Papakura Local Board Agenda September 2017

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Papakura Local Board will be held on:
Date: Wednesday, 27 September 2017

Time: 4.30pm
Meeting Room: Local Board Chambers
Venue: Papakura Service Centre
35 Coles Crescent
Papakura
Papakura Local Board

OPEN AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson Brent Catchpole

Deputy Chairperson Felicity Auva'a
Members Hon George Hawkins, QSO
Bill McEntee
Michael Turner
Katrina Winn
(Quorum 3 members)
Trish Wayper
Local Board Democracy Advisor
22 September 2017
Contact Telephone: (09) 295 1331

Email: Patricia.Wayper@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy
unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact
the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.
27 September 2017
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
8.1 Deputation - The Rising Foundation Mentoring and Leadership
Programme - Alex Tarrant and Grace Kingi 5
9 Public Forum 6
10 Extraordinary Business 6
11 Notices of Motion 7
12 Councillors' Update 9
13 Auckland Transport Update to the Papakura Local Board September
2017 11
14 Disposals recommendation report 19
15 Papakura Business Association Inc Request for funding to undertake a
Papakura Business Improvment District (BID) expansion project. 25
16 Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 33
17 New Road Name Approval for the Waiata Shores Subdivision at 1V Great
South Road, Takanini (previously Manukau Golf Course) 43
18 Public alerting framework for Auckland 51
19 Remuneration Authority consultation document 123
20 Auckland Plan Refresh - Local Board Engagement 161
21 Adoption of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 173
22 Appointment of Franklin and Papakura Local Board representatives to the
Structure Planning Political Reference Group 209
23 Papakura Local Board Feedback on the Tkaro Investing in Play
discussion document 211
24 For Information: Reports and Information referred to the Papakura Local
Board 217
25 Governance Forward Work Calendar 219
26 Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term 223
27 Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes 233
28 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
Page 3
27 September 2017
1 Welcome
Member Felicity Auvaa will lead the meeting in prayer.
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making
when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external
interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Papakura Local Board:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 23 August 2017,
including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required
to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the
Chairperson of the Papakura Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations
can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes
or as resolved by the meeting.
8.1 Deputation - The Rising Foundation Mentoring and Leadership Programme -

Alex Tarrant and Grace Kingi
Purpose
1. Alex Tarrant (General Manager) and Grace Kingi (Programme Coordinator at
Papakura High) from the Rising Foundation will address the board about The Rising
Foundations Mentoring and Leadership Programme currently being run at Papakura
High School and Rosehill College.
Recommendation/s
a) thank Alex Tarrant (General Manager) and Grace Kingi (Programme Coordinator at
Papakura High) from the Rising Foundation for their presentation about The Rising
Page 5
27 September 2017
Foundations Mentoring and Leadership Programme currently being run at Papakura

High School and Rosehill College.
Attachments
A The Rising Foundation - Term 2 Newsletter .............................................. 265
B The Rising Foundation powerpoint presentation ....................................... 277
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to
address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per
item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
9.1 Public Forum Potters Club Toos Vandegraaf
Purpose
1. Toos Vandegraaf, member of the Potters Club will address the board on possible
funding for the club so that they can continue to use the room at the Old School.
Recommendation/s
a) thank Toos Vandegraaf for her presentation to the board on behalf of the Potters
Club about possible funding to ensure their continued use of the room at the Old
School in Papakura.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as
amended) states:
An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the
public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a
subsequent meeting.
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as
amended) states:
Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local
authority; and
Page 6
27 September 2017
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time
when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting;
but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item

except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further
discussion.
11 Notices of Motion
There were no notices of motion.
Page 7
27 September 2017
Councillors' Update
File No.: CP2017/18808
Item 12
Purpose
1. An opportunity is provided for Ward Councillors Daniel Newman, and Sir John Walker to
update the Board on regional matters of interest.
Executive Summary
2. Nil.
Recommendation/s
a) That the Councillors update be received.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor
Authorisers Madelon de Jongh Acting Relationship Manager
Councillors' Update Page 9

27 September 2017
Auckland Transport Update to the Papakura Local Board September

2017
Item 13
File No.: CP2017/20164
Purpose
1. This report:
a) Provides an update on the current status of Local Board Transport Capital Fund,
b) Responds to resolutions and requests on transport-related matters,
c) Provides a summary of consultation material sent to the Board and,
d) Provides transport related information on matters of specific application and interest to
the Papakura Local Board and its community.
Executive summary
2. In particular, this report covers:
a) Progress on the local current boards transport capital fund projects which include
relocation of the cycleway on Great South Road, Takanini, relocation of the pedestrian
crossing of the pedestrian crossing on East Street, raised pedestrian crossing on
Wood Street, signage plinth at the train station, walkway across the Pahurehure Inlet,
Priority Greenway project 12 and electronic notice board at the train station.
b) Responses to resolutions made by the Board on 23 August 2018
c) Update on the progress of Papakura Park and Ride
d) Update on the increase in rail patronage on the public transport network.
Recommendation/s
a) note the Auckland Transport update September 2017 report.
Comments
Transport capital fund update
Project Updates
Table 1: Local Board Transport Capital Fund [LBTCF] Current projects
Project Name Problem or Current Status

Opportunity Being
Addressed
Relocation of On-road cycle lane is Rough Order of Cost (ROC)

existing cycleway perceived to be ROC authorised by the Papakura Local
Auckland Transport Update to the Papakura Local Board September 2017 Page 11
27 September 2017

Opportunity Being
Addressed
Item 13
on Great South unsafe and rarely Board (PLB) in May 2017.

Road, Takanini. used. Estimated cost is approximately $4million. At
this time due to limited funding, alternative
solutions are being considered to achieve the
desired outcome i.e. greenway section also
being investigated for LBTCF ROC Priority
Greenway project 12.
Relocation of Existing pedestrian Rough Order of Cost requested by the

pedestrian crossing seen as a PLB in May 2017
crossing on East potential safety
Investigations near completion. Pedestrian
Street, Papakura. hazard and located in counts have been completed.
the wrong position. Recommendations are currently being
developed in preparation for local board
workshop.
Raised pedestrian Lack of safe Rough Order of Cost requested by the
crossing for Wood pedestrian crossing PLB in May 2017
Street, Papakura. on Wood Street and Investigations near completion. Pedestrian
speeding. counts have been completed.
Recommendations are currently being
developed in preparation for local board
workshop.
Signage Plinth at Lack of way-finding Rough Order of Cost requested by the
Papakura Train signage at the PLB in May 2017.
Station. Papakura Train An estimate of $15,000 for signage at the
Station. train station has been provided.
Local board request On hold until Electronic
Notice Board ROC.
Walkway/ Lack of pedestrian link Rough Order of Cost requested by the
Cycleway across between Longford PLB in May 2017.
Pahurehure Inlet. Park and Pahurehure Estimates based on similar projects in the
Esplanade Reserve. region exceed $3 million. This exceeds the
current balance of the LBTCF for this term
and therefore will not be progressed at this
time.
Priority Greenway No off-road cycleway/ Rough Order of Cost requested by the
Project 12 from the pedestrian link to SH1 PLB in August 2017.
Papakura cycleway / walkway Investigation currently underway. Findings
Greenways Plan - currently under will be reported back to the board for a
Elliot Street to development. determination whether to take this project to
the next stage.
Freelance Terrace.
Electronic notice Lack of way-finding Rough Order of Cost requested by the

board including signage at Papakura PLB in August 2017.
Investigation currently underway. Findings
27 September 2017

Opportunity Being
Addressed
Item 13
maintenance costs. Train Station. will be reported back to the board for a
determination whether to take this project to
the next stage.
Financials update
Papakura Local Board Transport Capital Fund financial summary
Total funds available in current political term $1,465,381

Amount committed to date on projects approved for design and/or
$156,237
construction
Remaining Budget left $1,309,144
Responses to resolutions
3. The resolution is detailed below in italics followed by Auckland Transports response.
Resolution number PPK/2017/184
a) request Auckland Transport to ascertain a rough order of cost and ongoing
maintenance costs for an electronic notice board providing information on events and
activities within the Papakura Local Board area.
This request for a rough order of costs, has been added to the list of projects for
investigation. A ROC is expected to be reported back to the Papakura Local Board
in November/ December.
b) Thank Auckland Transport for repainting the temporary road markings at the Great
South Road and Coles Crescent intersection, however, the original markings are still
causing confusion, particularly in wet weather and low light conditions.
The contractors have been advised of the issue and have noted that the paint used
for the blacked out sections have worn off since being repainted in July/August.
The reasons for the rapid wear have not been determined but contractors will
repaint the blacked out markings as soon as weather and availability permits.
c) note with concern that it will have been 12 months by the time the repairs have been
undertaken for the covered walkway.
As previously reported to the Papakura Local Board (PLB) the issues with the
damage to the covered walkway have been extensively investigated and have been
reported back to the PLB through workshops and formal reports.
Alterations to the curb along Railway Street West to mitigate bus strikes to the
covered walkway are planned with completion expected in November. To avoid
further repair costs in the meantime, repairs are being staged to coincide with the
alterations to the curb and covered walkway on the Averill and Railway Street
corner.
27 September 2017
d) request Auckland Transport to reduce the speed limits on Walters Road and Airfield
Road to 50 kph acknowledging the significant residential development in the area,
noting this matter was also raised by submitters to the Papakura Local Board Plan.
Item 13
e) request Auckland Transport to install a 40 kph school zone limit for the Holy Trinity
Catholic School on Airfield Road and Kauri Flats School on Walters Road, noting this
matter was also raised by submitters to the Papakura Local Board Plan.
f) request Auckland Transport to install footpaths on Airfield Road to the Holy Trinity
Catholic School and Kauri Flats School on Walters Road, noting this matter was also
raised by submitters to the Papakura Local Board Plan.
g) request Auckland Transport investigate the installation of a right hand turning bay on
Airfield Road into the Holy Trinity Catholic School, noting this matter was also raised
by submitters to the Papakura Local Board Plan.
These requests are currently being assessed. Results will be reported back to the
local board by November 2017.
Upcoming projects and activities of interest to the board

Papakura Park & Ride
4. The Papakura Park and Ride is a trial project to construct a park & ride facility to help cope
with the growth in patronage on the Auckland Transport Metro network, specifically at the
Papakura Train Station.
5. An engineering study was completed in December 2016 followed by a feasibility study
completed mid-year 2017. Detailed design work is currently underway to develop a business
case seeking New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) funding for this project.
6. NZTA is expected to confirm their position by next month October 2017.
New Rollerson Road footpath

7. Auckland Transport has a list of approximately 500 sections of new footpath for
consideration across Auckland.
8. Recently it has been raised that a section of Rollerson Road, Papakura currently only has a
footpath down the western side of the street. A footpath was not installed when the area was
first established.
9. A request for the opposite side of the street to have a footpath installed has been received
and has been prioritised for investigation and design in 2017/2018 and for construction in
2018/2019.
Regional and sub-regional projects

Rail Patronage
10. Aucklands commuter train network has surpassed its passenger forecasts to record 20
million train trips in one year recently, a mark that the network wasnt expected to hit for
another three years in 2020.
11. The past year has seen the opening of a new train station in Parnell, a bus-train interchange
in thuhu, improved links with our bus services and currently underway, the construction of
the new Bus Station in Manukau due for completion in early 2018.
27 September 2017
12. On average, train patronage has risen by nearly 20 percent each year and the number of
services has increased by almost 11,000 in the last year with punctuality now at 96.7 per
cent with the graph below indicating patronage growth till April of this year.
Item 13
13. These improvements to the service through significant investment is helping to provide
commuters with greater travel options than previously available and resulting in significant
increases to patronage.
Consultation
14. Auckland Transport provides the local board with the opportunity to comment on transport
projects being delivered in this local board area.
15. In the reporting period for September 2017, one project was put forward for comment to the
local board. The project was for traffic controls for the final stages of the Addison subdivision
in Takanini. A summary of the proposal is contained in Attachment A to this report.
Traffic Control Committee (TCC) decisions

16. Traffic Control Committee (TCC) decisions within the local board area are reported on a
monthly basis. The decisions affecting this local board area are summarised below.
Table 2: Transport Control Committee Decisions

Street name Type of Report Nature of Restriction Committee
Decision
East Street / Permanent Traffic Berm Parking prohibition Carried
Young Crescent and Parking
changes
Battalion Drive / Permanent Traffic No Stopping At All Times and Approved in

Troop Road / and Parking Give-Way control Principle
Bravery Road changes Combined
27 September 2017
Consideration
Local board views and implications
Item 13
17. The local boards views will be taken into account during consultation on any proposed
schemes.
Mori impact statement

18. No specific issues with regard to impacts on Mori are triggered by this report and any
engagement with Mori will be carried out on an individual project basis.
Health and safety implications

