You are on page 1of 27

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278674903

Production of Food Additives

Chapter January 2010

CITATIONS READS

0 3,104

2 authors:

Pierre FONTANILLE Christian Larroche


Universit Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand II Universit Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand II
39 PUBLICATIONS 652 CITATIONS 127 PUBLICATIONS 3,285 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Pierre FONTANILLE on 18 June 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Production of Food Additives 1071

34

Production of Food Additives


Pierre Fontanille and Christian Larroche

1. INTRODUCTION
Many people enjoy making bread, cakes, wine, beer and ice cream at home. However, most of
todays food is bought from shops and supermarkets and has to stay in top condition over a much
longer period of time than home-cooked food. Thats why food additives have become a necessity
of all types of food products and food industry. Right from the aroma of the beverage, the texture
of the food and its visual appeal, have to be enriched to make it acceptable. Additives also improve
the nutritional value of some foods and can make them more appealing by improving their taste,
texture, consistency or color. Because many chemical additives are banned by food legislation
and by customers, the need for natural alternatives has increased. Thats why more and more
additives are produced by fermentation or will be produced in future.
This chapter first summarizes the main legislations on food additives in the world. Then, the authors
aim is to show examples of molecules belonging to the main categories of food additives produced
by fermentation for industrial application. Bioprocesses currently used in industry or under
investigation are also considered. The choice of these products is based on global food additives
market (Fig. 1). Future prospects and new products likely to become new food additives are more
detailed in other specific chapters of this book.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1. The Codex alimentarius definition of food additives


The internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations
relating to food, food additives, food production and food safety are given by the Codex
Alimentarius (Latin for food code or food book). The Codex Alimentarius Commission, where
1072 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

7,000 6,500

6,000

5,000

3,850
4,000
3,220
3,000
2,300
1,830
2,000 1,610
1,150
830 788 679
1,000

0
rs ld
s rs ts rs rs ur
s es ts es
vou l lo nce l an e ne ine lo ym dan ativ
co u t s o i
Fl
a ha d e ul C En
z x rv
ro en Ad we Em tto se
yd r S An re
H ou P
lav
F

Fig. 1: Global food additives market by category, 2007(Value in USDm) excluding sales of vitamins,
minerals, fat replacers and functional ingredients (http://www.leatherheadfood.com/food-additives-
marketglobal-trends-and-developments-4th-edition, 2008).

sit the representatives of about 200 countries, was created in 1963 by the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to try and
achieve harmonization in the use of food additives through-out the world by developing food
standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food
Standards Programme.
Food additives are clearly defined in the codex general standard for food additives (CODEX STAN
192-1995) as: Any substance not normally consumed as a food by itself and not normally used
as a typical ingredient of the food, whether or not it has nutritive value, the intentional addition
of which to food for a technological (including organoleptic) purpose in the manufacture, processing,
preparation, treatment, packing, packaging, transport or holding of such food results, or may be
reasonably expected to result (directly or indirectly), in it or its byproducts becoming a component
of or otherwise affecting the characteristics of such foods. The term does not include contaminants
or substances added to food for maintaining or improving nutritional qualities.
Even though the Codex alimentarius is recognized as international standard, a food additive
definition is included in the European Council Directive 89/107/EEC. This definition is, however,
quite similar to the Codex one. In the USA, the Food Additives Amendment 1958 to the Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act contains a more complex definition.
Production of Food Additives 1073

The term food additive means any substance the intended use of which results or may reasonably
be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component or otherwise affecting
the characteristics of any food (including any substance intended for use in producing, manufacturing,
packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food; and including
any source of radiation intended for any such use), if such substance is not generally recognized,
among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been
adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior
to January 1, 1958, through either scientific procedures or experience based on common use in
food) to be safe under the conditions of its intended use; except that such term does not include:
(1) a pesticide chemical residue in or on a raw agricultural commodity or processed food;
or
(2) a pesticide chemical; or
(3) a color additive; or
(4) any substance used in accordance with a sanction or approval granted prior to the enactment
of this paragraph 4 pursuant to this Act [enacted Sept. 6, 1958], the Poultry Products
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 and the following) or the Meat Inspection Act of March
4, 1907 (34 Stat. 1260), as amended and extended (21 U.S.C. 71 and the following);
(5) a new animal drug; or
(6) an ingredient described in paragraph (ff) in, or intended for use in, a dietary supplement.
This amendment categorized food chemicals as: (1) those Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS);
(2) those with prior sanction; and food additives. Pesticides on raw agricultural products and food
color additives were excluded from the legal definition as they were covered by other legislation.

2.2. How are additives approved for use in foods?


New additives and new process production of existing additives are evaluated by the Joint FAO/
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) which normally meets twice a year. It is
an international expert scientific committee that is administered jointly by the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). It has been
meeting since 1956, initially to evaluate the safety of food additives. To date, JECFA has evaluated
more than 1500 food additives. The Committee has also developed principles for the safety
assessment of chemicals in food that are consistent with current thinking on risk assessment and
take into account recent developments in toxicology and other relevant scientific areas such as
microbiology, biotechnology, exposure assessment, food chemistry including analytical chemistry
and assessment of maximum residue limits for veterinary drugs.
The Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA, Codex STAN 192-1995) lists and sets
1074 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

forth the conditions under which permitted food additives may be used in all foods. To search
for the provisions of a food additive, GSFA Database is available at: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/
gsfaonline/additives/search.html?lang=en.
In the United States, food and color additives are strictly studied, regulated and monitored by
the FDA which has the primary legal responsibility for determining their safe use. To market a
new food or color additive (or before using an additive already approved for one use in another
manner not yet approved), a manufacturer or other sponsor must first petition FDA for its approval.
These petitions must provide evidence that the substance is safe for the ways in which it will
be used. As a result of recent legislation, since 1999, indirect additives have been approved via
a premarket notification process requiring the same data as was previously required by petition.
Under the Food Additives Amendment, two groups of ingredients were exempted from the regulation
process.
GROUP I - Prior-sanctioned substances - are substances that FDA or USDA had determined safe
for use in food prior to the 1958 amendment. Examples are sodium nitrite and potassium nitrite
used to preserve luncheon meats.
GROUP II - GRAS (generally recognized as safe) ingredients - are those that are generally
recognized by experts as safe, based on their history of extensive use in food before 1958 or
based on published scientific evidence. Among the several hundred GRAS substances one finds
salt, sugar, spices, vitamins and monosodium glutamate (MSG). Manufacturers may also request
that FDA review the industrys determination of GRAS Status.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains a list of over 3000 ingredients in its data
base Everything Added to Food in the United States available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/
FoodIngredientsPackaging/FoodAdditives/FoodAdditiveListings/ucm091048.htm

2.3. Why are Additives Used in Foods?


Additives perform a variety of useful functions in foods that are often taken for granted. Most
people today have come to rely on the many technological, aesthetic and convenience benefits
that additives provide in food.
Additives are used in foods for five main reasons:
To maintain product consistency. Emulsifiers give to products a consistent texture and
prevent them from separating. Stabilizers and thickeners give smooth uniform texture. Anti-
caking agents help substances such as salt to flow freely.
To improve or maintain nutritional value. Vitamins and minerals are added to many common
foods such as milk, flour, cereal and margarine to make up for those likely to be lacking
in a persons diet or lost in processing.
Production of Food Additives 1075

To maintain palatability and wholesomeness. Preservatives retard product spoilage caused


by mold, air, bacteria, fungi or yeast. Bacterial contamination can cause foodborne illness,
including life-threatening botulism. Antioxidants are preservatives that prevent fats and oils
in baked goods and other foods from becoming rancid or developing an off-flavor. They
also prevent cut fresh fruits such as apples from turning brown when exposed to air.
To provide leavening or control acidity/alkalinity. Leavening agents that release acids when
heated can react with baking soda to help cakes, biscuits and other baked goods to rise
during baking. Other additives help modify the acidity and alkalinity of foods for proper
flavor, taste and color.
To enhance flavor or impart desired color. Many spices, natural and synthetic flavors
enhance the taste of foods. Colors, likewise, enhance the appearance of certain foods to
meet consumer expectations.

