Professional Documents
Culture Documents
January 24 2017
DRAFT
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Introduction
Mr. Warren Yau of Teck Resources suggested a focus on two questions for this review.
First, is the hydrogeologic model of the aquifer defensible? Second, is the
development plan technically sound? It is understood that the spatial distribution of
brackish water with varying degrees of salinity may emerge as an important
constraint on the available supply and permissible locations for establishing a well
field.
Participants have referred to the system as a man-made aquifer because the water
table has risen some 150 m within the permeable sediments that underlie the
irrigation area. This term carries with it the connotation that the system is somehow
unique. I would discourage use of the term man-made aquifer, and in this report
will simply refer to the mound of brackish water that has developed as the aquifer.
Although the circumstances are quite different, the brackish-water system at Majes
has elements in common with aquifer storage and recovery systems that have a long
history of use in North America and Europe as a means of augmenting water supplies.
1
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
3. Observations
The following bullets present my assessment of the status of data collection, data
interpretation, and model development. The assessment is based on the level of
project understanding typical of studies carried forward a step beyond pre-feasibility
investigations.
2
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
the MIKE SHE model, and the excess recharge at Majes attributable to
irrigation practice.
3
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
The field data demonstrates vertical and lateral variability in the salinity of the
groundwater beneath the Majes Irrigation Area. Several factors have been identified
to explain this variation; principally salinity variations in the pore waters infiltrating
downward through the vadose zone beneath the irrigation area and the presence of
lower-salinity groundwater in the deeper part of the aquifer associated with regional
groundwater flow or pre-development infiltration of water from the Siguas River.
The highest-salinity groundwater has been detected in association with deep
upwelling flows along major faults. The data hint this upward flow can occur
anywhere along the trace of the faults, it is not restricted to expression in the
streambed profiling along the Siguas River (eg. PZ-05, 13 mS/cm). Commented [DE1]: I dont think this is due to upwelling of
regional saline groundwater since the well is below the Majes
area and not in the discharge area of the river.
For external review, I anticipate it will be important to identify the importance of
evapoconcentration of pore waters in the shallow soils beneath the irrigation area, in
comparison to the dissolution of soluble salts in the sediments, when explaining the
origin of higher-salinity water in the groundwater mound (to demonstrate corporate
understanding of the origin of the brackish water). Confirming the characteristic
salinity of the pore water at a depth of 4 to 5 m below active irrigation areas could be
particularly helpful in verifying current thinking that evapoconcentration of
irrigation water is the principal cause of brackish water quality. Analysis of oxygen Commented [DE2]: Im not sure how we would do this at this
depth.
and deuterium isotope ratios in pore water in this depth range may also be helpful in
this regard. Any long-term variation in the source concentration of brackish water in
the soil profile could depend upon which of these two processes is dominant. This
insight might aid in the interpretation of the salinity variation through the brackish
water mound.
4
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
To provide a clear explanation of salinity variations at Majes for the EIS document, it Commented [DE3]: We may never have a clear explanation
of the salinity variations considering the lack of input data which
will be helpful to assign representative ranges of pore water salinity to the different vary spatially salt contents in the surface prior to farming
water sources: irrigation water; infiltration water at a depth of 4 -5 m below ground (which were washed out), salt contents in the vadose zone and
saturated zone, irrigation rates over time, locations of
surface in active irrigation areas; pore water in the vicinity of the current water table canal/pipeline leakages, and contaminant fluxes from other
beneath the irrigation area; pore water at the estimated depth of the pre- sources such as sewage lagoons.
development water table; and background or regional water quality. I expect a Formatted: Highlight
substantive mixing zone of variable salinity at the contact between the excess Formatted: Highlight
irrigation water and the pre-development groundwater because the density
stratification is inherently unstable (denser water above fresher water). The field
data also show that less saline water reflecting pre-development conditions may be
locally-present near the base of the aquifer if a lower-permeability horizon within the
Moquegua C inhibits vertical migration of the brackish irrigation water (PB-29).
These factors add complexity to the interpretation of the salinity data; a simple model Formatted: Highlight
is unlikely to capture important elements of the variability. Commented [DE4]: A simple model is sometimes best when
the data set is limited.
