Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Page 1 of 29
1 interest in the D970 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D970 Patent is
2 attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
3 11. On May 8, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United
4 States Design Patent No. D659,182 (D182 Patent), titled EYEGLASS AND
5 EYEGLASS COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,
6 title, and interest in the D182 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D182
7 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 5.
8 12. On February 26, 2013, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued
9 United States Design Patent No. D676,898 (D898 Patent), titled EYEGLASS
10 AND EYEGLASS COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all
11 right, title, and interest in the D898 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D898
12 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 6.
13 13. On May 5, 2015, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United
14 States Design Patent No. D728,664 (D664 Patent), titled EYEGLASS.
15 Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D664
16 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D664 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit
17 7.
18 14. On July 31, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United
19 States Design Patent No. D547,794 (the D794 Patent), titled
20 EYEGLASSES. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title and
21 interest in the D794 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D794 Patent is
22 attached hereto as Exhibit 8.
23 15. On November 6, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued
24 United States Design Patent No. D554,689 (the D689 Patent), titled
25 EYEGLASS FRAME. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title
26 and interest in the D689 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D689 Patent is
27 attached hereto as Exhibit 9.
28 ///
-3- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.5 Page 5 of 29
1
2
3 25. Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to
4 suffer irreparable injury to its business. Oakley will continue to suffer
5 substantial loss and irreparable injury unless and until Defendant is enjoined
6 from its wrongful actions complained of herein.
7 26. Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
8 Defendants acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate.
9 27. Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to
10 suffer irreparable injury to its business. Oakley will suffer substantial loss of
11 goodwill and reputation unless and until Defendant is preliminarily and
12 permanently enjoined from its wrongful actions complained of herein.
13 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
14 (Patent Infringement)
(35 U.S.C. 271)
15
16 28. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-27 of
17 this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.
18 29. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271.
19 30. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
20 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D180 Patent by
21 making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
22 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
23 the claim of the D180 Patent, for example, Defendants XF032 model
24 sunglasses as shown below.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
-6- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.8 Page 8 of 29
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
31. Defendants acts of infringement of the D180 Patent were
13
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Oakley is informed and
14
believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys
15
rights in the design claimed in the D180 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs
16
are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and Defendants XF032
17
model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented design. Accordingly,
18
Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D180
19
Patent. Defendant infringed the D180 Patent with reckless disregard of
20
Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant
21
should have known, that its actions constitute infringement of the D180 Patent.
22
Defendants acts of infringement of the D180 Patent were not consistent with
23
the standards of commerce for its industry.
24
32. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
25
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D604 Patent by
26
making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
27
design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
28
-7- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.9 Page 9 of 29
1 the claim of the D604 Patent, for example, Defendants XF006 model
2 sunglasses as shown below.
3 Accused Product Oakley Patent
4 XF006 D610,604
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
33. Defendants acts of infringement of the D604 Patent were
13
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
14
knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed in the D604 Patent, at least
15
through a prior litigation that Oakley filed against Defendant on or about March
16
26, 2015, which also alleged infringement of the D604 Patent. Oakley and its
17
iconic designs are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and
18
Defendants XF006 model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented
19
design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional
20
infringement of the D604 Patent. Defendant infringed the D604 Patent with
21
reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so
22
obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constitute
23
infringement of the D604 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D604
24
Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
25
34. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
26
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D919 Patent by
27
making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
28
-8- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.10 Page 10 of 29
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
35. Defendants acts of infringement of the D919 Patent were
14
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
15
knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed in the D919 Patent, at least
16
through a prior litigation that Oakley filed against Defendant on or about March
17
26, 2015, which also alleged infringement of the D919 Patent. Oakley and its
18
iconic designs are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and
19
Defendants XF006 model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented
20
design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional
21
infringement of the D919 Patent. Defendant infringed the D919 Patent with
22
reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so
23
obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constitute
24
infringement of the D919 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D919
25
Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
26
36. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
27
continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D970 Patent by
28
-9- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.11 Page 11 of 29
1 making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
2 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
3 the claim of the D970 Patent, for example, Defendants XF006 model
4 sunglasses as shown below.
