6 views

Uploaded by Laura Pamela Alvarez

jjj

- article-1081-342307
- pre_1999
- fractal antenna theisis sco
- Deterministic Prediction and Chaos in Squid Axon Response
- M. Budišić: Time-Averages of Observables
- Fractals in Music
- Snowflakes, Creativity and Patterns That Connect
- kishu
- Feedback Stabilization of PWM DC-DC Converters
- A Pikovsky - M Rosenblum - J Kurths - Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences
- IFS Matlab Generator a Computer Tool for Displaying IFS Fractals
- JAPEDv1
- Katie's Tok Paper
- (eBook PDF) Mathematics - Chaos Theory
- TotalGadha CopyCAT1
- A Driver's Steering Aid
- Theses
- 13.7 Billion B.C.the Ontology of Vibrational Force
- Signals&Systems Lab 13_2
- Ece5320 Mechatronics Syllabus Sp07

You are on page 1of 22

.

Applications in Electrical Engineenng

by ARNAUD JACQUIN

600 Mountain Avenue, P.O. Box 636, Murray Hill, NJ 0797440636, U.S.A.

ABSTRACT : Wepresent a very brief history offractals, describe their generation, their charac-

teristics, and their relation with chaos. We point to where and why,fractals and chaotic s_wtems

are commonly found in nature, which implies that they should be good candidates for modeling

dijyerent types of real worldsignals. We then list a number ofdioerse research areas in electrical

engineering where ,fractals and,fractal-based techniques have ,found applications. Finally, we

present in some detail applications of ,fractals in signal processing, more spec~jically in the

areas qf digital ima~qe modeling, synthesis, and compression.

I. Introduction

The applications of fractals in signal and image processing have been losing their

boundaries more and more, as one starts to witness the merging of various fields :

image synthesis and computer animation (which traditionally derive from computer

graphics), with digital image and video compression (which derive from digital

si~gnalprocessing, specifically information theory). To a large extent, this merging is

due to the need to find ever more powerful models for real world digital signals in

order to represent, store, and transmit these signals efficiently. We will give exam-

ples involving different types of signals, and correspondingly, different types of

fractal models, and will try to describe the advantages and shortcomings of each

of these models. The reader should be warned that our choice was to present several

frameworks and examples which prevented mathematical rigor. This tutorial is

mostly aimed at engineers who are interested in an overview of fractals and chaos,

rather than in mathematical detail. However, references to articles and books

which give the details of the various frameworks are indicated in each section.

The general problem statement which underlies the use of fractals for signal

modeling and compression-the main purpose of the last and largest section of

this paper-is the following. Given any original object or signal, for example a

discrete monochrome image specified by an array of S-bit pixel values, how can a

computer construct a fractal object-the encoded object-which is both visually

close to the original one, and has a digital representation which requires fewer bits

than the original. Note that this latter requirement is not part of the notion of

modeling peu se but is essential to the efficiency of the modeling procedure for

compression or coding. For each type of object/signal to model, this problem will

659

A. Jucquin

be presented in the following format. First, we describe the objects under study,

the class of iterated systems which can generate them, and the generation process.

Second, we describe several approaches to solving what is commonly referred to

as the inverse problem, which consists of devising a procedure for controlling the

generation process in such a way that it produces fractal models of original real

world objects. While the first part is mathematically straightforward and merely

represents several instances of a very general theory of iterated contractive trans-

formations in a metric space, the inverse problem can only be dealt with on a per-

framework basis and does require a significant amount of creativity on the part of

the designer of a fractal modeling system.

Texts on ,fractal geometry abound. We refer the reader with a strong math-

ematical interest in the topic to (l-7). Although it is difficult to give an all-

encompassing definition since fractals can be objects of different types, it is usually

agreed that (deterministic) fractals arise from the repeated iteration of a trans-

formationt. In other words, fractals are mathematical objects which can in general

be written as

A = ,liir ?(A,,),

a sequence of iterates

&,A,,Az,..., (3)

where A, = z(A,_,). From Eq. (l), it is clear that fractals satisfy the invariance

equation :

A = z(A), (4)

which confers to them a property which we generically refer to as self-trans-

,formability, and which leads to the well-known properties of fractals to be rugged

objects with an infinite amount of detail; objects which can be found again and

again in magnified pieces of themselves, however small.

This very simple formulation can lead to objects which have pathological

mathematical propertiesI, as well as a tremendous visual complexity. It is sufficient

tNote that where mathematicians see iteration, engineers might be more likely to see

a feedback process. The idea is the same.

ISuch as nowhere differentiability for some continuous fractal curves and surfaces, or

infinite length or area. Pathological is meant here as opposed to the regularity of the

typical curves and surfaces of Cartesian geometry and differential calculus.

660

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

Sierpinski triangle, von Koch curve and snowflake, space-filling Peano curve,

Menger sponge, etc. (I, 7), which kept a number of mathematicians at the beginning

of the twentieth century puzzled for a number of years, but which are by now

considered to be rather tame examples of fractal objects and are all well-under-

stood. Their status of monsters caused them to fall into near-oblivion until

they were rediscovered by the mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot in the 1960s

triggering a shift of attitude towards them.

One can safely assume that this shift of attitude was due to the advent of the

computer and graphic display devices which made these objects visual, and often

strikingly so, as opposed to being characterized only by their construction and

mathematical properties, or rather lack thereof. This was also due to the realization,

initially by Mandelbrot but soon followed by others, that their complexity was

typical of objects found in nature (cf. Section 2.2), as opposed to being aberrant.

An illustration of this idea can be found in a paper by Mandelbrot entitled How

long is the coast of Britain? [. .I (8). The argument is the following. If one set

out to measure the coastline of a geographic region such as the west coast of Great

Britain with yardsticks of ever decreasing size, the measurements would show that

the length associated with each yardstick keeps increasing as the size of the yardstick

decreases, eventually reaching infinity?. The impracticality of describing most

natural objects in terms of straight lines-the basis of differential calculus and

engineering-and the hint at the possibility to find accurate fractal models for

them both contribute to the fascination exercised by fractals.

