Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(close enough)
13.6 Summary
This chapter reviews interference and pulse tests, also known as multiple-
well testing. These types of tests can be used to obtain an adequate reservoir
description for homogeneous (both isotropic and anisotropic) and hetero-
geneous systems. Numerical solutions must be used to analyze pressure
transient data from heterogeneous reservoir systems. At the same time, it
is one of the most important and useful tests to understand the well behavior
in a water flood and EOR projects.
References
1. Kamal, M., and Brigham, W. E., "Pulse Testing Response for Unequal
Pulse and Shut-In Periods," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Oct. 1975), 399-410;
Trans. AIME 259.
2. Johnson, C. R., Greenhorn, R. A., and Woods, E. G., "Pulse Testing: A
New Method for Describing Reservoir Flow Properties Between Wells,"
/. Pet. Technol. (Dec. 1966), 1599-1604, Trans. AIME 237.
3. Earlougher, R. C, Jr., Advances in Well Test Analysis, Society of
Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, TX, 1977.
4. Falade, G. K., and Brigham, W. E., "The Dynamics of Vertical Pulse
Testing in a Slab reservoir," paper SPE 5055A presented at the SPE-
AIME 49th Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, Oct. 6-9, 1974.
5. Falade, G. K., and Brigham, W. E., "The Analysis of Single-Well Pulse
Tests in a Finite-Acting Slab Reservoir," paper SPE 5055B presented at
the SPE-AIME 49th Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, Oct. 6-9, 1974.
Additional Reading
1. Mueller, T. D., and Witherspoon, P. A., "Pressure Interference Effects
Within Reservoirs and Aquifers," /. Pet. Technol. (April 1965), AlX-Al A\
Trans. AIME 234.
2. Wattenbarger, R. A., and Ramey, H. J., "Well Test Interpretation of
Vertical Fractured Gas Wells," /. Pet. Technol. (May 1969), 625-632.
Chapter 14
Injection Well
Transient Testing
and Analysis
14.1 Introduction
This chapter presents pressure analysis techniques in injection wells. The
injectivity test and the fall-off tests are used to estimate the reservoir proper-
ties of injection wells in waterflood and tertiary recovery projects. The
knowledge of reservoir properties and near wellbore conditions in injection
wells is as important as in the producing wells. Injection well transient
testing and analysis are simple as long as the mobility ratio between the
injected and in-situ fluids is about unity and the radius of investigation is not
beyond the water (injected fluid) bank. Figure 14-1 shows types of tests,
limitations, and their uses.
Injectivity Test Pressure fall-off Tests Two Rate Test Step Rate Injectivity Test
Shut-in
Rate, q
Injecting
Injection time, t
Pressure, pw,
psig
Injection time, t
(14-1)
Figure 14-3. Water Injection well showing stimulation effects under steady-state
condition-Hall 1 .
(14-2)
(14-3)
Method of Analysis
end of
wellbore
storage effects
Unit slope
End of
wellbore
storage
effects
From these graphs, find the following using log-log type curve matching
techniques.
1. Injection time t where wellbore storage effects end. (Time at the
beginning of middle transient region MTRl.) Lower limits of usable
straight line should be checked by plotting log (pw/ pt) versus log
Bottom-hole pressure, p^, psig
Slope m=95
psig/cycle
Approximate end of
wellbore storage effects
time. The beginning of the straight line can be estimated by one of the
two methods:
(i) By the one and one half log cycle rule;
(ii) By the type curve overlay.
2. Injection time t where boundary effects appear. (Time at the end of
middle transient region, MTR2, where data begin to deviate from the
semilog straight line.)
Time Radius of
(hr) investigation rd (ft) Equation used Remarks
2.25 142.2 (Eq. 14-12) Wellbore storage effects end
6.00 232.3 (Eq. 14-12) Boundary effects appear
61.65 744.6 (Eq. 14-12) Near producing well
drainage radius
Interpreted data
Pressure response at 1 hr = 709 psig
Tubing pressure before injection = 175 psig
Slope, m, from Figure 14-6 = 95psig/cycle
Calculated parameters
Figures 14-4 and 14-6 are log-log and semilog plots for the test data
shown in Table 14-1. Figure 14-5 is a semilog data plot to justify using unit
mobility ratio concept. Total producing time, tp, is 7.0 hr. Using
A/? = lOOpsi and At = 0.2 hr (from the unit slope line), estimate wellbore
storage coefficient, C:
At the depth of 5002 ft, a casing radius is 0.95 ft, which is too large for a hole
of radius 0.25 ft. This clearly indicates the need for a check of the well
completion equipment and surface connecting lines. The current straight
lines in Figures 14-4 and 14-5 indicate m = 95psi/cycle and p\ hr 709 psi.
Estimate the following parameters.
Radius of investigation
Radius of drainage, rd = 250.9 ft (Table 14-1)
Distance to water bank, rwt 311.51 ft (Eq. 14-11)
Since r</ is less than rwt, it is justified to use unit-mobility ratio analysis.
Liquid Filled Unit Mobility Ratio Reservoirs
Method of Analysis
(1+-4)
(14-5)
(14-6)
To estimate the duration of wellbore storage effects, a plot of log (pw/ -pt)
versus log t may be used. The beginning of the semilog straight line can be
estimated by the following equation:
(14-7)
where
The values of At and Ap can be found from the unit-slope portion of log-log
plot. Once the semilog straight line is determined, reservoir permeability, k,
and skin factor are estimated using Eqs. 14-9 and 14-10:
(14-9)
(14-10)
Distance to water bank is calculated from the following equation: 5
(14-H)
where
rwb = drainage radius (distance to water bank), ft
Wi volume injected, res bbl
= Qinj x Av x injection time
/3W = water formation volume factor, rb/stk
The estimated permeability is used to determine a radius of drainage
from:2
/0.00084\kt , A. . . .c
r r
d ~ \ A ' d < ^(condition to justify
V Yl1OCt
unit mobility ratio analysis) (14-12)
The calculated value of r</ should be less than rwb to justify using the unit-
mobility ratio analysis. Pressure drop across the skin may be estimated from:
(14-13)
(14-14)