5 Accused Product Oakley Patent
6 XF006 D620,970
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
37. Defendants acts of infringement of the D970 Patent were
15
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual
16
knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed in the D970 Patent, at least
17
through a prior litigation that Oakley filed against Defendant on or about March
18
26, 2015, which also alleged infringement of the D970 Patent. Oakley and its
19
iconic designs are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and
20
Defendants XF006 model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented
21
design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional
22
infringement of the D970 Patent. Defendant infringed the D970 Patent with
23
reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so
24
obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constitute
25
infringement of the D970 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D970
26
Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
27
///
28
-10- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.12 Page 12 of 29
1 38. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
2 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D182 Patent by
3 making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
4 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
5 the claim of the D182 Patent, for example, Defendants XF017 model
6 sunglasses as shown below.
7 Accused Product Oakley Patent
8 XF017 D659,182
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 39. Defendants acts of infringement of the D182 Patent were
21 believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys
22 rights in the design claimed in the D182 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs
28 should have known, that its actions constitute infringement of the D182 Patent.
-11- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.13 Page 13 of 29
1 Defendants acts of infringement of the D182 Patent were not consistent with
2 the standards of commerce for its industry.
3 40. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
4 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D898 Patent by
5 making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
6 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
7 the claim of the D898 Patent, for example, Defendants XF017 model
8 sunglasses as shown below.
9 Accused Product Oakley Patent
10 XF017 D676,898
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
41. Defendants acts of infringement of the D898 Patent were
20
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Oakley is informed and
21
believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys
22
rights in the design claimed in the D898 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs
23
are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and Defendants XF017
24
model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented design. Accordingly,
25
Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D898
26
Patent. Defendant infringed the D898 Patent with reckless disregard of
27
Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant
28
-12- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.14 Page 14 of 29
1 should have known, that its actions constitute infringement of the D898 Patent.
2 Defendants acts of infringement of the D898 Patent were not consistent with
3 the standards of commerce for its industry.
4 42. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and
5 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D664 Patent by
6 making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
7 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
8 the claim of the D664 Patent, for example, Defendants XF015 model
9 sunglasses as shown below.
10 Accused Product Oakley Patent
11 XF015 D728,664
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
43. Defendants acts of infringement of the D664 Patent were
20
undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Oakley is informed and
21
believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys
22
rights in the design claimed in the D664 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs
23
are well-known throughout the eyewear industry, and Defendants XF015
24
model sunglass is an identical copy of Oakleys patented design. Accordingly,
25
Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D664
26
Patent. Defendant infringed the D664 Patent with reckless disregard of
27
Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant
28
-13- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.15 Page 15 of 29
1 should have known, that its actions constitute infringement of the D664 Patent.
2 Defendants acts of infringement of the D664 Patent were not consistent with
3 the standards of commerce for its industry.
4 44. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
5 Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and continues to,
6 knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D794 Patent by making,
7 using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a design that
8 would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to the claim of
9 the D794 Patent, for example, Defendants sunglasses shown below.
10 Accused Product Oakley Patent
11 D547,794
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
45. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
20
Defendants acts of infringement of the D794 Patent were undertaken without
21
permission or license from Oakley. Oakley is informed and believes, and
22
thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the
23
design claimed in D794 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known
24
throughout the eyewear industry, and Defendants sunglass is an identical copy
25
of Oakleys patented design. Accordingly, Oakley is informed and believes,
26
and thereon alleges, that Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional
27
infringement of the D794 Patent. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon
28
-14- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.16 Page 16 of 29
1 alleges, that Defendant infringed the D794 Patent with reckless disregard of
2 Oakleys patent rights. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges,
3 that Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known,
4 that its actions constitute infringement of the D794 Patent. Oakley is informed
5 and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants acts of infringement of the
6 D794 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its
7 industry.