2.1.1. Two simple examples qf self-similar fractals : the con Koch curze and snoM,-

jake. The fractal curve known as the con Koch curre can be generated in the

following way (see Fig. 1) :

1. Take as initial object a line segment of unit length S,, = [0, 11.

2. To produce the first iterate S, distort the segment by introducing a bump

in the middle of S, in the form of two sides of an equilateral triangle with

side of length f of the length of So.

3. Repeat this introduction of triangular bumps to each line segment until

convergence.

One can see that this construction can be equivalently formulated in the framework

of Eq. (l), with a transformation r consisting of the union of four similarities

which map S, to S,. The construction of the snowflake is very similar and is left

as a simple exercise to the reader. The iterative construction of both objects is

illustrated in Fig. 1.

?A series of such measurements was studied by L. F. Richardson, who showed that the

approximate length L(q) of the west coast of Great Britain, as measured with a yardstick

of size q, satisfies an empirical law of the form L(q) cc q- (9). In (1, 8), Mandelbrot

interprets the quantity D = 1+cc as the ,fractaldimension of a curve. According to the

measurements, the west coast of Great Britain has a fractal dimension approximately equal

to 1.25. It is easy to see that a curve with a fractal dimension strictly greater than one has

infinite length. This feature is characteristic of fractal curves.

Pnnted I Great Bntan 661

A. Jacquin

FIG. 1. Construction of the von Koch curve (left) and snowflake (right).

2.2.1. Fractal objects in nature. Most objects found in nature such as (i) weeds,

ferns, vegetables, and trees, (ii) clouds and mist, (iii) mountain ranges, coastlines,

terrain, rocks, aggregates, and ice crystals, and (iv) galaxies, etc. exhibit typical

fractal characteristics such as self-transformability, which manifests itself by the

fact that the object looks the same at many different scales. This observation

gives weight to the assumption that the geometry of nature is a,fr.actal geometry

which arises from iterative processes; a notion which was popularized by Man-

delbrot (1). Yet it would be naive to believe that the iterative processes at work in

nature are as simple as Eq. (1). Rather, it is reasonable to assume that they are

influenced by external forces and perturbations. The growth of two trees from two

identical seeds, one in a protected (ideal) environment, the other in an environment

plagued with acid rain, poor soil, aridity, strong winds, etc. illustrates this concept.

Rather than trying to find perfect deterministic fractals in nature (the naive view)

one should realize that real world objects are more likely to be the result of an

iterated process of the type

4, = ~(&,)+&I, (5)

662

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

(and even perhaps E,) from a real-world object resulting from many iterations of

Eq. (5) constitutes the basic principle of,fractal modeling which is addressed in

Section IV.

2.2.2. Chaotic dynamical systems. Fractals are closely related to chaotic systems.

In this section, we introduce the mathematical notion of chaos by describing and

analyzing a simple chaotic dynamical system, and briefly describe the relation

between fractals and chaos. For an introduction to chaos we refer the reader to

(11) and to the texts (5, 7, 12-14) for a comprehensive treatment of chaotic

dynamical systems and fractals.

A dynamical system consists of a transformation or map s defined from a metric

space of points into itself-we consider an example where the space is the unit

interval I = [0, I] endowed with the Euclidean metric. The orbit of a point x,, E I is

the sequence of iterates

The orbit of x0 is said to be periodic if there exists an integer P such thata

We consider the dyadic map s defined by

2x if O<x<i

s(x) = (8)

i 2x-1 if i6x61,

the analogy with an idealized process of kneading dougha. The analysis of the

dynamical system {I, s} can be more easily carried out when representing the real

numbers in I by their binary expansions, whereby a point x0 in I is written

to denote that

x0 =a,*2-'+a2*2-2+.". (10)

One can easily see that the transformation s is equivalent to the left-shif operator

S which acts on the binary expansions of points in I in the following way :

TThis type of process can lead to what Mandelbrot refers to as statistical selfsimilarity

(10, 1).

$The smallest non-zero integer P which satisfies Eq. (7) is called the period of the orbit.

A piece of dough is modeled by the line segment [0, I]. The transformation s can be seen

as stretching the dough to twice its initial length, then cutting it into two equal-length

pieces, and finally pasting the pieces together. The kneading comes from the repetition

of the above sequence of steps.

Prmted m Great Britain 663

A. Jacquin

exhibits the three characteristics, which we intuitively describe below.

Sensitivity to initial conditions. Let x0 and _vObe two arbitrarily close real

numbers in 1. There exists a strictly positive threshold T (consider for example

T = i) and a (large) number of iterations N such that _Y~~, and Y,~ differ by the

threshold T. This property is also known as the butterfly effect because of the

chaotic weather models developed by Lorenz (16, 17). This is the property which

explains the impossibility to successfully perform long-termpredictions with chaotic

dynamical systems.

Mixing. The points in an arbitrarily small subinterval of [0, l] of initial values

eventually spread over the whole interval [0, I].

E.uistence qfdenseperiodicpoints. There exists a set of points with periodic orbits

for S which is dense in [0, 11.

Dynamical systems theory is closely related to fractal geometry. One can show

that fractalsPattractors of iterated function systems (cf. Section 4.1) in par-

ticular-have a naturally associated dynamical system which is chaotic. Fractals

are attractors of dynamical systems ; the place where chaotic dynamics occur. For

details on the relation between chaos and fractals, we refer the reader to (5, 7, 12-

14).

Chaos in the real lz,orld. The list of the areas of science and engineering where

chaotic dynamics are observable is long : astronomy, biology [e.g. models of popu-

lation growth (IS)], chemistry (e.g. diffusion-limited aggregation), climatology (16,

17), economics [e.g. stock market prices (l)]. electrical engineering (19), fluid

dynamics (e.g. turbulent flows), geology, medicine, physics, physiology and psy-

chiatry, seismology (e.g. earthquake prediction). What is often of most interest in

each of these areas is the extremely difficult task of trying to accurately model the

underlying systems which give rise to the chaotic behavior observedPattempts

have been met with varying degrees of success so far.

in the context of chaotic phenomena, and/or fractal tools are actively used as

analysis tools. Reference (19) includes a special section covering some of these

applications.