19. Health and Safety is an inherent part of all Auckland Transport projects. Any specific
concerns will be covered as part of individual project reporting.
Implementation
20. All proposed schemes are subject to prioritisation, funding and consultation.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Summary of consultation information sent to the Papakura Local Board - 17
September 2017
Signatories
Authors Kenneth Tuai Elected Member Relationship Manager
Authorisers Jonathan Anyon, Manager Elected Member Relationship Unit
Madelon De Jongh Acting Relationship Manager
27 September 2017
Item 13
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Disposals recommendation report

File No.: CP2016/24934
Item 14
Purpose
1. This report seeks the Papakuras Local Boards endorsement for Panuku Development
Auckland (Panuku) to recommend to the Finance and Performance Committee the disposal
of the council owned property at 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura.
Executive summary
2. The council-owned site at 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura has been identified as
potentially surplus to council requirements through a review process. The rationalisation
process commenced in August 2015. Consultation with council departments and CCOs, Iwi
authorities and the Papakura Local Board has now taken place. No alternative service use
has been identified for the property through the rationalisation process. Due to this, Panuku
recommends disposal of the site.
3. A resolution approving the disposal of the subject site is required from the Finance and
Performance Committee before the proposed divestment can be progressed.
Recommendation/s
a) endorse Panuku Development Aucklands recommendation to the Finance and
Performance Committee to dispose of 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura.
Comments
4. Panuku and Auckland Councils Stakeholder and Land Advisory team in Community
Facilities work jointly on a comprehensive review of councils property portfolio. One of the
outcomes of the review process is to identify properties in the council portfolio that are
potentially surplus to requirements and may be suitable to sell. The subject site was
identified as potentially saleable through the review process.
5. Once a property has been identified as potentially surplus, Panuku engages with council
departments and its CCOs through an expression of interest process, to establish whether
the property must be retained for a strategic purpose or is required for a future funded
project. Once a property has been internally cleared of any service requirements, Panuku
then consults with local boards, mana whenua and ward councillors. All sale
recommendations must be approved by Panukus Board before it makes a final
recommendation to Councils Finance and Performance Committee.
Property information
6. 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura is a 809m2 council owned site that was acquired by
the former Papakura City Council in 1983 for parking purposes. Parking is a public work
within the meaning of the Public Works Act 1981.
7. 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura was managed by the Auckland Transport (AT) as
part of their car parking network. In 2015, the AT Board resolved that it was no longer
required for ATs infrastructure or service purposes. 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura
was subsequently transferred to Panuku for rationalisation purposes.
Disposals recommendation report Page 19

27 September 2017
8. The Unitary Plan zoning of 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura is Metropolitan Centre. It
has a 2014 capital value of $470,000.
Internal consultation
Item 14
9. The rationalisation process commenced in August 2015. No alternate service uses for the
subject site were identified during the internal consultation.
Consideration
10. Local boards are informed of the commencement of the rationalisation process for specific
properties. Following the close of the expression of interest period, relevant local boards are
engaged with.
11. Panuku attended a workshop with the Papakura Local Board regarding the subject site in
November 2015. The board provided informal advice that it was opposed to the proposed
disposal of 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura and questioned ATs decision to release
the site from service. The board later requested in 2017 the site also be investigated as an
off street bus layover.
12. Panuku raised these concerns with AT, which confirmed that it does not require 26-32
OShannessey Street, Papakura for current or future transport infrastructure purposes.
Auckland Transport also advised that the evaluation criteria used was in terms of catchment,
utilisation and access to public transport was consistent with the Auckland Parking Strategy
2015.
13. In April 2017, the board requested that consultation occur with the Papakura commercial
centre group and that the subject site be considered in the context of the Manurewa
Takanini Papakura Area Spatial Plan as part of the rationlisation process.
14. Panuku provided advice that engagement has already occurred with mana whenua, internal
council departments and CCOs represented on the Papakura commercial centre group and
that should the board wish to include additional feedback from the group as part of the
boards formal feedback, Panuku will report it to Councils Finance and Performance
Committee as part of the decision making process.
15. Councils Central/South Planning team advised that individual sites are not reviewed as part
of the Area Spatial Plan for the Manurewa Takanini Papakura area. The team confirmed
its previous assessment that it does not see a need to retain 26-32 OShannessey Street,
Papakura in council ownership.
16. This report provides the board with an opportunity to formalise its views regarding the
subject site.

17. Ten mana whenua iwi authorities were contacted regarding the potential sale of 26-32
O'Shannessey St, Papakura. The following feedback was received:
a) Te Kawerau--Maki
No feedback received for this site.
b) Ngi Tai ki Tmaki
Ngi Tai ki Tamaki has expressed commercial interest in the property and signaled an
increased interest in council owned property that may come available for sale in their
rohe. Panuku will follow this feedback up should the property be approved for
divestment.
c) Ngti Tamaoho

27 September 2017
d) Te kitai Waiohua
Te kitai Waiohua have signaled a commercial interest in the property. Panuku will
follow this feedback up should the property be approved for divestment.
Item 14
e) Ngti Te Ata Waiohua
No site specific feedback received for this site; however Ngti Te Ata has expressed
general cultural interest across Tmaki Makaurau, has potential commercial interest in
any council owned land that comes available for sale in their rohe and notes specific
association with the south western area of Auckland, focusing around Manukau and
the western coastline.
f) Ngti Paoa
g) Ngaati Whanaunga
h) Ngti Maru
i) Ngti Tamater
j) Waikato-Tainui
Waikato-Tainui advised that as a matter of principal all lands are culturally important to
Waikato-Tainui should they fall within their tribal rohe and would look at acquiring the
property in the future should an opportunity arise. Panuku will follow this feedback up
should the property be approved for divestment.
Implementation
18. 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura is likely to be subject to the offer back obligations to
the former owners in accordance with section 40 of the Public Works Act 1981 if it is no
longer required for a public work.
19. The terms and conditions of any disposal would be approved under appropriate financial
delegation.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Images of 26-32 OShannessey Street, Papakura 23
Signatories
Authors Anthony Lewis - Senior Advisor Portfolio Review
Authorisers Letitia McColl - Team Leader Portfolio Review, Panuku Development Auckland
Madelon de Jongh Acting Relationship Manager

27 September 2017
Item 14
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Papakura Business Association Inc Request for funding to undertake a

Papakura Business Improvement District (BID) expansion project.
Item 15
File No.: CP2017/19041
Purpose
1. To request a funding grant from the Papakura Local Board to the Papakura
Business Association Inc to support the Papakura Business Improvement District (BID)
expansion project, and associate project costs.
Executive summary
2. The Papakura Business Association Inc (PBA) is undertaking a project to expand and
increase the area of the Papakura BID programme. The proposed Papakura BID expansion
map will be presented at the 2017 PBA Annual General Meeting (AGM) seeking the
approval from the association membership. The AGM is scheduled for 19 October 2017.
3. The PBA BID programme expansion project will be implemented in late September 2017
and include a BID postal ballot scheduled for March 2018. The ballot will determine the level
of support from property and business owners for the proposed BID expansion.
4. This report is to request funding from the Papakura Local Board of $15,000.00 as a
contribution towards the costs of the Papakura BID expansion project.
5. Under the Auckland Council BID Policy (2016), Local Board support for the proposed BID
boundary map is required. After the PBA membership have ratified the proposed Papakura
BID expansion map at their 19 October 2017 AGM, a report will be prepared for the
Papakura Local Board seeking their approval of the proposed Papakura BID expansion
map. This report will be included in the agenda of the Papakura Local Board November
business meeting.
6. The Papakura BID expansion project will conclude with the PBA holding a Special General
Meeting in April 2018, whereby the members of the PBA will consider whether to accept the
BID ballot results and approve the BID programme expansion map and target rate for
2018/2019 financial year.
7. If the Papakura BID expansion project is successful, a second report will be prepared for the
Papakura Local Board April/May 2018 business meeting. This report will advise the board if
the PBA has met the requirements of the 2016 BID Policy and Operating Standard. The
report will seek the local boards approval to expand the Papakura BID programme and
boundary and will seek a recommendation to the Governing Body regarding the striking of
the BID target rate for 2018/2019.
Recommendation/s
a) approve $15,000 from the Business Improvement District top up budget line (#2558),
for the Papakura Business Association Inc, to assist with the cost of implementing
the proposed Papakura Business Improvement District programme expansion
project.
Papakura Business Association Inc Request for funding to undertake a Papakura Business Page 25
Improvment District (BID) expansion project.
27 September 2017
Comments
8. The PBA has been a BID since 2011 and is one of 48 BIDs operating across the Auckland
Region.
Item 15
9. The PBA will confirm their intention to expand their BID boundary at the 2017 PBA Annual
General Meeting to be held on 19 October 2017.
10. The BID Policy (2016) states there are two areas of a BID expansion project that require
approval by the appropriate local board as follows:
BID Policy Table 1, page 9, Partner roles: Local boards (as a whole) have allocated
governance and decision-making relating to:
o Approval of BID programme boundary maps
o Approval of BID programme boundary expansions
BID Policy Appendix 2 page 51, criteria 9: The local board pass a resolution (noted in the
local board meeting minutes) approving the proposed BID programme map and support
for the project.
BID Policy Appendix 2 page 63, criteria 22: A resolution noted in the local board meeting
minutes approving the BID programme and boundary and recommending to the
governing body to strike the BID programme targeted rate grant on 1 July.
11. A report seeking approval from the Papakura Local Board for the proposed Papakura BID
expansion map will be prepared for the November 2017 board business meeting agenda.
12. All BID expansion projects require local board approval after the completion of the BID
expansion project, voter engagement and ballot. This is to ensure the local board has the
opportunity to view the final outcome of the completed BID expansion project, review the
ballot results, and are satisfied the criteria for a BID expansion has been completed against
the BID Policy and Operating Standards (2016).
13. Council staff are satisfied that the PBA have completed the preliminary work prior to starting
their BID expansion project, which included a survey and consultation with business owners
located within the proposed BID expansion area.
14. The PBA have provided a detailed project overview and cost breakdown for the proposed
Papakura BID expansion project. A copy of these documents is attached as Attachments A
and B.
Consideration
15. The Papakura Local Board will be asked to consider and approve the proposed Papakura
BID expansion map at a business meeting in November 2017.
16. If the Papakura BID expansion ballot is successful, the board will be asked to consider
approving the Papakura BID programme expansion and BID target rate.

17. Mori Businesses located within the PBA BID expansion boundary area will be included in
the proposed PBA BID expansion project under the same policy regulations as non-Mori
businesses. A BID programme may identify opportunities for niche support or development
of any Mori business sector in the area.
27 September 2017
Implementation
18. The funding of $15,000.00 grant requested by the PBA to cover the cost of the Papakura
BID expansion project is part of a budget allocation within the Papakura Local Board
Item 15
2017/2018 budgets.
19. Following consideration by the board, council officers will inform PBA of the grant amount
allocated to the Papakura BID expansion project.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Papakura Business Association BID expansion project overview 29
B Papakura Business Association BID expansion project budget 31
Signatories
Authors Claire Siddens - BID Partnership Advisor
Authorisers Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance & External Partnerships
27 September 2017
Item 15
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 15
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 15
Attachment B
27 September 2017
Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addison Stage 8

File No.: CP2017/17424
Item 16
Purpose
1. To seek approval for the proposed development of two reserves associated with Stage 8 of
the Addison residential development in Takanini, Auckland. This includes a feature Historic
Reserve (Walsh Brothers Park) commemorating the first powered flight in New Zealand.
Executive summary
2. Development of Walsh Brothers Park will be carried out by Addison Development Limited.
3. Addison Development Limited has prepared concept plans for the Walsh Brothers Park in
consultation with Council staff and the Local Board following a Local Board workshop held
on 9 August 2017. These are provided for the local boards consideration and approval. The
proposed development of this historic reserve forms part of the wider Addison development
open space network of eight reserves. The reserve commemorates the first powered flight
in New Zealand by the Walsh brothers in 1911. Local Board would like to see the plaque
updated with the correct date of the flight, 9th February 1911.
Recommendation/s
a) Approve the Addison Reserve Development Preliminary Landscape Design,
prepared by Natural Habitats (Attachment A).
b) Delegate the approval of engineering detailed design to Parks Sport and Recreation
and Community Facilities.
c) Allocate funding from the Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) Capex Budget to upgrade
the bronze plaque to read 9th February 1911 (cost estimate $1800 to $2500).
Comments
Background
4. Addison Development Limited are a land development organization, who have overseen the
development of the Addison subdivision in Takanini. The development involves the creation
of 1,300 medium density residential lots in eight stages across 32 hectares. The overall
concept for the Addison development is to create a community with a residential
neighbourhood core. The development started in 1999 with an opportunity to develop land
on the edges of the metropolitan boundary limit of the Auckland region for residential
development.
5. Stage 8 is the final stage of this development and involves the creation of 44 residential lots,
six super lots, roads and two reserves (together creating Walsh Brothers Park).
6. The site is bounded by the main trunk railway line to the west, Airfield Road to the north and
Arion Road to the south. Porchester Road bisects Addison connecting it with the new transit-
oriented centre of Takanini and the existing Papakura town centre to the south.
7. This site is unique as it is the site of the first powered flight in New Zealand by the Walsh
brothers in 1911. The aircraft, named Manurewa, achieved a flight of 365m at a height of
18m, before colliding with the boundary fence. Glenora Park was subsequently redeveloped
Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 33

