Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
2 AMONG
3 COMMANDER, NAVY REGION NORTHWEST,
4 AND
5 THE WASHINGTON STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
6 AND THE
7 THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
8 REGARDING THE SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS AT
9 OUTLYING LANDING FIELD COUPEVILLE,
10 NAVAL AIR STATION WHIDBEY ISLAND,
11 ISLAND COUNTY, WASHINGTON
12 2017
13
14 WHEREAS, Commander, Navy Region Northwest (hereinafter the Navy) requires the
15 installation of security enhancements at Outlying Landing Field Coupeville (herein after OLF
16 Coupeville) and proposed to install an entrance gate and concrete eco-block barriers around a
17 portion of the perimeter of OLF Coupeville; and
18
19 WHEREAS, the Navy has determined that the proposed Undertaking has the potential to cause
20 effects on historic properties subject to review under section 106 of the National Historic
21 Preservation Act (hereinafter NHPA) 54 U.S.C. 306108, and its implementing regulations,
22 36 C.F.R. 800; and
23
24 WHEREAS, the Navy established the Area of Potential Effect (hereinafter APE) for the
25 Undertaking as defined at 36 C.F.R. 800.16(d) as the location of the entrance gate and the
26 concrete eco-block perimeter barrier; and
27
28 WHEREAS, the Navy determined that the Undertaking would have no adverse effect on historic
29 properties and completed section 106 consultation on 23 September 2013 with the Washington
30 State Historic Preservation Officers (hereinafter SHPO) concurrence on a finding of No
31 Historic Properties Affected; and
32
33 WHEREAS, in September 2013 the Navy also consulted with Swinomish Indian Tribal
34 Community, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, and Stillaguamish Tribe of
35 Indians of Washington who expressed no questions or concerns about the Undertaking; and
36
37 WHEREAS, the Navy implemented the installation of the concrete eco-block barrier in
38 November 2013; and
39
40 WHEREAS, as the project was underway the community expressed concern over impacts to the
41 viewshed of Ebeys Landing National Historical Reserve (hereinafter Ebeys Reserve), and the
42 lack of community participation in the section 106 consultation process; and,
43
44 WHEREAS, the Navy immediately worked with SHPO, National Park Service (hereinafter
45 NPS), and the Trust Board of Ebeys Reserve (hereinafter Trust Board) to address
46 community concerns and analyze affects to the viewshed; and,
47
48 WHEREAS, the SHPO revised her concurrence on the previous finding of No Historic
49 Properties Affected to a finding of Adverse Effects on Historic Properties on 20 December 2013,
50 after completion of the installation of the concrete eco-block barrier and prior to the installation
51 of the entrance fence based on the enduring nature of the need for security requirements at OLF
52 Coupeville; and
53
54 WHEREAS, the Navy, in the spirit of preserving relationships and building partnerships, stopped
55 the undertaking and agreed to consult on a finding of Adverse Effect and to develop this
56 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to mitigate for adverse effects of the Undertaking on the
57 historic viewshed of Ebeys Reserve; and
58
59 WHEREAS, in accordance with 36 C.F.R. 800.6(a)(1), the Navy has notified the Advisory
60 Council on Historic Preservation (hereinafter ACHP) of the adverse effect determination,
61 providing the specified documentation, and the ACHP has chosen to participate in the
62 consultation pursuant to 36 C.F.R. 800.6(a)(1)(iii); and
63 WHEREAS, the Navy made information about this project available to the public and provided
64 opportunity for comments per 36 C.F.R. 800.5(d); and
65 WHEREAS, the Navy has invited the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Upper Skagit Indian
66 Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, and Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington to participate in
67 the development of this MOA; and
68
69 WHEREAS, the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Samish
70 Indian Nation, and Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington did not express an interest to
71 participate or did not respond to the Navys invitation to consult on the development of this
72 MOA; and
73
74 WHEREAS, the Navy invited the Trust Board, NPS, Island County Commissioners (hereinafter
75 Commissioners), Town of Coupeville (hereinafter Coupeville), and the Citizens of Ebeys
76 Reserve (hereinafter COER) to participate in the development of this MOA; and
77
78 WHEREAS, the Trust Board, NPS, Commissioners, Coupeville, and COER agreed to participate
79 and be concurring parties; and
80
81 NOW, THEREFORE, the Navy, SHPO, and ACHP, as the signatory parties, agree that the
82 following stipulations resolve Adverse Effects to Historic Properties caused by the undertaking
83 in compliance with the NHPA and that the stipulations govern all aspects of the Undertaking
84 unless this MOA expires or is terminated.
