Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective
CONTENTS
Introduction
Vertical Lift Performance (VLP)
Basic Theory of Fluid Flow in Pipe
Gilbert Method
Determination of Pwf
Determination of THP
Selection of Optimum Tubing Size
Factors Affecting VLP
Choke Performance (CP)
Introduction
Introduction
Figure 3-1: The three phases of flowing well performance. (a) Inflow
Mohd Fauzi Hamid
performance, (b) Vertical lift performance, (c) Choke performance. 5
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
The question: Is Pwf Pt > Pwh (or THP)? If yes, the well will
flow.
where: Pt - pressure losses or differential pressure in tubing
Pwh- well head pressure or tubing head pressure (THP)
Basic information:
Density
Slip density, s
No-slip density, n = m
Kinetic density, k
s = L H L + g (1 H L )
n L L + g g
= where :
L 2
g g2 = H L liquid hold up
k
= L
+ L =
no slip liquid hold up
HL 1 HL
=H g gas hold up
g =
no slip gas hold up
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 9
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
L o Fo + w Fw
=
oil fraction water fraction
qo
Fo = Fw = 1 Fo
qo + qw
28.97 g P
For gas: 2.7 g P
=g =
ZRT ZT o R (o F + 460)
Viscosity
Viscosity is a function of T, P, Rs, , composition.
Please refer to the reservoir fluid properties for
determination of viscosity.
Mixture viscosity of multi-phase flow, m:
m = L H L + g (1 H L )
Viscosity of oil and water mixture, liquid viscosity, L:
L o Fo + w Fw
=
where :
= H L liquid hold up
Fo = oil fraction
Fw = water fraction
Hold-up Factor
Four types of hold-up factor involve when study on the two-
phase flow:
Liquid Hold-up, HL
No-slip liquid hold-up, L
Gas hold-up, Hg
No-slip gas hold-up, g
(2)
mgZ 2 mv22
U 2 , PV
2 2, ,
gc 2 gc
(- q)
z2
mgZ1 mv12
U1 , PV
1 1, ,
gc 2 gc
(1)
z1
(+ W)
Introduction
Based on Energy Equation which produce Energy Equilibrium:
mgz
= potential energy
c
g
dP g f v 2 vdv... (2)
= sin + +
dZ g c 2 g c d g c dZ
where:
f = friction factor = f(NRe, )
NRe = Reynold number
= absolute pipe roughness
gc = 32.2lbm.ft/lbf.s2 NRe < 2100 : laminar flow
NRe = 2100 4000 : transition flow
m vm d NRe > 4000 : Turbulent flow
NRe =
m In petroleum :
Water-like viscosity : turbulent flow
Viscous oil : laminar flow
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 20
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
dP g f v 2 vdv
= + + ... (4)
dZ g c 2 g c d g c dZ
For horizontal flow = 0o:
dP f v 2 vdv
= + ... (5)
dZ 2 g c d g c dZ
dP g f m m vm 2 m vm dvm (6)
= m sin + +
dZ g c 2 gc d g c dZ
subscript m refer to mixture
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 22
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Group that consider the slip but not the shape of flow. This
include:
Hagedorn & Brown
Group that consider the slip and the shape of flow. This
includes:
Ros
Duns & Ros
Okiszewski
Aziz & Govier
Beggs & Brill
Chierici, Civcci & Scrocchi
All the above methods are complex and difficult, especially for
multi-phase flow.
For practical purpose, empirical method established by Gilbert
(Gilbert Method) will be used.
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 24
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Gilbert Method
Depth, ft
C
Figure 3-3: Flowing BHP as function of THP Figure 3-4: Pressure distribution curve:
and tubing length: constant GLR, vertical two-phase flow
production rate, and tubing size.
Gilbert then assumed that all the curves of varying THP could
be overlying as one curve with the THP converted to a depth
equivalent, as shown in Figure 3-4.
He then continue his correlation to produce a pressure
distribution chart (pressure traverse curve) for a specific
tubing size and production rate. An example of this chart
shown in Figure 3-5.
The pressure distribution charts can be used for:
Selection of the optimum tubing size
Prediction of a well life
Prediction when the well need artificial lift
Planning the artificial lift
Planning the stimulation
Determination of the required Pwf
Mohd Fauzi Hamid Calculating the optimum flow rate 27
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
C
Tubing equivalent depth
(Pwf equivalent depth)
Example 3-1
Find the flowing pressure at the foot of 13,000 ft of 2-in
tubing if the well is flowing 100 BPD at a GLR of 1.0 Mcf/bbl
with a THP of 200 psi.