27 September 2017
as a race training facility and was acquired by the Auckland Racing Club (ARC), who
retained the property until 2004.
8. Addison Development Limited sought approval for the vesting of five reserves across the
Item 16
Takanini Special Housing Areas in February 2015. The Walsh Brothers Park, including a
2000m2 historic reserve and 5000m2 corridor reserve were agreed to be vested at no cost.
The proposed reserves were identified as high priority when assessed against the strategic
criteria of the Parks and Open Spaces Acquisition Policy.
9. The proposed open space acquisitions in the Takanini SHAs were discussed at a workshop
with the Papakura Local Board on 5 November 2014 and reported to its business meeting
on 10 December, where the local board resolved to accept these acquisitions (resolutions
PPK/2014/220 and PPK/2014/221).
10. The Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee approved the acquisition through vesting of this
land on 10 February 2015. A condition has also been placed on the subdivision consent
R/VCC/2015/4378/1 variation granted on 21 February 2017 to this effect.
11. The historic reserve was seen as a positive opportunity to commemorate the flight of the
Walsh brothers, given its location at the end point of the flight path. The access reserve is
constrained by its long, narrow shape and two power lines. Given this, an agreement
between Addison Development Limited and Auckland Council was made to vest this reserve
at no cost to council.
12. The development of the two reserves will be completed by Addison Development Limited in
accordance with the Addison Reserve Development Preliminary Landscape Design,
prepared by Natural Habitats (Attachment A). The reserve development meets the Auckland
Council standards and Auckland Council will be responsible for the ongoing management
and maintenance of these reserves.
13. The Addison Reserve Development Preliminary Landscape Design (Attachment A) has
been developed following consultation with Council staff and the Local Board, and a
workshop held on 9 August 2017.
14. It is proposed to relocate the commemorative Plaque to reflect the flight path and update the
date shown on the plaque to read 9 February 1911 (the date is currently incorrect and states
that the flight took place on 5 February 2017).
15. Parks, Sport and Recreation and Community Facilities staff have discussed the concept
plans and support the preferred concept for the Addison Reserves. Two feature tree options
were discussed, Maori Princess and Magnolia Little Gem. The latter was agreed more
appropriate as the scale of Maori Princess would dominate over the commemorative plaque
and requires more space for growth. Other alterations to the proposal included; grassing
under powerlines; updating pathway configuration/crossings; and updating the Historic
Reserve path material to Waikato Flec compacted gravel (originally a pebbled finish was
proposed).
Financial Implications
16. The local board has delegated decision making responsibility for the development of Walsh
Brothers Park. All construction costs and the maintenance period of two years (historic
reserve) to three years (corridor reserve) will be funded and carried out by Addison
Development Limited. The annual operational costs of maintaining the proposed reserves
have been estimated by Community Facilities to be approximately $9,300, subject to
detailed design. It is expected that Councils obligation for maintenance of the landscaping
items will commence following practical completion in accordance with condition 44(b) of
consent R/VCC/2015/4378/1. This condition specifies a three year maintenance for the
corridor reserve and a two year maintenance period for the historic reserve and street trees.
Practical Completion is expected to be in the 2017/2018 financial year. Council will be
expected to commence maintenance of the landscaping items in financial year 2020.

27 September 2017
17. Cost estimates provided by Community Facilities to upgrade the bronze plaque to read 9th
February 1911 is estimated to be between $1800 to $2500. The source of this funding will
be LDI Capex.
Item 16
Consideration
18. The proposal for reserve development was presented to the Local Board in a workshop on 9
August 2017. The Local Board anticipated that Walsh Brothers Park was intended to be
developed to commemorate the first powered flight in New Zealand. Feedback from the
Local Board was that the proposal to relocate the commemorative Plaque to reflect the flight
path and update the date shown on the plaque to read 9 th February 1911 is strongly
supported.
19. The Local Board applauded Addison Development Limited for gifting the Kauri Stumps to Iwi
and provided overall support to the final design as positive example. No requests to alter
the proposed design were received.

20. No direct impacts on iwi arising from this development have been identified.
21. Addison Development Limited have consulted with Ngati Tamaoho (Ted Ngataki); Ngati Te
Ata (Karl Flavell); and Te Akitai (Chris Wade) on the Addison SHA development. These
parties are supportive of the proposed development.
22. Representatives of these iwi were invited to the prestart meeting for the commencement of
earthworks for Stage 8 (in compliance with condition 13). They have also been involved with
road naming within the subdivision.
23. Addison Development Limited have generously gifted the swamp kauri that was unearthed
as part of the development to these Mana whenua iwi including the costs of milling and
transportation.
Implementation
24. The developer wishes to develop Walsh Brothers Park as soon as possible once the local
boards approval is granted. Once approval to a concept plan has been provided, then
Council staff will work with Addison Development Limited on engineering details of the
proposed park developments to ensure the proposal meets the Councils park construction
standards.
25. Parks Planning and Community Facilities staff (from the Landscape Architecture; Parks &
Places; Service & Asset Planning; and Facility Performance Analysis teams) have reviewed
engineering detail and provided their approval.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Landscaping Proposal Addison, prepared by Natural Habitats, dated 37
04/07/17.
Signatories
Authors Kate Richardson - Parks Planner
Authorisers Mace Ward - General Manager Parks, Sports and Recreation
Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager

27 September 2017
Item 16
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 16
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 16
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 16
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 16
Attachment A
27 September 2017
New Road Name Approval for the Waiata Shores Subdivision at 1V

Great South Road, Takanini (previously Manukau Golf Course)
Item 17
File No.: CP2017/19492
Purpose
1. To seek approval from the Papakura Local Board for 13 new road names for roads to vest
within the Waiata Shores subdivision development of the previous Manukau Golf Course at
1V Great South Road, Takanini.
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of
the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in
this situation to ensure consistency of road naming.
3. The applicant Fletcher Residential Limited, have submitted the following road names in
order of preference:
Road No. Type Preferred Alternate 1 Alternate 2

1 Drive Te Napi Pepene ** Kawe Marie
2 Drive Waituarua Pepene ** Riria ****
3 Avenue Naganui Riria **** Orford **
4 Avenue Pepene Te Awapu **** Periko *****
5 Crescent Paraone Te Napi * Orford **
6 Crescent Riria Periko Te Awapu ****
*****
7 Lane Adlam Periko Riria ****
*****
8 Lane Orford Gosper *** Adlam **
9 Road Gosper Te Awapu **** Riria ****
10 Crescent Te Awapu Neilds * Clarry *
11 Way Periko Te Awapu **** Adlam **
12 Close Neilds Periko Gosper ***
*****
13 Close Clarry Periko Gosper ***
*****
Spare NA Wardell Orona Balfour Irving
Names
Repeats * once **twice ***three ****four *****five
4. Auckland Councils road naming criteria typically requires that road names reflect; a
historical or ancestral linkage to an area; a particular landscape, environmental or
biodiversity feature; or an existing (or introduced) thematic identity in the area. The criteria
also encourage the use of Maori names. Names need to be easily identifiable and intuitively
clear, thus minimising confusion.
5. All of the proposed road names are deemed to meet the criteria and are acceptable to both
Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) and NZ Post.
New Road Name Approval for the Waiata Shores Subdivision at 1V Great South Road, Takanini Page 43
(previously Manukau Golf Course)
27 September 2017
Recommendation/s
approve the proposed road names for the 13 new roads within the Waiata Shores
Item 17
a)
subdivision of the former Manukau Golf Course at 1V Great South Road, Takanini,
being;
Road 1 Te Napi Drive
Road 2 Waituarua Drive
Road 3 Naganui Avenue
Road 4 Pepene Avenue
Road 5 Paraone Crescent
Road 6 Riria Crescent
Road 7 Adlam Lane
Road 8 Orford Lane
Road 9 Gosper Road
Road 10 Te Awapu Crescent
Road 11 Periko Way
Road 12 Neilds Close
Road 13 Clarry Close
Comments
6. According to the Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines, where a new public or private
road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider /
developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the
Local Boards approval.
7. The 13 new public roads to be named service 484 lots within the Waiata Shores subdivision
at Takanini in accordance with resource consents R/VCC/2013/2042/4 and LUC61035619-C
by Fletcher Residential Ltd approved 11/7/2017.
8. The subdivision is located on the previous Manukau Golf Course site.
9. A map showing the 13 new roads with suggested road names is attached.
10. The applicant has proposed the road names listed in the table below, in order of preference.
All proposed names meet the road naming criteria because:
o The Maori names have been chosen in consultation with local iwi, in particular with Te Akitai,
and represent ancestors, settlements and traditional fishing grounds from the area.
o The European names are a mix of early settlers from the immediate area and the early
patrons, president and champion golfers from the old Manukau Golf Club. All are deceased.
27 September 2017
Proposed New Road

Meaning
Name
Road 1
Item 17
Te Napi Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(Preferred)
Pepene Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Kawe Marie Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Road 2
Waituarua Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(Preferred)
Pepene Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Riria Drive The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Road 3
Naganui Avenue The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(preferred)
Riria Avenue The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Emily Gladys Walpole, the second wife of the Earl of Orford,

Orford Avenue
who died at Manurewa House in 1931 (early settlers)
Road 4
Pepene Avenue The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(preferred)
Te Awapu Avenue Te Akitai settlement in this area
Periko Avenue The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Road 5
Paraone Crescent The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(preferred)
Te Napi Crescent The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.

Orford Crescent
who died at Manurewa House in 1931 (early settlers)
Road 6
Riria Crescent The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(preferred)
Periko Crescent The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Te Awapu Crescent Te Akitai settlement in this area
27 September 2017
Proposed New Road

Meaning
Name
Road 7
Item 17
Manukau Golf Club first women president Mrs O Adlam 1932-

Adlam Lane 1934
(preferred)
Periko Lane The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Riria Lane The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Road 8
Orford Lane who died at Manurewa House in 1931 (early settlers)
(preferred)
Gosper Lane E G Gosper set up a blacksmith on Mahia Road in 1923

Adlam Lane
1934
Road 9
Gosper Road E G Gosper set up a blacksmith on Mahia Road in 1923
(preferred)
Te Awapu Road Te Akitai settlement in this area
Riria Road The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Road 10
Te Awapu Crescent Te Akitai settlement in this area
(preferred)
Percy Neilds set up the first blacksmiths on Great South Road in

Neilds Crescent
1914
Manukau Golf Club member Clarry Halsey, winner of many

Clarry Crescent tournaments over the years. Played his last round in January
2006 and died March 2006.
Road 11
Periko Way The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
(preferred)
Te Awapu Way Te Akitai settlement in this area

Adlam Way
1934
Road 12
Percy Neilds set up the first blacksmiths on Great South Road in
Neilds Close 1914
(preferred)
Periko Close The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
27 September 2017
Proposed New Road

Meaning
Name
Gosper Close E G Gosper set up a blacksmith on Mahia Road in 1923
Item 17
Road 13 Manukau Golf Club member Clarry Halsey, winner of many
tournaments over the years. Played his last round in January
Clarry Close 2006 and died March 2006.
(preferred)
Periko Close The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Gosper Close E G Gosper set up a blacksmith on Mahia Road in 1923
Spare Charlie Wardell, Manukau Golf Club Champion 1932 1934

and president in 1937. Made a life member in 1950.
Wardell
Orona The name of a Te Akitai ancestor who occupied this area.
Balfour Irvine was a local South Auckland sheep farmer with a

passion and vision of golf. He was one of the original pioneers
Balfour Irving
of the Manukau Golf Club in 1932 and the first patron until his
death in 1953.
11. The road naming criteria suggests that the road types could be referred to as:
Road No. Type Guideline Description Applicant

Preferred
1 Drive Wide main road without many cross Drive
2 Drive streets Drive
3 Avenue Broad roadway, usually planted on Avenue
4 Avenue each side with trees Avenue
5 Crescent Crescent shaped thoroughfare, Crescent
6 Crescent especially where both ends join the Crescent
same thoroughfare.
7 Lane Narrow roadway between walls, Lane