8 46. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
9 Defendant, through its agents, employees, and/or servants has, and continues to,
10 knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D689 Patent by making,
11 using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a design that
12 would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to the claim of
13 the D689 Patent, for example, Defendants sunglasses shown below.
14 Accused Product Oakley Patent
15 D554,689
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
47. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
24
Defendants acts of infringement of the D689 Patent were undertaken without
25
permission or license from Oakley. Oakley is informed and believes, and
26
thereon alleges, that Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the
27
design claimed in D689 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known
28
-15- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.17 Page 17 of 29
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
49. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
27
Defendants acts of infringement of the D818 Patent were undertaken without
28
-16- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.18 Page 18 of 29
1
2
3
4
5
6 XF006PL XF003SD
7 81.
8
9
10
11
12
13 82. As a foreseeable, direct, and proximate result of Defendants
14 breach of contract, Oakley has suffered irreparable injury to its rights and
15 pecuniary damages. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
16 Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,
17 gains, profits, and advantages from Defendants breach of contract in an amount
18 that is not presently known to Oakley. Oakley is entitled to monetary relief in
19 an amount to be determined at trial.
20 83. Due to Defendants breach of contract, Oakley has suffered and
21 continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no
22 adequate remedy at law. Oakley is entitled to injunctive relief from Defendants
23 wrongful conduct.
24 84.
25
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
-23- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.25 Page 25 of 29
1 sunglasses identified above as infringing the D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and
2 the D818 Patent, as well as any products that are not colorably different from
3 these products;
4 C. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its
5 respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and
6 those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or
7 indirectly infringing any of the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271;
8 D. That Defendant account for all gains, profits, and advantages
9 derived by Defendants infringement of the Asserted Patents in violation of
10 35 U.S.C. 271, and that Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by
11 Oakley and/or Defendants total profit from such infringement pursuant to 35
12 U.S.C. 284 and 289;
13 E. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages
14 because of Defendants willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;
15 F. That the Court find for Oakley and against Defendant on Oakleys
16 claims of trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair
17 competition under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a);
18 G. That the Court find for Oakley and against Defendant on Oakleys
19 claims of unfair competition under California Business & Professions Code
20 17200, et seq. and California common law;
21 H. That the Court issue a preliminary and permanent injunction
22 against Defendant, its agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors,
23 and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations in active concert or
24 participation with Defendant, enjoining them from engaging in the following
25 activities and from assisting or inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage
26 in the following activities:
27 1. Manufacturing, importing, marketing, displaying,
28 distributing, offering to sell, and/or selling Defendants
-25- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.27 Page 27 of 29
1 KS1375 product shown above and any products that are not
2 colorably different therefrom;
3 2. using Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade Dress, or any other trade
4 dress that is confusingly similar to Oakleys HOLBROOK
5 Trade Dress;
6 3. falsely designating the origin of Defendants goods;
7 4. unfairly competing with Oakley in any manner whatsoever;
8 5. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Oakleys
9 business reputation; and,
10 6. manufacturing, importing, marketing, displaying,
11 distributing, offering to sell, and/or selling any goods that
12 infringe Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade Dress.