Refer to suitable Pressure distribution chart (Figure 3-8);
THP equivalent depth = 2500 ft
Tubing equivalent depth = 2500 + 13000 = 15500 ft
Pwf = 1860 psi
THP Pwf
200 psi 1860 psi
THP equivalent
2500 ft
Pwf equivalent
15500 ft
Example 3-2
What is the THP of a well, completed with 8000 ft of 2-in
tubing, that is flowing at 600 BPD and a GLR of 0.4 Mcf/bbl if
the pressure at the bottom of the tubing is 2250 psi?.
THP equivalent
4150 ft
Pwf equivalent
12150 ft
Method 1
From Pwf, Ps and q, plot IPR curve.
Plot Pwf vs q for several size of tubing based on VLP on the
same graph.
Pwf (psi)
Pwf vs q
A IPR
B
C
Method 2
Plot IPR curve.
Assume q and determine Pwf from IPR curve (or from PI
formula).
By using a suitable pressure distribution chart, determine Pwf
equivalent depth (tubing equivalent depth) (Pwf from 2nd step).
Determine THP equivalent depth.
(= Pwf equivalent depth tubing depth), and then THP.
Repeat the above steps for new tubing size.
From required THP, draw a horizontal line to the right, until
intercept with the THP vs q curves. Intersection points will give
the optimum q for that THP and tubing size.
The highest optimum q correspond to the optimum tubing size.
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 41
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
(4)
(3)
(1) (2) THP (5)
Pwf equivalent
q (BPD) Pwf (psi) equivalent THP (psi)
depth (ft)
depth (ft)
q1 - - - THP1
q2 - - - THP2
q3 - - - THP3
q4 - - - THP4
assume pressure pressure
IPR or PI (3) - tubing
according to distribution distribution
formula depth
chart chart chart
P (psi)
IPR
Pwf
A
B
C THP vs q
THP
q
0 qopt-C qopt-A qopt-B q (BPD)
Figure 3-11: Determination of Optimum Tubing Size (Method 2)
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 43
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Example 3-3
A well producing from a pay zone between 5000 and 5052 ft
is completed with 2-in tubing hung at 5000 ft. The well has a
static BHP of 2000 psi and a PI of 0.3 bb/day.psi and produces
with a GOR of 300 cuft/bbl and a water cut of 10%. At what
rate will the well flow with a THP of 100 psi?
Assume a straight line IPR.
qw gas
= 0.1,
= and 300
q qo
gas 300qo 300(q qw ) q
=
GLR= = = 300(1 w )
q q q q
= 300(1 0.1) = 270 cuft / bbl
q
=
PI = =
qmax 0.3* 2000 600 bbl / d
Ps Pwf
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 44
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Method 1
Involves calculation of Pwf at various values of q, and THP of
100 psi.
(2) (3)
(1) (4)
THP equivalent Pwf equivalent
q (BPD) Pwf (psi)
depth (ft) depth (ft)
50 500 5500 1275
100 700 5700 1150
200 800 5800 1050
400 800 5800 975
600 800 5800 910
assume according to pressure distribution pressure distribution
(2) + 5000
chart chart chart
Method 1
2500
Example 3-3
P(psi)
Method 2
500 q = 280 bbl/d
qw = 28 bbl/d (10% WC)
0 qo = 252 bbl/d
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
q(BPD) THP= 100 psi
Method 2
Involves calculation of THP at various values of q, using the
value of Pwf from IPR.
(4)
(3)
(1) (2) THP (5)
Pwf equivalent
q (BPD) Pwf (psi) equivalent THP (psi)
depth (ft)
depth (ft)
50 1833 7300 2300 450
100 1667 7500 2500 400
200 1333 6700 1700 250
400 667 4200 - -
600 0 - - -
Exercise
A well is to becompleted for which the following data has
been derived:
q
=PI =
q max 18= =
x 5500 99, 000 BPD (at Pwf 0)
Ps Pwf
=
q 0 at Pwf= P=
s 5,500 psia
VLP Method-2
Pwf Equi. THP Equi.