85
86 STIPULATIONS
87
88 The Navy will ensure that the following stipulations are implemented and carried out under the
89 supervision of a cultural resource professional(s) meeting the Secretary of the Interior (SOI)
90 Professional Qualifications as defined in 36 C.F.R. 61.
91
137 (a) military activities that occurred during the Euro-American settlement of Whidbey
138 Island through the end of World War II; and (b) the post-World War II era, which no
139 longer required ground based coastal defenses provided by Fort Casey and Fort Ebey due
140 to the evolution of air power that gave rise to NAS Whidbey Island and OLF Coupeville.
141
142 1) The Navy shall provide hard copies of this report to consulting parties. In addition the
143 Navy will offer hard copies to Coupeville School District libraries, Sno-Isle Library
144 System, the Island County Historical Society and Archive, and the Island County
145 Museum. A digital copy will be provided to SHPO in PDF format, compatible with
146 Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data
147 (hereinafter WISSARD)..
148
149 D) The Navy will provide the Trust Board an opportunity to review the design for the
150 entrance gate component of the OLF Coupeville Security Enhancement Project prior to
151 reinitiating the undertaking.
152
153 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
154
155 II) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS
156
157 A) Should any signatory or consulting party to this MOA object at any time to any actions
158 proposed or the manner in which the terms of this MOA are implemented, the Navy shall
159 consult with such party to resolve the objection. If the Navy determines that such
160 objection cannot be resolved, the Navy will:
161
162 1) Forward all documentation relevant to the dispute, including the Navys proposed
163 resolution, to the ACHP. The ACHP shall provide the Navy with its advice on the
164 resolution of the objection within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving adequate
165 documentation. Prior to reaching a final decision on the dispute, the Navy shall
166 prepare a written response that takes into account any timely advice or comments
167 regarding the dispute from the ACHP, signatories and concurring parties, and provide
168 them with a copy of this written response. The Navy will then proceed according to
169 its final decision.
170
171 2) If the ACHP does not provide its advice regarding the dispute within the thirty (30)
172 calendar day time period, the Navy may make a final decision on the dispute and
173 proceed accordingly. Prior to reaching such a final decision, the Navy shall prepare a
174 written response that takes into account any timely comments regarding the dispute
175 from the signatories and concurring parties to the MOA, and provide them and the
176 ACHP with a copy of such written response.
177
178 B) The Navy's responsibility to carry out all other actions subject to the terms of this MOA
179 that are not the subject of the dispute remain unchanged.
180
181
182 III) ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT
183
184 A) The Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, prohibits federal agencies from incurring an
185 obligation of funds in advance of or in excess of available appropriations. Accordingly,
186 the Signatory Parties agree that any requirement for the obligation of funds arising from
187 the terms of this MOA will be subject to the availability of appropriated funds for that
188 purpose. The Stipulations contained in this MOA will not be interpreted as requiring the
189 obligation or expenditure of funds in violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act.
190
191 B) If compliance with the Anti-Deficiency Act impairs the Navy's ability to implement the
192 Stipulations of this MOA, the Navy will consult with the Signatory Parties to determine if
193 an amendment is necessary to fully satisfy the stipulation herein.
194
195 IV) AMENDMENTS
196
197 This MOA may be amended when such an amendment is agreed to in writing by all
198 signatories. The amendment will be effective on the date a copy signed by all of the
199 signatories is filed with the ACHP.
200
201 V) TERMINATION
202
203 A) If any signatory to this MOA determines that its terms will not or cannot be carried out,
204 that party shall immediately consult with the other parties to attempt to develop an
205 amendment per Stipulation IV, above. If within thirty (30) calendar days (or another time
206 period agreed to by all signatories) an amendment cannot be reached, any signatory may
207 terminate the MOA upon written notification to the other signatories.
208
209 B) Once the MOA is terminated, and prior to work continuing on the undertaking, the Navy
210 must either (a) execute an MOA pursuant to 36 C.F.R. 800.6 or (b) request, take into
211 account, and respond to the comments of the ACHP under 36 C.F.R. 800.7. The Navy
212 shall notify the signatories as to the course of action it will pursue.
213
214 VI) COORDINATION
215
216 The Navy will ensure that each Signatory and Concurring Party is provided a copy of the
217 fully executed MOA within thirty (30) calendar days of executing the MOA.
218
219 VII) POST REVIEW DISCOVERY
220
221 If during the performance of the undertaking or in the course performance of the
222 stipulations in this MOA previously unknown historic properties are discovered or
223 unanticipated effects on historic properties found, the Navy shall immediately implement
224 the Inadvertent Discovery Plan (Appendix B).
225
226 VIII) DURATION
227
228 This MOA will expire if its terms are not carried out within five (5) years from the date
229 of its execution. Prior to such time, the Navy may consult with the other signatories to
230 reconsider the terms of the MOA and amend it in accordance with Stipulation IV above.
231
232 Execution of this MOA by the Navy, SHPO, and the ACHP and implementation of its terms
233 evidence that the Navy has taken into account the effects of this undertaking on historic
234 properties and afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment.
235
263