You are on page 1of 8

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH

2016, Science Hu, http://www.scihub.org/AJSIR


ISSN: 2153-649X, doi:10.5251/ajsir.2016.7.5.129.136

Heavy Metal Content and Physico Chemical Properties of Soil around


Solid Waste Disposal Sites
Asmamaw Abera Kebede1*, Dessalegn Dadi Olani2, Tadesse Getahun Edesa2,
Yohannes Tefera Damtew3
1Debre
Berhan University, Department of Public Health Science, Ethiopia.
2JimmaUniversity, Department of Environmental Health Science and Technology,
Ethiopia,
3Haramaya University, Department of Environmental Health Science, Ethiopia
*Corresponding author: E-mail;asmenst13@gmail.com Tel: +251-91-1002936 P.O.Box-

445 Debre Berhan. Ethiopia


ABSTRACT

Uncontrolled disposal of solid waste causes different adverse ecological impacts. One of the
serious problems is enrichment of heavy metals to the nearest environment. This study analyzed
content of Pb, Cr and Cd and physicochemical properties of soil around solid waste disposal sites
at Adama town. Sampling locations were selected by transect sampling method and soil samples
were taken at distance of 10m, 30m and 60m from periphery of the disposal sites at a depth of
05-20cm and 20-35cm. The pH of soils near Qobbo Luxo and Jogo Dedo disposal sites exhibited
slightly basic and basic respectively. Vertical distribution of Pb, Cr and Cd increased in Qobbo
Luxo disposal site whereas in Jogo Dedo disposal site Pb and Cr increased but Cd decreased.
The total average surface content of Cr (13.71ppm) > Pb (1.033ppm) > Cd (0.223ppm) at Qobbo
Luxo site whereas at Jogo Dedo site Cr (12ppm) > Cd (2.245ppm) > Pb (0.635ppm). The study
demonstrated contamination of the soil by heavy metals that will cause environmental and human
risk through food chain and possibly leaching into ground water sources.

Key words: Adama, Heavy metals content, Soil properties


INTRODUCTION contribute heavy metals in landfill. Released leachate
in the surrounding environment presents a risk to
Most adverse environmental impacts from solid waste
human health (Salvato et al., 2003; Remigios, 2010).
are rooted from inadequate collection and recovery of
The physical and chemical characteristics of the soil
recyclable wastes; as well as, co disposal of
system influence the transformation, retention, and
hazardous wastes and lack of properly designed
movement of pollutants through the soil. Some metals
landfills (USAID, 2009; Remigios, 2010). Open
tend to be relatively strongly adsorbed by soil
dumping is the most common method of Municipal
constituents and their mobility and bioavailability
solid waste disposal in many middle and lower-
depend on the soil condition (USEPA, 1989; Alloway,
income countries. The indiscriminate and open
1990). However, there is lack of comprehensive and
disposal of waste can cause environmental
detail studies about content of heavy metals and
degradation through introducing different toxicants
properties of soil around solid waste disposal facilities
including heavy metals. Contaminations of soil by
in developing countries including Ethiopia. There are
heavy metals are global concern and present a
suggestions for further studies on heavy metals
serious problem (Muniafu and Otiato, 2010; Panagos
content in the soil profiles closer to dumpsites
et al., 2011).
(Kouame et al., 2010). In Ethiopia there are
According to Jayaprakash et al., (2012) heavy metals researches done on the contamination of
occurrence in soil is an indication for existence of groundwater around Reppi open solid waste disposal
natural or anthropogenic sources of pollution. Various site in Addis Ababa City. An increment in the contents
types of wastes like old computer, tin cans, and E- of Cr, Cd and Pb by 99.48%, 95.4% and 93.9%
waste and old battery are few examples that respectively at the outlet of a leachate stream was
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