Chuas circuit (20, 21) is a simple electronic circuit which gives rise to chaotic

behavior and fractals, and has become the paradigm for the study of nonlinear

dynamical systems. For a review of the state-of-the-art on chaos in nonlinear

electronic circuits, as well as a number of emerging applications from this field, the

reader is referred to (22) as well as this special issue.

l_The proofs of these properties can be found in (7, 15). They make extensive use of the

following lemma. Let x and J be two real numbers in I = [0, 11. whose binary expansions

agree up to the kth position, i.e. x= O.CI,U~ . . . . and y = O~a,~~...a~b~+,h~+~ . . . . then

I-ll < 2-.

664 Elsc\~r Scxncc Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

A great body of research work exists in the areas of electromagnetics and wave

propagation in fractal media, dealing in particular with fractal antennas and arrays,

and the scattering from fractal objects and propagation through fractal screens.

The reader is referred to (23) for a thorough list of references on these topics.

The notion of,fractal dimension has been increasingly used as a tool for signal

analysis in the past few years. Numerous methods and algorithms have been

developed for the estimation of the fractal dimension of an object, which measures

its degree of irregularity. We refer the reader to (24) for a review of these methods.

Used originally mostly in physical sciences such as material science, they are now

used in a wide range of fields such as the classification of landforms from digitized

topography (25,26), the detection and discrimination of objects (e.g. natural versus

man-made) (27, 28), and analysis and characterization of textures in medical

images.

images and animation before 1980 illustrates the impact that fractal modeling tools

have had in computer graphics in the past 1.5 years. Because of their inherent

ability to look like typical objects found in nature, fractal models have been

extensively used for image synthesis to model and render objects such as plants,

trees, terrain, clouds, landscapes, seascapes, etc. (1,7, 29-35). Some of the natural

scenes generated from fractal models such as the fractal forgeries of Voss (7,

35), Musgrave et al. (7), Peitgen et al. (7,35) have a strikingly natural quality.

A more mathematical approach to the controlled synthesis of fractal patterns

and textures has been developed in the context of approximation theory (3638).

Moment matching techniques are used to approximate two-dimensional image

textures by synthetic fractal ones.

However, the examples of synthetic images given above remain limited by the

fact that the fractal techniques used only allow a fairly limited range of objects or

textures to be modeled and forged. Besides, they do so by generating fractal

scenes which, although they do look like they could be real natural scenes, are not

fractal versions of an underlying original, and are therefore not candidates for

image compression. In the following sections, we will show how other types of

fractal forgeries obtained either as attractors of iterated function systems or of

recurrent IF%, or, in the framework of Section 4.3, as fixed points of contractive

image transformations defined piecewise, are explicitly modeled from original real-

world signals.

Why is this interesting to engineers? The modeling of signals such as images is

interesting if it can lead to very high compression. With the current state-of-the-

art digital communication and coding technology, the very high-quality trans-

mission of simple head-and-shoulder scenes for video teleconferencing/telephony

Printed m Great Britain 665

A. Jucquin

remains a challenge at bit rates under 64 kbpst. It seems that classical image

compression techniques will not be sufficient, and different types of model-based

approaches are being considered (3942).

4.1.1. Fractals us attractors sf iterated ,function systems. An iterated function

system in LVis entirely specified by a set of k affine transformations M,,. , ~1~in

a metric space (KY, d). A transformation M,which operates on (compact) sets of

points in R, is defined by,

1 <r<h

for some real number s, < l$, it can be shown that it is also a contractive trans-

formation in the metric space ofcompact sets in (LV,d) endowed with the Hausdorff

metric (5) associated with d. The contruction mappingprinciple (43), due to Banach,

ensures that w has a unique,fixedpoint A-a set of points in (KY, d), which is called

the attractor of the iterated function system. The set A satisfies the invariance

equation

A = w(A), (14)

which means that A is exactly made of the union of k affinely transformed copies

of itself. It is said to be a glohull~ self-gffine fructul$. The famous 2D Black

Spleenwort fern of Barnsley (5, 44) is an example of such an object; it is the self-

affine attractor of a set of four two-dimensional affine transformations. It is easy

to show that any iterated sequence of the type

converges to the attractor A regardless of the choice of the initial set A,. This

property provides a simple procedure for theyenerution or synthesis of the attractor.

The above results are due to the work of Hutchinson in the context of self-

similar fractals (45). They were later extended by Barnsley (5, 46) to encompass

the self-affine case. Barnsley further extended these results by introducing the

notion of IFS with condensation sety, whereby the IFS is of the form

tEven though many approaches have been proposed and many systems have been

developed, the image quality of these systems is well below that of analog television signals.

$The smallest .s, for which Eq. (13) holds is called the contractivity factor of the trans-

formation IV,.

If the transformations M,are contractive sirdaritie.s, i.e. each W,contracts the p dimen-

sions of RP with the same factor, A is said to be a (globally) self-similar fractal.

11Fractal plants and trees, for example, are objects which arise as attractors of such

systems.

666

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

w,(B) = C, and where w is now defined by

4.1.2. The inverse problem of modeling an object as the attractor of an IFS. Let

us now suppose that we start with an original object Aurz9 which seems to be

approximately globally self-affine, and therefore a good candidate for an attempt

at modeling it as the attractor of an IFS. For the sake of illustration, let this

original object be a digitized binary image of a real Black Spleenwort fern for

example. The inoerse problem consists of trying to recover a set of affine trans-

formations under which the original object is approximately invariant. This can be

expressed as finding a set of k (resp. k+ 1) transformations {w,},~,~~ (resp.

{w,}~~,~J which satisfy

1 Ci<k ,,

The union of the transformed copies in Eq. (18) is called a collage of Aor,y (5, 44).

The goal of the modeling is to find the best possible-in the sense of Eq. (18)-

collage of Aorrywith as few affine transformations as possible, in the shortest amount

of time. Note that although the notion of closeness should be in the sense of the

Hausdorff metric, it was interpreted in the sense of visual closeness as defined

by a human operator in the examples of natural scenes described at the end of this

section.

The collage theorem of Barnsley et al. (5,44) states that the fixed point A of the

transformation

\, ,\

an exactly globally self-affine fractal which in practice can be synthesized by

iterating w a large number of times on any initial object A,,, is also close to A(+,,

i.e.

Therefore, the information contained in the parameters of the transformation w is

sufficient to enable anyone with a knowledge of the iterative reconstruction pro-

cedure to synthesize an object which is close to the original. The set of trans-

formations {w,}, s,sk can thus be considered as a,fractal code-lossy in general-

for A,,,.

