Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assumptions regarding gender roles do not just render women invisible in the
archaeological record, they dilute our understanding of past societies and the
enormous complexity of human achievement and activity.
Holly Norton
Friday 15 September 2017 06.21 EDTLast modified on Friday 15 September
2017 12.32 EDT
While the popular story has been about a female warrior, the real story that
underlies this study are the assumptions the researchers just blew out of the
water. Hedenstierna-Jonson et al. do not equivocate in their statements that,
for over a century, this individual was mis-identified as male because
archaeologists, acculturated in a western society with strictly defined gender
roles, view men alone as warriors, or soldiers, or wielders of violence. A
warrior, like warfare itself, is a cultural construct, practices and professions
created by human societies to fulfill specific desires. To assume uncritically
that men alone are warriors leads to a cascade of other assumptions about
human behaviors that renders our attempt to understand those behaviors
somewhat moot.
This is not a new problem in archaeology and anthropology. Our most basic
categorization of man the tool maker was challenged by feminist researchers
such as Joan Gero in the early 1990s. Geros argument then was that stone
tools, the most ubiquitous artifact in the archaeological record, were assumed
to be manufactured and used by males, even in contexts, such as house and
village sites, where the activities were assumed to be dominated by women.
Gero illustrated clearly and concisely that ethnographic and historic evidence
does not in fact support the man-the-tool maker hypothesis, and that other
aspects of our modern value system- our tendency to commodify labor, to
quantify energy and expenditure and therefore give those things higher
value- may in fact warp many of our research questions and a priori
conclusions.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/sep/15/how-the-female-viking-warrior-was-written-out-
of-history