8 Lane buildings or a narrow country roadway Lane
9 Road Open roadway primarily for vehicles Road
10 Crescent Crescent shaped thoroughfare, Crescent
especially where both ends join the
same thoroughfare.
11 Way Short enclosed roadway Way
12 Close Short enclosed roadway Close
13 Close Close
Consideration
12. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long-term Plan 2012-2022, allocated
the responsibility for the naming of new roads to local boards, pursuant to Section 319(1)(j)
of the Local Government Act 1974. A decision is sought from the local board in this report.
27 September 2017
13. The decision sought from the Upper Harbour Local Board for this report does not trigger the
Significance policy and is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications or any
immediate impact on the community.
Item 17

14. Local iwi were consulted and responses in support were received from Ngati Tamaoho, Te
Atikai and Ngati Te Ata.
Implementation
15. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name is recoverable in
accordance with Councils Administrative Charges.
16. The Resource Consent Project Management Team will ensure that the appropriate road
name signage will be installed by the Applicant at their full cost, once an approval is
obtained for the new road name and prior to the completion of the subdivision.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Site Plan - 1V Great South Road 49
Signatories
Authors Philip Steven Resource Consent Project Management Team
Authorisers Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents
27 September 2017
Item 17
Attachment A
New Road Name Approval for the Waiata Shores Subdivision at 1V Great South Road, Takanini (previously Manukau Golf Course) Page 49
27 September 2017
Public alerting framework for Auckland

File No.: CP2017/19563
Item 18
Purpose
1. To provide information on the Public Alerting Framework for Auckland. The report also
provides the results of an analysis carried out by GNS Science, identifying communities at
risk from tsunami across Auckland.
2. In addition, the report also seeks in-principle support for the proposed enhancement of
Aucklands tsunami siren network.
Executive summary
3. In February 2017, the Auckland Civil Defence and Emergency Management (CDEM) Group
Committee endorsed the draft Public Alerting Framework for Auckland.
4. Following on from this, Crown research agency, GNS Science, was commissioned to
provide an analysis of those communities most at risk from tsunami, within the orange and
red tsunami evacuation zones.
5. The GNS report and the Public Alerting Framework was presented to local boards in
workshop sessions. Auckland Emergency Management is asking local boards for in-principle
support for the Public Alerting Framework and for an enhanced tsunami siren network.
6. Next steps involve procurement and design of tsunami sirens and signage. Further
information will be presented to local boards in due course.
Recommendation/s
a) note the approach to public alerting, as outlined in the Public Alerting Framework for
Auckland (refer to Attachment A of the agenda report).
b) provide in-principle support for the development of an enhanced and expanded
regional tsunami siren network, noting that further information on design, placement
and other considerations for the network will be reported in due course.
Comments
Tsunami risk for Auckland
7. A tsunami is a natural phenomenon consisting of a series of waves generated when a large
volume of water in the sea, or in a lake, is rapidly displaced1. Tsunami threats pose a risk to
New Zealand and to Auckland. Occurrence rates of tsunami are higher in the Pacific than for
other oceans because of the Ring of Fire.2 Tsunami waves are most commonly caused by
underwater earthquakes. In addition, these events have the potential to cause multiple other
hazards including but not limited to:
fire;
fault line ruptures;
1 Berryman, K. et al. (2005) Review of Tsunami Hazard and Risk in New Zealand. Dunedin, Institute of Geological and
Nuclear Sciences Limited.
2
GNS Science, Tsunami in New Zealand data accessed on 26th June 2017 from https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Our-
Science/Natural-Hazards/Tsunami/Tsunami-in-New-Zealand
Public alerting framework for Auckland Page 51

27 September 2017
coastal inundation;
landslides;
lifeline utility failures; and
Item 18
serious health issues.3

8. The Tonga-Kermadec trench is one of earths deepest trenches, and is Aucklands highest
risk for tsunami. Auckland is susceptible to regional and distant source tsunami, that is,
tsunami generated from earthquakes in and around the Pacific Rim with travel time more
than one hour, as well as locally generated tsunami. Tsunami can be categorised as local,
regional or distant, based on their travel time or distance to the Auckland coastline:
local source less than one hour travel time. These tsunamis can be generated by
offshore faults, underwater landslide or volcanic activity;
regional source earthquakes in and around the Pacific Islands and the Tonga-
Kermadec Trench, one to three hours travel time to Auckland; and
distant source commonly generated by a large earthquake from any location around
the Pacific Rim, including but not limited to South America, Japan, the Aleutian Islands
and Alaska. The travel time to Auckland will be three hours or greater.4
This map shows the position of New Zealand in the Pacific Ocean within an area of intense
seismic activity called the Ring of Fire. Source: GNS Science
3 ACDEM (2016), Auckland Civil Defence and Emergency Management Group Plan 2016-2021
4 Auckland Council, Natural hazards and emergencies- Tsunami data accessed on 26th June 2017 from
http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/en/environmentwaste/naturalhazardsemergencies/hazards/pages/tsunamihazardsin
auckland.aspx

27 September 2017
Tsunami sirens
5. Currently, Auckland has 44 fixed tsunami warning sirens across nine sites in legacy Rodney
and Waitakere. These sirens were installed in 2008 and 2010 and do not meet current
Item 18
government technical standards5 for tsunami warning sirens. All new and existing siren
installations will need to meet these standards by June 2020.
6. Auckland Emergency Management is currently investigating the upgrading of its existing
siren network from tone-only sirens to those with PA/voiceover loudspeaker capability. The
sirens have a strong immediate effect and can prompt immediate action to seek further
information. There are valuable benefits in using tsunami sirens, in particular, sirens can be
used when other communications (e.g. cell phones and radio broadcasting) may not have
the maximum reach or be as effective. It is commonly accepted across the emergency
management sector that effective public alerting systems are those that take a holistic view.
This being said, public alerting needs to be well planned, understood, and in conjunction
with effective public education information and campaigns. This is imperative for a regionally
consistent approach to public alerting that communities can use and understand.
7. The limited locations of the present tsunami siren systems have been identified as a gap in
the public alerting capabilities of Auckland region. Presently, Auckland is not well
represented by tsunami sirens, with the estimated reach of Aucklands current sirens being
only eight per cent of the at risk population. Aucklands tsunami siren network is currently
being considered for enhancement and expansion through the delivery of the Public Alerting
Framework.
Public Alerting Framework
8. Auckland Council has recognised the need for a regionally consistent approach to public
alerting through the adoption of the Public Alerting Framework. The framework, which was
approved for consultation with local boards in February 2017, has been designed to:
explain what public alerting in a CDEM sense is, what it can and cannot do;
give detail on the range of channels for public alerting currently available in Auckland;
highlight the advances being taken with regard to public alerting at a national level;
provide some commentary on tsunami sirens, their uses and limitations; and
assist with decisions taken by the Auckland CDEM Group Committee, local boards and
partners and stakeholders with regard to the prioritisation of budgets and options for
enhancing public alerting across the Auckland region.
9. Auckland Council recognises the need to enhance the public alerting network and, as such,
has allocated funds from the Long-term Plan for this venture. This funding provides a
starting point for consultation on the future of Aucklands tsunami siren network and the
enhancement of public alerting.
10. It is important to understand that no one public alerting system is without fault. The Public
Alerting Framework focusses on the use of multi-platforms, understanding that a holistic
approach is one that maximises the reach of public alerting in an emergency or hazard
event. Through this project, prioritised public education is critical. Without effective public
education and engagement activities, sirens alone are not considered a standalone
approach to public alerting.
GNS Science report

Introduction and methodology
11. Following endorsement of the Public Alerting Framework, Crown research agency GNS
Science was contracted to complete an independent analysis (refer Attachment B) of those
communities most at risk of tsunami.
5 5
MCDEM (2014), Tsunami Warning Sirens Technical Standard [TS 03/14]

27 September 2017
12. A GeoMaps based analysis was used to calculate the number of exposed residents in
communities. The analysis used 2013 census population data to identify the number of
residents located in the red and orange tsunami evacuation zones (see figure below). For
further detail on the evacuation zones and the methodology, please see Attachment B.
Item 18
Auckland red and orange tsunami evacuation zones as used in the GNS Science analysis
Results
13. The results of the analysis carried out by GNS Science identified 217 communities at risk
from tsunami. For all 217 communities modelled, there are a total of 49,853 people at risk
from tsunami in the orange and red evacuation zones. For detailed information on the results
of this analysis, including detail on those communities at risk of tsunami, please refer to the
report from GNS Science at Attachment B.
Next steps
14. Workshops have been held with local boards across the region in order to share the results
of the GNS Science report, and the intention to implement an enhanced and expanded
regional tsunami siren network. This report seeks in-principle support for this enhanced and

27 September 2017
expanded network. More information on design, placement and other considerations for the
network will be reported in due course.
Consideration
Item 18
15. Workshops on tsunami risk were held with local boards in 2016. Following the development
of the Public Alerting Framework, further information on tsunami risk, including the results of
the GNS Science report, were shared with local boards between July and October 2017.
Local boards were told that in-principle support for the enhanced and expanded tsunami
siren network would be sought at formal business meetings of local boards.
16. As key decision-makers representing local communities, local board input into this important
project will continue.
Maori impact statement

17. There are no particular impacts on Mori communities which are different from the general
population arising from this report. The Public Alerting Framework for Auckland notes the
importance of community resilience, of reaching all members of the community, and of
having systems in place to ensure that public alert messages are understood and
ubiquitous.
Signatories
Authors Celia Wilson, Project Manager
Authorisers Craig Glover, Head of Strategy and Planning
John Dragicevich, Civil Defence Emergency Management Director
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Public alerting framework 57
B GNS report 67
Signatories
Authors Celia Wilson, Project Manager
Authorisers Craig Glover, Head of Strategy and Planning
John Dragicevich, Civil Defence Emergency Management Director

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 18
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Remuneration Authority consultation document

File No.: CP2017/19242
Item 19
Purpose
1. To provide comments on the Remuneration Authoritys Consultation Document Local
Government Review by 15 December 2017.
Executive summary
2. The Remuneration Authority is consulting local authorities on proposals in its consultation
document Local Government Review. Feedback is due by Friday 15 December 2017. The
Remuneration Authority wants to discuss the proposals with Local Government New
Zealand (LGNZ) zone meetings.
3. The Authority has noted that they are seeking the views of councils, not individual elected
members or staff. All local boards are being provided the opportunity to respond as is the
governing body.
4. The Authority proposes the following long-term changes to the way in which remuneration is
decided:
(i) each council is sized according to proposed factors such as population
(ii) a remuneration pool for the council is determined based on the size
(iii) the mayors salary is determined by the Authority
(iv) the council then proposes how to allocate the total pool (after the mayors salary is
deducted) among elected members to recognise positions of responsibility
(v) there is relativity between mayors and MPs, with the Auckland mayor being paid no
more than a cabinet minister.
5. The consultation document sets out the proposals and asks for feedback in regard to
specific questions.
6. The proposals do not impact on expenses policies or meeting fees for resource
management hearings.
7. The body of this report summarises the content of each section of the document and quotes
the questions. Comments from staff highlight issues the local board might wish to consider.
The document is in Attachment A and provides the full details of the proposals.
8. The proposal to provide each council with a remuneration pool gives councils more flexibility
to recognise varying responsibilities among members, but it puts elected members in the
position of making decisions about their own salaries.
9. The consultation document does not discuss local boards. In other councils, community
board salaries would be funded from the council pool, unless they were funded by a targeted
rate. Local boards are very different from community boards and local boards should make
their comments in the context of their role and responsibilities within Auckland Council. Local
boards may wish to comment on how, if the remuneration pool concept proceeds, the
remuneration of local boards should be decided.
Remuneration Authority consultation document Page 123

27 September 2017
Recommendation/s
provide its comments on the Remuneration Authoritys Consultation Document
Item 19
a)
Local Government Review.
Comments
Introduction
10. The Remuneration Authority has circulated a discussion document with a request for
comments by 15 December 2017. This is appended in Attachment A. The Authority states
that a separate consultation document will be circulated for Auckland Council but that the
principles in the current document will apply to Auckland Council.
11. The Authority has noted that they are seeking the views of councils, not individual elected
members or staff. All local boards are being provided the opportunity to respond as is the
governing body.
12. Currently, the key aspects for setting remuneration for councils other than Auckland are:
(i) a size index for each council based on population and expenditure
(ii) job-sizing council positions in sample councils
(iii) assessing the portion of full-time work
(iv) the Authoritys pay scale
(v) a pool equivalent to one members salary for recognising additional positions of
responsibility
(vi) a loading of 12.5% for unitary councils
(vii) hourly rates for resource consent hearings.
13. The report summarises the content of each section of the discussion document and quotes
the questions. Comments from staff highlight issues the local board might wish to consider.
The document is in Attachment A and provides the full details of the proposals.
Council size
14. The discussion document defines council size as the accumulated demands on any council
resulting from its accountability for its unique mix of functions, obligations, assets and
citizenry. It proposes a number of measures on which to base council size such as:
(i) population
(ii) operational expenditure
(iii) asset size
(iv) social deprivation
(v) guest nights.
15. For regional councils, social deprivation would not be used to assess size, but land area
would be.
16. For unitary councils, land area would be added to all other factors in order to recognise
regional responsibilities. The previous 12.5% loading would not apply.
17. Detailed explanations about why these factors were chosen are in the discussion document.
18. Remuneration Authority questions on sizing factors:
With regard to the proposed factors to be used for sizing councils