The result of an important stability theorem, which is referred to in (5) as

continuous dependence of attractors on transformation parameters can be informally

stated as follows. Small errors in the parameters of w-such as the ones that occur

by quantizing the parameters of the individual w,s for transmission on a digital

channel-will induce equally small changes in the attractor. This property is a

consequence of the contractivity of the transformation w. It ensures that two

different decoders of the attractor of w, which could for example consist of the

same reconstruction algorithm implemented on computers with different floating

point precision, will produce two visually indistinguishable fractals.

Prmted in Great Br~tam 667

A. Jacquin

Black Forest, Sunflower field, and Bolivian Girl, (5, 31, 47), were all

synthesized with this type of fractal modeling technique. More specifically, they

were obtained from the following three-step procedure :

1. Real world color images were segmented by a human operator who would

strive to identify various self-affine objects.

2. Each object was modeled as the attractor of an IFS, using an interactive

software package?.

3. The final images were synthesized by successively reconstructing, rendering,

and overlaying the pieces in a specific order-from background to fore-

ground-using another software package described in (30).

The fact that this procedure, when viewed as an image coding and decoding

schemet, can be seen as compressing images with ratios of 1000: I and higher

provoked great, and partially unfulfilled, excitement in the signal processing com-

munity. The major hurdles with the approach described above are clear : (i) natural

scenes are in general not globally self-affine (the way a fern is), and scene seg-

mentation-a difficult problem by itself-is one essential feature, and (ii) the

scheme fundamentally involves a human operator whose function cannot easily be

automated.

Piece-Iv&e selfltran.~forn?ahility, recurrent IFS. Foreseeing that the above pro-

cedure could only be automated with great difficulty, if it could be automated at

all, lead the author to try and bypass the segmentation step by capturing the notion

of piececvise self-tran:formahility in the transformations themselves, albeit by con-

sidering slightly more general transformations. Instead of segmenting a priori an

object Aorjg into several pieces and modeling each of the pieces separately, one

could look for a set of contractive transformations which operate on an object

restricted to pieces of its support, i.e. of the general form

w(B) = u

I <izsk

w,(B,.,). (21)

and which would leave the object approximately invariant, i.e. such that

context of IFS theory is a global one, and the only reasonable one when the objects

to model are not self-affine, such the image of a human face. When working in a

space of digital images, the pieces Dj can be for example squares of pixels of size

8 x 8 which form a partition of the image support. This idea can be applied to the

modeling of contours of real-world objects as well as to the coding of digital

images, two examples that are developed in the next section.

Pin practice, these objects were not as obviously self-affine as ferns. The number of

transformations as well as the transformations themselves involved a great deal of both

intuition and trial-and-error.

ZAlbeit only semi-automated and very lossy.

668

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

4.2.1. Fractal curves as attractors of recurrent IF&. This particular theory of

recurrent iterated,function systems? (RIFS) was developed in order to be used as a

synthesizer of planar, continuous fractal curves which interpolate a set of data

points. It was independently developed by Hutchinson (45), and can also be seen

as an extension of the theory offractal interpolationjimctions of Barnsley (49).

Let {z,);=~ be a set of Nf 1 interpolation nodes in Iw2.Let C denote the space of

continuous parametrized curves with compact support [0, I]$, which interpolate

the set of nodes, i.e.

Note that Z(t) is a closedcurve if go = +. Let Z ,rl,,J(t) denote the restriction of the

parametrized curve Z(f) to the segment [ti, t,].

To each ordered pair of consecutive range nodes (z,, zi+ I), is associated an ordered

pair of domain nodes (z,,,, Q+ , ), also among the set of interpolation points, and a

contractive two-dimensional affine transformation We,such that

which operates on a continuous interpolating curve Z in the following way :

(25)

The action of this mapping is illustrated in Fig. 2. It is easy to see that the

transformed curve T(Z) is also a continuous interpolating curve. It can also be

tThe term recurrent was coined by Barnsley et ul. (5, 48). Its selection will probably

not seem obvious to the reader, whom we refer to (48) for a justification of that choice.

$For the sake of simplicity, we use the same notation for a curve 2(*)-a parametric

vector function, and its graph-the set of points {Z(t), t E [0, I]}.

Prmted tn Great Britain 669

A. Jucquin

shown (50) that the mapping T is contractive in the space of interpolating curves

endowed with an appropriately defined Hausdorff metric and therefore has a

unique fixed point A-the attractor of the RIFS {{z,};=,, T}-which is a con-

tinuous fractal curve that interpolates the set of pomts {zi};=,. The invariance

equation

shows that the curve A is the union of N affinely distorted copies of pieces of itself.

This type of fractal curve is therefore said to be piecew-ise selfhffine. It can be

generated by plotting the iterates of the sequence

where Z, is, for example, the linear interpolation of the nodes. An example of a

recurrent IFS structure and its associated attractor are shown in Fig. 3.

4.2.2. Contour modeling. The inverse problem can in this context be viewed as a

contour modeling problem, whereby given a set of digital object contours extracted

from image data, one would look for a model in the form of the attractor of a

recurrent IFS. A version of the collage theorem can be shown to hold. It states

that given an original contour and a set of interpolation points on that curve, the

attractor of a recurrent IFS which leaves the original curve approximately invariant

will be visually close to the original.

Examples of contours extracted from the image Cumulus of Fig. 4(a) are

shown in Fig. 4(b). These contours were extracted by first applying a median edge-

preserving filter and quantizing the image to eight gray levels, producing uniform

gray plateaus whose outer boundaries were traced using a left-most looking rule

(50). A collage of the cloud boundaries was constructed using interactive software

described in (50,51). The final set of interpolation points chosen on the boundaries

is shown in Fig. 4(c), with two node mapping conditions indicated in this figure by

arrows from domain to range nodes. The collage, made of transformed pieces of

the original boundaries is shown in Fig. 4(d). Figure 5 shows a reconstruction

sequence of the RIFS structure resulting from the collage procedure. The top-left

frame shows the initial graph; a linear interpolation of the nodes. At the fifth

iteration, the sequence has converged to the attractor shown in the lower-right

frame.

