Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE
LETTERS OF FR. JOHN KRESTIANKIN.
INTRODUCTION. RECOLLECTIONS OF A
SPIRITUAL SON
May God Give You Wisdom! The Letters of Fr. John Krestiankin
(published by Sretensky Monastery and St. Xenia Skete)
Even as a child the young Vanya served in the altar of his church,
under the direction of the austere archbishop of Orel, Seraphim
(Ostroumov), who was canonized by the Moscow Patriarchate in 2000
with a host of Russian New Martyrs. Fr. John was being prepared for
monasticism from his early years by Archbishop Seraphim and his
friend, Bishop Nicholas (Nikolsky), and by the Orlov eldress, Vera
Alexandrovna Loginova, who blessed him to live in Moscow, and
foresaw his service in Pskov. Athanasius Andreevich Saiko, the fool-
for-Christ of Orlov, also left a lasting impression on the future pastor.
The youth John was also able to visit the famous priest George Kosov
of Spas-Chekrak, a spiritual son of Elder Ambrose of Optina.
Fr. John was first held in the Liubyanka prison, then transferred to
solitary confinement in Lefortovo prison, and finally to Butyrsky prison
until his departure by convoy on October 9, 1950. From 1950 to 1953
he labored in the lumber works of the Russian far north. In 1955 he was
transferred to Kuibishev (now Samara) Province to the sector for
invalids. On February 2/15, 1955, the day when the Orthodox Church
celebrates the Meeting of the Lord, Fr. John was released before the
end of his term, without the right to live in or near Moscow.
After his release Fr. John was assigned to serve as the second priest of
the Holy Trinity Pskov Cathedral. In May of 1956 he was re-assigned to
Riazan Province, where he served for nearly eleven years.
Only God rules the world, Fr. John would repeat over and over again,
not humans. His firm conviction that all things happen according to
Gods Providence preserved his spirit throughout those difficult years.
The Riazan period of Fr. Johns life was also a time of spiritual growth,
under the guidance of elders from the Glinsk Hermitage, famous for its
tradition of eldership. One of these elders was Schema-Archimandrite
Seraphim (Romanstov), who became Fr. Johns spiritual father. Fr.
Seraphim lived as a desert-dweller in Abhazia after the closure of
Glinsk Hermitage. It was from this elder that Fr. John received the
monastic tonsure in the town of Sukhumi, on June 10, 1966. Also living
in Kasimov during those years was Hieroschemamonk Macary
(Eremenko), who had shared a cell with Elder Seraphim in the
mountains of Abhazia until his arrest and exile to Central Asia. Fr.
Macary moved to Kasimov at the completion of his term. He was a
clairvoyant elder, and great doer of the Jesus Prayer.
Although during his later years in the monastery, access to Fr. John
became more and more restricted, first by the monastery authorities
and later by the infirmities of old age, all ranks of people came to him
for counsel: the Patriarchs of Russia, Pimen and later Alexei II, many
clergymen, writers, film-makers, foreigners, and a multitude of
Orthodox Christians. Even President Vladimir Putin visited Fr. John.
When Fr. John was no longer physically able to receive people, his
correspondence and publications served as instruction and consolation
to his many spiritual children.
One spiritual son of Fr. John, Alexander Ogorodnikov, who spent nine
years in a concentration camp for organizing a Christian seminar,
described Fr. John: He immersed those who conversed with him in a
sea of love, never forbidding, but rather softly leading one towards
integrity and resolve.
Bishop Hilarion of Vienna and Austria recalls his meetings with Fr.
John Krestiankin over the course of many years, from the time he was
thirteen years old. Fr. Johns counsels were simple and healthy. I do
not recall any time when he insisted on any decision. He always
emphasized that God has given every human being freedom, and no
spiritual counselor, no elder may transgress it. A person must make all
of his responsible, important decisions himself, and come for a blessing
only after this decision has already ripened within, when there is no
wavering or doubt about it. As he wrote in his letters, No one can
decide our important life decisions for us; even in former times, elders
did not command Gods inheritance. There can be no commanding in
spiritual life.
Fr. John was a man of fiery prayer and a zealous celebrant of the
Divine Services. His serving was inspired, prayer passed through him,
filling his entire being, his eyes gazed towards the heavens, and nothing
earthly distracted him. He pronounced the words loudly and distinctly.
Sometimes he was as if raised upon tip-toes, ready to fly up to the
heavens.He involuntarily reminded one of St. John of Kronstadt,
for whom Fr. John had a great veneration. Spiritual freedom, in Fr.