2.4. Classification of additives


Food additives can perform a number of technological functions during food processing and storage
and in a few cases the same substance may have more than one function.
A comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of additive functions is given in the Codex Standard
on Food Labeling (Table 1). The food additive functional classes are based on the Codex Class
Names and the International Numbering System (INS) for Food Additives (CAC/GL 36-1989).
This list illustrates the diversity of functions covered by additives and in most countries it forms
the basis for the classification of approved additives.

3. FLAVOURING AGENTS AS FOOD ADDITIVES


Flavouring agents are one of the largest single groups of food additives. Food and beverage
applications of flavours include dairy, fruit, nut, seafood, spice blends, vegetables and wine
flavouring agents. They may complement, magnify, or modify the taste and aroma of the foods.
They represent a worldwide market of about US$ five billion and constitute over a quarter of
the global market of food additives. Indeed, olfaction has a dramatic impact on our food perception
because it can elicit strong emotions and lasting memories (Shepherd, 2006).
The subdivision of volatile flavors into natural, natural identical (EC only) and artificial is based
on legal definitions: the EC Guidelines 88/388/EEC, 91/71/EEC, 91/72/EEC and the US code
of Federal Regulation. The term natural, considered as consumer friendly, is defined in Europe
as flavoring substances or preparations which are obtained by appropriate physical processes or
enzymatic or microbiological processes from material of vegetal or animal origin (EC Flavor
Directive, 88/388/EEC). In the USA, the term natural flavor means the essential oil, oleoresin,
essence or extractive, protein hydrolysate, distillate of any product of roasting, heating or
1076 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

Table 1 : Food additives functional classes according to codex alimentarius

Food additives Technological purpose Definitions


functional class

Acidity regulator Acidity regulator, acid, acidifier, alkali, Alters or controls the acidity or alkalinity of a
base, buffer, buffering agent, pH food.
adjusting agent

Anticaking agent Anticaking agent, antistick agent, Reduces the tendency of particles of food to
drying agent, dusting powder, release adhere to one another.
agent

Antifoaming agent Antifoaming agent Prevents or reduces foaming.

Antioxidant Antioxidant, antioxidant synergist, Prolongs the shelf-life of foods by protecting


sequestrant against deterioration caused by oxidation, such as
fat rancidity and colour changes

Bulking agent Bulking agent, filler A substance, other than air or water, which
contributes to the bulk of a food without
contributing significantly to its available energy
value.

Colors Color Adds or restores color in a food.

Color retention agent Color fixative, color stabilizer Stabilizes, retains or intensifies the color of a
food.

Emulsifier Clouding agent, dispersing agent, Forms or maintains a uniform mixture of two or
emulsifier, plasticizer, surface active more immiscible phases such surface as oil and
agent, surfactant, wetting agent water in a food.

Emulsifying salt Melding salt, sequestrant Rearranges cheese proteins in the manufacture of
processed cheese, in order to prevent fat separation.

Firming agent Firming agent Makes or keeps tissues of fruit or vegetables firm
and crisp, or interacts with gelling agents to
produce or strengthen a gel.

Flavor enhancer Flavor enhancer, flavor modifier, Enhances the existing taste and/or odor of a food.
tenderizer

Flour treatment agent Bleaching agent, dough improver, A substance added to flour to improve its baking
flour improver quality or color.
Production of Food Additives 1077

Food additives Technological purpose Definitions


functional class
Foaming agent Aerating agent, whipping agent Makes it possible to form or maintain a uniform
dispersion of a gaseous phase in a liquid or solid
food.

Gelling agent Gelling agent Gives a food texture through formation of a gel.

Glazing agent Coating, polish, sealing agent A substance which, when applied to the external
surface of a food, imparts a shiny appearance or
provides a protective coating.

Humectant Moisture/water retention agent, Prevents food from drying out by counteracting
wetting agent the effect of an wetting agent atmosphere having
a low degree of humidity.

Preservative Antimicrobial preservative, anti- Prolongs the shelf-life of a food by protecting


mycotic agent, bacteriophage control against deterioration caused by microorganisms.
agent, chemosterilant, disinfection
agent, wine maturing agent

Propellant Propellant A gas, other than air, which expels a food from
a container.

Raising agent Binder, leavening agent, raising agent A substance or combination of substances which
liberate gas and thereby increase the volume of
a dough.

Stabilizer Colloidal stabilizer, firming agent, Makes it possible to maintain a uniform dispersion
foam stabilizer, moisture/water of two or more immiscible substances in a food.
retention agent

Sweetener Artificial sweetener, nutritive A non-sugar substance which imparts a sweet


sweetener, sweetener taste to a food.

Thickener Bodying agent, texturizer, thickening Increases the viscosity of a food.


agent

enzymolysis, which contains the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit juice, vegetable
or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bud, bark, root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, seafood,
poultry, eggs, dairy products or fermentation products thereof, whose significant function in food
is imparting flavoring rather than nutrition (Code of Federal Regulations, 1990).
Both definitions state that the precursor or product must be present in nature or be part of traditional
1078 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

foods and those natural flavors must be obtained via physical or bio-processes. Microbial flavors
can occur along de novo microbial syntheses (fermentation), or in bioconversions upon adding
a suitable precursor compound to the micro-organisms or enzymes (biocatalysis). Physical processes
include extraction, distillation, concentration, crystallisation etc.
The authors intention is to illustrate examples of compounds currently used or under investigation
in industry rather than to present the large variety of flavor compounds generally made available
by biotechnology. More detailed review on this topic is given elsewhere in the book. There are
over 1200 different flavoring agents used in foods to create flavor or replenish flavors lost or
diminished in processing, and hundreds of chemicals may be used to simulate nature flavours.
Alcohols, esters, aldehydes, ketones, pyrazines or terpenes are examples of flavouring agents.

3.1. Vanillin, benzaldehyde and aromatics


Vanillin, the main flavor compound of the bean of Vanilla planifolia, is by far the most important
flavor chemical in terms of amount and value. Annually more than 10 000 tons are produced
and less than 1% is extracted from the vanilla bean. Whereas chemically produced vanillin is
a cheap flavor compound (US$ 11 kg1), natural vanillin derived from microbial processes currently
costs up to US$ 1000 kg1 and yields a market volume of several tons per annum (Schrader et
al., 2004).
Limited supply and the high price of the natural vanillin extracted from the botanical source (up
to US$ 4000) stimulated research for a biotechnological substitution. Different biotechnological
production processes are based on bioconversion of ferulic acid, phenolic stilbenes, isoeugenol,
or eugenol and on de novo biosynthesis, applying bacteria, fungi, plant cells or genetically
engineered microorganisms (Priefert et al., 2001). Two commercial processes are well known:
pressure hydrolysis of curcumin from curcuma roots and degradation of natural feluric acid,
frequently occurring in plants and mainly isolated from rice bran, by Pseudonocardia.
Benzaldehyde, with an annual global consumption of 7,000 tons, is the second most important
aroma after vanillin. It has a cherry or almond taste and can be extracted from fruit kernels. Only
a few organisms have been reported to produce benzaldehyde in high amounts, mainly because
it is toxic towards microbial metabolism (Desmet et al., 2008).
Cinnamic acid esters (exotic fruit), cinnamaldehyde (cinnamon), eugenol (clove), methyl benzoate
(dry fruit) and benzyl acetate (jasmine) were among the volatiles found in submerged cultures
of basidiomycetes.

