Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOCTRINE:
Facts:
Issue:
Whether or not the CA erred in dismissing their appeal for being an inappropriate
remedy that a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 is the sole remedy?
Held:
No. The CA emphasized that the petitioners should have led the petition for review
on certiorari under Rule 45 considering that Section 29 of the Arbitration Law has limited
the ground of review to "questions of law." Although the Special Rules of Court on
Alternative Dispute Resolution provides that the appropriate remedy from an order of the
RTC vacating a domestic arbitral award is an appeal by petition for review in the CA, not
an ordinary appeal under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, the Court cannot set aside and
reverse the assailed decision on that basis because the decision was in full accord with
the law or rule in force at the time of its promulgation.