27 September 2017
Are there significant influences on council size that are not recognised by the factors
identified?
Are there any factors that we have identified that you believe should not be used and
Item 19
why?
When measuring council assets, do you support the inclusion of all council assets,
including those commercial companies that are operated by boards?
If not, how should the Authority distinguish between different classes of assets?
19. Comments:
(i) It is noted that prior to 2013, the Authority took population growth into account. The
councils experiencing higher growth might be expected to be faced with more complex
issues to resolve than councils with stagnant growth.
(ii) In a review conducted in 2012, the Authority stated:
The adjustment for abnormal population growth has been discontinued, because it
is felt that such growth will be reflected in a councils expenses
Weighting
20. The discussion document proposes weighting the factors slightly differently for different
types of council.
Territorial authorities:
Population, operational expenditure
Assets
Deprivation index, visitor nights
Regional councils:
Operational expenditure, geographic size
Assets, population
Visitor nights
Unitary authorities:
Population, operational expenditure, geographic size
Assets
Deprivation index; visitor nights
21. Remuneration Authority questions on weighting:

Are you aware of evidence that would support or challenge the relativity of the factors for
each type of council?
If you believe other factors should be taken into account, where would they sit relative to
others?
22. Comments:
(i) Staff do not see any issues with this proposal.
Mayoral remuneration
23. Mayors are considered to be full-time positions. The discussion document states that a
base rate would be determined and additional amounts would be based on the size of the
council as assessed above. The Remuneration Authority would set the mayors salary.
24. Remuneration Authority questions on Mayoral remuneration:
Should mayor/chair roles be treated as full time?

27 September 2017
If not, how should they be treated?

Should there be a base remuneration level for all mayors/chairs, with additional
remuneration added according to the size of the council?
Item 19
If so, what should determine this base remuneration?

25. Comments:
(i) For Auckland Council, the roles of the mayor, councillors and local board chairs have
all been treated as full-time. There has been no diminution in role responsibilities since
that was determined. There is no rationale for change.
Councillor remuneration
26. A total remuneration pool would be set for each council and each council would decide how
to distribute the pool among elected members (after the mayoral salary has been deducted).
A 75% majority vote would be required. The Remuneration Authority would receive each
councils decisions and would then make formal determinations.
27. The pool could be used to recognise additional workload arising from appointments to
external bodies.
28. Remuneration Authority questions on councillor remuneration:
Should councillor remuneration be decided by each council within the parameters of a
governance/representation pool allocated to each council by the Remuneration
Authority?
If so, should each additional position of responsibility, above a base councillor role,
require a formal role description?
Should each council be required to gain a 75% majority vote to determine the allocation
of remuneration across all its positions?
29. Comments:
(i) Setting a remuneration pool for an entity with the entity then responsible for deciding
how it is allocated among members, is a valid remuneration practice.
(ii) One issue to consider relating to the pool proposal is that the size of the pool, once
determined, is fixed. If a pool is determined for each local board, then if the number of
members on a board is increased or decreased, say by a review of representation
arrangements, the amount that each member is paid will decrease or increase
accordingly. This issue is acknowledged in paragraphs 102 and 103 of the discussion
document.
(iii) In view of this, the local board might wish to consider its view on the assumption that
the governance responsibility can be represented by a fixed pool.
(iv) A further issue to consider is that elected members would need to debate how to
allocate the pool. The Remuneration Authority currently fully sets Auckland Councils
elected member remuneration. Council has not had to debate how remuneration
might be apportioned among governing body and local board members. This would
be a major change.
(v) Staff do not see any issues with the proposals for role descriptions and a 75% majority
vote.
External representation roles
30. The Authority notes that elected members are increasingly being appointed to represent
councils on various outside committees and bodies.
31. Remuneration Authority questions on external representation roles:
Should external representation roles be able to be remunerated in a similar way to
council positions of responsibility?

27 September 2017
32. Comments:
(i) There are many bodies such as trusts and co-governance entities to which Auckland
Council elected members are appointed. These appointments are currently treated
Item 19
as part of the role of being an elected member.
(ii) If the pool proposal allows councils to recognise additional responsibilities (or
workload) attached to representation on external organisations, an issue to consider is
whether such recognition of additional workload might then extend to internal
committee membership, including the number of committees a member is part of. The
issue is how granular the recognition of responsibilities should be.
Appointments to CCOs
33. The Authority notes that some councils make appointments of elected members to CCOs.
34. Remuneration Authority questions on appointments to CCOs:
Do the additional demands placed on CCO board members make it fair for elected
members appointed to such boards to receive the same director fees as are paid to
other CCO board members?
35. Comments:
(i) Auckland Council cannot legally appoint elected members to substantive CCOs, other
than Auckland Transport.
(ii) In the current term, Auckland Council has not appointed elected members to Auckland
Transport, but in previous terms the two appointees received directors fees.
Community boards
36. The discussion document includes proposals and questions regarding community boards.
Auckland Council does not have community boards and we recommend this is clearly stated
in any local board response.
37. Community board salaries would either come from the council pool or be separately funded
by way of a targeted rate.
38. Remuneration Authority questions on community boards:
Should community board remuneration always come out of the council
governance/representation pool?
If not, should it be funded by way of targeted rate on the community concerned?
If not, what other transparent and fair mechanisms are there for funding the
remuneration of community board members?
Local Boards
39. The discussion document does not mention local boards.
40. Most local boards are larger or similar in size to other councils in New Zealand.
41. Local boards have decision-making and governance responsibilities over $500million per
annum
Comments:
Local boards should comment
(i) On the merits or otherwise of a bulk funding approach
(ii) If the Remuneration Authority does decide on a bulk funding approach
a. Should the governing body determine remuneration for each local board or
b. Should the Remuneration Authority determine separate bulk funding for the
governing body and each local board.

27 September 2017
Local government pay scale

42. The discussion document discusses how the role of elected members might compare to
other roles and other entities for the purposes of setting a pay scale. It considers local
Item 19
government managers, central government managers and boards of directors. These are
not elected member roles.
43. The document then considers parliamentary elected member salaries for comparison.
44. Remuneration Authority questions on local government pay scale:
Is it appropriate for local government remuneration to be related to parliamentary
remuneration, but taking account of differences in job sizes?
If so, should the relativity be capped so the incumbent in the biggest role in local
government cannot receive more than a cabinet minister?
If not, how should a local government pay scale be determined?
45. Comments:
(i) The Authority suggests in the document that mayor/chair salaries are related to MPs.
The question refers to the biggest role in local government which would be the
Auckland mayor. By setting the salary of the Auckland mayor to that of a cabinet
minister, other mayors would be scaled accordingly.
Timetable
46. A determination setting councils remuneration pools will be made around 1 July in each
election year. Following the elections, each council is to resolve its remuneration policy on
the allocation of the pool for the triennium. In the years between elections, adjustments will
be made based on published Labour Market Statistics.
Conclusion
47. These proposals constitute a major change for Auckland Council. From its inception, the
salaries of Auckland Council elected members have been fully determined by the
Remuneration Authority.
48. The remuneration pool proposal provides councils with more flexibility to recognise varying
responsibilities among members, but this puts elected members in the position of making
decisions about their own salaries.
Consideration
49. This report seeks the local boards views on the proposals contained in the Remuneration
Authoritys discussion document. Local board views will be reported individually to the
Remuneration Authority.

50. The level at which elected members are remunerated does not impact differently on Mori
as compared with the wider community.
Implementation
51. Feedback from the local board will be communicated to the Remuneration Authority.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Remuneration Authority Consultation Document Local Government 131
Review

27 September 2017
Signatories
Item 19
Authors Warwick McNaughton - Principal Advisor - Democracy Services
Authorisers Marguerite Delbet - General Manager Democracy Services

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 19
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Auckland Plan Refresh - Local Board Engagement

File No.: CP2017/18796
Item 20
Purpose
1. To seek local board feedback on draft Auckland Plan content to inform the final draft of the
refreshed Auckland Plan.
Executive summary
2. In June and July 2017 the Auckland Plan refresh team provided all local boards with
summaries of the strategic themes and focus areas for the refreshed Auckland Plan for their
consideration.
3. Resolutions and feedback from local boards over June and July, and feedback from
stakeholders informed the further development of the content and development of the
strategic framework. The framework was approved in principle by the Planning Committee
on 1 August 2017. A summary of the feedback from local boards accompanied the report to
the Planning Committee.
4. A further update on the Auckland Plan refresh was sent by memo to local boards on 16
August. This memo highlighted next steps, in particular that there would be further
engagement with local boards in September 2017.
5. Local boards are scheduled to hold workshops during September 2017 to review the
Auckland Plan package of materials, including content across the six outcome areas and the
Development Strategy. This report seeks formal feedback on this content which will be
considered as part of the proposed Auckland Plan.
6. Further Planning Committee meetings will be held in October and November to finalise draft
content for the proposed Auckland Plan prior to public consultation in early 2018.
Recommendation/s
a) provides feedback, including any specific feedback on the package of materials
across the six outcome areas and the Development Strategy (attachment A to the
agenda report entitled Auckland Plan Refresh Local Board Engagement).
b) notes that the resolutions of this meeting will be reported back to the Planning
Committee for consideration in the drafting of the refreshed Auckland Plan.
Comments
7. Auckland Council is required under the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 to
develop and review a spatial plan for Auckland. The Auckland Plan refresh provides an
opportunity to revisit Aucklands most challenging issues, to ensure the plan continues to be
a useful guiding document for Auckland.
8. On 28 March 2017, the Planning Committee endorsed a streamlined spatial approach for the
refresh of the Auckland Plan. The refreshed plan is intended to be more focused and
structured around a small number of inter-linked strategic themes that address Aucklands
Auckland Plan Refresh - Local Board Engagement Page 161

27 September 2017
biggest challenges. The plan is also intended to have a greater focus on the development
strategy.
Local Board involvement in the refresh
Item 20
9. Local board chairs have been invited to all Planning Committee workshops on the Auckland
Plan during 2017. Throughout these workshops, chairs (or their representatives) have
provided early input into opportunities and challenges for Auckland over the next 30 years
and feedback on the proposed strategic framework for the refreshed Auckland Plan. This
input was the views of chairs only and does not represent formal local board feedback.
10. At local board cluster briefings in February and April 2017, local board members gave
feedback and information which was used to refine the scope of strategic themes and focus
areas.
11. A report on the Auckland Plan Refresh was considered at local board business meetings in
June and July. Local boards were invited to consider their formal position on the themes
and focus areas and provide further feedback.
12. Local board cluster briefings were also held in April and July on the Development Strategy
which is a core component of Auckland Plan.
13. Resolutions and feedback from local boards over June and July informed the further
development of a draft strategic framework. This was approved in principle by the Planning
Committee on 1 August. A summary of the feedback from local boards accompanied this
report to the Planning Committee.
14. A further update on the Auckland Plan refresh was sent by memo to local boards on 16
August 2017. This memo highlighted next steps, in particular that there would be further
engagement with local boards in September 2017.
15. Local boards are scheduled to hold workshops during September 2017 to review the
Auckland Plan package of materials, including content across the six outcome areas and the
Development Strategy. This report seeks formal feedback on this content which will be
considered as part of the proposed Auckland Plan.
16. Further Planning Committee meetings will be held in October and November to finalise draft
content for the proposed Auckland Plan prior to full public consultation in early 2018.
Consideration
17. Local board feedback on the package of engagement material is being sought in this report.
18. Local boards play an important role in relation to the content of the Auckland Plan through
communicating local views to the governing body and providing input to regional strategies,
policies, and plans.

19. The council is required to provide opportunities for Mori engagement and to support Mori
capacity to participate in decision-making. When making significant decisions in relation to
land or a body of water, the council must take into account the relationship of Mori and their
culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water, sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and
fauna and other taonga.
20. Staff from the Independent Mori Statutory Board (IMSB) provided guidance on the strategic
themes of the plan. The IMSBs Mori Plan for Tmaki Makaurau was a guiding document
underpinning the development of the strategic themes and focus areas.