revealed (Beyene and Banerjee, 2011). This shows disposal site with an area of 3,008m 2 for the last 20
the need to conduct other studies in other dumpsites. years and it shifted to a new disposal site namely
The present study focused on analysis of Lead, Jogo Dedo (Fig. 2.) with an area of 1,985m 2 since
Chromium and Cadmium contents and 2010. There was no documented information for
physicochemical properties of soil nearby Adam town hydrological, geological and overall condition of both
solid waste disposal site. sites but gully erosion passes nearby both disposal
sites. The study was conducted in dry season and
MATERIALS AND METHODS
there was no observed leachate generation near
The study was conducted in Adama (Nazreth) town disposal sites. The sampling location was selected by
solid waste disposal sites namely Qobbo Luxo and transect through simple random sampling method
Jogo Dedo. Adama is found within the Wonji Fault towards gully erosion. The sampling points were
Belt which is the main structural system in the located at 10m, 30m and 60m from periphery of
Ethiopian Rift Valley. The City is located at 9.130- Qobbo Luxo as well as 10m and 30m from Jogo Dedo
9.360N & 40.130E-40.600E and at an elevation of disposal site. Depth-specific soil samples were taken
1712m. The mean annual rainfall is 72.67cm (Tefera, at a depth of 05-20cm and 20-35cm from each
2010). sampling points. The top 05cm of surface soil was
removed before sampling.
The daily generation rate and composition of solid
waste in city was not well studied. The town
municipality has used Qobbo Luxo (Fig. 1.) solid

130
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

Fig. 1. Sampling locations for soil samples at Adama town Qobbo Luxo solid disposal site
(letters A, B and C indicate sampling points)

Fig. 2. Sampling locations for soil samples at Adama town Jogo Dedo solid disposal Site (letters
D and E indicate sampling points)

131
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

A stainless steel knife was used to dig the soil. The pH of the soil at Qobbo Luxo disposal site from
Collection materials were washed using distilled three sampling locations at different depths was 7.46-
water prior to use and before shifting to the next site. 8.08 with a mean of 7.850.23 which is slightly basic;
Collected samples were transported to Addis Ababa whereas the pH of soil from Jogo Dedo was 7.81-
Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory, Addis 8.13 with mean of 8.010.14 which was higher
Ababa, Ethiopia for treatment and analysis. compared to Qobbo Luxo site. The detected slightly
basic pH values in both study areas may be related
Collected soil samples were air dried for 72 hours.
to the soil property of the disposal sites which show
Then disaggregated with mortar and pestle and finely
pH 8.42-8.47 in the control samples. Similar study
powdered as well as thoroughly mixed. The
conducted in Addis Ababa solid waste disposal site
subsample <2mm mesh size was used for analysis.
showed slightly basic pH of 8.170.95 and 7.370.37
The pH of the soil was measured by digital pH meter
in the nearby grazing land which was also due to a
(Model 3510, JENWAY LTD; UK). Electric
soil with high metallic burden (Beyene and Banerjee,
Conductivity was analyzed by 1:2.5 soil-to-water
2011). There was slight difference throughout the
extraction methods and the extract was measured by
depth in both disposal sites. Other study also
digital EC meter (Model 4510, JENWAY LTD; UK).
revealed depth related differences (Adelekan and
Soil Cation exchange capacity was determined by
Alawode, 2011).
ammonium acetate method (Van Reeuwijk, 2002).
Porosity was measured by placing an oven-dry soil The values in the current study are comparable with
core in a pan of water until the entire empty pore findings in Akouedo landfill with a pH of 7.24-8.70
spaces filled with water (Van Reeuwijk, 2002). (Kouame et al., 2010) whereas other study revealed
strongly acidic and strongly alkaline (i.e. pH of 4.9 to
An aqua-regia method (concentrated HCl and HNO3)
8.8) (Al-oud, 2014). On the other hand Qobbo Luxo
was used for heavy metals extraction based on
site exhibited lower pH compared to Jogo Dedo site.
USEPA method 3051a and the concentration of
This variation may be due to age difference and
heavy metals was measured by Graphite Furnace
decomposition rate of organic matters through time.
atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Model
Qubbo Luxo site is older and expected to have higher
novAA400 Analytikjena). The data was analyzed
decomposition of organic matters which can increase
statistically using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version
the humus content and ultimately results high humic
20. The mean concentration was compared by
acid that can lower the pH value (McCarthy, 2001).
Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test.
This is supported by the finding of Abdus-Salam
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (2009) which revealed neutral to slightly basic pH in
more active sites while old or inactive sites exhibited
The Physico chemical properties and heavy metals slightly lower pH.
content of soil samples at Adama town solid disposal
sites are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Physico-chemical properties of soil at Adama town solid waste disposal sites along horizontal
distances and soil depths
Disposal Site Distance (m) Depth (cm) EC (ms/cm) CEC (meq/kg) pH Soil Porosity
10 (A) 05-20 0.03 15 7.87 52.93
20-35 0.13 24 8.08 52.14
Qobbo Luxo 30 (B) 5-20 0.05 25 7.72 52.51
20-35 0.10 21 7.46 53.94
60 (C) 05-20 0.20 24 7.97 50.00
20-35 0.21 30 8.01 52.41
10 (D) 05-20 0.08 17 7.81 55.11
Jogo Dedo 20-35 0.11 32 8.04 49.79
30 (E) 05-20 0.23 23 8.07 52.41
20-35 0.11 31 8.13 47.43
Control 05-20 0.10 25 8.42 53.10
20-35 0.10 24 8.47 52.76

