Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article views: 1
Download by: [University of California Santa Barbara] Date: 14 June 2016, At: 17:15
Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast 27
Acta Chir Belg, 2015, 115, 27-32
Abstract. Background : To compare predicting factors for the diagnosis and clinical course of benign and malign/
borderline phyllodes tumours (PT) of the breast, and to discuss treatment modalities.
Methods : Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients with histopathological diagnosis of phyllodes tumour
were examined. Patients were divided into group 1 (benign PT) and group 2 (borderline/malignant PT). Groups were
Downloaded by [University of California Santa Barbara] at 17:15 14 June 2016
mass localization, biopsy type, preoperative radiologic tistically significant. Roc curve analysis was performed
imaging, radiographic imaging preliminary diagnosis, to identify cut-off values.
mass size, concomitant pathologies, presence of multiple
masses, surgery type, surgical margin distance, mitotic Results
index, histopathologic diagnosis, recurrence, re-excision,
distant organ metastasis, radiotherapy/chemotherapy Results comparing the demographic and clinical charac-
treatment, follow-up and mortality. teristics of benign and malignant PTs are summarized in
Table 1.
Diagnosis When comparing the two groups, a statistically sig-
nificant relationship was detected between the incidence
Patients were diagnosed both radiologically and patho-
of malignancy and mass diameter (p = 0.001) and age
logically. Ultrasonography (USG), mammography (MG)
(p = 0.030). Ultrasound alone in 23 (42.6%) patients, or a
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used as im-
combination of two or more imaging techniques (ultra-
aging techniques. Either excisional or core biopsies were
sound, MRI or mammography) in 31 patients, were used
preferred for pathologic diagnosis.
as the diagnostic tool. The most frequent diagnosis was
Downloaded by [University of California Santa Barbara] at 17:15 14 June 2016
Table 1. Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of benign and borderline / malignant PTs.
Demographic and clinical characteristics Group 1 Group 2 (Borderline/malignant PT) All PTs
(Benign FT)
Number of patients, n (%) 37 (68.5%) 17 (31.5%) 54 (100%)
*Age (years) (median) 33 (15-74) 45 (21-68) 40 (15-74)
(p: 0.030)
Family history, n (%) 3 (8.1%) 1 (5.9%) 4 (7.4%)
Side of tumour (right/left), n (%) 17 (45.9%)/20 (54.1%) 9 (52.9)/8 (47.1%) 26 (48.1%)/28 (51.9%)
The most common initial diagnosis in 17 Phyllodes tumor 8 Breast cancer 19 Fibroadenoma
radiological imaging
*Size of the mass (mm) (median) 29 (10-80) 51 (30-110) 38 (10-110)
(p: 0.001)
Type of biopsy (excisional/core), n (%) 36 (97.2%)/1 (2.7%) 15 (88.2%)/2 (11.7%) 51 (94.4%)/3 (5.5%)
Downloaded by [University of California Santa Barbara] at 17:15 14 June 2016
the both masses were done by core needle biopsy and a metastasis was encountered in two patients with PT and
modified radical mastectomy was performed which in one patient with infiltrative ductal carcinoma.
determined a stage 2 (T2N0M0) cancer. She died on the
77th month of follow-up due to lung and liver metastases Discussion
of breast cancer. The second patient was a of 45-year-old
woman with a benign PT of 10 mm in diameter in her PTs are rare tumours of the breast with difficult radio-
right breast and 40 mm invasive ductal carcinoma in her logical diagnosis, diverse clinical behaviour and contro-
left breast. Wide excision to the PT in the right breast and versies regarding the most effective surgical approach
lumpectomy in conjunction with left axillary lymph node and adjuvant chemotherapy / radiotherapy treatment op-
dissection to the invasive cancer in the left breast was tions. Serious problems arise during the diagnosis and
performed. The stage of the cancer was determined as treatment of the disease. However, the increasing number
T2N1M0 and had been followed-up for 42 months of patients and clinical outcome results contribute toward
disease free. As a result, mortality due to distant organ re-establishing the diagnosis and treatment algorithms of
Conclusion
the tissue samples of the three patients previously diag-
nosed as PT by core biopsy with the mass removed after Due to the problems in both diagnosis and treatment
surgery. We have detected that core biopsy correctly pre- phases, PTs remain a serious health problem. We think
dicted pathological diagnosis of PT in all patients. The that diagnosis and appropriate treatment should be deter-
effort of diagnosing a mass in the breast during surgery mined according to a proper assessment of prognostic
usually works out with a limited intervention like inci- factors of the disease to reduce these problems. Accord-
sional biopsy or enucleation. Consequently, in many pa- ing to the results obtained in our study, among the pa-
tients a subsequent wider intervention is needed due to tients who were considered to have PT, malignancy was
margin positivity problems (24). Therefore, those pa- likely to be present, especially if patients age was over
tients whose diagnoses of PT were obtained with core 40 and the diameter of the mass was above 33.5 mm.