3.2. -Decalactone
-decalactone is the most important lactone for flavor application. It has an oily-peachy aroma,
extraordinarily tenacious odour and a very powerful, creamy-fruity, peach-like taste at concentrations
below 5 mg L1. In the early eighties natural -decalactone was an extremely expensive, rare natural
Production of Food Additives 1079

flavor (>US$ 10,000 kg1). The subsequent introduction and optimization of microbial processes
has resulted in a price decrease to approx. US$ 300 kg1 and a market volume of several tons
per year (Schrader et al., 2004).
Most of the commercial processes for the formation of -decalactone use ricinoleic acid, the main
fatty acid of castor oil or esters thereof. The formation of -decalactone, with the same enantiomeric
configuration as the lactone naturally found in peaches and other fruits, was first observed by
Okui et al. (1963) in the catabolism of ricinoleic acid by yeasts of the genus Candida. The processes
with the highest product concentrations use Yarrowia lipolytica strains. Using a genetically
engineered multiple auxotrophic mutant, designated PO1D, Nicaud et al. (1996) obtained high
yields of -decalactone from ricinoleic acid methyl ester. After 75 h the culture broth yielded
9.5 g -decalactone L1 (Pagot et al., 1997). In a production process established by Haarmann
& Reimer GmbH (H&R), Germany, up to 11 g -decalactone L1 was obtained in 55 h without
a genetically modified production strain and with raw castor oil as substrate (Rabenhorst & Gatfield,
2000). Kmin & Mnch (1997) at Givaudan, Switzerland, used Mucor circillenoides on ethyl
decanoate as substrate for the production of -decalactone. They obtained 10.5 g -decalactone
L1 after 60 h.

3.3. Esters
Aliphatic and terpenic esters can be found in almost every food. Those with a relatively low
molecular weight are usually fruity in character. The word estery is an established term to describe
this sensory impression. Ethyl esters belong to the most important esters that are relevant for flavors
since ethanol is widely present in plant metabolism. Methyl, propyl, butyl, isobutyl, amyl and
isoamyl esters are also of specific interest for flavors in the food industry. They are generally
produced by many microorganisms by oxidative shortening of fatty acids and partial reduction
of the degradation products, by degradation of free amino acids, or by conversion of terpenoid
precursors (Berger, 2000). A great advantage of reactions involving lipases or esterases is that
they can be carried out in organic solvents without the need for any cofactor. This is of special
interest for ester formation since the water formed can be removed simply by distillation or
adsorption.

3.4 Green aldehydes and alcohols


C6 aldehydes and their corresponding alcohols are the industrially most relevant compounds to
obtain the green organoleptic characteristic. For example, 3(Z)-hexen-1-ol (leaf alcohol) has
a powerful odour of freshly cut grass and is an important flavor and fragrance material used for
natural green top notes. The market of natural green notes is estimated at 510 t year1 and
US$ 3000 kg1 (Muller et al., 1995a). Since the traditional preparation of natural green notes
by distilling plant oils, e.g. mint terpene fractions, is costly and cannot meet the increasing market
demand for natural flavors, different biocatalytic syntheses have been developed, all containing
1080 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

at least one enzymatic reaction catalyzed by crude plant material (Goers et al., 1989, Brunerie
& Koziet, 1997, Belin et al., 1998, Holtz et al., 2001). In comparison with these patents, one
filed by Firmenich (Muller et al., 1995b) reported the highest yields, e.g. 4.2 g 3(Z)-hexen-1-
ol kg1 and 1.5 g 2(E)-hexenal kg1 were produced (Schrader et al., 2004).

3.5. Ketones
The most important ketone aroma is 2,3-butanedione (diacetyl), which is related to the flavor of
butter (Bartowsky & Henschke, 2004). It is produced by lactic acid bacteria and other
microorganisms present in food, and is, therefore readily available. Methyl ketones, such as
2-heptanone, are the largest contributors to stale flavors in UHT milk, and are used for the flavoring
of blue cheese. A interesting method to produced 2-heptanone has been developed by Larroche
and coworkers (1992) with spores of Penicillium roquefortii in a water-organic solvent two-phase
system.

3.6. Terpenes and terpenoids


Terpenes and terpenoids are molecules composed of isoprene units and can be found in the essential
oil of plants (Loza-Tavera, 1999). The terpenes with the highest flavor intensity are geraniol,
citronellol, nerol and linalool. Terpenoid flavor compounds represent an area of high commercial
interest to the industry due to the large number of key aroma compounds which are in principle
accessible by biotransformation of abundant natural terpene hydrocarbons (Schrader & Berger,
2001). For this class of molecule, the feasibility of novel biocatalytic flavor syntheses will much
depend on process engineering features. This is especially obvious in the case of biotransformation
which have to overcome several drawbacks, such as the low water-solubility of the precursors,
toxicity of precursors and products, and metabolic diversity which leads to unwanted by-products
or further degradation of the target molecules. One example showing that extremely high yields
can nevertheless be obtained has been given by Fontanille & Larroche (2003). Up to 400 g cis-
2-methyl-5-isopropyl-2,5-hexadienal (isonovalal) l1, an artificial fragrance compound for potential
use in perfume formulations, has been reported to be produced from -pinene oxide within 2.5
h using permeabilized Pseudomonas rhodesiae CIP 107491. The bioprocess was performed with
in situ product recovery using hexadecane in a biphasic medium and by sequential feeding of
biomass and precursor to compensate the irreversible biocatalyst inactivation by the product.

3.7. Pyrazine
Pyrazines are heterocyclic, nitrogen-containing compounds which have been shown to contribute
significantly to the unique taste and aroma of roasted or toasted foods since the mid-1960s (Seitz,
1994). Thermally treated foods accumulate these heterocycles from aminoketone precursors through
the Maillard reaction. The demand for bacterial pyrazines as food additives was initiated by the
development of modern cooking processes (i.e. micro-waving) which do not result in the formation
Production of Food Additives 1081

of pyrazines. The GRAS list of substituted pyrazines shows that 34 such compounds are approved
for use in flavoring. They can be produced in foods by various microorganisms and in broth systems
by actinomycetes, Gram negative, Gram positive and filamentous fungi. Fermentation or
biotransformation processes with submerged techniques or solid substrate fermentations are claimed
to be an useful tool for the production of this kind of natural components (Larroche et al., 1999).

4. HYDROCOLLOIDS AS FOOD ADDITIVES


Hydrocolloids are thickening, gelling and stabilizing agents, which play a major role in numerous
food and beverage products. Recently, Morris (2006) has described the wide potential application
and the latest research in the hydrocolloid field of bacterial polysaccharides in food industry. They
are essentially produced for their applications as good substitutes of gums from plants and marine
algae.
The water-binding properties of hydrocolloids are used for viscosifying and gelling purposes in
food. Several of the products also interact with proteins, allowing for protein stabilization and
protection applications. To a large extent, the use of hydrocolloids also influences the texture and
consequently the mouth-feel and eating experience of foods.
These last years a lot of authors have tried to provide a comprehensive overview of novel aspects
of the main classes of polysaccharides employed in food products underscoring their nutritional
contribution and all their biotechnological properties including organoleptic properties, health effect,
role in emulsions and foams formation, interaction with particles, flavour encapsulation, food
texturation, etc (Alistair, 2006; Williams & Philipps, 2007, Delattre et al., 2008).
Only main industrial microbial polysaccharides productions are presented here. More details can
be found elsewhere in the book.
Since many years, microbial exopolysaccharides such as xanthan and dextran have been commercial
products. For example, approximately 40 000-50 000 tones of xanthan per year are produced due
to its success based on its important rheological properties at low concentrations (Demain, 2000).
Others exopolysaccharides produced by fermentation such as gellan or curdlan have worthwhile
industrial food applications.

