgrass (Liu et al., 2003) and
sequent decline after 28 days of drought; APX activity increased bluegrass (Qian et al., 2001). Liu et al. (2003) reported that more
over the entire drought duration (Gao et al., 2009). Mller et al. drought-intolerant turfgrass cultivars accumulate the most pro-
(2007) have suggested that high levels of antioxidant enzyme activ- line, indicating that proline accumulation is a damage response
ity can increase plant resistance to drought stress. ROS scavenging to drought treatment. In contrast, in other speciesdespite some
enzymes and plant antioxidants, including SOD and APX, are acti- controversythe more proline accumulated by a cultivar, the more
vated in rice in response to drought stress treatments (Moumeni drought tolerant it is (Ahmed et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2009).
et al., 2011). In our research, we found that SOD and CAT activi- This process thus seems to be cultivar- and species-dependent,
ties were higher in NX than in Nannong Jingyang after 5 days of with different species having different mechanisms under water
drought stress. In both cultivars, SOD and APX activity levels were decit.
highest on day 7 of treatment (Fig. 3). In contrast to NX, POD and CAT In both cultivars in our study, drought stress decreased Gs and
activity levels in NJ were highest at 5 days of drought. This suggests Pn , with Gs more sensitive to early drought than Pn (Fig. 7). Var-
that these ROS scavengers provide cells with efcient machinery ious experiments have shown that stomatal responses are often
for detoxifying O2 and H2 O2 . more closely linked to soil moisture content than to leaf water
ROS, particularly O2 and H2 O2 , can either be cytotoxic or take status (Farooq et al., 2009). This conclusion is supported by our
part in a cellular signaling process that induces many genes and results; on day 3 of drought stress when SWC was 23.324.5%, Gs
proteins involved in drought stress defenses (Gao et al., 2009). Var- of both cultivars decreased (Fig. 7B) while RWC remained con-
ious genes are induced in response to drought at the transcriptional stant (Fig. 1B), indicating that Gs is a more sensitive parameter
level (Kavar et al., 2008). A previous study showed that expression at the primary stage of drought. On day 3 of drought stress, the
levels of genes in the SOD family are higher in drought tolerant rice decline in Pn was accompanied by dramatic decreases in Gs ; Fv /Fm
(Moumeni et al., 2011). In our study, we also investigated the effects remained unaffected in both cultivars. Stomatal closure limits
of drought stress on the expression of genes encoding antioxidant CO2 assimilation, which may promote an imbalance between PSII
enzymes at the mRNA level, and detected a signicant increase photochemical activity and photosynthetic electron requirements,
in expression during drought stress in both cultivars (Fig. 4). In leading to overexcitation and subsequent damage to PSII reaction
addition, expression levels and accumulation rates of antioxidant centers from photoinhibition (Hu et al., 2010). Based on chloro-
enzyme encoding genes were signicantly higher in NX than in phyll uorescence measurements, we observed that Fv /Fm did not
NJ. After 3 days of re-watering, NX still maintained higher antiox- decline until day 5 of drought stress, and NX had signicantly higher
idant activities and gene expression levels (Fig. 4). Variations in PSII than NJ (Fig. 9). These results indicate that during primary
gene expression were similar to variations in antioxidant enzyme stages of drought, Pn was mainly affected by stomatal closure. From
activity, although antioxidant activity lagged behind related gene day 5 to day 7 in NX, G and Fv /Fm continued to decrease, suggesting
expression. We hypothesize that the delayed changes in enzyme that when drought stress is prolonged, non-stomatal limitations
activity are the result of the gene translation and modication pro- are the major factors inuencing Pn . Flexas et al. (2004) reported
cess. that non-stomatal limitations on Pn occurred when Gs was reduced
Proline accumulation, considered a general indicator for below 0.05 mol CO2 m1 s1 . We found that Gs remained above
drought tolerance (Ahmed et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2011), permits 0.05 mol CO2 m1 s1 through day 5, but was reduced to below this
osmotic adjustment, which results in water retention and avoid- level by day 7 (Fig. 7B), further conrming that non-stomatal factors
ance of cell dehydration (Blum et al., 2005). There are some studies, affected Pn during prolonged drought stress in NX. In NJ, in contrast,
however, that have shown that the accumulation of proline under Gs and PSII decreased during drought stress (Figs. 7B and 9B), sug-
adverse conditions is the result of injury, implying that it should not gesting that both stomatal and non-stomatal limitations played a
be used as an indicator of tolerance screening (Liu et al., 2000). In role throughout almost the entire drought duration. Non-stomatal
J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258 257

limitations are the main factors destroying the PSII system and Flexas, J., Medrano, H., 2002. Energy dissipation in C3 plants under drought. Func-
affecting maximum quantum efciency and actual photosynthetic tional Plant Biology 29, 12091215.