The parameters of the model for the cloud boundaries considered here consisted

of approximately 70 nodes, 60 affine transformations, amounting to about 500

bytes of data. Note that this modeling approach still has the undesirable charac-

teristic of requiring human interaction in the selection of nodes and transformation.

The author is not aware of any successful attempts to fully automate this procedure,

although a similar procedure was implemented by Maze1 et al. for the modeling of

speech signals and seismic data (52).

In this section, we look at the modeling and encoding of monochrome S-bit

digital images. Fractal block coding (FBC) is a modeling approach to image coding

670 Elscv~er Scicncc Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Elecrrical Engineering

Pnnted in Great Bntam

671

A. Jacquin

FIG. 4. Modeling contours extracted from Cloud image with recurrent IFSs. (a) Cloud

image, (b) Extracted contours, (c) Interpolation points, (d) Collage, @1988, SPlE Vol. 1001

Visual Communications and Image Processing 88, p. 128.

piecewise. This work was initially published by the author in (51, 53), and is fully

described in (51, 54). The two main characteristics of the approach are that (i) it

relies on the assumption that image redundancy can be efficiently captured and

exploited through piecewise se(f-traruformability on a blockwise basis, and (ii) it

approximates an original image by a fractal image obtained from a finite number

of iterations of an image transformation defined blockwise called a fractal code. It

is truly an image coding technique since it can be used to encode any digital image,

as opposed to only images of a specific type, and is implementable as a computer

algorithm which requires no human intervention. We now summarize this coding

technique.

Let (M, d) denote a metric space of digital images, where d is for example the

familiar root-mean-square error metric. The encoding of an original image P,,,~

672 Elsevm Sc,ence Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

FIG. 5. Six iterations converging to the attractor of a RIFS model for Cloud contours,

$31988, SPIE Vol. 1001 Visual Communications and Image Processing 88, p. 129.

Printed m Great Britam

673

A. Jacquin

defined piecewise, which leaves ,LL+ approximately invariant, i.e. such that

(29)

where

9 = {R,)S,<,V (30)

usually, but not necessarily, square blocks of possibly different sizes. The symbol

p, R, denotes the restriction of the image p to the cell R, ; we call it the image block

over Ri and write

p= 1 i+R,, (31)

O<,<N

simply to indicate that an image is the union of its restrictions to the cells of the

partition. The symbol zi denotes an elemental block transformation from a domain

cell D,t to the range cell Ri. For clarity, 7i is written as the composition of two

transformations Si and T, :

T, = T,oS,, (32)

where Si and T, are the so-called geometric and massic parts of T,, respectively. In

the case of square blocks, S, contracts domain blocks the size of range block R,,

while T, processes an image block without altering its square support.

Designing a fractal block coding system consists in defining a priori the fol-

lowing: (i) a procedure for constructing a good image dependent partition,

which can consist for example of a quadtree structure or any other type of tiling,

and (ii) classes of discrete block transformations and a procedure for searching

these classes. The construction of a fractal code 5 for p,,, consists in finding, for

each value of the index i, the best pair of domain and block transformation

(D,, 70, i.e. the pair such that the distortion

The fractal code consists of the description of the image partition along with the

quantized parameters of the block transformations. Its structure is illustrated in

j-These cells have to be larger than the range cells so as to ensure contractivity. A common

choice is to consider square blocks of twice the size of the range blocks.

674 Elsewer Scm~e Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

Fig. 6, in which the arrows indicate block transformations from domain block to

range block.

Decoding/reconstruction. As always with fractal techniques, the reconstruction

of a decoded image is easily achieved through iteration. Here, the fractal block

code z is iterated on an initial image, such as a black square (or any other image)

until convergence to a stable image-in practice after about ten iterations. This

reconstruction procedure is illustrated in Fig. 7 for a fractal code of the familiar

digital image Lena, with the initial image peppers.

Extensions. Over the past five years, a large number of extensions of fractal

image block coding have been proposed by various researchers in the signal pro-

cessing research community (5%79), which shows that the field remains a very

active research area. These extensions broadly address the following issues: (i)

the influence of the type of image partition, pool of block transformations, and

optimization of the parameters defining these transformations, (ii) the reduction

of the complexity of the encoding process-the search for the best matching blocks

in the image to encode, (iii) the comparison and possible merging of fractal block

coding with more traditional block-based image coding techniques, and (iv) the

extension of the theory to the three-dimensional case for fractal block coding of

sequences of images. A summary of these extensions can be found in (80).

Unfortunately, the compression ratios achieved with block fractal coding tech-

niques turn out to be quite similar to those obtainable with other more classical

image coding techniques, in the order of 30: 17, which seems modest compared

with the 1000 : 1 ratios claimed for the pictures described in Section 4.1.2. This is

because, in order to make it tractable, the inverse problem had to be broken up

into elementary subproblems which can be efficiently dealt with automatically. In

particular, the image segmentation with human operator described in Section 4.1.2

?A rather severe breakdown seems to occur fairly systematically at coding rates below

0.2 bpp.

Prmted in Great Bntam 675

A. Jacquin

676 Elsebm Science Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

has been replaced by an image partitioning into fairly small blocks, which is of

course reminiscent of other block-based image coding techniques such as block-

based DCT (81L83), or vector quantization (VQ) (84,SS). However, by doing so,

the possibility to model very large image segments by only very few trans-

formations-as was done in the images of Section 4. l-has been lost.

V. Conclusion

objects with an intricate geometry which look the same at many different scales,

and chaotic systems-systems for which long term prediction is impossible due to

the property of sensitivity to initial conditions. We then described applications of

fractals in signal processing, specifically in the modeling and compression of images.

Three basic types of deterministic fractal modeling techniques were described.

The first two, iterated function systems (IFS) theory and recurrent IFS theory,

could potentially achieve extremely high compression ratios-provided that they

could be automated. The third, fractal block coding, is a true image compression

technique but leads, to this date, to more modest compression ratios, comparable

to those obtained with standard image compression techniques. Even though

fractal block coding of images seems to offer a promise of both understanding and

exploiting the iterative processes commonly found in nature which give rise to

fractal patterns, the actual process of modeling natural scenes with both a very

compact (i.e. very low bit rate) fractal model and a great degree of fidelity seems

to be eluding us, still.

References

(1) B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, San Francisco, CA,

1982.