4.1. Xanthan
Xanthan gum is the most versatile microbial exopolysaccharide. It is produced by the phytopathogen
bacteria Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris. It is largely used in food industry (cheese, beer,
sauces, juices, ice cream, salad) alone or in association with others polysaccharides as
galactomannans or glucomannans (Sutherland, 1998) reflecting its physico-chemical properties, as
a gelling, emulsifying, thickening, and stabilizing agent (Delattre et al., 2008). Xanthan gum is
a ramified heteropolysaccharide made up of a principal cellulosic backbone substituted on every
1082 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

second unit with a trisaccharide side chain linked on C-3 position of the glucosyl residue (Jansson
et al., 1983).
The xanthan gum is produced in batch fermentation. Components of the media used in industry
are mainly inexpensive and complex, being natural raw materials. Successful fermentation requires
a clear understanding of the microbial environment with particular attention to the high viscosity
of the fermentation broth. The kinetics are influenced significantly by spatial variations in the
concentrations of substrate, biomass and the polymer itself. Final concentration can reach 15-30
kg m3 after 96h of fermentation.

4.2. Gellan
Another interesting exopolysaccharide formally called gellan gum (E418) is prepared by aerobic
submerged fermentation process from Sphingomonas paucimobilis (Pollock, 1993). It is used in
food and pharmaceutical industry for its wide various texture properties. Gellan is a gelling agent
obtained by mild alcalin deacetylation and is commercially called under the trade name Kelcogel
and Gelrite (Banik et al., 2000). Other bacterial species from the bacterial genus Sphingomonas
have been described as producer of gellan like polysaccharides called sphingans. New polysaccharides
belonging to this new family (gellan, welan and rhamsan) have been produced and sold for
applications in food hydrocolloids market. Gellan has been approved in USA and EU for food
uses as suspending, stabilizing, thickening, binding and gelling agent, either alone or in combination
with other hydrocolloids (Sutherland, 1998; Sa-Correia et al., 2002; Sanderson & Clark, 1983).

4.3. Curdlan
Curdlan (E424) is a bacterial neutral linear and no branching b-D-glucan polysaccharide consisting
of -1,3-linked glucose units produced by Agrobacterium biovar.1 (Alcaligenes faecalis var.
myxogenes strain 10C3), few Rhizobium and Gram-negative Cellulomonas, including C. flavigena
KU (Lee, 2002; Kenyon & Buller, 2002; McIntosh et al., 2005).
At ambient temperature, curdlan is totally insoluble in water and in most organic solvents but
can form two types of heat-induced gels termed high-set gels and low-set gels via the heating
of aqueous solution (Harada et al., 1996; Lee, 2002). Curdlan gels have properties similar to the
gelatine elasticity and the agar fragility. These specific properties are particularly appreciated by
food industry in Korea, Taiwan, and Japan (Spicer et al., 1999), since it can be applied as texturant
processing aid, stabilizer and thickener or texture modifier in a wide range of food preparations
including processed meat, surimi products, sauces, vegetarian foods, or other functional foods
(Harada & Sato, 1978).

5. AMINO ACIDS AS FOOD ADDITIVES


For almost 50 years now, biotechnological production processes have been used for industrial
Production of Food Additives 1083

production of amino acids. In terms of market volume, development over the last 20 years has
been tremendously bullish in the so-called feed amino acids L-lysine, DL-methionine, L-threonine,
and Ltryptophan, which constitute the largest share (56%) of the total amino acid market, estimated
in 2004 at approximately US $4.5 billion (Leuchtenberger et al., 2005). The food sector represents
a small part of the market, and is determined essentially by three amino acids: L-glutamic acid
in the form of the flavor enhancer monosodium glutamate (MSG) and the amino acids L-aspartic
acid and L-phenylalanine, both of which are starting materials for the peptide sweetener L-aspartyl
Lphenylalanyl methyl ester (Aspartame), used, for example, in lite colas. Monosodium Glutamate
(MSG), the sodium salt of glutamic acid, is the most closely studied taste enhancer. MSG enhances
the savory flavors imparted by glutamic acid, which occurs naturally in proteinaceous foods (eg,
meats, seafood, stews, soups, sauces). MSG is on the list of GRAS ingredients, but the US FDA
requires manufacturers to list MSG and related compounds (monopotassium glutamate,
monoammonium glutamate) on the food label. Indeed, MSG was banned from the production of
infant foods because of the occurrence of irreversible retinal lesions in neonatal rodents.

5.1. Monosodium glutamate


The rapid development of the amino acid market since the 1980s is due for a large part to major
successes in cost effective production and isolation of amino acid products. Among the four
production methods for amino acids-extraction, synthesis, fermentation, and enzymatic catalysis-
it is particularly the last two biotechnological processes, with their economic and ecological
advantages, that are responsible for this spectacular growth.
The extraction method for obtaining L-glutamate was superseded nearly 50 years ago by
fermentation, following a sharp increase in demand for the flavor-enhancer MSG. The discovery
of the soil bacterium, Corynebacterium glutamicum, which is capable of producing L-glutamic
acid with high productivity from sugar, paved the way for the success of the fermentation technique
in amino acid production (Kinoshita et al., 1957). It was advantageous here that the wild strain
could be used on an industrial scale under optimized fermentation conditions for mass production
of glutamate. Glutamate biosynthesis and methods for improving production strains have been
investigated in depth (Kimura, 2003). The fermentation process is in principle very simple: a
fermentation tank is charged under sterile conditions with a culture medium containing a suitable
carbon source, such as sugar cane syrup, as well as the required nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus
sources, and some trace elements. A culture of the production strain prepared in a pre-fermenter
is added to the fermentation tank and stirred under specified conditions (temperature, pH, aeration).
The L-glutamic acid released by the microorganism into the fermentation solution is then obtained
by crystallization in the recovery section of the fermentation plant. MSG (1.5 million tons) is
currently produced each year by this method, making L-glutamic acid the number one amino acid
in terms of production capacity and demand.
1084 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

6. ORGANIC ACIDS AS FOOD ADDITIVES


The organic acids commonly used as food additives include, in order of decrease importance,
citric, acetic, lactic, tartaric, malic, gluconic, propionic and fumaric acids. From the root word,
acid, one can conclude that this class of compounds tends to lower pH of any food in which
the compounds are incorporated. They also enhance desirable flavors, and in many cases, such
as in pickled products, are the major taste component. Vinegar (acetic acid) is added to relishes,
chili sauce, ketchup and condiments as a flavor component and to aid in the preservation of these
products. Since the microbial spoilage of food is inhibited when the pH of a food is lowered,
acidulants are used for that purpose in many cases. Many acidulants occur naturally in foods (e.g.,
citric acid in citrus fruits, malic acid in apples, acetic acid the major component of vinegar).
In addition to their preservative and flavor enhancing effects, organic acids are used to improve
gelling properties and texture. They are also used as cleaners of dairy equipment. Acidulants may
be used in the manufacturer of processed cheese and cheese spread for the purpose of
emulsifications as well as to provide a desirable tartness. Acid salts may be added to soft drinks
to provide a buffering action to prevent excess acidity. In some cases, acid salts are used to inhibit
mold growth.