Johns words, is bought at the great price of suffering. [4]
One theme which might cause perplexity to the reader appears in his
letters to laypeople about the mixing of family life and monasticism,
and the marriage sacrament in general. During the communist
repressions, many monasteries were closed, and the practice of
tonsuring people (most often nuns) in the world was common. This
lent people the idea of receiving the tonsure outside of a monastic
enclosure, even while still lawfully married, and with dependent
children. With the re-opening of monasteries, Fr. John began to
discourage this practice, which was also officially spoken against by His
Holiness Patriarch Alexei II. In letters to married couples, we also read
how Fr. John encourages them to be wed sacramentally. [5] This means
that, although they were legally married by civil law, as Christians they
should receive the sacrament of marriage in church as a blessing upon
their marital life. This confusing situation was caused by the
communist repression of all aspects of church life, and many of those
rediscovering their Orthodox roots were either unaware of this
sacrament, or afraid to have it in their time.
In the section entitled Letters about the Seal of Antichrist and the Last
Days, we see clearly how the faithful in Russia looked to Fr. John as
the spiritual authority who could resolve their perplexities and calm
their distress over the various modern means of census-taking, and the
tax and personal identification numbers only recently introduced in
Russia. Although Westerners have long been used to social security
numbers and computerization, this new system, which looks all too
apocalyptic, caused great havoc among believers in Russia, even to the
point of schism, departures from monasteries and parishes that had
received tax identification numbers, and in rare but exceedingly
alarming cases, suicide by those who had taken new passports or
numbers and then been told by some zealous priest that they were
now inescapably doomed to eternal perdition. It is fair to say that Fr.
Johns pastoral letters on this subject played probably the greatest role
in resolving the schisms occurring in the Church. This collection of
pastoral letters could also be applied to any existing tendency to over-
sensationalize the Last Days in ignorance of patristic teachings on
them, and lack of concern for each individuals personal last daythe
day of his death.
We hope also that the reader would bear in mind how people wrote to
Fr. John at crucial moments in their lives, when they needed that final
word about serious situations. The content of Fr. Johns replies
reflects this. Though we may not precisely identify with each situation,
we can nevertheless benefit greatly from Fr. Johns voice of sobriety,
self-crucifixion, and life according to the Gospel commandments, as it
speaks to our own lives.
Not long before his death Fr. John called me and said, "Im going to die
soon. Please do me a favor and write what you remember and want to
say about me. Otherwise, people will write about me anyway, and they
will come up with such things as they did about poor Fr. Nicholas, who
supposedly resurrected cats. That way Ill look everything over and be
at peace [6]
Thus, fulfilling my spiritual fathers obedience, I began this task in the
hope that Batiushka himself would separate the wheat from the chaff,
perhaps suggest some things that I might have forgotten, and, as
always, correct any mistakes I might have made.
I will not write very much about what Fr. John meant to me. My whole
monastic life was inseparably connected with him. He has been and
remains for me the ideal of an Orthodox Christian, a monk, and a
loving and demanding priest and father.
For me, Fr. Johns main spiritual quality was not only his gift of
discernment, but also his unshakeable faith in the all-good and perfect
Providence of God, which leads a Christian to salvation. An epigraph to
one of Fr. Johns books is something he often repeated: "The main
things in spiritual life are faith in Gods Providence and discernment
with guidance." Once, in answer to my perplexity, Batiushka wrote: "At
the moment I am reading a passage from the Old Testament, and what
depth [I find in it]: A mans heart deviseth his way, but the Lord
directeth his steps (Prov. 16:9). The wise Solomon bore this out. You,
also, in your own life must be convinced that it can be no other way."
Trust and obedience are the main rule of the relationship between a
Christian and his spiritual father. Of course, one cannot manifest
absolute obedience to every spiritual father. Such spiritual directors are
a rarity. This is quite a delicate matter. Very serious spiritual and life
tragedies often happen when unreasoning priests imagine themselves
to be elders, and their unfortunate spiritual children take upon
themselves a form of absolute obedience which is beyond their strength
and entirely inappropriate in our times. Fr. John never ordered or
forced anyone to listen to his spiritual advice. People would come to
free, unfeigned obedience to him through experience and time. He
never called himself an elder. When he was told he was, he would smile
and say that there are no elders nowadays, only experienced old men.
He remained convinced of that. However, I am convinced that in his
person the Lord sent me a true elder, who knew Gods will for me and
all that is needed for my salvation.
The pilgrim and I sat down and were terrified by our own speculations:
What if Fr. John is mistaken? What if the baby dies? What would the
mother do to Fr. John if that happens? Of course, we couldnt believe
that Fr. John had displayed a crude denial of medicine, something
which, however rare, still is not unheard of in some Church circles. We
knew of many cases when Fr. John would bless surgery and even insist
on it. There were many well-known doctors among his spiritual
children. With dread we awaited what would happen. Would the
broken-hearted mother show up in the monastery and raise a
monstrous scandal? Or would nothing of the kind happen, as Fr. John
had predicted?