27 September 2017
21. The strategic themes acknowledge and celebrate Mori culture as Aucklands point of
difference, and Mori as Treaty partners in Auckland.
22. Mori Identity and Wellbeing is one of the six outcomes of the plan. The outcome describes
Item 20
the application of Te ao Mori values to the region, acknowledges the unique role of mana
whenua as kaitiaki of Tmaki Makaurau and acknowledges the foundational role of Te Tiriti
o Waitangi.
23. Engagement with mana whenua, mataawaka, and relevant Mori community groups has
been undertaken to develop the draft plan.
Implementation
24. Feedback from the local boards will be summarised and provided to the Planning Committee
for consideration in the drafting of the refreshed Auckland Plan.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Auckland Plan Draft Content Package 165
Signatories
Authors Denise OShaughnessy - Manager Strategic Advice
Authorisers Jacques Victor - GM Auckland Plan Strategy and Research

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 20
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Adoption of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017

File No.: CP2017/18226
Item 21
Purpose
1. To adopt the final version of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017.
Executive summary
2. Under the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 each local board is required to
adopt a local board plan by 31 October 2017.
3. The Act also requires local board plans to be developed using the special consultative
procedure. The consultation period for the 2017 local board plans ran from 22 May to
30 June 2017.
4. The local board has considered submissions received and feedback gathered from the
consultation period. As a result of this consideration, the following changes are proposed:
Refocus of the plan from Papakura town centre focused, to also address the
development of Takanini, Drury and other satellite centres
Utilise the strong Mori heritage as an opportunity to put Papakura on the map as a
tourism destination
Further strengthening of the wording under the vibrant and prosperous metropolitan
centre outcome by adding a safety focus
The need to improve the overall standard of all parks and community facilities in
Papakura is specifically being mentioned
Wording to be changed to reflect the boards support to create a schedule of sports, arts
and cultural events that promote Papakura as a visitor destination
The wording under the objective Public transport is safe, convenient, reliable and
affordable was further strengthened to include the need for a third line further South and
to futureproof the rail network and enable express trains.
5. The Papakura Local Board Plan 2017, which includes proposed changes, is attached to this
report (Attachment A).
6. Pending adoption of the plan, photos and other design features will be added to prepare for
publication.
Recommendation/s
a) adopt the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 (Attachment A to the report entitled
Adoption of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017), subject to the following
amendments:
Refocus of the plan from Papakura town centre focused, to also address the
development of Takanini, Drury and other satellite centres
Utilise the strong Mori heritage as an opportunity to put Papakura on the map as
a tourism destination
Further strengthening of the wording under the vibrant and prosperous
metropolitan centre outcome by adding a safety focus
The need to improve the overall standard of all parks and community facilities in
Adoption of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 Page 173

27 September 2017
Papakura is specifically being mentioned

Wording to be changed to reflect the boards support to create a schedule of
sports, arts and cultural events that promote Papakura as a visitor destination
Item 21
The wording under the objective Public transport is safe, convenient, reliable and
affordable was further strengthened to include the need for a third line further
South and to futureproof the rail network and enable express trains.
b) delegate authority to the Chairperson to approve any minor edits that may be
necessary.
Comments
7. The Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 requires local boards to produce and
adopt a local board plan every three years. This means that the Papakura Local Board Plan
2017 must be adopted by 31 October 2017.
8. Local board plans are strategic plans for the following three years and beyond. The plans
reflect the priorities and preferences of the community. They guide how the local board:
makes decisions on local activities and projects
provides input into regional strategies and policies.
9. The plans form the basis for development of the annual local board agreement for the
following three financial years and subsequent work programmes. They also inform the
development of councils 10-year budget.
10. Under Section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002 local boards are required to use the
special consultative procedure in adopting their local board plan. The consultation period ran
from 22 May to 30 June 2017. The board also held a hearing on 2 August 2017.
11. Submissions were made through the following channels and coded together:
online form available on the Shape Auckland website
hard copy form included in the household summary document
via email or post.
12. In total 382 submissions were received on the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017. In
addition, 87 people provided feedback at engagement events and there were 50 pieces of
feedback gathered through Facebook. Ten people spoke at the hearing that was held on the
2 August 2017.
Consideration of submissions and feedback

13. The board has considered the submissions and feedback gathered. They received data
analysis reports and all submissions and feedback to read on 28 July 2017 and held a
workshop to discuss this on 16 August 2017.
14. A hearing was held on 2 August 2017 where submitters were able to speak to their written
submission. Following the hearing the board held a deliberation meeting. Advice has been
sought from staff on matters raised during the consultation period and this is reflected in the
table included later in this report.
15. Public feedback on the draft plan was generally positive, with 73% of the respondents
supporting the outcomes sought through the Local Board Plan. Some feedback was given
concerning things people didnt like or thought were missing from the draft plan. This
feedback mostly related to council processes and specific projects. These matters will be

27 September 2017
addressed via other routes, for example, conversations with staff looking after the named
council processes and the Local Board work programming process.
16. Key feedback points are outlined in the table below. Analysis of these points, and any
Item 21
resulting substantive proposed changes to the outcome chapters, are outlined in the
corresponding columns.
Key public feedback points Analysis Proposed changes

A number of submitters have Board members were Specific mention be made
commented on the fact that supportive of refocusing the of the Takanini, Drury and
the draft plan only focused on plan and staff advised that other satellite centres.
the development of the there are no policies or legal
Papakura town centre. directives or constraints that
prevent the board to refocus
the plan.
Feedback was received for the Staff advised that there will A key initiative was added
need to specifically mention be opportunities through the focusing on the creation of
the strong Mori heritage and boards work programme to an environment which
links to the land, and the further build on this and encourages and supports
opportunity to utilise this and explore opportunities. creativity and helps
show that connection through showcase local artists.
art and promotional activities. The key initiative of
working together with
mana whenua and
mataawaka was widened
and an initiative put in
around utilising the strong
Mori heritage to put
Papakura on the map as a
tourism destination.
A lot of commentary was An option is to strengthen the Safety is now specifically
received around the need to wording under the vibrant mentioned as part of the
make Papakura and and prosperous metropolitan key initiative around the
specifically the town centre a centre outcome by adding a town centre.
safer and more welcoming safety focus.
place.
Submissions were received Detailed actions regarding A sentence was added
requesting that the overall sports and community referring to the need to
standard of sport parks and facilities mentioned by improve the overall
community facilities be submitters will be addressed standard of all parks and
improved. through future annual work community facilities in
programmes and are Papakura.
covered by the local board
plan outcome People in
Papakura lead active,
healthy and connected lives.
Submitters highlighted the fact Staff advised that with the Specific mention is made
that they would like to see current infrastructure there is in the plan for the boards
more (free) events in an opportunity for Papakura support to create a
Papakura. to host (national) events. schedule of sports, arts
and cultural events that
promote Papakura as a
visitor destination.
Many people commented on Work is already underway by The wording under the
the need for congestion in Auckland Transport to objective Public transport

27 September 2017
Key public feedback points Analysis Proposed changes

Papakura and surrounding promote public transport and is safe, convenient,
areas to be addressed. Further make the network more reliable and affordable
Item 21
investment in public transport frequent and reliable. was further strengthened

was seen as a solution for this to include the need for a
issue. third line further South to
futureproof the rail network
and enable express trains.
Changes to the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017

17. The Papakura Local Board Plan 2017, with proposed substantive changes to the outcome
chapters as described in the above table, is attached to this report (see Attachment A).
18. Other minor changes, made for the purposes of clarification, are also included.
Consideration
19. The local boards views have driven the development of the plan attached to this report.
20. In developing the plan, the board considered:
what they already know about our communities and what is important to them
community feedback on the development of an Integrated Area Plan for the Manurewa-
Takanini-Papakura area
submissions received via online forms, hardcopy forms, emails and post as well as
feedback provided by people at engagement events and gathered through Facebook
regional strategies and policies, including the Auckland Plan, I Am Auckland the
Children and Young Peoples Strategic Action Plan, the Mori Plan for Tamaki
Makaurau, Quality of Life Survey 2016, New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016-2026,
Auckland Transport Regional Land Transport Plan, the Papakura Greenways Local
Paths Plan, New Zealand Positive Aging Strategy and the Papakura Local Economic
Development Action Plan April 2014
staff advice
stakeholder views from mana whenua, mataawaka and the pasifika community (as
sought at the Pasifika fono held on 21 June 2017).

21. As part of developing the plan, the board have:
considered views expressed by mana whenua authorities at a sub-regional governance
level hui and local level one-on-one hui
considered pre-existing feedback from Mori within the local board area
attended a BBQ on 2 June 2017 held at the Papakura Marae, an event delivered in
partnership with the Papakura Youth Council and specifically targeting youth
attended a southern local boards engagement hui with mana whenua on 27 June 2017
in the Manukau Civic building
attended a southern local boards hui on the 29 June 2017 with mataawaka at the
Manurewa Marae.
22. The Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 promotes outcomes and matters of importance to
Mori (for instance a focus on natural environment and heritage, protecting and nourishing it
for future generations). The Papakura Local Board has also endorsed the resolutions of the

27 September 2017
joint mana whenua and local board members working party for Mori input into local board
decision-making. These include:
establishing a representative mana whenua body for local boards to engage with directly
Item 21
at a governance level
initiating te ao Mori training for local board candidates and members developed by
mana whenua
inviting mana whenua participation in local board workshops
convening formal kanohi ki te kanohi (face to face) hui between local board members
and mana whenua at marae at the start of each new political term.
Implementation
23. Pending adoption of the plan, minor edits may be necessary. This report recommends that
responsibility for approving these are delegated to the Chair.
24. Photos and other design features will then be added to the plan to prepare for publication.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 179
Signatories
Authors Madelon De Jongh - Senior Local Board Advisor
Authorisers Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 21
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Appointment of Franklin and Papakura Local Board representatives to

the Structure Planning Political Reference Group
Item 22
File No.: CP2017/19019
Purpose
1. Seeking an appointment of a representative from each of the Franklin and Papakura Local
Board respectively on the Structure Planning Political Reference Group.
Executive summary
2. The Planning Committee at its meeting held on 1 August 2017 considered the Place-based
Spatial Planning Update and Future Programme report and resolved inter alia as follows:
Resolution number PLA/2017/1
MOVED by Chairperson C Darby, seconded by Deputy Mayor B Cashmore:
That the Planning Committee:
g) approve the preparation of structure plans for the Drury-Opaheke and Paerata-
Pukekohe future urban areas, to be completed within the next 12 months.
i) approve the formation of a Structure Planning Political Reference Group to provide
feedback to staff on the contents of these four structure plans and to approve the draft
structure plans for public feedback, comprising:
Planning Committee chair
Planning Committee deputy chair
Rodney Ward councillor
Franklin Ward councillor
Manurewa Papakura Ward councillor (name to be determined)
Rodney Local Board member
Franklin Local Board member
Representative from the Independent Mori Statutory Board.
3. Subsequent to this resolution advice was received that a Papakura Local Board
representative was also required on the Structure Planning Political Reference Group.
4. The report is seeking the appointment of a representative from each of the Franklin and
Papakura Local Board respectively.
Recommendation/s
a) appoint a representative to the Structure Planning Political Reference Group.
Attachments
Appointment of Franklin and Papakura Local Board representatives to the Structure Planning Page 209
Political Reference Group
27 September 2017
Signatories
Authors Lee Manaia - Local Board Democracy Advisor
Authorisers Madelon De Jongh Acting Relationship Manager
Item 22
Appointment of Franklin and Papakura Local Board representatives to the Structure Planning Page 210
Political Reference Group
27 September 2017
Papakura Local Board Feedback on the Tkaro Investing in Play

discussion document
Item 23
File No.: CP2017/18377
Purpose
1. Attaching the Papakura Local Board feedback to the Tkaro Investing in Play discussion
document for the boards endorsement.
Executive summary
2. The Papakura Local Board at its meeting held on 26 July 2017 resolved as follows:
Resolution number PPK/2017/1
MOVED by Member K Winn, seconded by Chairperson B Catchpole:
a) delegate the provision of feedback on the questions presented in the Tkaro

Investing in Play discussion document to the Parks, Sport and Recreation
workstream members, being Member George Hawkins, Deputy Chairperson Felicity
Auva'a and Member Michael Turner, noting this feedback is required by 21 August
2017.
CARRIED
3. The Parks, Sport and Recreation workstream members formulated the boards feedback
which was then circulated to all members for input.
4. The feedback was due on 21 August 2017.
5. A copy of the feedback is attached to this report.
Recommendation/s
a) endorse the Papakura Local Board feedback to the Tkaro Investing in Play
discussion document, noting the feedback was provided by the due date of
21 August 2017.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Papakura Local Board feedback to the Takaro - Investment in Play 213
discussion document
Signatories
Authors Lee Manaia - Local Board Democracy Advisor
Papakura Local Board Feedback on the Tkaro Investing in Play discussion document Page 211
27 September 2017
Item 23
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 23
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 23
Attachment A
27 September 2017
Item 23
Attachment A
27 September 2017
For Information: Reports and Information referred to the Papakura

