Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Greetings -
A review of the draft plan raises several serious concerns for us as residents of a community
deeply effected by the presence of the military in Washington state. Overall, our primary
concern is the lack of opportunities for citizens living near military operations to participate or
be represented in the decision making process effecting their communities.
More specifically our concerns include:
1. The draft states (p. 39 in 6.1.1)that the people of Washington state are the first
target audience of the draft. The circulation of the draft to the citizens of community
directly impacted by military operations has been very limited. We only became aware
of the draft in mid July when it was shared with us by someone on the official
distribution list. After the comment deadline this month, it is not clear that citizens
beyond the limited and narrow list of stakeholders outlined in the draft will have any
opportunities for input in the plan or implementation.
2. Military advisory bodies to be created (p. 14) do not include any community or civilian
representation.
3. The plans states that the base may have to adjust its procedures for the sake of
civilian neighborsifaccidentsand noise from aircraftpose public safety hazards for
communities(p.11). The plan does not describe how the community is able to engage
with the military regarding such concerns.
4. The plans Goal3.2.1 Goal: effective and timely stakeholder engagementdoes not
address community engagement (p.20) in any way beyond narrowly defined
stakeholder participation.
5. The plan does not address the impact of the military operations on other economic
issues including individual property values, impact ontourism and recreation. The plan
is based on a narrowly defined business case that assumes themilitarys economic
impact on adjacent communities is uniformly positive.
With concern -
FranEinterz
Anne Harvey
Christine Hurley
Kelly Keilwitz
Jan Pickard
Lori Taylor