Apparently nothing happened, because Fr. John went on as before with
his daily walk between the church and his cell, surrounded by pilgrims
filled with hope and gratitude. It remained for us to assume that Fr.
John foresaw Gods Providence for that infant, and took upon himself
the great responsibility for his life. And the Lord did not put the faith
and hope of his faithful servant to shame.
Fr. John, of course, knew as well as she did what kind of surgery it was,
and that it didnt pose any serious threat. But, having read her letter, he
became terribly anxious. We sat together for a long time, and he kept
persuading me that it was essential to talk Valentina Pavlovna out of
having the surgery at that time. He wrote to her again. He asked,
begged, and even ordered her, as her spiritual father, to put off the
surgery. I had two free weeks coming up. I hadnt had a vacation for
over ten years, so Fr. John blessed me to go to a sanatorium in the
Crimea for two weeks, and to take Valentina Pavlovna with me. He told
her about that in the letter as well, adding that she was to have her
surgery a month after the vacation. "If she has her surgery now, shell
die," he sadly told me when we were saying goodbye to each other.
However, in Moscow I realized that we had run into a brick wall. All of
a sudden, Valentina Pavlovna, probably for the first time in her life,
rose up against the will of her spiritual father. She at first firmly
refused to go to the Crimea, but then it seemed as though she was
humbling herself. But she was quite indignant that Fr. John was
making so much fuss about such a trifle. I told her that no matter what,
I was going to work on making our arrangements, and we would soon
be going to the Crimea.
A few days later I received the Patriarchs blessing for the trip, after
which I ordered two reservations, which were not difficult to obtain at
that time of year. Then I called the store to tell Valentina Pavlovna
about our departure. "Shes in the hospital, in surgery," her assistant
told me.
It turned out that a couple of days earlier some nun, formerly a doctor,
had called on her, and having found out about her cataract problem,
didnt agree with Fr. Johns decision, either. So she took it upon herself
to get a blessing from one of the spiritual fathers of the Holy Trinity-St.
Sergius Lavra. A blessing was received, and Valentina Pavlovna went
straight to the Feodorov Institute, hoping that after a short and simple
operation she would go with me to the Crimea. However, during the
surgery, right on the operating table, she had a serious stroke and was
totally paralyzed. As soon as I learned about it I rushed to call Fr.
Philaret, Fr. Johns long-time cell-attendant. In exceptional cases Fr.
John would go down to Fr. Philarets cell and use his phone.
"How could you! Why didnt you listen to me?" cried Fr. John, almost
in tears. "If I insist on something, that means I know what Im doing!"
What could I tell him? I asked Fr. John what I was to do. Valentina
Pavlovna was still unconscious. Fr. John said I should take the
Reserved Gifts from the church to my cell, and as soon as Valentina
Pavlovna regained consciousness I was to immediately go and confess
her and give her Holy Communion.
"Batiushka," I said, "His Holiness the Patriarch does not bless the
founding of metochions in Moscow, unless they be of stavropegic
monasteries. Another monastery made such a request to the Patriarch
not long ago, and His Holiness answered that if we were to give
churches to all the monasteries desiring metochions, there would be no
parishes left in Moscow.
[He said,] "Have no fear! Go straight to His Holiness and ask to open a
metochion of the Pskov-Caves Monastery."
Everything turned out just as Fr. John said. I made my request, albeit
not without fear, to His Holiness the Patriarch about the opening of a
metochion of the Pskov-Caves Monastery. But the Patriarch replied
very mercifully to this request, blessed this resolution, and immediately
delegated the matter to [Vicar Bishop] Arseny and [Dean] Fr. Vladimir
Divakov. Thus was the first and only diocesan metochion opened in
Moscow, which, as Fr. John also had foretold, would later become an
independent monastery, never losing its spiritual connection with
either Pechory or Fr. John. It is superfluous to say that Fr. Johns
blessing and counsel in the monasterys life was most precious and
desirable for us. I must confess, though, that not all the letters I
received were affectionate. Sometimes his letters were so stern that I
could not regain my composure for several days.
Usually when someone begins to reminisce about Fr. John, they write
about how good, kind, and loving he was. Yes, this is undoubtedly true;
I never knew a man more able to express fatherly, Christian love.
However, it must be added that Fr. John could be truly tough when
necessary. He could at times find such words of reproach that one
would not envy the recipient afterwards. I recall when I was a novice in
Pechory, I happened to hear what Fr. John said to two young
hieromonks: "What kind of monks are you? You are only jolly fellows."
Fr. John was never afraid to speak the truth without respect of persons,
and he did so first of all in order to correct and save the soul of the one
with whom he spoke, be he a hierarch or a simple novice. This firmness
and spiritual integrity was of course placed in Fr. Johns soul from
early childhood, when he knew those great ascetics and New Martyrs.
This was all an expression of true Christian love for God and people. It
was also, of course, an expression of a true Christian consciousness.
