Professional Documents
Culture Documents
But heres the crowning irony: since modalist models and social trinitarian models are logically incompatible,
Clarks overall view of the Trinity (based on all his writings taken together) appears to be logically inconsistent. In
other words, Clarks view of the Trinity is paradoxical. This is rather unfortunate for one who so vehemently
repudiated paradoxes in Christian theology! Perhaps Clark had more in common with Van Til than his followers
care to concede.
I want to make clear that Im not trying to argue that Clark was a heretic or anything of the sort. I dont think that at
all. Its important to distinguish between those whose views appear to have unorthodox implications(implications
which they themselves would repudiate) and those who knowingly promote unorthodox views that cause division in
the church. I find much of Clarks theology and philosophy to be problematic, but Ive benefited from reading his
books and I still consider him to be one of the Good Guys. And unlike some of his followers, I wont dismiss him as
an irrationalist simply because he advocates a paradoxical theology.