6.1. Citric acid


Citric acid has several uses in the food industry. Some of them are presented in table 2. Citric
acid was originally extracted from lemons and limes but it is now produced commercially by a
fermentation process. Its production currently uses submerged or surface fermentation processes,
with beet molasses or glucose syrup as the main raw material. The mould Aspergillus niger is
Table 2: Examples of citric acid use in the food industry

Use in the food industry Associated products

generate the optimum conditions for the formation of gels jams, jellies, confectionary and desserts

help give the conditions for the stabilization of emulsions processed cheese and dairy products

prevent the browning salads

enhance the action of antioxidants and prevent deterioration frozen food

act as an antioxidant fats and oils

preserve products and help modify their texture during their meat products
processing

provide sharp taste soft drinks and sweets


Production of Food Additives 1085

used to ferment its carbohydrate source even if citric acid fermentation was first found as a fungal
product in cultures of Penicillium glaucum on sugar medium by Wehmer in 1893.
An interesting review on citric acid production patents (Anastassiadis et al., 2008) summarizes
the developments in citric acid production technologies in world for the last 100 years. Citric
acid is commercially produced by large scale fermentation mostly using selected fungal or yeast
strains in aerobic bioreactors. It still remains one of the runners in industrial production of
biotechnological bulk metabolites obtained by microbial fermentation since about 100 years,
reflecting the historical development of modern biotechnology and fermentation process technology.
Global citric acid production has reached 1.4 million tones, increasing annually at 3.5-4.0% in
demand and consumption. Citric acid production by fungal submerged fermentation is still
dominating, however new perspectives like solid-state processes or continuous yeast processes can
be attractive for producers to stand in todays strong competition in industry (Soccol et al., 2006).
Many inexpensive by-products and residues of the agro-industry (e.g. molasses, glycerin etc.) can
be economically utilized as substrates in the production of citric acid, especially in solid-state
fermentation, enormously reducing production costs and minimizing environmental problems.
Alternatively, continuous processes utilizing yeasts which reach 200-250 g.L1 citric acid can stand
in todays strong competition in citric acid industry and replace the traditional discontinuous fungi
processes (Anastassiadis et al., 2008).

6.2. Acetic acid


Acetic acid is produced both synthetically and by bacterial fermentation. Today, the biological
route accounts for only about 10% of world production, but it remains important for vinegar
production, as many nations food purity laws stipulate that vinegar used in foods must be of
biological origin. Acetic acid is widely used, particularly in the pickling industry. Naturally
fermented vinegar has a variable pH and so acetic acid is added to this to form a pickling liquor
with a specified acidity. It can also be used in confectionery goods and flavorings. The flavoring
sodium diacetate is commonly known as salt n vinegar and is widely used in crisps. Acetic
acid has excellent bacteriostatic properties and hence has considerable importance as a preservative.
It is produced from sugar-rich materials by successive anaerobic and aerobic fermentation. The
first step of the process involves production of alcohol solution from sugar through yeast enzymes.
Then, the conversion of alcohol to acetic acid is classically made by acetic acid bacteria of the
genus Acetobacter. Most vinegar today is made in submerged tank culture, first described in 1949
by Hromatka and Ebner. In this method, alcohol is fermented to vinegar in a continuously stirred
tank, and oxygen is supplied by bubbling air through the solution. Using modern applications
of this method, vinegar of 15% (w/w) acetic acid can be prepared in only 24 hours in batch
process, and up to 20% in 60 hours fed-batch process.
Species of anaerobic bacteria, including members of the genus Clostridium, can also convert sugars
to acetic acid directly, without using ethanol as an intermediate. More interestingly from the point
1086 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

of view of an industrial chemist, these acetogenic bacteria can produce acetic acid from one-carbon
compounds, including methanol, carbon monoxide, or a mixture of carbon dioxide and hydrogen.
This ability of Clostridium to utilize sugars directly, or to produce acetic acid from less costly
inputs, means that these bacteria could potentially produce acetic acid more efficiently than ethanol-
oxidizers like Acetobacter. However, Clostridium bacteria are less acid-tolerant than Acetobacter.
Even the most acid-tolerant Clostridium strains can produce vinegar of only a few per cent acetic
acid, compared to Acetobacter strains that can produce vinegar of up to 20% acetic acid. At present,
it remains more cost-effective to produce vinegar using Acetobacter than to produce it using
Clostridium and then concentrating it. As a result, although acetogenic bacteria have been known
since 1940, their industrial use remains confined to a few niche applications (Sim et al., 2007).

6.3. Lactic acid


Lactic acid is widely used in almost every segment of the food industry, in particular in the
production of boiled sweets, pickled foods and as a raw material in the manufacture of important
emulsifiers for the baking industry. Its main functions are flavoring agent, pH regulator,
improvement of microbial quality and mineral fortification. It is classified as GRAS for use as
a food additive by the US FDA.
As for acetic acid production, both synthetically and bacterial fermentation are used to produce
lactic acid. The advantage of fermentation process is to obtain the desirable L(+)-lactic acid
stereoisomer while the mixture of L(+) and D()-isomers is generated by the synthetic route.
The existing commercial production processes use the homolactic organisms, such as Lactobacillus
amylophilus, L. delbrueckii, L. bulgaricus, L. helveticus, Enterococcus faecalis or Poediococcus
damnosus, which are capable of fully converting glucose to lactic acid. Among the different
fermentation techniques, such as fed-batch, repeated-batch and continuous cultures the batch
fermentation stays the common method for the industrial production of lactic acid. The limitation
of the development of lactic acid production by fermentation has been the availability of cheap
resources. Lots of recent studies have shown the success of using renewable resources in
fermentation processes and become more and more advantageous than the chemical route from
an economical point of view (Wee & Ryu, 2009).

6.4. Gluconic acid


Gluconic acid is a mild organic acid, which finds lots of applications in the food industry. As
stated above, it is a natural constituent in fruit juices and honey and is used in the pickling of
foods. Its inner ester, glucono-d-lactone imparts an initially sweet taste which later becomes slightly
acidic. It is used in meat, dairy products, particularly in baked food as a component of leavening
agent for pre-leavened products. It is used as a flavoring agent (for example, in sherbets) and
it also finds application in reducing fat absorption in doughnuts and cones. Foodstuffs containing
Production of Food Additives 1087

D-glucono-d-lactone include bean curd, yoghurt, cottage cheese, bread, confectionery and meat.
In the European Parliament and Council Directive No. 95/2/EC, gluconic acid is listed as a generally
permitted food additive (E 574). The US FDA has assigned sodium gluconate a GRAS status
and its use in foodstuff is permitted without limitation.
There are different approaches available for the production of gluconic acid, namely, chemical,
electrochemical, biochemical and bioelectrochemical (Ramachandran et al., 2006). There are several
different oxidizing agents available, but still the process appears to be costlier and less efficient
compared to the fermentation processes. Although the conversion is a simple one-step process,
the chemical method is not favored. Thus fermentation has been one of the efficient and dominant
techniques for manufacturing gluconic acid. Among various microbial fermentation processes, the
method utilizing the fungus A. niger is one of the most widely used ones. A recent review exposes
in more details the gluconic acid properties, applications and microbial production processes
(Ramachandran et al., 2006).
Another recent review (Anastassiadis & Morgunov, 2007) presents the comprehensive information
of patent bibliography for the production of gluconic acid and compares the advantages and
disadvantages of known processes. Numerous manufacturing processes are described in the
international bibliography and patent literature of the last 100 years for the production of gluconic
acid from glucose, including chemical and electrochemical catalysis, enzymatic biocatalysis by free
or immobilized enzymes in specialized enzyme bioreactors as well as discontinuous and continuous
fermentation processes using free growing or immobilized cells of various microorganisms,
including bacteria, yeast-like fungi and fungi.