Galms, J., Flexas, J., Sav, R., Medrano, H., 2007. Water relations and stoma-
efciency (PSII) (Bu et al., 2010). Decrease of Fv /Fm and PSII tal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and
causes irreversible PSII damage and decreases reaction center pho- leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil 290,
tochemical activity. Not only is photosynthesis inhibited during the 139155.
Gao, D., Gao, Q., Xu, H.Y., Ma, F., Zhao, C.M., Liu, J.Q., 2009. Physiological responses to
drought stress process, but also the ability to recover after stress gradual drought stress in the diploid hybrid Pinus densata and its two parental
removal is affected. After re-watering, higher levels of Pn , Gs , Fv /Fm , species. Trees-Structure and Function 23, 717728.
and PSII were observed in NX than in NJ (Figs. 7 and 9). The incom- Gill, S.S., Tuteja, N., 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in
abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48,
plete recovery of photosynthesis could be attributable to lasting
909930.
stomatal limitations that were induced by prolonged drought dam- Guha, A., Sengupta, D., Kumar Rasineni, G., Ramachandra Reddy, A., 2010. An inte-
age in both cultivars. grated diagnostic approach to understand drought tolerance in mulberry (Morus
indica L.). Flora 205, 144151.
Throughout the entire treatment, NX had a higher photo-
He, J., Chen, F., Chen, S., Lv, G., Deng, Y., Fang, W., Liu, Z., Guan, Z., He, C.,
synthetic capacity, which may be correlated with chlorophyll 2011. Chrysanthemum leaf epidermal surface morphology and antioxidant and
concentration. Under control conditions, the chlorophyll concen- defense enzyme activity in response to aphid infestation. Journal of Plant Phys-
tration in NX was almost twice that of NJ. Previous investigations iology 168, 687693.
Hu, L., Wang, Z., Huang, B., 2010. Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors asso-
found that chlorophyll concentration decreased in apple (Sircelj ciated with inhibition and recovery of photosynthesis from drought stress in a
et al., 2007) and wheat (Wang et al., 2011) under drought stress, C3 perennial grass species. Physiologia Plantarum 139, 93106.
and similar changes were observed in our study. When both Kavar, T., Maras, M., Kidric, M., Sustar-Vozlic, J., Meglic, V., 2008. Identication of
genes involved in the response of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris to drought stress.
chrysanthemum cultivars were subjected to identical drought Molecular Breeding 21, 159172.
stress, however, chlorophyll concentration was highest in NX Li, H., 1993. Chrysanthemums in China. Jiangsu Scientic and Technical Press, Nan-
and could be restored to near control levels by re-watering jing.
Liu, C., Liu, Y., Guo, K., Fan, D., Li, G., Zheng, Y., 2011. Effect of drought on pigments,
(Fig. 8). osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst
In summary, we found that the more drought-tolerant chrysan- habitats of southwestern China. Environmental and Experimental Botany 71,
themum had a highly-integrated system, with a well-developed 174183.
Liu, E., Zong, H., Guo, Z., Li, Y., 2000. Effects of drought, salt and chilling stresses on
leaf epidermis, up-regulation in antioxidative defense mechanisms,
proline accumulation in shoot of rice seedlings. Journal of Tropical and Subtrop-
and better gas exchange capabilities that allowed high photosyn- ical Botany 8, 235238.
thetic activity under drought stress. To the best of our knowledge, Liu, S., Chen, S., Chen, S., Liang, X., Guo, Z., 2003. Responses of proline content
and activity of antioxidant enzymes in warm-season turfgrasses to soil drought
this is the rst report on leaf epidermal surface morphology of cut
stress. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 30, 303306.
chrysanthemum seedlings and physiological responses to drought Livak, K.J., Schmittgen, T.D., 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data
stress. using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2CT method. Methods 25,
402408.
Lv, G., Tang, D., Chen, F., Sun, Y., Fang, W., Guan, Z., Liu, Z., Chen, S., 2011. The anatomy
Acknowledgements and physiology of spray cut chrysanthemum pedicels and expression of a caffeic
acid 3-O-methyltransferase homologue. Postharvest Biology and Technology 60,
244250.
This study is supported by the Program for New Century Excel- Mller, I.M., Jensen, P.E., Hansson, A., 2007. Oxidative modications to cellular com-
lent Talents in University of Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant ponents in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58, 459481.
Mackov, J., Vaskov, M., Macek, P., Hronkov, M., Schreiber, L., Santrucek, J., 2013.
No. NCET-10-0492), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Plant response to drought stress simulated by ABA application: changes in chem-
Central Universities (KYZ201112), the Natural Science Fund of ical composition of cuticular waxes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 86,
Jiangsu Province (BK2011641) and Sci-Tech Support Plan of Jiangsu 7075.
Morgan, P., 1990. Effects of abiotic stresses on plant hormone systems. Plant Biology
Province (BE2011325 and 2012350). 12, 113146.