(2) K. Falconer, The Geometry of Fractal Sets, Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, 1985.

(3) K. Falconer, Fractal Geometry, Mathematical Foundations and Applications,

J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 1990.

(4) G. Cherbit, Fractals, Dimensions non Entieres et Applications, Masson, Paris, 1987.

(5) M. F. Barnsley, Fractals Everywhere (Second edition), Academic Press, New York,

1988.

(6) M. SchrBder, Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York,

1991.

(7) H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jiirgens and D. Saupe, Chaos and Fractals, New Frontiers of

Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.

(8) B. Mandelbrot, How long is the coast of Britain?-Statistical self-similarity and

fractional dimension, Science, Vol. 155, pp. 636-638, 1967.

(9) L. F. Richardson, in General Systems Yearbook, 6, 139, 1961.

(10) B. Mandelbrot, Les Objects Fractals (Deuxikme tdition), Flammarion, Paris, 1984.

(11) J. Gleick, Chaos, the Making of a New Science, Vicking, New York, 1987.

(12) K.-H. Becker, M. DBrfler, Dynamical Systems and Fractals, Cambridge University

Press, Cambridge, 1989.

Printed m Great Britain 677

A. Jacquin

(14) A. A. Tsonis, Chaos, From Theory to Applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1992.

(15) R. Devaney, Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems, Benjamin-Cummings,

Medwood City, 1986.

(16) E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic non-periodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., Vol. 20, pp. 130-141,

1963.

(17) E. N. Lorenz, Dimension of weather and climate attractors, Nature, Vol. 353, pp.

241-241, 1991.

(18) R. M. May, Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Natuw,

Vol. 261, pp. 459467, 1976.

(19) D. L. Jaggard, Ed., Special section on fractals in electrical engineering, Proc. IEEE,

Vol. 8 I, pp. 1423-1533, October 1993.

(20) R. N. Madan, Chuas Circuit : A Paradigm for Chaos, World Scientific Publishing

Company, Singapore, 1993.

(21) L. 0. Chua, R. Brown and N. Hamilton, Fractals in the twist-and-flip circuit, Proc.

IEEE, Vol. 81, pp. 146661491, October 1993.

(22) L. Chua and M. Hasler, Eds., IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems (Special Issue

on Chaos in Electronic Circuits), October 1993, November 1993.

(23) D. L. Jaggard, Prolog to special section on fractals in electrical engineering, Proc.

IEEE, Vol. 81, pp. 142331427, October 1993.

(24) J. Theiler, Estimating fractal dimension, JOSA A : Optics huge Sci. Vol. 7, 1990.

(25) A. P. Pentland, Fractal surface models for communications about terrain, SPIE

Visual Comm. Imuge Processing II, Vol. 845, 1987.

(26) J. Huang and D. L. Turcotte, Fractal image analysis : application to the topography

of Oregon and synthetic images, JOSA A : Optics Image Sci., Vol. I, 1990.

(27) M. C. Stein, Fractal image models and object detection, SPZE Visuul Comm. Image

Processing II, Vol. 845. 1987.

(28) T. Peli, Multiscale fractal theory and object characterization, JOSA A : Optics Image

sci., Vol. 7, 1990.

(29) A. Fournier, D. Fussell and L. Carpenter, Computer rendering of stochastic models,

Comm. ACM, Vol. 25, pp. 371-384, 1982.

(30) L. Hodges-Reuter, Rendering and magnification of fractals using iterated function

systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Tech, 1987.

(31) M. F. Barnsley, A. Jacquin, F. Malassenet and L. Reuter, Harnessing chaos for

image synthesis, Proc. SIGGRAPH 88, pp. 131-140, 1988.

(32) J. C. Hart, D. J. Sandin and L. H. Kauffman, Ray tracing deterministic 3-D fractals.

Computer Grupphics, Vol. 23, pp. 91-100, 1989.

(33) J. C. Hart and F. K. Musgrave, Co-Chairs. Fractal modeling in 3D computer graphics

and imaging, in SIGGRAPH 91, course notes, 199 1.

(34) H-O. Peitgen and P. H. Richter, The Beauty of Fractals, Springer, Berlin, 1986.

(35) H-O. Peitgen and D. Saupe, The Science of Fractal Images, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

1988.

(36) F. J. Malassenet, Texture coding using a pyramid decomposition, Proc. ICASSP-

93, Vol. V, pp. 3533356, 1993.

(37) R. Rinaldo and A. Zakhor, lnverse problem for two-dimensional fractal sets using

the wavelet transform and the moment method, Proc. ICASSP-92, March 1992.

(38) R. Rinaldo and A. Zakhor, Inverse problem and approximation of fractdl-like

images, Proc. ISCAS 94, May-June 1994.

(39) M. Kunt, A. lkonomopoulos and M. Kocher, Second-generation image coding tech-

niques, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 13, pp. 5499574, April 1985.

678 Elsewer Scm~cc Ltd

Fractals and their Applications in Electrical Engineering

IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Szqnal Processing, Vol. 37, pp. 20082023, December

1989.

(41) K. Aizawa, H. Harashima and T. Saito, Model-based analysis synthesis image coding

(MBASIC) system for a persons face, Signal Processing : Image Comm., Vol. 1,

pp. 139-152, October 1989.

(42) H. G. Musmann, M. Hotter and J. Ostermann, Object-oriented analysis-synthesis

coding of moving images, Signal Processing : Image Comm., Vol. 1, pp. 117-l 38,

October 1989.

(43) N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, Linear operators, Wiley, New York, 1966.

(44) M. F. Barnsley, V. Ervin, D. Hardin and J. Lancaster, Solution of an inverse problem

for fractals and other sets, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Vol. 83, pp. 1975-1977, 1986.

(45) J. E. Hutchinson, Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana Unit?. Math. J. Vol. 30, 1981.

(46) M. F. Barnsley and S. Demko, Iterated function systems and the global construction

of fractals, Proc. Royal Sot. London, Vol. A399, pp. 243-275, 1985.

(47) M. F. Barnsley and A. Sloan, A better way to compress images, BYTE Magazine,

January 1988.

(48) M. F. Barnsley, J. H. Elton and D. P. Hardin, Recurrent iterated function systems,

Constructive Approximation, pp. 333 1, 1989.

