Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13
*
100872
Co-regulation in Food Safety Governance: Enterprises, Government and the Third Party
Abstract: Considering the frequent outbreaks of food safety scandals, co-regulation has been carried out in order to promote
food safety governance in China. The essence of the transformation from traditional regulation to co-regulation is that the
top-bottom management model turns into the regulation model combining top and bottom power, government and society.
Combining a literature review with case studies, this paper reviews the recent progress on co-regulation in Europe, analyzes
the roles of thee primary responsibility bodies-enterprises, government and the third party in food safety, discusses the
regulation mechanisms of media, non-governmental organizations and consumers, and highlights the importance of the third
party that can be regarded as the complement of the top-bottom regulation due to its bottom-up pressures.
Key words: food safety; co-regulation; self-regulation; the third party; bottom-up pressure
TS201.6D035 A 1002-6630201413-0286-07
doi:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201413057
2013
[2]
Akerlof [3]
1970
[1]
2013-12-18
71173225
1990E-mailzhangmanlucky@126.com
*1965E-mailzft2000@126.com
2014, Vol.35, No.13 287
hazard
analysis and critical control pointHACCP
No intervention
Self-regulation
Co-regulation
Incentive based
structure
[4]
Information&
Education
Direct command and
control intervention
1
co-regulation
Rouvire [8]
[5]
Eijlander
Garcia Martinez [6]
6
[7,9]
1
NGO
enforced self-regulation
Fairman [7] [10-11]
288 2014, Vol.35, No.13
2
[12]
1
[13]
9
85%
[14]
Whole Foods
Subway
[15]
PrimusLabs
[16]
[17]
[19]
2009
3
[18] 2013
2014, Vol.35, No.13 289
2009 Hoban[20]90%
2080
Verbeke[21]
Verbeke[22]
4
[23]
2
1 2
1 2
2
4.1
2012
2004
20082011
2012
2011
86.7%
[2]
290 2014, Vol.35, No.13
NGO
[24]
NGO
NGO
Lorentzen[25] [28]NGO
NGO
NGO
[29]
NGO
NGO
2090
NGO
[26]
NGO
NGO
2002
[30]NGO
4.3
2009
10
4.2
non- 2011
governmental organizationsNGO
NGO
NGO
30
[27]
Jacobsen NGO
NGO
2014, Vol.35, No.13 291
NGO
[31]
3
3 [32-33]
[1] . : [EB/
OL]. (2013-06-17) [2013-10-02]. http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/
gdxw/201306/17/t20130617_24486357.shtml.
[2] . , [J]. ,
2012(6): 115-133.
[3] AKERLOF G A. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and
[4] .
[EB/OL]. (2013-11-28) [2013-11-30]. http://news.ruc.edu.cn/
archives/69948.
[5] EIJLANDER P. Possibilities and constraints in the use of self-
regulation and co-regulation in legislative policy: experiences in the
Netherlands-lessons to be learned for the EU?[J]. Electronic Journal of
Comparative Law, 2005, 9(1): 102-114.
[6] GARCIA MARTINEZ M, FEARNE A, CASWELL J A, et al. Co-
regulation as a possible model for food safety for publicprivate[J].
Food Policy, 2007, 32(3): 299-314.
[7] FAIRMAN R, YAPP C. Enforced self-regulation, prescription, and
conceptions of compliance within small businesses: the impact of
2005: 335-366.
[11] KING B G, BENTELE K G, SOULE S A. Protest and policymaking:
explaining fluctuation in congressional attention to rights issues,
19601986[J]. Social Forces, 2007, 86(1): 137-163.
[12] HENSON S, CASWELL J. Food safety regulation: an overview of
[16] TAYLOR E. HACCP in small companies: benefit or burden?[J]. Food [26] DYCK A, VOLCHKOVA N, ZINGALES L. The corporate
Control, 2001, 12(4): 217-222. governance role of the media: evidence from Russia[J]. The Journal of
[17] . [EB/OL]. (2013-06-18) [2013-09- Finance, 2008, 63(3): 1093-1135.
18]. http://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2013/06/18/268779.html. [27] JACOBSEN E. The politics of food[M]. Bloomsbury: Oxford
[18] . [J]. , 2002(1): 2-3.
International Publishers Ltd., 2004: 59-79.
[19] . [J]. , 2010(10): 7-9.
[28] AERNI P. Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of
[20] HOBAN T J, KENDALL P A. Consumer attitudes about food
agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: a comparison
biotechnology: project report, 1993[M]. Raleigh North Carolina: NC
Cooperative Extension Service, 1993: 1-36. between Mexico and the Philippines[J]. Risk Analysis, 2002, 22(6):
[21] VERBEKE W, WARD R W, VIAENE J. Probit analysis of fresh meat 1123-1137.
consumption in Belgium: exploring BSE and television communication [29] BERNAUER T, CADUFF L. In whose interest? Pressure group
impact[J]. Agribusiness, 2000, 16(2): 215-234. politics, economic competition and environmental regulation[J].
[22] VERBEKE W, WARD R W. A fresh meat almost ideal demand Journal of Public Policy, 2004, 24(1): 99-126.
system incorporating negative TV press and advertising impact[J]. [30] . , :
Agricultural Economics, 2001, 25(2/3): 359-374.
[J]. , 2008(3): 79-83.
[23] , . : [J].
[31] . [J]. , 2013(3): 81-87.
, 2010(4): 14-27.
[32] MITCHELL V W. Handling consumer complaint information: why
[24] , . , [J]. ,
2012(6): 116-126. and how?[J]. Management Decision, 1993, 31(3): 21-28.
[25] LORENTZEN P. Chinas strategic censorship[J]. American Journal of [33] ADAMSON C. Complaint handling: benefits and best practice[J].
Political Science, 2014, 58(2): 402-414. Consumer Policy Review, 1991, 1(4): 196-203.