FEBRUARY 29 child prostitution, child abuse, white slave
trade, etc. There can be as many charges as the
[Read mo sa mga ppt na gi post guyssss kay mao crimes committed. In terms of service of ra ni ang gipang ingun ra ni maam and other sentence, kung pwede simultaneously, edi important stuff] simultaneously like fine ug imprisonment. But if dili, kay successive ang punishments like imprisonment and desierto- serve the DISINI VS SOJ imprisonment first so if naka gawas na kas Why cant a person be charged for libel if he prisohan, di gihapun ka kaulis inyo haha. had already been charged with cyber-libel or child pornography if cybercrime. PP vs Casio Reason: in the cybercrime law, the crime of child pornography was not defined- only made - the case that happened here in Cebu. reference. It only mentioned that if child Trafficking of minors- qualified trafficking. pornography was committed by the use of computers or internet, then this law can apply. Wa siyay iyang kaugalingon definition. Photo and video voyeurism Essentially the same crime. same goes with - does not necessarily involve the internet or a libel. Same ra man elements pud. You have to computer choose only one. Same is true with 7610(child abuse) and rape. If you look at 7610, it did not 2 acts: define rape kay same definition ra sa rape under RPC. 1.) act of taking a photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual Sa pagkaron, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND LIBEL acts or any similar activities or capturing an LANG SAH ANG NAAY JEOPARDY. Unya na ang image of the private area without consent and judgment sa SC sa uban once an actual case is when the person has a reasonable expectation decided. of privacy There should only be an increase in the penalty of the cybercrime law if the use of the computer is specifically sought Sa taking- no particular form of consent pwede verbal like sa katung ka katrina halili, ni Anti-trafficking in Persons (RA 9208, as tanaw shas cam, consent need not be in writing, amended by RA 10364) pwede implied. ( PP vs Lalli Should be under circumstances in which the person expected privacy- like if sa public beach - katung case na gi bring ang girl sa Malaysia to kung mag sex mo nya it was found on youtube- work as a restaurant entertainer unta pero it no violation of this law, no reasonable turned out na prostitution den diay tung expectation of privacy unlike if mag hubo kas restaurant. imong kwarto nya kwaan kag picture - NO double jeopardy between Illegal recruitment and anti-trafficking kay different elements. Same goes with anti- trafficking as to 2.) selling, copying, producing, sharing, distributing, etc. through DVD, cd, cellphone
-consent must be in writing
Sa case ni katrina, there would still be a crime
kay wa may written consent sa kaning number 2 (selling, distribution, etc) ang ma validate ra sa implied consent ang taking