(49) M. F. Barnsley, Fractal functions and interpolation, Constructioe Approximation,

Vol. 2, pp. 3033329, 1986.

(50) M. F. Barnsley and A. Jacquin, Application of recurrent iterated function systems to

images, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1001, pp. 1222131, 1988.

(51) A. E. Jacquin, A fractal theory of iterated Markov operators with applications to

digital image coding, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Tech, 1989.

(52) D. S. Maze1 and M. H. Hayes, Using iterated function systems to model discrete

sequences, IEEE Trans. SP, Vol. 40, pp. 1724-l 734, July 1992.

(53) A. E. Jacquin, A novel fractal block-coding technique for digital images, Proc.

ICASSP-90, pp. 2225-2228.

(54) A. E. Jacquin, Image coding based on a fractal theory of iterated contractive image

transformations, IEEE Trans. Zma,qe Processing, Vol. 1, pp. 18830, January 1992.

(55) Z. Baharav, D. Malah and E. Karnin, Hierarchical interpretation of fractal image

coding and its application to fast decoding, Proc. Digital Signal Processing Corzfl

Cyprus, 1993.

(56) K. U. Barthel, T. VoyC and P. Nell, Improved fractal image coding, Picture Coding

SJ,mp., Lausanne, 1993.

(57) J. M. Beaumont, Image data compression using fractal techniques, BT Technology

J., Vol. 9, pp. 93-109, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, October 1991.

(58) T. J. Bedford, F. M. Dekking and M. S. Keane, Fractal image coding techniques and

contraction operators, Delft University of Technology, Internal Report, 1992.

(59) T. J. Bedford, F. M. Dekking, M. Breeuwer, M. S. Keane and D. van Schooneveld,

Fractal coding of monochrome images, Delft University of Technology, Internal

Report, 1992.

(60) J-M. Chassery, F. Davoine and E. Bertin, Compression fractale par partitionnement

de Delaunay, Quatorzitme colloque GRETSI, Juan-Les-Pins, September 1993.

(61) Y. Fisher, E. W. Jacobs and R. D. Boss, Iterated transform image compression,

NOSC TR-1408, Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA, 1991.

(62) M. Gharavi-Alkhansari and T. S. Huang, A fractal-based image block-coding algo-

rithm, Proc. ICASSP-93, pp. 345-348, 1993.

(63) E. W. Jacobs, Y. Fisher and R. D. Boss, Image compression : A study of the iterated

transform method, Signal Processing, Vol. 29, pp. 251-263, December 1992.

Prmted m Great Britain 679

A. Jacquin

(64) T. Laurencot and A. Jacquin, Hybrid image block coders incorporating fractal coding

and vector quantization, with a robust classification scheme, AT&T Technical

Memorandum, February 1992.

(65) S. Lepsoy, Attractor image compression-fast algorithms and comparisons to related

techniques, Ph.D. Thesis, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, June 1993.

(66) S. Lepsoy, G. E. 0ien and T. A. Ramstad, Attractor image compression with a fast

non-iterative decoding algorithm, Proc. ICASSP-93, pp. 331-340, 1993.

(67) H. Li, M. Novak and R. Forchheimer, A fractal-based image sequence compression

scheme, Preprint, 1993.

(68) L. Lundheim, An approach to fractal coding of one-dimensional signals, Proc.

KOMPRESJON-89 (Oslo), 1989.

(69) L. Lundheim, Fractal signal modelling for source coding, Ph.D. Thesis, The

Norwegian Institute of Technology, September 1992.

(70) D. M. Monro and F. Dudbridge, Fractal approximation of image blocks, Proc.

ICASSP-92, Vol. III, pp. 485488, 1992.

(71) D. M. Monro and F. Dudbridge, Fractal block coding of images, Elec. Letters, Vol.

28, pp. 1053-1055, May 1992.

(72) D. M. Monro, Generalized fractal transforms : Complexity issues, Proc. Duta Com-

pression Cor~fi, pp. 254261, IEEE Computer Society Press, March-April 1993.

(73) G. E. 0ien, S. Lepsoy and T. A. Ramstad, An inner product space approach to image

coding by contractive transformations, Proc. ICASSP-91, pp. 211332776, 1991.

(74) G. E. Oien, S. Lepsoy and T. A. Ramstad, Reducing the complexity of a fractal-

based image coder, EUSIPCO-92.

(75) G. E. Mien, A. Sollid and T. A. Ramstad, Hybrid image compression combining

transform coding and attractor coding, NOBIM-92.

(76) G. E. 0ien, Lz-Optimal attractor image coding with fast decoder convergence, Ph.D.

Thesis, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1993.

(77) G. E. 0ien, Z. Baharav, S. Lepssy and E. Karnin, A new improved collage theorem

with applications to multiresolution fractal image coding, Proc. ICASSP-94, 1994.

(78) D. van Schooneveld, Fractal coding of monochrome images, Delft University of

Technology, Internal Report, December 1991.

(79) G. Vines and M. H. Hayes, III, Adaptive IFS image coding with proximity maps,

Proc. ICASSP-93, pp. 3499352, 1993.

(SO) A. E. Jacquin, Fractal image coding : A review, Proc,. IEEE, Vol. 81, pp. 1451-1465,

October 1993.

(81) N. S. Jayant and P. Nell, Digital Coding of Waveforms : Principles and Applications

to Speech and Video, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.

(82) R. J. Clarke, Transform coding of images, Academic Press, London, 1985.

(83) A. N. Netravali and B. G. Haskell, Digital Pictures : Representation and

Compression, Plenum Press, New York, 1989.

(84) R. M. Gray, Vector quantization, IEEE ASSP Mug., April 1984.

(85) A. Gersho and R. M. Gray, Vector Quantization and Signal Compression, Kluwer

Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992.