Local Board
Item 24
File No.: CP2017/18809
Purpose
1. Providing an opportunity for the Board to receive reports, resolutions and memorandums
that have been referred from Governing Body Committee meetings, forums or other local
boards for the information.
2. The information listed below has been received and circulated to members from the
following local board meetings.
No. Report Title Date sent to Governing Body

Members Committee or Forum or
Local Board
1.
2.
Recommendation/s
That the Papakura Local Board
a) note the information from the following local board meetings:
No. Report Title Date sent to Governing Body

Members Committee or Forum or
Local Board
1.
2.
Attachments
Signatories
For Information: Reports and Information referred to the Papakura Local Board Page 217
27 September 2017
Governance Forward Work Calendar

File No.: CP2017/18812
Item 25
Purpose
1. To present a 12 month governance forward work calendar to the board.
Executive Summary
2. This report updates the governance forward work calendar: a schedule of items that will
come before the board at business meetings over the next 12 months. The governance
forward work calendar for Papakura is included in Attachment A.
3. The calendar aims to support local boards governance role by:
ensuring advice on agendas and workshop material is driven by local board priorities
clarifying what advice is required and when
clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar will be updated every month. Each update will be reported back to business
meetings and distributed to relevant Council staff. It is recognised that at times items will
arise that are not programmed. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the
calendar.
Recommendation/s
a) notes the attached Governance Forward Work Calendar.
Comments
5. The councils Quality Advice Programme aims to improve the focus, analysis, presentation
and timeliness of staff advice to elected representatives. An initiative under this is to develop
forward work calendars for governing body committees and local boards. These provide
elected members with better visibility of the types of governance tasks they are being asked
to undertake and when they are scheduled.
6. Although the document is new, there are no new projects in the governance forward work
calendar. The calendar brings together in one schedule reporting on all of the boards
projects and activities previously approved in the local board plan, long-term plan,
departmental work programmes and through other board decisions. It includes governing
body policies and initiatives that call for a local board response.
7. This initiative is intended to support the boards governance role. It will also help staff to
support local boards, as an additional tool to manage workloads and track activities across
council departments, and it will allow greater transparency for the public.
8. The calendar is arranged in three columns, Topic, Purpose and Governance Role:
Topic describes the items and may indicate how they fit in with broader processes such
as the annual plan
Purpose indicates the aim of the item, such as formally approving plans or projects,
hearing submissions or receiving progress updates
Governance Forward Work Calendar Page 219

27 September 2017
Governance role is a higher-level categorisation of the work local boards do. Examples
of the seven governance categories are tabled on the following page.
Governance role Examples
Item 25
Setting direction/priorities/budget Capex projects, work programmes, annual plan

Local initiatives/specific decisions Grants, road names, alcohol bans
Input into regional decision-making Comments on regional bylaws, policies, plans
Oversight and monitoring Local board agreement, quarterly performance
reports, review projects
Accountability to the public Annual report
Engagement Community hui, submissions processes
Keeping informed Briefings, cluster workshops
9. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar. The calendar will be
updated and reported back every month to business meetings. Updates will also be
distributed to relevant Council staff.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
10. All local boards are being presented with governance forward work calendars for their
consideration.

11. The projects and processes referred to in the governance forward work calendar will have a
range of implications for Mori which will be considered when the work is reported.
Implementation
12. Staff will review the calendar each month in consultation with board members and will report
an updated calendar to the board.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Papakura Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar 221
Signatories

27 September 2017
Papakura Governance Forward Work Calendar for the period 1 September 31 December 2017
Item 25
Date Topic Meeting Governance Role Purpose
4 October 2017 Local Board Agreement Workshop 1 Workshop Local initiatives / specific decisions Briefing
4 October 2017 Transpower Auckland Development Strategy Workshop Information dissemination Briefing
11 October 2017 Papakura Local Grants Round 1 Workshop Local initiatives / specific decisions Review grants
11 October 2017 Waste Plan Workshop Input into regional decision making Agree priorities for consultation
Attachment A
11 October 2017 Arts, Community and Culture Work Programme Update Workshop Oversight and Monitoring Check in on performance/inform future direction
11 October 2017 NZTA Southern Corridor Update Workshop Information dissemination Receive update
11 October 2017 Walter Strevens Drive Access to State Highway 1 Cycleway Workshop Local initiatives / specific decisions Check in on performance/inform future direction
18 October 2017 Local Board Agreement Workshop 2 Fees and charges, levels of service, Workshop Setting direction/priorities/budget Check in on performance/inform future direction
asset information, regional feedback
18 October 2017 Community Facilities Work Programme Update - Snapshot Workshop Oversight and monitoring Check in on performance/inform future direction
18 October 2017 Parks, Sports and Recreation Work Programme update Workshop Oversight and monitoring Check in on performance/inform future direction
25 October 2017 Papakura Local Grant Round 1 Business Meeting Local initiatives/specific decisions Formal adoption
1 November 2017 Arts Facilities six monthly update External site visit Oversight and monitoring Receive update on progress
1 November 2017 Kura Kawana Conflict of Interest Workshop Learning and development Briefing
opportunity
1 November 2017 Manukau Beautification Trust Workshop Oversight and monitoring Receive update on progress

27 September 2017
Date Topic Meeting Governance Role Purpose

Item 25
1 November 2017 Arts, Community and Events Work Programme Update Workshop Oversight and monitoring Check in on performance/inform future direction
8 November 2017 National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management Workshop Input into regional decision-making Briefing
15 November 2017 Local Board Agreement Workshop 3 Responses from departments Workshop Setting direction/priorities/budget Check in on performance/inform future direction
29 November 2017 Takanini Community Hub and Library Workshop Local initiatives/specific decisions Receive and update on progress
29 November 2017 Arts, Community and Events Work Programme Update Workshop Oversight and monitoring Check in on performance/inform future direction
Attachment A
6 December 2017 Papakura Quick Response Round 2 Workshop Local initiatives/specific decisions Review Quick Response Grants
6 December 2017 Local Board Agreement Workshop 4 Agree consultation material Workshop Setting direction/priorities/budget Check in on performance/inform future direction
13 December 2017 Long Term Plan 2018 - 2028 Consultation Business Meeting Setting direction/priorities/budget Formal adoption
13 December 2017 Papakura Quick Response Round 2 Business Meeting Local initiatives/specific decisions Formal adoption
13 December 2017 Regional Facilities Auckland Quarterly Report Business Meeting Oversight and monitoring Receive update on progress

27 September 2017
Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term

File No.: CP2017/18813
Item 26
Purpose
1. Providing an updated register of achievements of the Papakura Local Board for the 2016-
2019 Electoral Term.
Executive Summary
2. Nil.
Recommendation/s
a) That the report entitled Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019
Electoral Term be received.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 225
Signatories
Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term Page 223
27 September 2017
PAPAKURA LOCAL BOARD
Item 26
ACHIEVEMENTS REGISTER 2016-2019 ELECTORAL TERM
Date ACHIEVEMENT
9 September 2017 Creative Souls Aranga Exhibition Opening
9 September 2017 Papakura Art Gallery Exhibition Opening Cast of Minds and Sorawit
Songsatayas Cabinets of Curiosities by Joanna Fieldes
2 September 2017 Innovation Event 4 3D printing
23 August 2017 - Allocated $70,000 to the Papakura Business Assn to address the
safety issues in the town centre.
Business Meeting
- Allocated $33,000 for the two security guards to continue patrolling
until 31 October 2017.
- Endorsed the handover of responsibility for security in the railway
Attachment A
station car park to Auckland Transport to manage.
- Approved the Papakura sports needs assessment study scope.
- Reallocated up to $80,000 to the Papakura sports codes and parks
needs assessment
- Approved 16 Papakura Quick Response Grants
- Approved a Deed of Leave for the Redhill Superette at 152 Dominion
Road, Papakura.
- Approved the 2017/2018 Community Facilities Leasing Work
Programme.
- Provided comprehensive feedback to the Regulatory Committee on
the Auckland Council Local Alcohol Policy Project Feedback on
Decision from Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority.
- Approved the message from the Chairperson for the Draft Annual
Report 2016/2017.
19 August 2017 Papakura Innovation Event 3 Papakura Library
5 August 2017 Papakura Innovation Event 2 Repair Caf (Upcycling)
29 July 2017 Papakura Art Gallery Exhibition Opening Mohi Ofi
26 July 2017 - Approved new road name for the residential subdivision by Nagra Homes
Limited at 17 Bunnythorpe Road, Papakura Nagra Lane
Business Meeting
- Approved new road name for the residential subdivision by Pakenham
Group Limited at 170-190 Walters Road and 543-587 Mill Road, Takanini
Toropapa Crescent
- Endorsed the local board feedback into the Auckland Transport Election
Signs Bylaw
- Endorsed the local board feedback in the proposed direction of the
Auckland Regional Pest Management Plan
- Appointed the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson as the lead and
alternate to take part in regional strategic priority workshops on the Long-
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
term 2018-2028
Item 26
- Provided feedback to the Auckland Plan refresh 2018

- Delegated the provision of feedback on the Takaro Investing in Play
discussion to workstream members Hawkins, Auvaa and Turner.
- Endorsed the boards feedback on Auckland Transports Roads and
Streets framework.
- Requested Auckland Transport to review the road markings on the
intersection of Great South Road and Coles Crescent.
- Requested Auckland Transport resolve the ongoing issue with the failing
chip seal on Elliot Street from the RSA entrance to Mossford Green.
- Requested an update on progress on the repair of the covered walkway to
the train station.
- Requested a progress report, including a full health and safety review, on
the parking and speed situation in Oakleigh Avenue, Takanini by 31
August 2017.
Attachment A
- Provided feedback on the report entitled Airport Access relating to

proposed versions of access to Auckland Airport.
- Provided input in the review of the Citizens Advice Bureaux services.
23/24/25 July 2017 Local Government New Zealand Conference
22 July 2017 Papakura Innovation Event Robots and Wearables Papakura Library
6 July 2017 Drury Community Committee
3 July 2017 Youth Council Meeting
2 July 2017 Papakura Action Expo
30 June 2017 Opening Brylee Reserve Wetlands
30 June 2017 Signing of Relationship Agreement between Ngati Tamaoho, Manurewa,

Papakura, Otara-Papatoetoe and Mangere-Otahuhu Local Boards
29 June 2017 Mataawaka Hui Local Board Plan
28 June 2017 - Approved an operational grant of $5,000 to the family of Leona McKenzie
Business Meeting as a contribution towards the installation of a memorial seat at Opaheke
School road crossing.
- Approved 24 Papakura Local Board grants.
- Approved 7 multi board grants
- Approved an application from Papakura Kootuitui Trust for $5,000.00
- Approved the relationship agreement template and a process as a basis
for discussions with mana whenua
- Approved the Papakura Local Board 2017/2018 Community Facilities
Work Programme.
- Approved in principle the Papakura Local Board 2017-2020 Community
Facilities Physical Work Programme
- Supported all the provisions of community and workforce measures for
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
year one (2017/2018) of new maintenance contracts.
Item 26
- Approved the renewal of a community ground lease to Counties Manukau
Softball Association Incorporated for the land encompassing the
clubrooms at 1R Wharf Street, Papakura
- Provided feedback on the Auckland Plan refresh 2018.
- Approved a new road name for the residential subdivision by Karaka
Brookview Limited at 241 Park Estate Road, Hingaia
28 June 2017 Site Visit State Highway 1 Papakura to Bombay
27 June 2017 Neighbourhood Support Meeting
25 June 2017 Local Board Engagement Drop-in, Takanini Sikh Temple
24 June 2017 Local Board Plan Engagement Drury
24 June 2017 Matariki Ki Papakura Event
Attachment A
21 June 2017 Pasifika Fono
19 June 2017 Attended Obligations and Opportunities: Maori, Te Tiriti Treaty and Auckland
Council Workshop
19 June 2017 Attended Papakura CrimeWatch Patrol Meeting
14 June 2017 Attended Pips Meeting and TRAG Meeting
13 June 2017 Chair attended LGNZ Zone One Meeting
10 June 2017 Childrens Forest Planting
8 June 2017 Careers Kiosk Opening Papakura Library
8 June 2017 Civil Defence Workshop
7 June 2017 - Approved the allocation of $73,000 for environmental projects to be

delivered by the Infrastructure and Environmental Services Directorate in
Business Meeting
2017/2018.
- Approved the Papakura Parks, Sports and Recreation draft Annual Work
Programme 2017/2018 financial year with two amendments.
- Approved the Papakura Local Board Libraries Work Programme for
2017/2018
- Approved the Local Board Arts, Community and Events (ACE) Work
Programme 2017/2018
- Approved the Papakura 2017/2018 Local Economic Development Work
Programme
- Adopted the Papakura Local Board Agreement 2017/2018 including local
fees and charges schedule.
2 June 2017 Local Board Engagement, Papakura Marae including the Careers Coach
1 June 2017 Local Board Plan Engagement Rosehill College
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
Item 26
31 May 2017 Have Your Say Event Papakura Library
29 May 2017 Local Board Plan Engagement Papakura High School
29 May 2017 Careers coach at Papakura High School
25 May 2017 Papakura Citizenship Ceremony
24 May 2017 - Approved 17 Quick Response Round Four Grant Applications