6.5. Fumaric acid


Fumaric acid is the strongest tasting food acidulant. It has limited applications due to its very
low solubility. In the main, it is used in gelatin dessert powders, cheesecake mixes and some
powdered drinks. A substantial amount of fumaric acid is used in animal feedstuffs mainly because
of its strong flavor and favorable price.
Fumaric acid is mainly manufactured synthetically. But the potential of this compound as raw
material in industry and the increment of cost of petroleum-based fumaric acid raises interest in
fermentation processes for production of this compound from renewable resources. Although the
chemical process yields 112% w/w fumaric acid from maleic anhydride and the fermentation process
yields only 85% w/w from glucose, the latter raw material is three times cheaper. Production of
fumaric acid by Rhizopus species and the involved metabolic pathways has been recently reviewed
by Roa Engel et al. (2009). They indicate that submerged fermentation systems coupled with product
recovery techniques seem to have achieved economically attractive yields and productivities. Future
prospects for improvement of fumaric acid production also include metabolic engineering
approaches to achieve low pH fermentations.
1088 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

6.6. Malic acid


Malic acid is naturally found in apples, pears, tomatoes, bananas and cherries. It has applications
similar to those of citric acid and is the preferred acidulant in low calorie drinks, such as cider
and apple juices. However, it has the disadvantage of being slightly more expensive than citric
acid.
Racemic malic acid is synthesized petrochemically from maleic anhydride. Enantiomerically pure
L-malic acid is produced from fumarate (synthesized from maleic anhydride) by enantioselective
hydration with fumarase, using either immobilized cells or isolated enzyme. Increasing oil prices,
concerns about climate change, and advances in the field of metabolic engineering have fueled
renewed interest in the production of organic acids by microbial fermentation (Goldberg et al.,
2006). In 2004, the U.S. Department of Energy included a group of 1,4-dicarboxylic acids, namely
succinic, fumaric, and malic acids, in the top 12 most interesting chemical building blocks that
can be derived (Zelle et al.,2008).

7. ENZYMES AS FOOD ADDITIVES


Enzymes are nontoxic protein substances that occur naturally in foods or may be produced by
microorganisms or biotechnology to catalyze various reactions. Their employment in food industry
is based on three basic aspects which are the control of quality of certain foods, the modification
of the properties of some food additives and of the foods itself and, the production of enzymes
used as food additives (Aguilar et al., 2008).
In the food industry, the use of enzymes is more and more important in food processing. The
food enzymes is the second largest segment of the industrial enzyme market (25%) and include
the enzymes employed in the dairy, brewing, wine and juice, fats and oils, and baking industries,
and this sector is expected to grow around 3% (Binod et al., 2008).
Amylases are the most important enzymes used in food industry and have great significance in
extensive biotechnological applications in particular in the bread and baking industry (Pandey
et al., 2000). They represent a quarter of the total demand for industrial enzymes. Their
thermostabilities represent a major advantage and they have completely replaced the chemical
hydrolysis of the starch in starch processing industries (Emmanuel et al., 2000). They are also
used along with acids in the production of corn syrup. Alpha amylases and glucoamylases are
preferentially used in the alcohol industry and their use has resulted in complete malt replacement.
Glucose oxidase is added to foods such as egg whites in order to prevent Maillard browning.
Several enzymes, such as chymosin, are utilized in the dairy industry to coagulate milk proteins
during cheese making. Betagalactosidase and lactase are used to split milk lactose into glucose
and galactose, which allows the resulting product to be consumed by the lactose intolerant
population. Papain is used in meat industry as tenderizer of muscle tissues. Several hydrolytic
enzymes are also utilized in fruit juice manufacturing such as pectinase, xylanase and cellulase
Production of Food Additives 1089

which improve, by breaking down cell walls, the liberation of the juice from the pulp. The pectinases
and amylases are also used in the clarification of juice (Binod et al., 2008).
Microorganisms used in the production of enzyme preparations should not leave any residues
harmful to human health in the processed food under normal conditions of use. Microbial strains
used in the production of enzyme preparations may be native or mutant strains derived from native
strains using techniques such as serial culture and selection or mutagenesis and selection or by
using recombinant DNA technology. Although nonpathogenic and nontoxigenic microorganisms
are normally used in the production of enzymes in food processing, several fungal species are
known to include strains capable of producing low levels of certain mycotoxins under fermentation
conditions. Enzyme preparations derived from such fungal species should not contain toxicologically
significant levels of mycotoxins that could be produced by these species. Microbial production
strains should be taxonomically and genetically characterized and identified by a strain number
or other designation. Enzyme preparations should be produced in accordance with good food
manufacturing practice and cause no increase in the total microbial count in the treated food over
the level considered to be acceptable for the respective food.
Ideally, extra-cellular enzymes are preferred as the recovery and purification processes are much
simpler compared to intracellular enzymes. Other important factor is that the organism should be
able to produce high amount of the desired enzyme in a reasonable time frame (Binod et al.,
2008). Most of the industrial enzymes are produced by only a relatively few microorganisms such
as Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Streptomyces and Bacillus.
Most enzyme manufacturers produce enzymes using submerged fermentation (SmF) or liquid surface
(SLF) fermentation techniques with enzyme titers in the range of grams per liter. Such levels are
a prerequisite if specific compounds are to be considered as commodities because product recovery
costs are inversely proportional to concentration in a fermentation broth. There is however a
significant interest in using solid-state fermentation (SSF) techniques to produce a wide variety
of enzymes, mainly from mold origin, as indicated by the growing number of research papers
in the literature and the marketing and development by a small but visible number of fermentation
industries (Viniegra-Gonzlez et al., 2003 ; Pandey et al, 2001).

8. BACTERIOCINS AS FOOD ADDITIVES


Bacteriocins are proteinaceous toxins produced by bacteria to inhibit the growth of similar or closely
related bacterial strain(s). They can be introduced into food either as a pure compound, or by
the use of lactic acid bacteria that secrete bacteriocins. They were first discovered by A. Gratia
in 1925. He called his first discovery a colicine because it killed E. coli (Delves-Broughton et
al, 1996). Bacteriocins are categorized in several ways, including producing strain, common
resistance mechanisms, and killing mechanism (pore forming, Dnase, nuclease, inhibition of murein
synthesis, etc), genetics (large plasmids, small plasmids, chromosomal), molecular weight and
1090 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

chemistry (large protein, polypeptide, with/without sugar moiety, containing atypical amino acids
like lanthionine) and method of production (ribosomal, post ribosomal modifications, non-
ribosomal).
A method of classification fits bacteriocins into Class I, Class IIa/b/c, and Class III (Cotter et
al., 2006). Class I bacteriocins are small peptides and include nisin. The class II are small heat-
stable proteins. The class IIa (pediocin-like bacteriocins) are the largest subgroup and contain an
N-terminal consensus sequence -Tyr-Gly-Asn-Gly-Val-Xaa-Cys within this group. The C-terminal
amino acid is responsible for species-specific activity, causing cell-leakage by permeabilizing the
target cell wall. Class IIa bacteriocins have a large potential for use in food preservation as well
as medical applications, due to their strong anti-listerial activity, and broad range of activity. Class
IIb (two-peptide bacteriocins) requires two different peptides for activity. Other bacteriocins can
be grouped together as Class IIc (circular bacteriocins). These have a wide range of effects on
membrane permeability, cell wall formation and pheromone actions of target cells. Class III is
large and groups heat-labile proteins.
The first bacteriocin called nisin was discovered in 1927. It is currently used as food additive
(E234) for food preservation but many bacteriocins are also naturally present in a large number
of foods (sausage)