132
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

Relative mean cation exchange capacity (CEC) was similar with the value from the control site; however,
23.174.96meq/kg and 257meq/kg in Qobbo Luxo mean EC values found in this study were less
and Jogo Dedo disposal site respectively. It shows compared to another similar study at Addis Ababa
slight variation along depth and with pH. Other study dump site and nearby grazing land as well as study
in soil of a Southern Guinea Savanna cation done in India Mysore city Industrial zone soil (Beyene
exchange capacity value had increased along the and Banerjee, 2011; Shivakumar and
depth (Fatubarin and Olojugba, 2014). At lower pH Srikantaswamy, 2012). Highest EC values indicate
the value of CEC decreases due to neutralization of movement of ion in the soil (Ifenna and Osuji, 2013).
negative charges on colloids of soil (McCauley et al., Therefore lower EC values may show limited
2005). This study also revealed lower values of CEC movement of ions in the study areas compared to the
at points that registered low pH (Table 1). The results previous finding in Addis Ababa. In addition, the
in both disposal sites were much less than the values difference may be due to seasonal variation and
at Addis Ababa solid waste dumping site which was nature of the soil.
found to be 64.34mol kg-1 (Beyene and Banerjee,
Average soil porosity at the Qobbo Luxo disposal site
2011) but greater than soil at vicinity of a hot mix
was 52.32% and Jogo Dedo disposal site showed
asphalt plant in Obigbo (Ifenna and Osuji, 2013).
51.19%. Jogo Dedo disposal site had highest and
Other study showed a wide range of CEC from very lowest soil porosity at distance of 10m and 30m
low of 4.1cmol/kg to very high of 99.0cmol/kg which respectively. The values were almost similar with the
is not a feature of this study (Al-oud, 2014). The value from the control site.
difference may be due to differences in soil properties
Level of heavy metals in both disposal sites is
and dry environmental condition that deteriorates the
presented in Table 2. The concentration of Pb, Cr
CEC of the soil in study areas.
and Cd were determined at different horizontal
The mean electric conductivity (EC) for Qobbo Luxo distances and depths. Contents were analyzed to
disposal site was found to be 0.120.075ms/cm indicate heavy metals burden on the soil around
whereas Jogo Dedo disposal site registered disposal sites.
0.130.066ms/cm. The values at both sites were

