Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One thing I’ve noticed as a city attorney over the years – where there’s smoke, there is
likely to be fire, but also heated complaints to city hall. Hard to tell which burns hotter
from some of the meetings I have attended. Smoke can be the result of residential
heating, recreational activities or industrial activities. Whatever the source, smoke is a
frequent topic of city regulation.
This article is the final segment in a 4-part series of LMC Codification blog entries on
city ordinances and smoke regulation. This week's focus is on zoning ordinance
standards regulating smoke and ambient air standards.
Cities commonly regulate smoke as part of their zoning ordinance. Frequently, these
rules are found in a “performance standards” section that regulates all types of nuisance
conduct that may result from uses, such as noise and vibrations.
In reviewing these ordinances, I find that cities generally follow three methods of smoke
regulation, including the Ringlemann chart, adoption of current Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) standards and use of something called “State of Minnesota
Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1 15.” For this blog entry we
will discuss each method in detail.
Many cities simply adopt MPCA standards as their performance standards for zoning
uses. Typical language is as follows:
SMOKE AND PARTICULATE MATTER. The ambient air quality standards of the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency shall apply to the release of airborne materials.
Generally, MPCA standards are found in the Minnesota Rules ch. 7009 (available at this
link: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=7009). The MPCA standards appear to be
based on federal standards. According to the MPCA, cities may adopt more stringent
local standards for smoke.
Ringlemann was a French scientist born in 1861. His practice of measuring smoke by
using cards of various colors from white to black is still used today. More his smoke
chart can be found on the CDC website at:
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/pubs/pubreference/outputid330.htm.
Ordinance provisions using the Ringlemann chart typically look like this:
Cities using the Ringlemann chart are using a legal and legitimate standard for
measuring smoke. However, cities using the chart may run into practical difficulties
related to enforcement should they have a true smoke problem use on their hands.
The problem with the Ringlemann chart is that it is speaking a different language from
the current MPCA standards. Smoke at Ringlemann No. 1 does not automatically equate
to a similar smoke measurement under MPCA standards. As a result, it may be difficult
for a city to understand (without expensive professional evaluation) how their standards
relate to mandatory state standards.
A substantial number of cities also have this language adopting Minnesota Regulation
APC 1-15 as their standard for smoke regulation:
The emission of smoke by any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the
State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1-15, as
amended.
This concludes our 4-part series on smoke regulation. Far from being an ephemeral
topic – smoke is a frequent and lasting concern to Minnesota cities. Ordinances on
smoke touch many areas of resident lives – from business endeavors to private
recreational uses. Recent changes in technology – related to both methods of heating
(such as the new popularity of outdoor wood boilers) and methods of measuring smoke
may prompt cities to review their ordinances. In addition, recent law changes related to
tobacco products regulation may require ordinance redrafting.
Rachel Carlson is an attorney with the League of Minnesota Cities. The League of
Minnesota Cities is a membership organization serving Minnesota cities since 1913.
LMC Codification is a specialized service to help our cities maintain complete, up to
date and affordable code books in a frequently changing legal landscape. The LMC
Codification blog can be found at: http://lmccodification.blogspot.com.