8.1. Nisin
Nisin is an antimicrobial peptide, produced by several strains of Lactococcus lactis, belonging
to the Class I bacteriocins called lantibiotics which are small (<5 kDa) bactericidal peptides and
are characterized by the presence of the unusual amino acids lanthionine, -methyl-lanthionine
and a number of dehydrated amino acids. Nisin is a small (3353 Da), cationic, hydrophobic, and
34-amino acids peptide that contains one lanthionine and four -methyl-lanthionine rings, and
unusual residues as dehydroalanine and dehydrobutyrine (Cheigh & Pyun, 2005)
Nisin was first introduced commercially as a food preservative approximately 40 years ago. The
first established use was as a preservative in processed cheese products and since then numerous
other applications in foods and beverages have been identified. It is currently recognized as a
safe food preservative in approximately 50 countries and used as a preservative in various
pasteurized dairy products and canned vegetables. More recent applications of nisin include its
use as a preservative in high moisture, hot baked flour products (crumpets) and pasteurized liquid
eggs. Renewed interest is also obvious for the use of nisin in natural cheese production.
Considerable research has been carried out on the anti-listerial properties of nisin in foods and
a number of applications have been proposed. Use of nisin to control spoilage lactic acid bacteria
have been identified in beer, wine, alcohol production and low pH food such as salad dressings.
Further developments of nisin are likely to include synergistic action of nisin with chelators and
other bacteriocins, and its use as an adjunct in novel food processing technology such as higher
pressure sterilisation and electroporation.
Production of Food Additives 1091

Nisin, also called nisin preparation, or INS N234 approved by JECFA as food additive is defined
as a mixture of closely related antimicrobial polypeptides produced by strains of Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis. The major polypeptide is Nisin A. Nisin has to be produced in a sterilized medium
of non-fat milk solids or of a non-milk-based fermentation source, such as yeast extract and
carbohydrate solids. Nisin can be recovered from the fermentation medium by various methods,
such as injecting sterile, compressed air (froth concentration), membrane filtration, acidification,
salting out and spray-drying. Non-fat milk solids or solids from other fermentation sources are
present in the product. Nisin is available in the commerce as a preparation consisting of Nisin
and sodium chloride and is stable at ambient temperatures and upon heating under acid conditions
(maximum stability at pH 3).

9. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES


The continuing evolution of the food industry means that the new types of products come into
use on a continuing basis. Novel type of food additives, packaging methods and materials represents
important challenges for the toxicologist and regulatory authorities in terms of appropriate testing
strategies. The European Commission has recently adopted a package of legislative proposals which
would introduce harmonized EU legislation on food enzymes for the first time and upgrade current
rules for flavorings and additives. The texts aim to clarify and update current legislation in this
area and to create a simplified common approval procedure for food additives, flavorings and
enzymes, based on scientific opinions from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the
latest scientific and technological developments (http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/additives/
prop_leg_en.htm).
In the future, innovative strategies for food additives generation will certainly take advantage of
the immense progress currently being made in the emerging fields of functional genomics,
proteomics, protein and metabolic engineering. As an increasing number of genome sequence data
becomes available, the improved genomic and proteomic methodologies provide access to new
enzymes including those playing key roles in fermentation. Nevertheless, addition to regulation
aspects, these strategies will run up against the public perception of the use of genetic engineering.
Thats why, in the coming years, the feasibility of novel food additives production will rather
depend on process engineering progress.

REFERENCES
Aguilar CN, Gutirrez-Snchez G, rado-Barragn PA, Rodrguez-Herrera R, Martnez-
Hernandez JL & Contreras-Esquivel JC, 2008, Perspectives of Solid State Fermentation for
Production of Food Enzymes, American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 4, 354-366.
Alistair MS, 2006, Food Polysaccharides and Their Applications (Second edition), MS Alistair
& GO Phillips (eds), CRC Press, London, pp 752-756.
1092 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

Anastassiadis S & Morgunov IG, 2007, Gluconic acid production, Recent patents on biotechnology,
1, 167-180.
Anastassiadis S, Morgunov IG, Kamzolova SV & Finogenova TV, 2008, Recent Patents on
Biotechnology, 2, 107-123.
Banik RM, Kanari B & Upadhyay SN, 2000, Exopolysaccharides of gellan family: prospects
and potential, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 16, 407-414.
Bartowsky EJ & Henschke PA, 2004, The buttery attribute of wine-diacetyl: desirability, spoilage
and beyond, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 96, 235-252.
Belin J-M, Dumont B & Ropert F, 1998, Enzymatic process for the preparation of flavours,
in particular the ionones and C6 to C10 aldehydes, Patent US 5705372.
Binod P, Singhania R R, Soccol C R & Pandey A, 2008, Industrial enzymes, In : Advances
in Fermentation Technology, A Pandey, C Larroche, CR Soccol & CG Dussap (eds), Asiatech
Publishers, New Delhi, pp 291-320.
Brunerie P & Koziet Y, 1997, Process for producing natural cis-3-hexenol from unsaturated fatty
acids, Patent US 5620879.
Cheigh CI & Pyun YR, 2005, Nisin biosynthesis and its properties, Biotechnology Letters, 27,
1641-1648.
Cotter PD, Hill C & Ross RP, 2006, Whats in a name? Class distinction for bacteriocins, Nature
Reviews Microbiology, 4, 134-168.
Delattre C, Laroche C & Michaud P, 2008, Production of bacterial and fungal polysaccharides,
In: Advances in Fermentation Technology, A Pandey, C Larroche, CR Soccol & CG Dussap (eds),
Asiatech Publishers, New Delhi, pp 291-320.
Delves-Broughton J, Blackburn P, Evans RJ & Hugenholtz J, 1996, Applications of the
bacteriocin, nisin, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 69, 193-202.
Demain AL, 2000, small bugs, big business: the economic power of the microbe, Biotechnology
Advances, 18, 499-514.
Desmet T, Cerdobbel A, Soetaert W & Vandamme E, 2008, Fermentation processes for
bioflavours, In: Advances in Fermentation Technology, A Pandey, C Larroche, CR Soccol & CG
Dussap (eds), Asiatech Publishers, New Delhi, pp 448-468.
Leveque E, Janecek S, Haye B & Belarbi A, 2000, Thermophilic archaeal amylolytic enzymes,
Enzyme and microbial technology, 26, 3-14
Fontanille P & Larroche C, 2003, Optimization of isonovalal production from -pinene oxide
using permeabilized cells of Pseudomonas rhodesiae CIP 107491, Applied Microbiology and
Biotechnology, 60, 534-540
Production of Food Additives 1093