The majority of the data on the lateral and vertical variability in salinity is Commented [DE5]: There is good correlation between the
based on air lift sampling (return water samples collected during drilling). ECs of the well and ECs from airlift testing. Most piezometers
correlate well with the airlift ECs but some show poor
The veracity of this data set could be challenged during project review, so development due to ingress of fresh water into the formation
independent support for the air-lift sample data could prove valuable. Water and difficulty with lifting 100m to surface.
samples collected at the end of pumping tests, and from piezometers with long Commented [DE6]: This is unlikely to give an accurate
estimate of the formation salinity due to stagnant water in the
well screens, represent vertically averaged concentrations, weighted toward well and density effects.
the open/screened borehole sections with highest permeability. While the Commented [DE7]: This would be more useful but costly and
broad picture of salinity variation can be established with the data on hand, very difficult considering the high lift would need a 4-inch
pump would need to do low flow pumping every 6m which is
there is a need to document how reliably the variability of EC values in the the length of the discharge pipes low flow sampling guidelines
brackish mound has been captured. Do correlations exist between the airlift say that the drawdown should not exceed 10 cm in the well
which could be hard to control. In low K zones it would also pull
samples and water samples taken in nearby piezometers with short well in water from above and below from the higher K zones hard
screens? It may also be possible to test the reliability of the existing data by to know exactly if this is occurring or not.
conducting electrical conductivity profiles in the five pumping wells that have Commented [DE8]: True but we are commonly limited by
budget and depth that the drilling rigs can explore. Normally the
been installed (under non-pumping conditions). If it is possible to carry out RC drill depth limit when advancing casing in these collapsing
low-flow profile sampling in these deep wells, this may also add confidence to formations is about 200-250m which doesnt get us to the fresh
water interface in many areas.
the data set. Alternately, electrical conductivity profiling in the wells under
pumping conditions may also be instructive in defining the EC profile with Commented [DE9]: True. The constraints are both financial
and social. There is also the belief that the NW side is generally
depth. lower in EC so its the opinion that its not good bang for the buck
to drill in this area.
The base of the brackish water zone in the groundwater mound has not been Commented [DE10]: Not exactly true. We have water
chemistry from Well No. 4, and several other piezometers in the
mapped in sufficient detail. Furthermore, the lateral distribution of brackish immediate area.
water northward from the southern end of Majes 1 is poorly defined due to Formatted: Highlight
constraints on drilling in that area. Considerable weight in the project Commented [DE11]: Well 5 has a salinity in the lower end of
evaluation is being placed on the salinity data collected from Well No. 5. What the saline aquifer range (i.e. 6 to 13 mS/cm). It is not that
anomalous an EC when considering the entire SW side. The big
is it about the local conditions around Well 5 that yield a vertical salinity question is why is the SE side so different compared to the NW
profile different from that seen at the other four wells? The Project needs to side?
Formatted: Highlight
5
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
be able to answer this question. Even in a 10-day pumping test, only water Commented [DE12]: Agreed. We need to try to answer it but
we may never arrive at the real answer even if we spent a lot of
from the immediate vicinity of the well screen is recovered at the well head. money trying.
In my opinion, refined estimates are essential for the volume of brackish water
that meets a target value above say 6 mS/cm, in the area that has been Commented [DE13]: In our opinion it is impossible to do this
without a lot more drilling and well installations which would be
identified as the preferred location for development of the well field, to further very costly. I dont think we can model this effectively.
evaluate project viability. The initiative to obtain permission to install
piezometers along the Pan-American Highway is important in this regard. Commented [DE14]: If all three new well locations along the
Panam hwy all come up with high salinity (i.e. >6 mS/cm), would
the data set be sufficient to convince the regulators that the SW
Long-term pumping near the base of the brackish water zone could induce side is uniformly saline? In our opinion it would be.
upwelling of less saline groundwater, which would mix within the wellbore
and lead to a yield of water with lower salinity as time passes. The potential Commented [DE15]: We believe this to be low risk due to the
high downward flux of recharge water in comparison to
for an upward-induced flow needs to be addressed. In large part upward flow potential deep upwelling. Numerical modeling would help
is controlled the degree of vertical anisotropy in hydraulic conductivity. No assess this.
data has been collected to estimate the hydraulic conductivity in the vertical
direction; it will be lower than the value in the horizontal direction. In the first
instance, the potential for upwelling of less saline groundwater could be
examined using the FEFLOW model. For example, could it be shown that
upwelling is unlikely to be an issue over the life of the well field if the vertical
hydraulic conductivity was ten times lower than the horizontal hydraulic
conductivity? If upward flow of less saline water proves to be an issue, this
places greater emphasis on the need for data to define the base of the brackish
water zone.
4. Concluding Comments
From the perspective of the constraints that may be placed on project development
due to water quality, there is considerable uncertainty in the development plans due
to the limited data available to characterize the vertical and lateral distribution of
salinity in the brackish water mound. Concerns relate principally to the lack of data
to define the volume and spatial continuity of higher-salinity water in the region that
has been identified as the preferred location of the well field. I also consider it
important that data be collected on pore water salinity in the shallow soils beneath
6
Review of Operational Water Supply Option Zafranal Project DRAFT
irrigated fields to aid in definition of the source zone concentrations for the brackish
water mound. These data could also prove valuable in interpreting salinity data
within the mound.