Moumeni, A., Satoh, K., Kondoh, H., Asano, T., Hosaka, A., Venuprasad, R., Serraj, R.,
Kumar, A., Leung, H., Kikuchi, S., 2011. Comparative analysis of root transcrip-
References tome proles of two pairs of drought-tolerant and susceptible rice near-isogenic
lines under different drought stress. BMC Plant Biology 11, 174.
Ahmed, C.B., Rouina, B.B., Sensoy, S., Boukhris, M., Abdallah, F.B., 2009. Changes in Munne-Bosch, S., Penuelas, J., 2003. Photo-and antioxidative protection, and a role
gas exchange proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three for salicylic acid during drought and recovery in eld-grown Phillyrea angusti-
olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environmental and folia plants. Planta 217, 758766.
Experimental Botany 67, 345352. Qian, Y., Wilhelm, S., Marcum, K., 2001. Comparative responses of two Kentucky
Alscher, R.G., Cumming, J.R., 1990. Stress Responses in Plants: Adaptation and Accli- bluegrass cultivars to salinity stress. Crop Science 41, 18951900.
mation Mechanisms. Wiley-Liss, New York. Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K.V., Vivekanandan, M., 2004. Drought-induced responses of
Bartoli, C.G., Gmez, F., Martnez, D.E., Guiamet, J.J., 2004. Mitochondria are the main photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant
target for oxidative damage in leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Physiology 161, 11891202.
Experimental Botany 55, 16631669. Riederer, M., Schreiber, L., 2001. Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier
Blum, A., Walker, G., Dunshea, F., Doyle, P., Bariana, H., Brown, G., Bansal, U., Miah, properties of plant cuticles. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 20232032.
H., Standen, G., Lu, M., 2005. Drought resistance, water-use efciency, and yield Russin, J., Guo, B., Tubajika, K., Brown, R., Cleveland, T., Widstrom, N., 1997. Compar-
potentialare they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian ison of kernel wax from corn genotypes resistant or susceptible to Aspergillus
Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 11591168. avus. Phytopathology 87, 529533.
Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of micro- Sairam, R., Srivastava, G., Agarwal, S., Meena, R., 2005. Differences in antioxidant
gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding. activity in response to salinity stress in tolerant and susceptible wheat geno-
Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248254. types. Biologia Plantarum 49, 8591.
Bu, L.D., Zhang, R.H., Chang, Y., Xue, J.Q., Han, M.M., 2010. Response of photosynthetic Sandquist, D.R., Ehleringer, J.R., 2003. Population-and family-level variation of brit-
characteristics to water stress of maize leaf in seedling. Acta Ecologica Sinica 30, tlebush (Encelia farinosa Asteraceae) pubescence: its relation to drought and
11841191. implications for selection in variable environments. American Journal of Botany
de Carvalho, R.C., Cunha, A., da Silva, J.M., 2011. Photosynthesis by six Portuguese 90, 14811486.
maize cultivars during drought stress and recovery. Acta Physioliae Plantarum Sircelj, H., Tausz, M., Grill, D., Batic, F., 2007. Detecting different levels of drought
33, 359374. stress in apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh) with selected biochemical and
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., Basra, S.M.A., 2009. Plant drought physiological parameters. Scientia Horticulturae 113, 362369.
stress: effects mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Devel- Wang, Y., Suo, B., Zhao, T., Qu, X., Yuan, L., Zhao, X., Zhao, H., 2011. Effect of nitric oxide
opment 29, 185212. treatment on antioxidant responses and psbA gene expression in two wheat
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Clfre, J., Mariano Escalona, J., Galms, J., Gulas, J., Le, E.L.K., Florinda cultivars during grain lling stage under drought stress and rewatering. Acta
Martnez-Canellas, S., Teresa Moreno, M., Ribas-Carb, M., 2004. Understanding Physiologiae Plantarum 33, 19231932.
down-regulation of photosynthesis under water stress: future prospects and Wu, F., Zhang, G., Dominy, P., 2003. Four barley genotypes respond differently to cad-
searching for physiological tools for irrigation management. Annals of Applied mium: lipid peroxidation and activities of antioxidant capacity. Environmental
Biology 144, 273283. and Experimental Botany 50, 6778.
258 J. Sun et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 161 (2013) 249258

Yang, W., Sun, Y., Chen, S., Jiang, J., Chen, F., Fang, W., Liu, Z., 2011. The effect of tolerance to waterlogging. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67,
exogenously applied nitric oxide on photosynthesis and antioxidant activity in 8793.
heat stressed chrysanthemum. Biologia Plantarum 55, 737740. Zhao, H.J., Zou, Q., 2002. Protective effects of exogenous antioxidants and pheno-
Yin, D., Chen, S., Chen, F., Guan, Z., Fang, W., 2009. Morphological and lic compounds on photosynthesis of wheat leaves under high irradiance and
physiological responses of two chrysanthemum cultivars differing in their oxidative stress. Photosynthetica 40, 523527.

You might also like