Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 124
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Where, Wd = the weight of the dry sample, Ws= the 3.3 Ultimate Tensile Strength
weight of sample immersed in water, Ww= the weight of
the saturated sample after removed from the water and 400
ULTIMATE TENSILE
is the apparent porosity.
STRENGTH (Mpa)
350
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 300
250
3.1 Porosity 200
150
6 100
4.89
Apparent Porosity
50
4 3.52 0
2.67
46.125 82.7 99.07 112.625
1.75
2 HARDNESS(VHN)
0
0 3 15 20 Chart-3 : Variation of Ultimate Tensile Strength
Wt. % of Copper
As it is mentioned above that hardness increases with
Copper percentage increases. Hence, maximum hardness
Chart-1 : Porosity due to increment of Copper into Aluminium occurs at 80 wt% Al -20 wt% Cu. So Chart-3 shows as the
Matrix hardness increases the ultimate tensile strength also
increases. Hence maximum ultimate tensile strength is
From Chart-1 Copper percentage increasesapparent found in 80 wt% Al -20 wt% Cu. So it can be said that
porosity decreases. Actually, the value of apparent increase in Copper percentage in Copper-Aluminium
porosity is permissible and lies the value between 1.75% metal matrix composite will increase the ultimate tensile
to 4.89%. Apparent porosity of Aluminium matrix strength of the composite.
composite containing 0 wt% of Copper is highest.
Apparent Porosity is measured in universal porosity 3.4 SEM analysis
measurement technique.
3.2 Micro-Hardness
150
112.625
99.07
100 82.7
VHN
46.125
50
0
0 3 15 20
Wt. % of Copper
Fig-1(a): : SEM analysis of Copper-Aluminium Composites
Chart-2 : Variation of MicroHardness due to increment
of Copper into Aluminium Matrix
Fig-1(b) : SEM analysis of Copper-Aluminium Composites [6] S. Skolianos, Mechanical behavior of cast SiC
reinforced Al-4.5%Cu-1.5%Mg alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Fig-1(a) and Fig-1(b) SEM image indicates fine grain 210 (1996) 76-82.
aluminium structure is produced and make matrix [7] J.W. Kaczmar, K.U. Kainer, Effect of alumina fiber
phase. Melting point of aluminium is 660oC. But here content on properties of PM 6061 Aluminium alloys
sintering was done at 600oC in 1 hour duration on box based composite materials, Powder Metall. 35 (1992)
furnace. 133-135.
As temperature increases simultaneously in box
furnace, aluminium melts at 600oC and produce fine [8] M. Eizadjou, A. Kazemi Talachi, H. Danesh Manesh , H.
grain structure. Copper is well distributed through out Shakur Shahabi, K. Janghorban, Investigation of
entire composite and play as second phase. structure and mechanical properties of multi-layered
Al/Cu composite produced by accumulative roll bonding
4. CONCLUSIONS (ARB) process ,(2008), 2003-2009.
[9] J.M. Torralba, C.E. da Costa, F. Velasco, P/M
The significant conclusions on Al- Cu composites are as aluminum matrix composites: an overview, (2003) 203
follows: 206
Al-Cu composites were developed successfully [10] S. Skolianos, Mechanical behavior of cast SiCp
by powder metallurgy technique. reinforced Al-4.5%Cu-1.5%Mg alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Hardness is increased with incorporating Cu 210 (1996) 76-82.
into Al matrix. Hardness is increased
significantly up to 20 Wt. % Cu content.
Porosity also decreases with increment of Cu
percentage. Hence, maximum porosity observed
in 0% weight fraction of Cu.
The results of study suggest that the hardness
value of Cu-Al increases with the Cu content.
The best esult has been obtained at 20% weight
fraction of Cu particles. Maximum Hardness =
112.625 VHN.
REFERENCES
[1] M.K.SURAPPA, Aluminium Matrix Composites-
challenges and opportunities, Vol. 28,Parts 1 & 2,
February/April 2003, pp. 319334
[2] J.W. Kaczmar, K.Pietrzak, W. Wlosinski, The
production and application of metal matrixcomposite
materials,(2000), 58-67.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 126