26 7 Vol.26 No.

7
2009 7 July 2009 ENGINEERING MECHANICS 251

1000-4750(2009)07-0251-06

*
1 1 1 1 2
(1. 1500012. 100085)

RANS -



-
O351.2 A

RESEARCH ON CAVITATION OF VERTICAL LAUNCH

SUBMARINE MISSILE
*
WEI Ying-jie1 , MIN Jing-xin1 , WANG Cong1 , ZOU Zhen-zhu1 , YU Feng2
(1. School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China; 2. China Ship Academy, Beijing 100085, China)

Abstract: In this paper, the unsteady cavitating flow in a longitudinal gravity force field was researched by
using numerical simulation method during vertical launch submarine missile rising. A dynamic mesh technique is
adopted, combined with considering transport RANS equations of liquid mass fractions, to solve the problem of
missile motion coupled with the flow field of mixture medium. The numerical results are perfectly consistent to
the experimental data, thus the efficiency of the numerical method is proved. Based on the efforts mentioned
above, the underwater motion process of a submarine vertically launched missile was simulated, and the
relationship between the drag coefficient of the missile and cavity number was given. At last the analysis for the
effect of the partial cavity on the hydrodynamics and water exiting speed was achieved.
Key words: fluid-solid coupling; vertical launch; partial cavity, hydrodynamic; dynamic mesh

(
)

[1]

2008-03-172008-09-19
*(1975)(E-mail: weiyingjie@gmail.com)
(1982)(E-mail: minjx@163.com)
(1968)(E-mail: alanwang@hit.edu.cn)
(1937)(E-mail: zouzz@sjzri.edu.cn)
(1978)(E-mail: yufeng@126.com).
252

2)
[2]
( m ui ) ( m ui u j )

[3
6]
t x j
Acosta[7] u u j
p
( m t ) i
m g (3)

xi x j x j xi

Basharova [8]
p m
[9]
n
m k k n t
k 1
[10]
g
Mixture
RANS 3)
[11] Singhal
Singhal [12] m
m
1/ 2
Vch 2 p p
m Ce l v v fl p pv (4)
3 l
2 p p
Vch
1/ 2

m Cc l l v f v p pv (5)
3 l

Vch

k k

pv

Ce =0.02 Cc =0.01 fl 1 f v
RANS
f ng f ng 1.5 105

4)
k
( k ) ( u j k )

t x j
t k
Gk (6)
x j
k x j

1 ( ) ( u j )
C 1 (Gk Gb )
t x j k
1.1
t 2
1) C 2 (7)
m ( m ui ) x j
x j k
0 (1)
t xi k C 0.09
( m f v ) ( m f v ui ) C 1 1.44 C 2 1.92 k 1.0 1.3 t
m m (2)
t xi Gb k
ui i m Gk k
m l l v v ng ng i
i ( i l , v, ng ) 1.2
fi i i / m ( i l,v,ng ) Fluent6.3
m
m
 253

- 2

C

Fluent (UDF)

F 10mm 100mm
ui ui 1 i 1 t (8)
52700
m
t vi vi 1 i i 1
Fi 1 i 1
DVm( p pv ) (p pref )
Re Cp (13)
F FG FB FV FP (9) 0.5Vm 2
0.5 Vm2
FG FB D Vm pv
FP FV p
pref
Vm
50m/s P 378955Pa
t 5 106 s
D Re 106
0.3 1
hideal
s c 100t
hi
(10)
(11)

hi (1 s )hideal (10)
hi c hideal (11)

V
1 v
d Fig.1 Contour of v during cavity growth
dt V
dV
V
(u ug ) dA
2
V dA V S dV (12)
[13] S/D S
u ug
S C p 2

V V [13] 2
SIMPLEC S/D 2


PRESTO
254

6
Re=1106Re=1x10
Hemispherical, , s=0.3 , s=0.3
4
1.0
13
0.8

0.6

Cp Cp

0.4

0.2
0.0

-0.2

-0.4

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
S/D
S/D

2
Fig.2 Comparison of simulation results with experimental ones
t=0.18 t=0.20 t=0.22

RANS

3 t=0.24 t=0.26 t=0.28

4 v
3.1
Fig.4 Contour of v during cavity growth

5
0.25 0.9
h / D

pref C p 5

/ 1.51

L 3
p0 gh ( p0

h )

x 2.0 t=0.10
1.8 t=0.15
1.6 t=0.20

1.4 t=0.24
1.2 t=0.28
Cpp
C

1.0
0.8
3 0.6
0.4
Fig.3 Computational domain and grid 0.2
V0 =15m/s 0.0
-0.2
0.3 Fr 6.56 -0.4