Table 2. Concentration of Cd, Cr and Pb in soil around Adama town solid waste disposals sites along
horizontal distances and soil depths
Disposal site Sampling location Depth (cm) Concentration (ppm)
Cd Cr Pb
10m 05-20 0.10 11.99 1.15
20-35 3.67 16.25 1.68
30m 05-20 0.15 14.37 1.13
Qobbo Luxo 20-35 2.92 16.47 0.76
60m 05-20 0.42 14.76 0.76
20-35 0.12 16.98 1.33
10m 05-20 2.49 12.44 0.08
Jogo Dedo 20-35 0.16 16.53 1.58
30m 05-20 2.00 11.66 1.19
20-35 0.14 16.56 2.05
Control 05-20 0.07 9.03 0.45
20-35 0.15 10.05 0.92

133
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

The average concentration of Pb in both disposal range for background content according to Alloway
sites increased along depth at different sampling (1990).
location with slight fluctuation at Qobbo Luxo site.
Cadmium was one of the heavy metals analyzed
This may be due to movement of Pb along the depth
horizontally and vertically at both disposal sites. Its
favored by slight differences in soil pH and porosity
content increased along depth in Qobbo Luxo site but
(Sherene, 2010; Ideriah et al., 2010) also found
decreased in Jogo Dedo site. Higher concentrations
similar pattern along the soil profile; however, the
with depth may be related with sorption of metals into
concentration is lower compared to this study. Slight
a soil with higher porosity. The porosity in turn
fluctuation along surface depth is supported by other
increases as organic component of soil increases
studies (Marzieh et al., 2010; Njoku and Ngene,
through time (Sherene, 2010; Beyene and Banerjee,
2012).
2011). Thus, it is expected to find higher
Mean content of lead distribution decreased along concentration in the case of old Qobbo Luxo dump
the horizontal distance in Qobbo Luxo site. This can site with highly decomposed organic matter
be due to adsorption of lead on decomposed organic compared to the new Jogo Dedo site. The result of
matter immediate to the disposal site that restricts its Qobbo Luxo agrees with other studies which show
mobility (Kouame et al., 2010). The total surface raise in concentration along soil profile (Adelekan and
mean content of lead (1.033ppm) in Qobbo Luxo site Alawode, 2011; Njoku and Ngene, 2012). Lower
was greater than Jogo Dedo (0.635ppm); however, values along depth in Jogo Dedo disposal site may
the difference was statistically insignificant (P=0.921) be due to slow sorption process in new disposal site.
at P-value = 0.05 according to Man-Whitney U and This is supported by another similar result from an
Kruskal Wallis test. However; the concentration of open dump site in Nigeria which revealed decreasing
Pb in this study was lower compared to other studies in concentration in soil profile (Adelekan and
done in Addis Ababa, India and Ivory Coast which Alawode, 2011).
show 17-852ppm,42.9-1833.5 mg/kg and 280ppm
Average horizontal concentration of Cadmium
respectively (Beyene and Banerjee, 2011; Parth et
decreased towards gully erosion from periphery of
al., 2011; Kouame et al., 2010). The difference may
both disposal sites. According to Kruskal-Wallis test
due to the quantity and constitute of municipal solid
the sites has no significant difference (p=0.2750 for
waste that contains Pb contents such as lead
Qobbo Luxo & p=0.121 for Jogo Dedo). This result
batteries, lead based paints, plastics, electronic
supported by a study conducted in Alexandria, in El-
waste and pipes.
Montaza and Abis dumpsites (Abdel-Monem et al.,
The content of Cr slightly increased along the depth 2011). Other study in Ivory Coast revealed higher
in both disposal sites at all sampling locations (Table average content of Cadmium at nearest sampling
2). The variation along depth may be due to porosity point (Kouame et al., 2010). This indicated open land
and pH of the soil that makes favorable condition for solid waste disposal contributes to increase the
Cr mobility (Adelekan and Alawode, 2011; Parth et concentration of heavy metals in the surrounding soil.
al., 2011). The average pit mean value shows slight The findings in this study were less than other
difference in Qobbo Luxo site at 10m (14.12ppm), findings in Ethiopia and other countries (Abdel-
30m (15.42ppm) and 60m (15.87ppm) but almost the Monem et al., 2011; Njoku and Ngene, 2012; Beyene
same in Jogo Dedo site. The difference is statistically and Banerjee, 2011). The reason may be due to age
insignificant (p=0.248) at P-value = 0.05 according to of disposal sites and constitutes of wastes that
Mann-Whitney U test. Average surface content of entered into the disposal sites.
Chromium at Qobbo Luxo and Jogo Dedo site was
CONCLUSION
13.71ppm and 12ppm respectively.
Among, analyzed parameters pH was slightly basic
Chromium content in this study was much lower than
but lower compared to the control site which indicates
the content reported from Reppi solid waste dump
the influence of solid waste dumped in the area.
site in different sampling points and on grazing land
Similarly EC was lower compared to values for
with a range of 46ppm to 561 ppm (Beyene and
organic soil. The content of Cr, Cd and Pb increased
Banerjee, 2011). But it was higher than the value
along the depth in all location at both disposal sites
found at Enyimba Dump site in Nigeria (Cr=1.34
which is an indicator for sorption of heavy metals into
mg/kg) (Akobundu and Nwankwoala, 2013). Even
the soil. The pit average content of three metals
though it was less when compared with different
decreased toward gully erosion. Average surface
studies, but it is higher than the typical least normal