680 Elsewer Sc~encr Ltd

- article-1081-342307Uploaded bypipul36
- pre_1999Uploaded byppkanjilal
- fractal antenna theisis scoUploaded bysomething creative
- Deterministic Prediction and Chaos in Squid Axon ResponseUploaded bykollanegeen
- M. Budišić: Time-Averages of ObservablesUploaded byIgor Mezic Research Group
- Fractals in MusicUploaded byynottrip
- Snowflakes, Creativity and Patterns That ConnectUploaded byLisa Lipsett
- kishuUploaded bykicha66655
- Feedback Stabilization of PWM DC-DC ConvertersUploaded bybmmostefa
- A Pikovsky - M Rosenblum - J Kurths - Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear SciencesUploaded byJewell Dewitt
- IFS Matlab Generator a Computer Tool for Displaying IFS FractalsUploaded byDorys Morgado
- JAPEDv1Uploaded byKunal Singh
- Katie's Tok PaperUploaded bybangalorep
- (eBook PDF) Mathematics - Chaos TheoryUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- TotalGadha CopyCAT1Uploaded byAnna Al
- A Driver's Steering AidUploaded byTuğçe Saygıcı
- ThesesUploaded byJadur Rahman
- 13.7 Billion B.C.the Ontology of Vibrational ForceUploaded byjllorca1288
- Signals&Systems Lab 13_2Uploaded byMuhamad Abdullah
- Ece5320 Mechatronics Syllabus Sp07Uploaded byryie
- 128-1321-1-PBUploaded byJason Jiahui Wu
- Emotion as MorphofuncionalityUploaded byAcelaFloyretteBorregoFabela
- NetPolitik-RidingTheWaveFunction-08-14-11Uploaded byMisoSusanowa
- KPTCL AEE Syllabus pdf.docxUploaded bySamiullaKamps
- 1999-Num Methods for FIVPsUploaded bysusan george
- HFE0404 EditorialUploaded byArun Kumar
- EI 2406 SET2Uploaded byrajemtech
- Optimal Tracking Control of Unknown Discrete-Time Linear Systems Using Input–Output Measured DataUploaded bythgnguyen
- Modern Thermodynamics Cleaner 15032011Uploaded byEdison Bittencourt
- 7SJ62-64 Manual V4.9 Us-commented 1Uploaded byHelton Geaquinto

- Lee Filter _ Image ProcessingUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Tarea Log BayesUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Ruido.pdfUploaded byAlberto Jimenez
- WienerUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Procesamiento digital de imágenes usando wavelets.pdfUploaded byT1J427
- Pre PrintUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- SpectrogramUploaded byLinh Nguyen
- 2010 SismicaSomera InnomarSES SenalmarUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- 03-electrica.pdfUploaded bymjailovi
- Matlab SignalUploaded byPanagiotis Giannoulis
- A9Uploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- 6 PipelineUploaded byLuis Oswaldo Velasquez Lovera
- Series Numericas Otono Ficha 1Uploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Tarea1Uploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Sonar Processing Project nUploaded byoman13905
- diseo_de_procesadores.pdfUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- HydroacousticsUploaded byKevinPereyra
- 1 Introduction to FractalUploaded byupildekil
- Copia de Capitulo 2 Ejercicio 2 y 7Uploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Anisotropic DiffusionUploaded bymisdyle
- Secuencia DorUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- GEO054Uploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Alg Lin II Prac1Uploaded by77jacki77
- TamUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Tema 2.Modelos de ColorUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- ProyectoNo3_ Ecualizacion de Distancia de HistogramaUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- Sonar Processing Project nUploaded byoman13905
- tesina_MTF.pdfUploaded byLaura Pamela Alvarez
- filtros_analogicosUploaded byhgabzv
- Manual Tecnicas[1]Uploaded byRicardo Buendia Sierra

- Nuclear Fission - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded bydonodoni0008
- Influence of Heat on Protein Degradation, Ultrastructure and Eating Quality Indicators of Pork.Uploaded byCarlos Eduardo Gutierrez Jacobo
- ChE 421_Lect8Uploaded byMohamed Jalala
- Pyramids and Stars EquisaionUploaded bygamal
- Supercritical fluid (carbon dioxide) based ultra performance convergence chromatography for the separation and determination of fulvestrant diastereomersUploaded byNicole Ramirez
- Modelling Ignition Probabilities Within the Framework of Quantitative Risk Assessment (LOPA)Uploaded byพงศกร มลธุรัช
- Criteria for Accepting Precoated Aggregate for Seal Coats and Surface TreatmentsUploaded byProf. Prithvi Singh Kandhal
- Australian Flying Saucer Review - Volume 1, Number 3 - September 1960Uploaded byUFO Research (NSW) Incorporated, Australia
- DuctSox Full Line BrochureUploaded byImran Hussain
- Seismic Behaviour of Elevated Water TankUploaded byFrederick Tan
- Lecture 1 Data Structure.pptUploaded bySello Hlabeli
- Panasonic Crs1 Mechanism [ET]Uploaded byAlvaro Ramos
- VibrationUploaded bySafe Sree
- Welding of Ductile Iron.pdfUploaded byAmr Mohamed Soliman
- Compositional Characteristics and Industrial Potential of the Lateritic Clay Deposit in Ara Ijero Ekiti Areas Southwestern NigeriaUploaded byIJSTR Research Publication
- Feature Extraction for Image AnalysisUploaded byNelson Raja
- Modeling of Rheological Behavior of Nano Composites by Browmn Dynamics SimulationUploaded byrenebarreiro
- Application of Equal Area Criterion Conditions in the Time Domain for Out-Of-Step Protection-2010Uploaded byDanielAlejandroRamosQuero
- Welding of CS Materials for Use in Sour ServiceUploaded bytrpac
- projectile motion practice questionsUploaded byapi-336277944
- CLS Aipmt 14 15 XI Phy Study Package 4 SET 2 Chapter 14Uploaded byrupa biswas
- Effect of Fibre Orientation on Non-linear Vibration of Partially Cracked Thin Rectangular Orthotropic Micro Plate an Analytical ApproachUploaded byHamid M Sedighi
- ENTSOE_SO_AF_2011-2025Uploaded byetienne.moser8708
- Boiler Powerpoint 2003Uploaded bySahil Mishra
- Distributed Generation in IndiaUploaded byjpsridhar
- rt1 paper 1Uploaded byRajat Bhargava
- Freezing tolerance cactusUploaded byMart Karm
- 2 Nozzle Pressure DistributionUploaded byKonul Alizada
- Numerical Studies on Sprinkler and Smoke Layer Interaction (Zhang 2013)Uploaded byclubberlangPCF
- Impact of DG with storage systems.pdfUploaded byPaul Andres Aucapiña