30m 0 20 40 60 80 100

h/D
h/D
t 105 s t t0 /T T
5
T L/V0 t
Fig.5 Distribution of pressure on missiles surface
0.0011
6 7 t 0.28
3.2
6
4
 255

t = 0.19 0.3
7




R/DRD

-1

-2

-3
3

0

0

9

2

1.3%
h/D

0.30
h/D

0.28

0.26
0.24

0.22
0.20
0.18
8

0.16
6 t=0.28 0.14
Fig.6 Vector graph of partial velocity at t=0.28 0.12
R/D
R/D 0.10
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
-1

-2
2

t t
1

(a)
2

0.20


0.18
h/D
3
h/D

0.16
4

0.14
5

0.12

7 t=0.28 0.10
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Fig.7 Vector graph of partial velocity at t=0.28 t t

3.3 (b)

8 0.40
C x F / 0.5 Vm2 A F
0.38
A Vm

0.36
8(a) 8(b) 8(c)

0.34

t = 0.025 t = 0.073 0.7 0.32

0.48
0.30

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

t = 0.073 t = 0.19 0.48 t t
0.3 (c)
8
Fig.8 Drag coefficient versus time
256

28 Osaka Sumplace, 2003, OS-7-018.

[2] . [M]. :
26
, 1991.
24 Huang Shoukang. Hydrokinetics ballistic trajectory load
(m/s)
/(m/s)

environment [M]. Beijing: Space Navigation Publishing

22
Company, 1991. (in Chinese)
20 [3] Wu Jiongyang, Yogen Utturkar, Wei Shy. Assessment of
18 modeling strategies for cavitating flow around a hydrofoil
[C]// Yoichiro Matsumoto. 5th International Symposium
16
on Cavilation. Japan: Hotel Osaka Sumplace, 2003,
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 OS-1-007.
t t
[4] Lecoffre Y. Cavitation bubble trackers [M]. Brookfield,
9 VT: A. A. Balkema, 1999.
Fig.9 Velocity coefficient versus time [5] Brennen C E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics [M]. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
4 [6] Bilus I, Predin A, Skerget K. The extended homogenous
cavitation transport model [J]. Journal of Hydraulic
Research. 2007, 45(1): 8187.
[7] Acosta A J. The effect of a longitudinal gravity field on
the supercavitating flow over a wedge [J]. Trans. ASME,
RANS
1961, 28(2): 188192.
- [8] Basharova V N, Buivol V N, Serebryakov V V. Slender
axisymmetric cavities in the flow around bodies in a
longitudinal gravity force field [J]. International Applied
Mechanics, 1983, 19(4): 359366.

[9] , . [J].
, 2004, 5(3): 1417.
Luo Jinling, He Haibo. Research on cavitation for
under-water launching missile [J]. Tactical Missile
Technology, 2004, 5(3): 1417. (in Chinese)
[10] , , .

[J]. , 2007, 22(5): 549

554.
Liu Yunqiao, Lu Chuanjing, Li Jie. An investigation of
ventilated cavitating flow in vertical launching of a missile
[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2007, 22(5): 549554. (in
1.3%
Chinese)
[11] , , .
[J]. , 2007, 28(6): 15061509.
UDF Wei Haipeng, Guo Fengmei, Quan Xiaobo. Research on
cavitation of submarine launched missiles surface [J].

Journal of Astronautics, 2007, 28(6): 15061509. (in

Chinese)
[12] Singhal A K, Athavale M M. Mathematical basis and
validation of the full cavitation model [J]. ASME Journal
of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124: 617624.
[1] Liu Zhiyong, Yi Shuqun, Yan Kai. Numerical simulation [13] Rouse H, McNown J S. Cavitation and pressure
of water-exit cavity [C]// Yoichiro Matsumoto. 5th distribution, head forms at zero angle of yaw [R]. Bulletin:
International Symposium on Cavitation. Japan: Hotel Studies in Engineering, State University of Iowa, 1948.