134
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

contents of Pb, Cr and Cd are greater at Qobbo Luxo Ifenna, I., and Osuji, C. L. (2013). Physico-chemical
disposal site. This implies areas near the disposal characteristics of soils within the vicinity of a hot mix
sites are more contaminated. Currently no pollution asphalt (HMA) plant in Obigbo, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
control mechanism established in both disposal sites. Archives of Applied Science Research, 5 (3), 184-192.
There is possibility of leaching of heavy metals to Jayaprakash, M., Nagarajan, R., Velmurugan, M. P.,
seasonal gully erosion which joins to Awash River Sathiyamoorthy, J., Krishnamurthy, R. and Urban, B.
and transfer of heavy metals to food chain that pose (2012). Assessment of trace metal contamination in a
public health risk. historical freshwater canal Chennai, India. Environ
Monit Assess, 184, 74077424.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Kouame, K. I., Dibi, B., Koffi, K., Savane, I. and Sandu, I.
The authors would like to acknowledge Debre Berhan (2010). Statistical approach of Assessing horizontal
University and Jimma University for funding this mobility of heavy metals in the soil of Akouedo landfill
research project. nearby Ebrie lagoon (Abidjan-cote Divoire).
International journal of conservation science, 1(3),
References 149-160.
Abdel-Monem, M., A., Salah, M. A. H. and Ahmed, F. El. MacCarthy, P. (2001). The principles of humic substances.
(2011). Assessment of the Heavy Metals around two Soil Science. 166, 738-751.
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Dumpsites, Egypt.
Marzieh, S., Hosseini, M. H. and Sarmadiyan, F. (2010).
Retried January 22, 2013, from www.eco-
Variation in soil heavy metal concentrations around
web.com/edi/110331.html.
and downstream of a municipal waste landfill.
Abdus-Salam, N. (2009). Assessment of Heavy Metals Retrieved February 8, 2013, from
Pollution in Dumpsites in Ilorin Metropolis. http://www.iuss.org/19th%20WCSS/Symposium/pdf/24
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and 28.pdf.
Management, 2(2), 92-99.
McCauley, A., Jones C., and Jacobsen, J. (2005). Soil and
Adelekan, B.A. and Alawode, A.O. (2011). Contributions of Water MANAGEMENT MODULE. A self-study course
municipal refuse dumps to heavy metals from the MSU Extension Service Continuing Education
concentrations in soil profile and groundwater in Series Module 1. Montana state University. Retrieved
Ibadan Nigeria. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 40, March 8, 2013, from http://www.montana.edu/.
2727-273. Muniafu, M. and Otiato, E. (2010). Solid Waste
Management in Nairobi, Kenya. A case for emerging
Akobundu, N. A. and Nwankwoala, H. O. (2013). economies. The Journal of Language, Technology &
Evaluation of Heavy Metal in Soils from Enyimba Entrepreneurship in Africa, 2(1), 342-350.
Dumpsite in Aba, Southeastern Nigeria Using Njoku, C. and Ngene, P.N. (2012). Content and Distribution
Contamination Factor and Geo-Accumulation Index. of Heavy Metals in an Abandoned Mechanic and Non-