q (bbl/day) Pwf (psig) Depth (ft) THP (psig)
Depth (ft)
5000
10000
20000
30000
Pwf (psi)
A Producing
B Not Producing
B Pwf vs q
A IPR
0 q (BPD)
Figure 3-12: Determination of Producing Well
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 52
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Pwf (psi)
The well will dead
at IPR no (3)
(1) Pwf vs q
(2)
IPR
(4) (3)
0 q (BPD)
Figure 3-13: Determination of Well Life
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 54
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Pwf (psi)
IPR
Pwf vs q
Pwf
0 q q (BPD)
Figure 3-14: Determination of Pwf and q at Specific Tubing,
GLR and THP
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 56
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Other Correlation
1962 Winker & Smith Practical 1 3.5 inch Oil, Curve for Poettmann &
water, Carpenter
gas
1960 US Industries Practical 1 4.5 inch Oil, Curve for Poettmann &
water, Carpenter
gas
1954 Gilbert Field data for 2, 2.5, 3 inch Oil, Vertical multiphase flow
practical use water, traverses curve
gas
1961 Ros Lab. exp & field All All Good correlation for all
data ranges of flow
1961 Duns & Ros Lab. exp & field All All Good correlation for all
data ranges of flow & easier to
understand
Other Correlation
196 Hagedorn & Brown Field exp. 1 4 inch Oil, water, Generalized correlation
5 gas to handle all ranges of
multiphase flow
196 Okiszewski Review all correlation All Oil, water, General correlation to
7 gas predict pressure losses
for all ranges of flow by
utilized Ros, Griffith &
Wallis works
197 Aziz & Govier Laboratory & field All All Testing lab data with
2 data field data
197 Beggs & Brill Laboratory 1, 1.5 inch Air, water Generalized correlation
3 to handle all ranges of
multiple phase flow &
for any pipe angle
As the fluid approaches the orifice, it leaves the pipe wall and
contracts to form a high-velocity jet.
The jet converges to a
minimum called the throat or
vena contracta, and then it
expands toward the wall of
the choke bore.
After leaving the choke, the
stream of fluid expands and Figure 3-21: Flow Regime in a Fixed
returns to a flow geometry Choke
similar to what it was before
entering the choke.
Correlation by Gilbert:
Determination of THP
Example 3-4
Calculate the choke size required to flow a well at 200
bbl/day with a GLR of 1.0 Mcf/bbl and a tubing head pressure
of 400 psi.
435(GLR)0.546
THP = 1.89
*q
S
(1/1.89) (1/1.89)
435(GLR )
0.546
435(1) 0.546
S = * q 400 * 200
THP
= 17.25
= 17 / 64 in.
Example 3-5
Given data:
oAPI = 40
THP = 400 psi
Choke size = 14/64 inch
GLR= 1000 cuft/bbl
Down stream pressure = 100 psi
Find the flow rate in BPD
435(GLR)0.546
THP = 1.89
*q
S
THP * S 1.89 400(14)1.89
=q =
435* 0.546 = 0.546
134.82 BPD
GLR 435(1)
Example 3-6
A well is producing through a -in choke at 100 bbl/day with
a THP of 150 psi. What is the GLR as calculated from
nomograph and from Eqn. (2)? What would be the calculated
GLR if, all other things being equal, the choke size were 17/64
in.?
435(GLR )0.546
THP = 1.89
*q
S
(1/ 0.546) (1/ 0.546)
THP * S 150(16)
1.89 1.89
GLR16 = = 0.455Mcf / bbl
435* q 435(100)
(1/ 0.546)
150(17)
1.89
GLR17 = 0.562 Mcf / bbl
435(100)
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 73
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
S3 (highest q)
IPR
S1
S2 CP
S3
0 q1 q2 q3 q (BPD)
Figure 3-23: Determination of Optimum Choke Size (Open Flow)
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 75
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
S1
S2 CP
VLP
S3
0 q1 q2 q3 q (BPD)
Figure 3-24: Determination of Optimum Choke Size (Restricted Flow)
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 77
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
CP
A
B
VLP S
C
0 q1 q2 q3 q (BPD)
Figure 3-25: Determination of Optimum Tubing Size
Mohd Fauzi Hamid 78
Production Engineering Chapter 3: Flow Through Tubing & Flowlines
Example 3-7
435(GLR)0.546
THP = 1.89
*q
S
(1/1.89) (1/1.89)
435(GLR )
0.546
435(0.27) 0.546
S = * q *300
THP 100
= 30
= 30 / 64 in.
To determine the q on a -in choke, note that THP and q are
unknowns. Substituting 0.27 for GLR and 16 for S in Eqn. 2
give the result:
2500
Example 3-7
P(psi)
THP = 1.128q is a
2000 straight line that
pass through an
origin.
1500
IPR
1000
500
TPR CP
0
q = 210 BPD
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
q(BPD)