Business Meeting - Requested Auckland Transport to provide a Rough Order of Costs for
five local projects
- Requested Auckland Transport to investigate elements of the Papakura
greenways local path plan that could potentially be funded through the
Local Board Transport Capital Fund
- Approved a new road name for the residential subdivision by Packenham
Group Ltd at 170 190 Walters Road and 543 587 Mill Road, Takanini.
Attachment A
17 May 2017 Arts Facilities, including Papakura Museum, site visits
5 May 2017 Concluded the Parks site visits.
5 May 2017 Attended Jobfest which included the YouthFull Official Launch.
3 May 2017 Papakura Local Board Extraordinary Meeting:

- Approved the Opaheke Concept Plan prepared by Surface Design Inc,
dated August 2016.
- Approved the allocation of the encumbrance funds ($1.75 million) to be
paid by Motleon Ltd, towards the development of the southern portion of
Opaheke Park.
- Adopted the final 2017/2018 Locally Driven (LDI budgets by project, within
the funding envelopes.
- Agreed to advocate for grade separation of the Takanini rail crossings with
Walters Road and Manuroa Road and also to advocate to Auckland
Transport to develop a multi-story park and ride at the Papakura Train
Station.
- Agreed the boards one key priority for the organisation to work on was to
alleviate traffic congestion through building transport infrastructure before
intensification.
- Agreed that a total of $300,000 for mangrove removal of the 2016/2017
Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) operational expenditure (Opex) be deferred
to 2017/2017.
26 April 2017 Papakura Business Meeting:

- Approved the Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme
2017/2018
- Approved a new community ground lease for Papakura City Brass Band
Inc for 30 Wairoa Road, Papakura.
- Approve a new community ground lease for Papakura Contract Bridge
Club Inc for 13 Opaheke Road, Papakura.
- Approved a grant of $4,940.60 for costs incurred on development of a
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
concept plan and a resource consent for Opaheke Park which was
Item 26
required by council final Reserve Management Plan for Opaheke Park.
- New road names approved for the following:
- For the residential subdivision by Housing New Zealand across
various sites in Papakura.
- For the New private roads created by various resource consents by
Housing New Zealand across various sites in Papakura.
- Recommended to the Governing Body to strike the targeted rate for the
Papakura BID Programme
- Approved Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited to undertake stream
planting and to manage weeds and pests at Hingaia Stream Esplanade
and Karaka Reserve as outlined in the landscape planting plan.
- Approved for the Chair and Deputy Chair to attend the Local Government
New Zealand Conference and Annual General Meeting 2017
- Approved the draft of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2017
Attachment A
- Endorsed submissions on the Draft Air Quality Bylaw and Statement of
Proposal and the Clean Water Package.
25 April 2017 Attended the Papakura and Drury ANZAC Services
22 April 2017 Attended Smiths Avenue Community Cultural Festival
20 April 2017 Attended Maori Communities Engagement Follow-up Expo
11 April 2017 Attended the Launch of Takanini Business Association
2 April 2017 Papakura Fun Run Bruce Pulman Park
31 March 2017 Hauora at the Pa Papakura Marae
28 March Transport Forum - Papakura
25 March 2017 Redhill Funday
25 March 2017 Attended Bruce Pulman Park Indoor Arena Opening
24 March 2017 Attended Police Pay Parade
23 March 2017 Papakura Art Gallery Exhibition Opening Tui Tuia with Horomona Horo
and Te Kiri o Tane with Nikau Hindin
22 March 2017 Papakura Business Meeting:

- Approved the Papakura Art Gallery Business Plan 2017-2020 with
amendments.
- Approved 16 Quick Response Round Three 2016/2017 applications.
- Approved new road names for the residential subdivision by Carhart
Investments and Darley Investments Limited at 889 Papakura-Clevedon
Road, Ardmore being Nola Dawn Crescent, Charles Henry Way, Te
Aramanu Crescent and Huahua Crescent.
- Endorsed the draft Manurewa Takanini Papakura Integrated Plan for
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
community engagement commencing 3 April 2017.
Item 26
- Provided board feedback on Project 17: Auckland Council Maintenance

Contracts.
- Delegated to the Chair and Work Stream Lead Member Turner to provide
feedback and attend the hearings on the draft Air Quality Bylaw for Indoor
Domestic Fires.
- Allocated up to $15,000 from the boards Community Response Fund to
the Papakura Business Association to commission a comprehensive
safety review of the Papakura town centre and immediate surrounds to
help inform future local board decision-making.
- Allocated $3,500 +GST from the boards Community Response Fund to
the Papakura Business Association to partner with the board to continue
the Proud Papakura Proud Initiative for 2017.
- Agreed to re-constitute the Manukau Harbour Forum joint committee with
the Franklin, Mangere-Otahuhu, Manurewa, Otara-Papatoetoe,
Maungakiekie-Tamaki, Puketapapa, Whau and Waitakere Ranges Local
boards for the 2016-2019 electoral term.
Attachment A
20 March 2017 Attended Pasifika Fono
17 March 2017 Papakura Parks site visits
16 March 2017 Attended Maori Communities Engagement Hui at Manukau
15 March 2017 Attended Blessing for the site where Papaka Road will be constructed.
10 March 2017 Papakura Local Board Have Your Say Event Papakura Library
25 February 2017 Papakura Town Centre Clean-up
22 February 2017 Papakura Local Board Business Meeting

- Agreed to fund the cost of $5,063 from the Community Response Locally
Driven Initiatives Fund to the Papakura Business Association Incorporated
to support the relocation of Closed Circuit Television from the PBA
premises to the Papakura Police Station to improve the monitoring by the
CrimeWatch volunteers.
- Agreed that the Chair and Deputy Chair liaise with the Papakura Business
Association Inc to assess suitable sites for installation of new cameras.
- Approved a new community ground lease for Counties Manukau
Kindergarten Association Incorporated (Nina Busing Kindergarten) for 13A
Clevedon Road, Papakura.
- Approved a new road name for the residential subdivision by Karaka
Brookview Limited at 241 Park Estate Road, Hingaia.
- Approved new road name for three private ways within the residential
subdivision by Addison Development at 250 Porchester Road, Takanini.
- Reallocated unspent events partnership funding of $22,500 to the three
remaining 2016/2017 contestable funding rounds as follows:
i) $5,625 towards the Quick Response Round Three
ii) $5,625 towards the Quick Response Round Four
iii) $11,250 towards the Local Grants Round Two
27 September 2017
Date ACHIEVEMENT
- Approved the scope of the Hawkins Theatre Business Planning Project
Item 26
with the following additions:
i) To include a strong focus on improved promotion of the
venue
ii) To include income and options for increased revenue
iii) To include community consultation with stakeholders, and
user groups.
- Agree that the Papakura Local Board Chair will initiate engagement with
mana whenua groups who have registered interest in the Papakura Local
Board area, to inform the Hawkins Theatre Business Plan.
- Endorsed the Manurewa and Papakura Local Board joint submission on
the Point England Development Enabling Bill January 2017.
- Adopted the work stream allocations for the Board and appointed Member
Auvaa to the Aircraft Noise Community Consultative Group.
- Received the Auckland Councils Quarterly Performance Report for the
Papakura Local Board: Quarter Two, 1 October 31 December 2016.
Attachment A
Waitangi Day Celebrations
6 February 2017
Art in the Park
27 January 2017
25 January 2017 Papakura Business Meeting:
- Approved various road names for the residential subdivision by
Housing New Zealand at 75 Walters Road, Takanini
- Approved 19 Papakura Local Board Scholarship grants.
Keri Downs Park - Out and About Programme
24 January 2017
Blessing of Pahurehure Boardwalk and esplanade
20 January 2017
Papakura Kite Day
13 January 2017
Papakura Local Board Christmas Community Morning Tea
16 December 2016
Drury Mile Post Ceremony
12 December 2016
Papakura Christmas Market
10 December 2016
Papakura Carols in the Park
9 December 2016
Papakura Christmas Parade
4 December 2016
Attended Counties Manukau Sport Excellence Awards
27 November 2016
Papakura Citizenship Ceremony
24 November 2016
Attended Vector Pacific Music Awards
18 November 2016
Attended Armistice Day Service
13 November 2016
Inaugural Meeting
3 November 2016
- Election of Chair, Brent Catchpole
- Deputy Chair, Felicity Auvaa
27 September 2017
Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes

File No.: CP2017/18814
Item 27
Purpose
1. Attached is a copy of the notes taken at the Papakura Local Board workshops held on
Wednesday 9, 16, 23 and 30 August and 6 September 2017. Also attaching the notes from
the joint Papakura and Franklin Local Board workshop held on 6 September 2017.
Executive Summary
2. Nil
Recommendation/s
a) receive the records for the Papakura Local Board workshops held on Wednesday
9, 16, 23 and 30 August and 6 September 2017.
b) receive the record for the joint Papakura and Franklin Local Boards workshop held
on Wednesday 6 September 2017.
Attachments
No. Title Page
A 9 August 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop record 235
B 16 August 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop record 241
C 23 August 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop record 247
D 30 August 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop record 249
E 6 September 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop record 251
F 6 September 2017 Joint Papakura and Franklin Local Boards workshop 259
record
Signatories
Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes Page 233

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment A

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment B

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment C

27 September 2017
Item 27
Placeholder for Attachment 4
27. Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes.DOC
30 August 2017 Papakura Local Board workshop

record
Attachment D

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment E

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment F

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment F

27 September 2017
Item 27
Attachment F

27 September 2017
ATTACHMENTS
Item 8.1 Attachment A The Rising Foundation - Term 2
Newsletter Page 265
Item 8.1 Attachment B The Rising Foundation powerpoint
presentation Page 277
Page 263
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 265
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 266
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 267
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 268
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 269
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 270
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 271
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 272
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 273
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 274
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 275
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment A
Page 276
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 277
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 278
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 279
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 280
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 281
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 282
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 283
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 284
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 285
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 286
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 287
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 288
27 September 2017
Item 8.1
Attachment B
Page 289

Papakura Local Board Agenda September 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Papakura Local Board Agenda September 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Papakura Local Board will be held on:

Date: Wednesday, 27 September 2017

Papakura Local Board

Chairperson Brent Catchpole

Contact Telephone: (09) 295 1331

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Member Felicity Auvaa will lead the meeting in prayer.

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

That the Papakura Local Board:

8.1 Deputation - The Rising Foundation Mentoring and Leadership Programme -

Foundations Mentoring and Leadership Programme currently being run at Papakura

9.1 Public Forum Potters Club Toos Vandegraaf

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item

There were no notices of motion.

Councillors' Update Page 9

Auckland Transport Update to the Papakura Local Board September

Table 1: Local Board Transport Capital Fund [LBTCF] Current projects

Project Name Problem or Current Status

Relocation of On-road cycle lane is Rough Order of Cost (ROC)

Project Name Problem or Current Status

on Great South unsafe and rarely Board (PLB) in May 2017.

Relocation of Existing pedestrian Rough Order of Cost requested by the

Electronic notice Lack of way-finding Rough Order of Cost requested by the

Project Name Problem or Current Status

Papakura Local Board Transport Capital Fund financial summary

Total funds available in current political term $1,465,381

Upcoming projects and activities of interest to the board

New Rollerson Road footpath

Regional and sub-regional projects

Traffic Control Committee (TCC) decisions

Table 2: Transport Control Committee Decisions

Battalion Drive / Permanent Traffic No Stopping At All Times and Approved in

Mori impact statement

Health and safety implications

Disposals recommendation report

Disposals recommendation report Page 19

Mori impact statement

Disposals recommendation report Page 20

Disposals recommendation report Page 21

Disposals recommendation report Page 23

Papakura Business Association Inc Request for funding to undertake a

Mori impact statement

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addison Stage 8

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 33

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 34

Mori impact statement

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 35

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 38

Development of Open Space at Walsh Brothers Park - Addision Stage 8 Page 40

New Road Name Approval for the Waiata Shores Subdivision at 1V

Road No. Type Preferred Alternate 1 Alternate 2

Proposed New Road

Emily Gladys Walpole, the second wife of the Earl of Orford,

Te Awapu Avenue Te Akitai settlement in this area

Emily Gladys Walpole, the second wife of the Earl of Orford,

Te Awapu Crescent Te Akitai settlement in this area

Proposed New Road

Manukau Golf Club first women president Mrs O Adlam 1932-

Gosper Lane E G Gosper set up a blacksmith on Mahia Road in 1923

Manukau Golf Club first women president Mrs O Adlam 1932-

Te Awapu Road Te Akitai settlement in this area