Energy and Environment Research, 3(1), 125-134. Mechanic Sites in Abakaliki, Southeastern Nigeria.
Al-oud, S.S., El-saeid, M.H and Nadeem, M. E. A. (2014). Greener Journal of Physical Sciences, 2(1), 016-019.
Effect of Soil Chemical and Physical Properties on Cd Panagos, P., Toma, V., ustovi , H. and Vraj B.
Mobility Studied by Soil Thin Layer Chromatography. (2011). Soil protection activities and soil quality
Current World Environment, 9(3), 561-569. monitoring in south Eastern Europe. Conference
Alloway, B. J. (1990). Heavy Metal in Soils. (New York: papers presented at the June 18th and 19th, on
Basic Books). Beyene, H. and Banerjee, S. (2011). European Unions policies for the protection and
Assessment of the Pollution Status of the Solid Waste sustainable development of the European and global
Disposal Site of Addis Ababa City with Some Selected environment, Luxembourg. Retrieved December 17,
Trace Elements, Ethiopia. World Applied Sciences 2012, from http://europa.eu/.
Journal, 14 (7), 1048-1057. Parth, V., Murthy, N. N. and. Saxena, R. P. (2011).
Fatubarin, A., and Olojugba, M. R. (2014). Effect of rainfall Assessment of heavy metal contamination in soil
season on the chemical properties of the soil of a around hazardous waste disposal sites in Hyderabad
Southern Guinea Savanna ecosystem in Nigeria. city (India): natural and anthropogenic implications. E3
Academic Journals of Ecology and the Natural Journal of Environmental Research and Management,
Environment, 6(4), 182-189. 2(2), 027-034.
Ideriah, T. J. K., Harry, F. O., Stanley, H. O. and Igbara, J. Salvato, J. A., Nemerow, L. N. and Agardy, J. F. (2003).
K. (2010). Heavy Metal Contamination of Soils and Environmental Engineering. (In G.Tchobanoglous 5th
Vegetation around Solid Waste Dumps in Port ed), Solid Waste Managment. (Pp 755-888). New
Harcourt, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage, 14(1), York: Wiley.
101-109.

135
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2016, 7(5):129-136

Sherene T. (2010). Mobility and transport of heavy metals USAID (2009). Learn more about the Environmental
in polluted soil environment. Biological Forum-An Guidelines for Small-Scale Activities in Africa;
International Journal, 2(2), 112-121. Environmental Guidelines for Small-Scale Activities in
Africa. Retrieved December 26, 2012, from:
Shivakumar, D. and Srikantaswamy, S. (2012). Study of www.encapafrica.org. U. S. Environmental protection
Physico-chemical characteristics of industrial zone soil; Agency (USEPA). (1989). Soil Sampling Quality
A case study of Mysore city, Karnataka, India. Assurance Users Guide.2nd Ed. Retrieved December
International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 29, 2013, from:
224-232.
http://www.epa.gov/esd/cmb/research/bs122.pdf.
Tefera, M. M. (2010). Food Security Attainment Role of
Urban Agriculture: A case study from Adama Town, Van Reeuwijk, L.P. (2002). Procedures for Soil Analysis.
Central Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Development Technical Paper/International Soil Reference and
in Africa, 12(3), 223-249. Information. 6th ed, Centre, the Wageningen, The
Netherlands.

136

You might also like