Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defence Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dt
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Fiber reinforced anti-hard-target warhead is a new-type sample munition, which is only designed based
Received 12 January 2017 on theoretical analysis and numerical simulation in laboratory. This warhead consists of carbon com-
Received in revised form posite casings and high explosive, which can greatly reduce the damage to objects outside the damage
27 March 2017
range. In order to evaluate its blasting damage effect on concrete target, the three types of charges were
Accepted 17 April 2017
researched by means of experiment, which are bare charge, charge with carbon composite material shell
Available online 19 April 2017
and charge with steel shell. Experimental results show that the peak overpressure of charge with carbon
ber composite shell is higher than that of charge with steel shell, but is lower than that of bare charge in
Keywords:
Carbon ber composite
the case of the same TNT equivalence. No fragments and fragment effect exist for distant target under the
Effect of blasting condition of charge with carbon ber composite shell. However, the experimental result of the charge
Experimental investigation with steel shell is completely contrary. According to the blast effect in the concrete target, the charge
Low collateral damage with carbon composite material shell is optimal in matched impedance and detonation propagation.
Also, the effective energy produced by the detonation of explosive with carbon composite material shell
is the largest.
2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2017.04.002
2214-9147/ 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
B. Liang et al. / Defence Technology 13 (2017) 212e218 213
2. Blast experiment length. A high speed camera is used to record the forming process
of blasting crater. The diameter and volume of blasting crater could
2.1. Experimental samples be used to evaluate the damage effect of different charges.
For enhancing the energy delivery to a target while controlling 3. Experimental results
the radius of damage area as well, a sample was lled with the
Composition B charge. The Composition B has been used in In the experiments, the silicon piezoelectric sensors were used
ammunition because it is a kind of powerful and very insensitive to measure the shock wave over pressure caused by the explosive
explosive. It is highly unlikely to explode accidentally. charge in the air. The processes of blasting damage and fracture of
The experimental samples were designed for the comparative concrete target was recorded using high speed camera.
analysis of three types of charge, i.e., bare charge, charge with
carbon ber composite material shell and charge with steel shell.
3.1. Air blast experimental results
The analysis focuses on the explosion efciency in air, the damage
ability of targets and the damage effect on concrete targets. The
A detonator is detonated at the top of charge. For the bare charge
structures of charges are shown in Fig. 1, and their parameters are
and the charge with carbon ber shell, there is no damage to the
listed in Table 1. The properties of composite material are listed in
sensor, sensor bracket, concrete cylindrical target and concrete
Table 2.
protection board after blasting. The carbon ber shell debris can not
be seen around the damage range. It can be inferred from the
2.2. Test layout combustible carbon ber shell material and the previous round of
tests [2], that the carbon ber shell is burning after blasting.
2.2.1. Air explosion test layout When the air is driven by the explosive ows at high speed, the
The air explosion test layout for overpressures of three charges blast wave is followed by an exponential decay of pressure as a
is shown in Fig. 2. The loaded sample is hanged over a support, and steep pressure occurs. Besides, explosions fragments could cause
its axis is vertical to a horizontal plane. Distance between the structural damage. A metal case in contact with explosive is usually
bottom of sample and the ground is 1.5 m. Horizontal distances broken into chunky fragments with the different dimensions in
among overpressure sensors and loaded sample axis are 0.4 m, different directions. The measured initial velocity of fragments is
0.6 m and 1.0 m, respectively. Gauges designed to measure these 2km/se3 km/s. The combination with the blast wave and the
pressures must be robust enough to survive for the total recording fragments causes the damage to target [2,3].
time, typically from 100 ms upwards. In order to avoid unnecessary The target damage due to blasting of the charge with steel shell
fragment impact damage, the silicon piezoelectric sensors and is depicted in Fig. 4. From the distribution of test pieces, it can be
charges are placed in different angles according to the estimated seen that the explosion fragments produce penetration damage to
dispersion angles of fragments. The sensors are placed at 1.3 m, steel hoop on the outer surface of the steel cylindrical concrete
1.1 m and 0.9 m above the ground, and the guide lines of silicon target and inner side of Longmen, which is 2 m far from the charge
piezoelectric sensors are guarded by steel tube and sandbags. center.
A 3D numerical simulation model, which includes high explo-
2.2.2. Test of blasting in concrete target sive material, shell, air and ground, was established using AUTO-
The schematic diagram of an experimental setup for explosion DYN 3D. High explosives were modeled using the
in concrete target is given in Fig. 3. The concrete specimens put on JoneseWilkinseLee (JWL) equation of state as follows:
the ground are 500 mm thick and 1600 mm 1600 mm square
u R1 v u R2 v ue
plates, and their compressive strength is 35 MPa. A predrilled hole p C1 1 e C2 1 e (1)
at target center for charges is 30 mm in diameter and 200 mm in R1 v R2 v v
p g 1re (2)
Table 1
Parameters of three charges.