biopsy, needed a second surgery with direct surgical mar- Therefore, in patients with similar characteristics,
gin positivity to a lesser extent than those directly oper- surgical margins should be kept slightly wider or wider
ated on. excisions with or without simultaneous reconstructive
Surgery is the main treatment for phyllodes tumours surgery in appropriate cases should be preferred. Further-
and surgical margins are very important in terms of re- more, although larger series are needed to make robust
gional recurrence. Regional recurrence rates range be- judgments, we believe that the application of core biopsy
tween 3% and 15% for benign PTs and between 3% and and MRI would be effective in determining the appropri-
50% for malignant PTs (12). The presence of positive ate preoperative treatment protocols and surgical
surgical margins after excision has been reported as the margins.
main prognostic factor for recurrence (25). In our study,
regional recurrence occurred in one patient (3.4%) after a
Acknowledgments
48-months follow-up. However, this patient did not have
positive surgical margins. In general, 6.6% to 7.5% of This study did not receive any specific funding or grants.
pathologic analysis of 42 cases. Cancer, 1978, 41 : 1974-1983. sis of 22 cases. Rev Invest Clin, 2013, 65 : 214-220.
7. Reinfuss M., Mitu J., DuDa K., stelMach a., Ry J., sMolaK K. 26. KAPIRIS I., NASIRI N., AHERN R., HEALY V., GUI G. P. Outcome and
The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of predictive factors of local recurrence and distant metastases
the breast : an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer, 1996, 77 : 910-916. following primary surgical treatment of high grade malignant
8. ROWELL M. D., PERRY R. R., HSIU J. G., BARRANCO SC. Phyllodes phyllodes tumours of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2001, 27 : 723-
tumors. Am J Surg, 1993, 165 : 376-379. 730.
9. BUCHANAN E. B. Cystosarcoma phyllodes and its surgical manage- 27. SPITALERI G., TOESCA A., BOTTERI E. et al. Breast phyllodes tumor :
ment. Am Surg, 1995, 61 : 350-355. a review of literature and a single center retrospective series analy-
10. CHANEY A. W., POLLACK A., MCNEESE M. D. et al. Primary treat- sis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2013, 88 : 427-436.
ment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer, 2000, 89 : 28. CHANEY A. W., POLLACK A., MCNEESE M. D. et al. Primary treat-
1502-1511. ment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer, 2000, 89 :
11. JARA-LAZARO A. R., TAN P. H. Molecular pathogenesis of progres- 1502-1511.
sion and recurrence in breast phyllodes tumors. Am J Transl Res, 29. MORALES-VSQUEZ F., GONZALEZ-ANGULO A. M., BROGLIO K. et al.
2009, 1 : 23-34. Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicine and dacarbazine has no
12. cabiolu n., eliK t., zMen V. et al. Memenin filloides tmrl- effect in recurrence-free survival of malignant phyllodes tumors of
erine tedavi yaklamlar. The Journal of Breast Health, 2008, 2 : the breast. The Breast Journal, 2007, 13 : 551-556.
99-104. 30. MACHER GOEPPINGER S., MARME F., GOEPPERT B. et al. Invasive duc-
13. BELLOCQ J., MAGRO G. Fibroepithelial tumors. In : TAVASSOLI F., tal breast cancer within a malignant phyllodes tumor : case report
DEVILEE P. (eds.). World Health Organization classification of tu- and assessment of clonality. Human Patol, 2010, 41 : 293-296.
mours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female 31. SHIN Y. D., LEE S. K., KIM K. S. et al. Collision tumor with inflam-
genital organs. Lyon : IARC Press, 2003, 99-103. matory breast carcinoma and malignant phyllodes tumor : a case
14. SALVADORI B., ZURRIDA S. M., CLEMENTE C. Phyllodes tumors. Am report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol, 2014, 12 : 5.
J Surg, 1993, 165 : 376-379. 32. Mitu J. W., blechaRz P., Reinfuss M., KulPa J. K., sKotnicKi P.,
15. CHEN W. H., CHENG S. P., TZEN C. Y. et al. Surgical treatment of WYSOCKI W. M. Changes in the clinical characteristics, treatment
phyllodes tumor of the breast : retrospective review of 172 cases. options, and therapy outcomes in patients with phyllodes tumor of
J Surg Oncol, 2005, 91 : 185-194. the breast during 55 years of experience. Med Sci Monit, 2013, 19 :
16. BEN HASSOUNA J., DAMAK T., GAMOUDI A. et al. Phyllodes tumors 1183-1187.
of the breast : a case series of 106 patients. Am J Surg, 2006, 192 :
141-147.
17. KARIM R. Z., GEREGA S. K., YANG Y. H. et al. Phyllodes tumors of
the breast : A clinicopathological analysis of 65 patients from a H. Yabanoglu, M.D.
single institution. Breast, 2009, 18 : 165-170. Bakent niversitesi Aratrma ve Uygulama Hastanesi, Dadalolu
18. CHUA C. L., THOMAS A., NQ B. K. Cystosarcoma phyllodes : a
mah. 39. Sk. No : 6
review of surgical options. Surgery, 1989, 105 : 141-147.
19. LIANG M. I., RAMASWAMY B., PATTERSON C. C. et al. Giant breast Yreir, Adana, Trkiye
tumors : Surgical management of phyllodes tumors, potential for Tel. : + 90 (505)2388108
reconstructive surgery and review of literature. World Journal of Fax : + 90 (322) 3271279
Surgical Oncology, 2008, 6 : 117. E-mail : drhyabanoglu@gmail.com