Here is one reply to a letter from me in 1997: "Here is another example
of an analogous situation from my memorys archives. I was twelve
years old at the time, but the impression was so earth-shakingly strong,
that to this day I can still see everything that happened, and remember
each participant by name.
"My childish consciousness was quite shaken by what had taken place,
precisely because the one thing occurred right after the other: first
banishment, that is, the absence of forgiveness, and then the humble
asking of forgiveness for himself, and his own forgiveness of everyone.
I only understood one thing: that punishment can serve as the
beginning of forgiveness, and without it, there can be no forgiveness.
"Now I bow down before Vladykas courage and wisdom, for the lesson
he taught remained as a living example for all present then, as you see-
for a whole lifetime."
What else can I write of essential importance, so that Fr. John himself
could read these lines and confirm the veracity of this testimony?
During the years of our relationship I noticed that Fr. John had
particular principles regarding spiritual counsel. Of course, he did not
apply them automatically. Interesting to me was his advice about
marriage. He blessed marriage only after the bride and bridegroom had
known each other for at least three years. This seems a very long term
to todays impetuous youth. However, many cases have shown how Fr.
Johns experience and insistence on this time of testing could save the
souls of the husband and wife, and of their family. I know many
instances when priests out of pity shortened this term before marriage
given by Fr. John, with woeful consequences for the young families.
This applies also to the trials our Church has experienced over the
recent decades: reformist tendencies on the one hand, and on the
other, morbid eschatological moods. In both cases, Fr. John exercised
discernment, showing love for those who were confused spiritually due
to faulty reasoning and the enemys snares, yet warning of the harm
which they were actively and even viciously ready to bring to the
Church. Nearly a century of Church life gave Fr. John a serious
advantage in the discernment of spirits, in determining what one or
another distraction, renovation, or "zeal not according to knowledge"
(cf. Rom. 10:2) might bring. Truly, there is nothing new under the sun.
"I will not participate in your campaign," he wrote to one young and
very sincere hieromonk, who was proposing that Fr. John participate in
the movement "Life without the Social Security Number." He wrote,
"The very spirit of such activity, with its abundant selfishness, noise,
and hope in man rather than in God, yes, and especially with its
criticism of the Church hierarchy, which springs out like a fountain in
your words, forbids me to do so. I have already seen such things in the
activities of the renovationists, who rose up against the most gentle
Patriarch Tikon, in fact, against the Lord Himself and His Church."
Fr. John many times expressed his sober and deeply considered
reaction to the problems of the global computer accounting system and
other similar tendencies of the modern world. This has all been
published in many places and has served for many as a cause of
spiritual peace, calming of the spirit of revolt, and trust in the Russian
Orthodox Church. For others it unfortunately served as a reason to
attack Fr. John, and even to slander him outright.
I think that this experience of slander and hatred coming during the
last years of his life was sent by the Lord providentially. St.
Barsanuphius of Optina, it seems, wrote somewhere that the Lord
sends such trials to his servants precisely at the end of their lives, as an
image of the Saviors Golgotha.
Several years before these events, Fr. John also stood firm under fire in
order to preserve the people of the Church from the temptation of a
new renovationism. He often met and conversed with currently
popular supporters of modernization and renovation in the Church.
Only after exhausting every means of convincing them of the extreme
danger of this path, did he pronounce clearly, precisely, for all to hear,
and with full responsibility for his words: "If we do not destroy this
movement, it will destroy the Church."
I was a witness to how Fr. John endured the hatred and false
accusations poured out upon him for standing in the Truth of Christ. I
saw all his pain, but also his good nature, when he endured
misunderstanding and betrayal. Batiushka never lost his infinite love
for his offenders, or his Christian forgiveness. I will always remember
the words of his sermon in the St. Michael Cathedral of the Pskov-
Caves Monastery in 1985. "The Lord has given us a commandment to
love our neighbors. But we mustnt worry about whether or not they
love us. We must only take care that we love them."
Much more could be written, chiefly about how the souls of people who
met Fr. John were transformed and resurrected, how people obtained
faith and salvation. But this is bound up with people who are still alive,
and therefore I cannot relate these stories without their permission.
Ar
chimandrite John (Krestiankin) and the monks of Pskov Pecherski (Cave) monastery at the 95th
anniversary of Dear Elder (2005).
In conclusion I would like to say just one thing: I thank the Lord that
by His great mercy He gave me, a sinner, the chance to meet such a
Christian in my life and to get to know him. I think there has never
been anything more astounding in my life so far, nor is there ever likely
to be in its remainder.
Martyrs [trans.].
[2]
Interview for the Strentensky Monastery website, pravoslavie.ru.
Condolences.
Province.
The book,
May God Give You Wisdom!
The Letters of Fr. John Krestiankin
is available from:
E-mail: stxenia@earthlink.net