Sample 1 e e 54 1 54
Sample 2 carbon ber composite material 4 54 0.47 115
Sample 3 Steel 4 54 0.15 360
Table 2
Properties of composite material.
1
Material Young's modulus Poisson's ratio Normal wave impedance/(kg$(m2s) )
Table 3
Experimental and numerically simulated results of air blast about different charges.
Fig. 8. High speed photographs of blasting in concrete for the three charges.
B. Liang et al. / Defence Technology 13 (2017) 212e218 217
different, and the distributed energy of carbon ber shelled charge Table 4
is larger than that of the steel shelled charge and less than that of Blasting craters sizes of concrete.
the bare charge since the axial constraint are different. Parameters of crater bare case carbon ber composite case steel case
Three blasting craters in the concrete target induced by explo- depth/mm 160 150 120
sion are shown in Fig. 9. The specic sizes of blasting craters are area/cm2 2462 1295 1225
listed in Table 4. There are some differences in blasting craters volume/cm3 8640 3978 3105
among the three kinds of charge. For the bare charge explosion, the
ratio of bottom radius to mouth radius (Ra) is the smallest, i.e., the
funnel taper is the smallest. The blasting funnel taper is the largest
for steel shelled charge, and is in the middle for the carbon ber
experimental results.
shell counterpart. Moreover, the blasting crater depth (H), the
Under the condition of the same quantity of explosives, the
funnel area (S), pit crater volume (V) all have the same rules.
overpressure and the propagation velocity of shock wave in the
It can be seen from Table 4 that the blasting crater sizes and
carbon ber composite shelled charge are higher than those in the
shapes caused by the three kinds of charges are different. From the
steel shell, and are lower than those in the bare charge. The ex-
principle of shock wave propagation in multilayer media [6], it can
plosion fragments of carbon ber composite shelled charge could
be known that the surface wave impedance of carbon ber com-
not produce damage to target. The steel shelled charge has killing
posite shelled charge is more closer to those of the explosives (or
effect on distant target.
explosive products) and concrete than the steel shelled material, so
In the case of the explosion damage effect of charge blasting in
that the wave impedance of carbon ber composite shelled charge
concrete target, the carbon ber shelled charge is better than the
is more matching with explosive, and the initial overpressure
steel shelled charge in the impedance matching, and is more
caused by the explosion of carbon ber shelled charge is higher
conducive to the propagation of blast shock wave. In the case of the
than that of the steel shelled one.
same quantity of explosives, the effective energy (impulse), the
It is a matter of controlling the energy and putting it to better
radial and circular energy ratio of the carbon ber shell charge to
use. Carbon ber composite is lightweight, and the weight of car-
the concrete target is higher than that of the steel charge. It can be
bon ber composite case will account for only 10 to 20 percent of
concluded that the damage efciency of the carbon ber shelled
total weight of munitions.
charge is higher than that of the steel shelled charge and less than
From the explosion energy distribution, the strength of the
that of the bare charge.
carbon ber shell material is lower than that of the steel shell
The carbon ber shell charge in the air explosion will not pro-
material, the consumption of shell fracture energy in explosion is
duce a lot of lethal damage elements (such as fragments), which
relatively low, at the same time, the explosion product leakage of
can be used for the urban environment. In view of the carbon ber
carbon ber shell is relative less than the counterpart of the steel
reinforced armor-piercing warhead having the characteristics
shell, so that the effective explosion energy to target damage of
above, the anti-hard-target projectile with head made of high
carbon ber shell is higher than that of the steel shell. The axial
strength steel or body using the composite shell has excellent
constraint of three charges are different, so that the utilization rate
damage effect on concrete target, which is superior to the tradi-
of carbon ber shelled charge is higher than that of steel shelled
tional steel shell. Furthermore, the explosive damage effect will be
charge and lower than that of bare charge.
further improved when the loading ratio of warhead is increased
greatly. Therefore, the application of ber reinforced warhead
4. Conclusions and discussion
technology with high lling ratio is defective to facing the chal-
lenges from fortications fortress concrete targets, which signi-
In the present work, the effect of carbon ber sheet reinforce-
cantly enhances the damage effect of blasting on target.
ment on the damage performance of concrete target was investi-
The designed new monition with carbon ber composite case
gated. The local damage degree of concrete plates subjected to
and enhanced-blast explosive increases the impulse delivered to
inner explosion was estimated by using experimental method. The
the intended target and that eliminates collateral damage caused
following conclusions can be concluded from the above