Goers SK, Ghossi P, Patterson JT & Young CL, 1989, Process for producing a green leaf essence,
Patent US 4806379.
Goldberg I, Stefan Rokem J & Pines O, 2006, Organic acids: old metabolites, new themes,
Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology, 81, 1601-1611.
Harada T & Harada A, 1996, Curdlan and succinoglycan. In: Polysaccharides in medical
applications, Dumitriu S (Ed), Dekker, New York, pp 21-57.
Harada T & Sato S, 1978, Production, properties and application of curdlan, Hakko to Kogyo,
36, 86-97.
Holtz RB, McCulloch MJ, Garger SJ, Teague RK & Phillips HF, 2001, Methods for providing
green note compounds, Patent US 6274358.
Hromatka O & Ebner H, 1949, Investigations on vinegar fermentation: Generator for vinegar
fermentation and aeration procedures, Enzymologia.
Jansson PE, Lindberg B & Sandforf PA, 1983, Structural studies of gellan gum, an
extracellular polysaccharide elaborated by Pseudomonas elodea, Carbohydrate Research, 124,
135-139.
Kenyon WJ & Buller CS, 2002, Structural analysis of the curdlan-like exopolysaccharide produced
by Cellulomonas flavigena KU, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29,
200-203.
Kimura E, 2003, Metabolic engineering of glutamate production, In: Advances in biochemical
engineering/biotechnology, T Scheper, R Faurie, J Thommel (eds) vol 79, Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg New York, pp 37-57.
Kinoshita S, Ukada S & Shimono M, 1957, Studies on the amino acid, fermentation, Journal
of General applied Microbiology, 3, 193-205.
Kmin B & Mnch T, 1997, Process for the preparation of a lactone, Patent EP 0795607.
Larroche C, Creuly C & Gros JB, 1992, 2-heptanone production by spores of Penicillium
roquefortii in a water-organic solvent two-phase system, Biocatalysis, 5, 163-173.
Larroche C, Besson I & Gros JB, 1999, High pyrazine production by Bacillus subtilis in solid
substrate fermentation on ground soybeans, Process Biochemistry, 34, 667-674.
Lee IY, 2002, Curdlan. In: Polysaccharides I: Polysaccharides from prokaryotes
(Biopolymers vol 5), EJ Vandamme, S De Baets, A Steinbchel (eds), Wiley, London, pp 135-
158.
Leuchtenberger W, Huthmacher K & Drauz K, 2005, Biotechnological production of amino
acids and derivatives: current status and prospects, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 69,
1-8.
1094 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

Loza-Tavera H, 1999, Monoterpenes in essential oils: biosynthesis and properties, Advances in


Experimental Medicine and Biology, 464, 49-62.
McIntosh M, Stone BA & Stanisich VA, 2005, Curdlan and other bacterial (1,3)-beta-D-glucans,
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 68, 163-173.
Morris VJ, 2006, Bacterial polysaccharides, In: Food Polysaccharides and their Applications AM
Stephen, GO Phillips, PA Williams (eds), Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp 413-454.
Muller BL, Dean C & Whitehead IM, 1995a, The industrial use of plant enzymes for the
production of natural green note flavour compounds, In: Bioflavour 95, P tivant & P Schreier
(eds), INRA, Paris, pp 339-344.
Muller BL, Gautier A, Dean C & Kuhn J-C, 1995b, Process for the enzymatic preparation
of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes from linoleic acid, linolenic acid, or a natural precursor, Patent
US 5464761.
Nicaud JM, Belin JM, Pagot Y & Endrizzi A, 1995, Bioconversion of substrate with microbe
auxotrophic for specific compound in medium deficient in this compound, Patent FR 2734-843.
Okui S, Uchiyama M & Mizugaki M, 1963, Metabolism of hydroxyl fatty acids. II. Intermediates
of the oxidative breakdown of ricinoleic acid by genus Candida. Journal of Biochemistry, 54,
536-540.
Pagot Y, Endrizzi A, Nicaud JM & Belin JM, 1997, Utilization of an auxotrophic strain of
the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica to improve gamma-decalactone production yields. Letters in Applied
Microbiology, 25, 113-116.
Pandey A, Nigam P, Soccol CR, Singh D, Soccol VT & Mohan R, 2000, Advances in microbial
amylases, Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 31, 135-52.
Pandey A, Soccol CR, Rodriguez-leon JA & Poonam Nigam, 2001, Solid state fermenta-
tion in Biotechnology: Fundamentals and Application, Asiatech Publisher, New Delhi, India,
pp 17.
Pollock TJ, 1993, Gellan-related polysaccharides and the genus Sphingomonas, Journal of General
Microbiology, 139, 1939-1945.
Priefert H, Rabenhorst J & Steinbchel A, 2001, Biotechnological production of vanillin, Applied
Microbiology Biotechnology, 56, 296314.
R G Berger, 2000, FERMENTATION (INDUSTRIAL) | Colours/Flavours Derived by Fermentation,
In: Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, R K Robinson, C A Batt & P D Patel (eds),Academic
Press, USA, pp 729-735.
Rabenhorst J & Gatfield I, 2000, Method of producing -decalactone, Patent WO 0024920.
Production of Food Additives 1095

Ramachandran S, Fontanille P, Pandey A & Larroche C, 2006, Gluconic acid:


properties, applications and microbial production, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 44,
185-195.
Roa Engel CA, Straathof AJJ, Zijlmans TW, van Gulik WM & van der Wielen LAM, 2008,
Fumaric acid production by fermentation, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 78, 379-389.
Sa-Correia I, Fialho AM, Videira P, Moreira LM, Marques AR & Albano R, 2002, Gellan
gum biosynthesis in Sphingomonas paucimobilis ATCC 31461: Genes, enzymes and exopolysaccharide
production engineering, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29, 170-176.
Sanderson GR & Clark RC, 1983, Laboratory-produced microbial polysaccharide has many
potential food applications as a gelling, stabilizing and texturing agent, Food Technology, 37, 63-
70.
Schrader J & Berger RG, 2001, Biotechnological production of terpenoid flavor and fragrance
compounds, In: Biotechnology, H-J Rehm & G Reed, (eds), Vol. 10, 2nd edn, Weinheim: Wiley-
VCH, pp. 373-422.
Schrader J, Etschmann MM, Sell D, Hilmer JM & Rabenhorst J, 2004, Applied biocatalysis
for the synthesis of natural flavour compounds-current industrial processes and future prospects,
Biotechnology Letters, 26, 463-72.
Seitz EW, 1994, Fermentation production of pyrazines and terpenoids for flavour and fragrances,
In: Bioprocess Production of Flavour, Fragrance and Colour, A Gabelman (ed), Wiley, New York,
USA, pp 95-134.
Shepherd GM, 2006, Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain, Nature, 444, 316-
321.
Sim JH, Kamaruddin AH, Long WS & Najafpour G, 2007, Clostridium aceticumA potential
organism in catalyzing carbon monoxide to acetic acid: Application of response surface methodology,
Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40, 1234-1243.
Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPS, Rodrigues C & Pandey A, 2006, New perspectives for citric
acid production and application, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 44, 141-149.
Spicer EJF, Goldenthal EI & Ikeda T, 1999, A toxicological assessment of curdlan, Food and
Chemical Toxicology, 37, 455-479.
Sutherland IW, 1998, Novel and established applications of microbial polysaccharides, Trends
in Biotechnology, 16, 41-46.
Viniegra-Gonzlez G, Favela-Torres E, Aguilar CN, Romero-Gomez S, Daz-Godinez G &
Augur C, 2003, Advantages of fungal enzyme production in solid state over liquid systems,
Biochemical Engineering Journal, 13, 157-167
1096 Food Fermentation Biotechnology

Wee Y J & Ryu H W, 2009, Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus sp. RKY2 in a cell-recycle
continuous fermentation using lignocellulosic hydrolyzates as inexpensive raw materials Bioresource
Technology, 100, 4262-4270.
Williams PA & Phillips GO, 2007, Gums and Stabilisers for the Food Industry 13, PA Williams
and GO Phillips (eds), pp. 495.
Zelle RM, de Hulster E, van Winden WA, de Waard P, Dijkema C, Winkler AA,
Geertman JMA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, & van Maris AJA, 2008, Pyruvate Carboxylation,
Oxaloacetate Reduction, and Malate Export, Applied And Environnemental Microbiology, 74,
2766-2777.

View publication stats