13 I. That an accounting be ordered to determine Defendants profits
14 resulting from its trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, and
15 unfair competition, and that Oakley be awarded monetary relief in an amount to
16 be fixed by the Court in its discretion as it finds just as an equitable remedy and
17 as a remedy under 15 U.S.C. 1117, including:
18 1. all profits received by Defendant as a result of its infringing
19 actions, said amount to be trebled;
20 2. all damages sustained by Oakley as a result of Defendants
21 acts of trade dress infringement, unfair competition, and
22 false designation of origin, and that such damages be trebled;
23 and
24 3. punitive damages stemming from Defendants willful,
25 intentional, and malicious acts;
26 J. That such damages and profits be trebled and awarded to Oakley
27 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;
28 K. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case;
-26- COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.28 Page 28 of 29
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
u 1 U.S. Government u 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State u 1 u 1 Incorporated or Principal Place u 4 u 4
of Business In This State
u 2 U.S. Government u 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State u 2 u 2 Incorporated and Principal Place u 5 u 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
1 TABLE OF EXHIBITS
2 Page #
3 Exhibit 1.............................................................................................................. 29
4 Exhibit 2.............................................................................................................. 35
5 Exhibit 3.............................................................................................................. 40
6 Exhibit 4.............................................................................................................. 44
7 Exhibit 5.............................................................................................................. 50
8 Exhibit 6.............................................................................................................. 55
9 Exhibit 7.............................................................................................................. 60
10 Exhibit 8.............................................................................................................. 66
11 Exhibit 9.............................................................................................................. 71
12 Exhibit 10............................................................................................................ 76
13 Exhibit 11............................................................................................................ 77
14 Exhibit 12............................................................................................................ 78
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF EXHIBITS
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.32 Page 2 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.33 Page 3 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-29-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.34 Page 4 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-30-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.35 Page 5 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-31-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.36 Page 6 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-32-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.37 Page 7 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-33-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.38 Page 8 of 67
EXHIBIT 1
-34-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.39 Page 9 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.40 Page 10 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
-35-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.41 Page 11 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
-36-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.42 Page 12 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
-37-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.43 Page 13 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
-38-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.44 Page 14 of 67
EXHIBIT 2
-39-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.45 Page 15 of 67
EXHIBIT 3
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.46 Page 16 of 67
EXHIBIT 3
-40-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.47 Page 17 of 67
EXHIBIT 3
-41-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.48 Page 18 of 67
EXHIBIT 3
-42-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.49 Page 19 of 67
EXHIBIT 3
-43-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.50 Page 20 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.51 Page 21 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-44-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.52 Page 22 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-45-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.53 Page 23 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-46-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.54 Page 24 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-47-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.55 Page 25 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-48-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.56 Page 26 of 67
EXHIBIT 4
-49-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.57 Page 27 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.58 Page 28 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
-50-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.59 Page 29 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
-51-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.60 Page 30 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
-52-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.61 Page 31 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
-53-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.62 Page 32 of 67
EXHIBIT 5
-54-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.63 Page 33 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.64 Page 34 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
-55-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.65 Page 35 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
-56-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.66 Page 36 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
-57-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.67 Page 37 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
-58-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.68 Page 38 of 67
EXHIBIT 6
-59-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.69 Page 39 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.70 Page 40 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-60-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.71 Page 41 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-61-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.72 Page 42 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-62-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.73 Page 43 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-63-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.74 Page 44 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-64-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.75 Page 45 of 67
EXHIBIT 7
-65-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.76 Page 46 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.77 Page 47 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
-66-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.78 Page 48 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
-67-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.79 Page 49 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
-68-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.80 Page 50 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
-69-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.81 Page 51 of 67
EXHIBIT 8
-70-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.82 Page 52 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.83 Page 53 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
-71-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.84 Page 54 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
-72-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.85 Page 55 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
-73-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.86 Page 56 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
-74-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.87 Page 57 of 67
EXHIBIT 9
-75-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.88 Page 58 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.89 Page 59 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-76-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.90 Page 60 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-77-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.91 Page 61 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-78-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.92 Page 62 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-79-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.93 Page 63 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-80-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.94 Page 64 of 67
EXHIBIT 10
-81-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.95 Page 65 of 67
EXHIBIT 11
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.96 Page 66 of 67
EXHIBIT 11
-77-
Case 3:17-cv-01838-LAB-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 09/11/17 PageID.97 Page 67 of 67
EXHIBIT 12
TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL