SYLLABUS REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW YEAR 2017 REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW I (Covers Civil and Criminal Procedures) HENEDINO M. BRONDIAL CIVIL PROCEDURE I. JURISDICTION A. Meaning; Classes of Jurisdiction - jurisdiction according to its nature: original, appellate ~ jurisdiction according to its object; corresponding principles over the subject matter ver the persons of the parties over the “res” iv. over the issues v. over the territory B. Elements of Jurisdiction C. Jurisdiction of Regular Courts 1, Supreme Court 2.. Courts of Appeals 3. Regional Trial Court A. Intellectual Property Courts 4, Family Courts 5. Metropolitan Trial Courts Municipal Trial Courts in cities Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Courts 6. Sandiganbayan 7. Court of Tax-Appeals 8. Quasi-Courts “9. Sharia’h Courts: appellate, district, circuit References: Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 BP. Big. 129 RA 7691 RA 8369 (Family Courts Act) SC-AO No. 113-95- Intellectual Property Courts RA 9282 (CTA) RA 7975; 8249; 10660 (Sandiganbayan) . RA 9054 (Sharia’h courts) PRAY PY NeCases: Duero vs CA ~373 SCRA 11 Donato vs. Court of Appeals — 417 SCRA 216 Gonzaga vs CA - 394 SCRA 472 Escobal vs Garchitorena — 422 SCRA 45 Agan, Jr. vs Phil International Air Terminal, Co. Inc.- 420 SCRA 575 . Liga Ng Mga Barangay National vs Atienza, Jr. 420 SCRA 562 Manila Bankers Like Insurance Corp. vs. Ng Kok Wei — 418 SCRA 454 . Office of the Court Administrator vs. Sardillo — 401 SCRA 583 14, Katon vs. Palanca— 437 SCRA 565 15. Figueroa vs. People, 558 SCRA 63 16, Hannah Serana vs. Sandiganbayan, 653 SCRA (7/6/11) 17. Pat-og Sr. vs. Civil Service Commission, 765 SCRA (June, 2013) 18. Boston Equity Resources, Inc. vs. CA, 699 SCRA 19. People vs. Henry T. Go, March 25, 2014 20. City of Manila vs. Judge Cuerdo, February 4, 2014 2015 Supreme Court Decisions: 21. St. Mary Crusade Foundation, Inc. vs. Riel, 745 SCRA 73 22. Duncano vs. Sandiganbayan, 762 SCRA 663 23. CE Casecnan Water and Energy Co. Inc. ‘Vs. PROV. OF Nueva Ecija, 759 SCRA 180 24, Ferrer, Jr. vs. Bautista, 760 SCRA 652 25. Lomondot vs. Balindong, 762 SCRA 494 26. PCGG vs. Dumayas, 765 SCRA 524 27. Regulus Dev. Inc. vs. De la Cruz, 781 SCRA 607 (1/25/2016) PAI AVALNE I. RULES 1 to 5 A. Actions: Commencement (Sections 3 and 5, R-1) 1. Alday vs. FGU Insurance, 350 SCRA 2. Korea Technologies vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA 3. Mereado vs. CA, 569 SCRA 4. Proton Pilipinas vs. Banque Nationale de Paris, 460 SCRA 5. Ruby Shelter Builders vs. Formaran, 578 SCRA 283 6. St. Louis University vs. Cobarrubias, 626 SCRA 649 7. Gipa vs. Souther Luzon Institute, 726 SCRA, 6/18/2014 8. Reyes vs. People, 763 SCRA 226 (2015) B. One suit for one action (Sec. 3, R-2) Splitting a single cause of action (Sec. 4, R-2) Joinder of Causes of action (S-5. R-2) 1. Dynamic Builders vs. Prisbitero, 755 SCRA 90 (2015) C. Parties to Civil Actions (S-1, R-3) Joinder of Parties (S-6, 7, R-3) Indispensable and Necessary Parties (S-7,8, R-3) Class Suit (S-12, R-3) Death or Separation of a Party (S-16,17,18, R-3)Transfer of Interest (S-19, R3) Contractual Money Claims (S. 20, R-3) Cases on Parties: 1. Relucio vs. Lopez — 373 SCRA 578 2. De Castro vs CA 386 SCRA 301 3. Orquiola vs CA - 389 SCRA 461 4. China Banking Corp., vs Oliver - 390 SCRA 263 5. Lotte Phils. Co. Inc. vs. De la Cruz — 464 SCRA 591 6. Carabeo vs. Dingco, 647 SCRA 200 7. De la Cruz vs, Joaquin — 464 SCRA 576 8, Navarro vs. Escobido, 606 SCRA 1 9, Land Bank vs. Cacayuran, 757 SCRA 160 (2015) 10. Divinagracia vs. Parilla, 753 SCRA 87 (2015) D. Venue of Actions: real actions, personal actions Distinction between Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Pacific Consultants International Asia vs. Schonfeld, 516 SCRA 2. Biaco vs. Countryside Rural Bank — 515 SCRA 106 3. BPI Savings Bank vs. Sps. Yujuico, 763 SCRA 486 E. Summary Procedure vs. Small Claims suit; their basic characteristics RULES 6-9 A. Kinds of Pleadings (R-6) Complaint and Answer (S-3,4, R-6) Defenses: Negative and Affirmative (S-5, R-6) Counterclaims: Compulsory and Permissive (S-6, R-6) Reply (S-10, R-6) 1. Alba vs. Malapajo, 779 SCRA 534 (1/13/2016) 2. Lim Teck Chuan vs. Uy, 752 SCRA 268 3. Metrobank vs. CPR Promotions, 760 SCRA 59 4. 5 6. Valdez vs. Dabon, 775 SCRA 1 . Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 406 SCRA 190 . Caneland Sugar Corp. vs. Alon, 533 SCRA 28 B. Parts of a Pleading (R-7) Verification and Certification (S-4,5, R-7) 1, Alma Jose vs. Javellana, 664 SCRA 1 2. Medado vs. Heirs of Antonio Consuing, 665 SCRA 534 3. COA vs. Paler, 614 SCRA 4. Basan vs. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., 749 SCRA 541 5. Uy vs. CA, 770 SCRA 513- 6. Bandillon vs. LFUC, 770 SCRA 624 7. People vs. Arojado, 774 SCRA 193. C. Allegations in Pleadings (R-8) Actionable documents (S-6,7, R-8) Specific denial (S-10, R-8) 1, Femando Medical Enterprises Inc. vs. Wesleyan University, 778 SCRA 508, 1/20/2016 2. Go Tong Electrical Supply vs. BPI Family Savings Bank, 760 SCRA 486 3. Benquet Exploration Inc. vs CA- 351 SCRA 4.. Asian Const. & Dev. Corp. vs. CA - 458 SCRA D. Effect of Failure to Plead (R-9) Waiver of defenses and objections (S-1, R-9) Default (S-3, R-9) 1. Salvador vs. Rabaja, 749 SCRA 654 2. BDO vs. Tansipek, 593 SCRA 456 3. Bitte vs. Jonas, 777 SCRA 489 RULES 10-13 A. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (R-10) Kinds of Amendments (S-2,3,4,5, R-10) Supplemental Pleadings (S-6, R-10) B. Time/Period for Filing Responsive Pleadings (R-11) Answer (S-1,2,3,4,5, R-11) Reply (S-6, R-11) C. Bill of Particulars (R-12) D. Filing and Service of P and other papers (R-13) Distinction between Filing and Service (S-2, R-13) Filing: Manner, completeness, Proof (S-3,12, R-13) Service: Mode, Completeness, Proof (S-5,6,7,8,10,13, R-13) Priorites in Modes of Service (S-11, R-13) 1. Yujuico vs. United Resources Asset Met. Corp., 760 SCRA a Lisam Enterprises vs. Banco de Oro — 670 SCRA 310 3.. Tiu vs. Phil Bank of Communications, 596 SCRA 432 4, Remington Industrial Sales Corp. vs CA, 382 SCRA 499 5. Palileo vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 738 SCRA 6. Heirs of Numeriano Miranda vs. Miranda, 700 SCRA V. RULE 14 (Summons ) A. What is Summons (S-2,5) B. Who issues (S-1) C. Who serves (S-3,4) D. Kinds of Summonsa. Service in pergon (S-6) b. Substituted (S-7 ) : c. Extraterritorial (S-15): personal, publication, any mode E. On whom served a. On Corporations 1. public (S-13) 2. private ~~" @ domestic (S-11) (b) foreign (S-12) b. On natural persons 1. prisoners (S-9) 2. minors and incompetent (S-10) 3. unknown identity and whereabouts (S-14) 4, temporarily abroad (S-16) c. On entities without judicial personality (S-8, R-14) F. Proofs of Service (S-18,19) 1. Valmonte vs CA- 252 SCRA 2. Millenium Ind. & Com. Corp., vs Tan- 326 SCRA . EB. Villarosa vs. Benito — 312 SCRA . Mason vs. CA, 413 SCRA . Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA Manotoc vs. CA — 499 SCRA 21 . Dole Phil. Vs. Quilala — 557 SCRA 433 . Santos vs. PNOC, 566 SCRA 272 9. Fortune Life Insurance Co. vs. COA, 748 SCRA 286 9. Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRA42 (2/25/15) 10. Nation Petroleum Gas, Inc. Vs. RCBC, 766 SCRA 653 11. Green Star Express vs. Nissin Universal Robina Corp., 761 SCRA 528 12. Guy vs. Gacott, 779 SCRA 579 (Jan. 13, 2016) PIYAWAYW G. Voluntary Appearance (S-20) 1. Sunrise Garden Corp. vs. CA—771 SCRA 616 VI. RULES 15-19 ‘A. Motions (R-15) Definition (S-1,2,3) Requirements (S-4,5,6) Omnibus Motion (S-8) B. Motion to Dismiss (R-16) Grounds (S-1) Distinctions: 1. Jurisdiction over the person from over the subject. matter 2. Notice of Lis Pendens (S-14, R-13) from Litis Pendentia 3. Lack of cause of action from failure to state a cause of action4. Bar by prior judgment from conclusiveness of. ies 5. Prescription from laches Effect of Dismissal (S-5) C. Dismissal of Actions (R-17) Dismissal Upon Notice (S-1) Dismissal Upon Motion (S-2) Failure to Prosecute (S-3) D. Pre-Trial (R-18) - A.M. No. 03-1-09 Supreme Court effective August 16, 2004 (Guidelines to be observed by trial courts judges and clerks of court in the conduct of pre-trial and use of deposition-discovery measures) - . Failure to appear at the pre-trial (S-5) - Pre-Trial Brief (S-6) E. Intervention (R-19) Who may intervene (S-1) When to intervene (S-2) Cases: Acampado vs. Cosmilla, 771 SCRA 535 Laude vs. Gines-Jabalde, 775 SCRA 408 De Guzman Jr. vs. Ochoa, 648 SCRA 677 Office of the Ombudsman vs. Sison, 612 SCRA Anonuevo vs. Intestate Estate of Jalandoni, 636 SCRA Fernandez vs. CA, 691 SCRA 167 Rodriguez vs. CA, 698 SCRA 352 }. People vs. Perez, 397 SCRA Ching vs. Cheng, 737 SCRA 10.Yao vs. Perello, 414 SCRA 11 Pinlac vs. CA, 410 SCRA 12.Chipongian vs. Benitez-Lirio, 768 SCRA 204 13.Navy Officers Village Association vs. Republic, 764 SCRA Pen ayaynye VII. RULES 23 to 32 A. Modes of Discovery (R-23 to 29) 1:Depositions Pending Action (R-23) a. Use of depositions (S-4) b. Officers to take depositions (S-10, 11,12) c. Deposition upon written examination (S-15) d. Deposition upon written interrogatories (S-25) " e. Effects of errors and irregularities (S-29) 2. Depositions before Actions or Pending Appeal (R24) 3. Interrogatories to Parties (R-25) a. Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories (S-6) 4, Admission by Adverse Party (R-26) a. Effect to failure to file and serve request for admission (S-25)5. Production or Inspection of Documents or things (R-27) 6. Physical and Mental Examination (R-28) - Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery (R.29) B. Trial (R-30) Notice (S-1) Adjournments and Postponement (S-2,3,4) Order of Trial (S-5) C. Consolidation or Severance (R-31) Consolidation (S-1) Severance (S-2) D. Trial By Commissioner (R-23) Distinguish from trial with Assessors Cases: 1. Dasmarinas Garment’, Inc. vs. Reyes, 225 SCRA 622 (1993) 2. Go vs. People, 677 SCRA 213 3. Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos, 563 SCRA 499 4. Allied Agri-Business Development Co. Inc. vs. CA, 299 SCRA 680 5. People vs. Webb, 312 SCRA 573 6. Afulugencia vs. Metro Bank, 715 SCRA 399, February 5, 2014 7. Disini vs. Sandiganbayan, 623 SCRA 8. People vs. Bustamante, 697 SCRA 411 9. Metrobank vs. Sandoval, 691 SCRA 92 10. Republic vs. Heirs of Enrique Oribello, 692 SCRA 645 11. Marano vs. Pryce Gases Inc., 755 SCRA 20 12. Phil. Health Ins. Corp. vs.Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, 774 SCRA VII. RULES 33-36 A. Demurrer to Evidence (R-33) - Distinguish between civil and criminal actions 1. Republic vs. Gimenez, 778 SCRA 261, Jan. 1 1, 2016 2. Bemardo vs. CA, 278 SCRA 782 3. Radiowealth Finance Co. vs. Del Rosario, 335 SCRA 288 4, Cabador vs. People, 602 SCRA 760 5. Claudio vs. Saraza, 768 SCRA 356 . 6. Felipe vs. MGM Motor Trading Corporation, 771 SCRA 360 B. Judgment on the Pleadings (R-34) C. Summiary Judgment (R-35) 1. Republic vs. Shell Petroleum Corp., 777 SCRA 393 2. Comglas Corp. vs. Santos Car Check Center, 754 SCRA 481 3.. Phil Bank of Communications vs. Go, 642 SCRA 4. Adolfo vs. Adolfo, 753 SCRA 580 D. Entry of Judgments and Final Orders (R-36) ~ Several judgments (S-4) - Separate judgments (S-5)THE REMEDIES AGAINST FINAL JUDGMENTS, - . New Trial or Reconsideration (R-37) - Grounds for New Trial (S-1) - Grounds for Reconsideration (S-1) - Effects of a Grant or Denial (S-6,7,8) 1, Mendezona vs Ozamis — 376 SCRA 482 2. Chua vs. People, 762 SCRA 523 3. Padilla-Rumbaua vs. Rumbaua, 596 SCRA 15 4. Senit vs. People, 778 SCRA 425 (1/11/2016) 5. People vs. Li Ka Kim, 429 SCRA 169 X. RULES 40 to 45. A. Appeal from MTC to RTC (R-40) Perfection of Appeal (S-4) Docket Fees (S-5) Appeals from order of dismissal (S-8) B. Appeal from RTC to CA (R-41) Modes of Appeal (S-2) Notice of Appeal vs Record on Appeal (S-5,6) Perfection of Appeal (S-9) C. Petition for Review from RTC to CA (R-42) How appeal taken (S-1) Failure to comply with requirements (S-3) Perfection of Appeal (S-8) D. Appeals from CTA & QUA to CA (R-43) Contents of Petition (S-6) Action on Petition (S-8) Effect of Appeal (S-12) E. Ordinary Appealed Cases to the CA (R-44) ‘Appellants Brief (S-7) Appellees Brief (S-8) - F. Appeal by Certiorari (R-45) Contents of Petition (S-4) Requirements (S-7) Heirs of Arturo Garcia vs. Mun. of Iba, 763 SCRA 349 Estinozo vs. CA — 544 SCRA 422 . Heirs of Sps. Reterta vs. Sps. Mores, 655 SCRA 580 Manaloto vs. Veloso III, 632 SCRA Latorre vs. Latorre, 617 SCRA PSS rr f6. Alfredo vs. Borras, 404 SCRA 145 7. People vs. Corpuz, 412 SCRA 479 8. PAL vs. CA, 417 SCRA 196 9. Augusto vs. Rios, 417 SCRA 408 10.Escueta vs. Lim — 512 SCRA 411 11 Springfield Dev. Corp. vs. RTC Judge of Mis. Occ. - 514 SCRA 32600~CO 12. Yuk Lik Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRA 42 13.De Vera vs. Santiago, 759 SCRA 431 14.PNCC vs. Asiavest, 767 SCRA SCRA 458 15.Maravilla vs. Rios, 767 SCRA 522 THE REMEDIES AGAINST EXECUTORY JUDGMENTS XI. RULE 38 - Petition for Relief from Judgment (S-1) ~ Petition for Relief from Denial of Appeal (S-2) - Time for filing Petition (S-3) - Preliminary Injunction (S-5) 1. The Prov. Govt of Aurora vs. Marco, 757 SCRA 222 2. Thomasites Center for International Studies vs. Rodriguez, 782 SCRA 391 (Jan. 27; 2016) XII RULE 47 ~ Annulment of Judgment - Coverage. Grounds, Period (S-1,2,3) - Contents (S-4) - Effect (S-7) Cases: 1. Diona vs. Balanque, 688 SCRA 22 2. Santos vs, Santos, 737 SCRA 637 3. Lasala vs. National Food Authority, 767 SCRA 430. 4, Manguba vs. Morga-Seva, 775 SCRA 312 5. Sibal vs. Buquel, 778 SCRAS17 (1/11/16) XIII. RULE 39— EXECUTION AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENTS A. Kinds of Execution 1, Matter of right, ministerial (S-1) 2. Discretionary (S-2) a. stay of discretionary execution (S-3) b. Judgments not stayed by appeal (S-4) B. Mode of ExecutionC. Manner of Execution 1. when party is dead (S-7) 2. when judgment is for money (S-6) 3. when judgment is for specific act (S-10) 4. when it is a special judgment (S-11) D. Properties exempt from execution (S-13) E. Third Party Claim (S-16) F. Execution Sale (S-17 to 26) G. Redemption: 1. The right of redemption vs: equity of redemption 2. Who may redeem (S-27) 3. Effects of redemption (S-29) H. Other remedies to fully satisfy judgment 1. Examination of judgment obligor (S-36) 2. Examination of obligor of judgment-obligor (S-37) 3. Appointment of receiver (S-41) 4, Sale of ascertainable interest (S-42) L Judgment: principal vs surety (S-46) J. Effect of Judgment (S-47) 1. inrem 2. in personam 3. over judicata K. Effect of foreign judgment (S-48) Cases: Bafies vs Bafies — 374 SCRA 340 Fajardo vs. Quitalig, 400 SCRA 25 Santos vs. Commission on Elections, 399 SCRA 611 RCBC vs. Magwin Marketing Corp, 402 SCRA 592 . City of Higan vs. Principal Mngmt Gr., 407 SCRA 554 Villaruel vs. Fernando, 412 SCRA 54 Morta vs. Bagagnan, 415 SCRA 624 Serrano vs. CA, 417 SCRA 415 D’Armoured Sec. Agency vs. Orpia — 461 SCRA 312 10.Perez vs. CA — 464 SCRA 87 IL FEBTC vs. Toh Sr. — 404 SCRA 590 42.Panotes vs. Townhouse Dev. Corp. - 512 SCRA 269 13.Stronghold Insurance vs, Felix — 508 SCRA 357 14. Fujiki vs. Marinay, 700 SCRA 69. 15. RCBC vs. Serra, 701 SCRA 124 16. Heirs of Magdaleno Ypon vs. Ricaforte, 700 SCRA 778 17. City of Cebu vs. Dedamo, 689 SCRA 547 PRI AVA S XIV. RULES 48-56 Dismissal of Appeal (R-50) Grounds (S-1); “Material data” ruleCRIMINAL PROCEDURE ON [ON A. Supreme Court: 1. No original Jurisdiction over criminal cases 2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by petition for review b) by notice of appeal B. Court of Appeals 1. No original jurisdiction 2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by notice of appeal b) by petition for review C. Sandiganbayan 1. Original and exclusive jurisdiction under the ff. guidelines: a. what offense or crime was committed a) R.A. 3019 — Anti Graft and Corrupt Practices Act b) R.A. 1379 — the law on IIl-gotten Wealth ¢) Chap. Il, Title VII, Bk. 2 of RPC — Bribery d) Exec. Orders 1, 2, 14, 14-A —PCGG cases ¢) Estafa under the Hannah Serana case, 542 SCRA, 1/22/08 f) Falsification under the Garcia vs. Sandiganbayan case, 603 SCRA b. Who committed the offense/crime . b-1. Public officers in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government with salary grade 27 according to R.A. 6758 ‘The Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 Read: Escobal vs. Garchitorena, 422 SCRA b-2. Private individuals committing the offense/crime with public officers, Read: People vs. Henry T. Go, March 25, 2014 Ramiscal vs. Sandiganbayan, 630 SCRA People vs. Benipayo, 586 SCRA c. How was the offense/crime committed Read: Lacson vs. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA Sanchez vs. Demetriou, 227 SCRA Hannah Serana vs. Sandiganbayan, 542 SCRA 2. Appellate Jurisdiction Alll cases decided by the RTC in the exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction over cases of public officers with salary grade less than 27 Charged with offenses/crimes aforementioned D. Regional Trial Courts 1. Original exclusive: all criminal cases which are not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court. The offense must carry a penalty of more than six years or prision major 2. Appellate jurisdiction: all criminal cases from the MTC E. Family Courts (RA 8369) 1. Exclusive original: a. where a party is a minor at the time of commission b. ‘violence against women and children c. child abuse d. drug casesF. Metropolitan/Municipal Trial Court 1. All violations of city/municipal ordinances 2. All offenses punishable with imprisonment of not more than 6 years 3. Violations of traffic rules and regulations 4. Violations of the Bouncing Check Law 5. Darnage to property with fine of not more than P10,000.00 G. Courts of Muslim Mindanao (RA 6734 as amended by 9054) 1, Shari’ah Circuit courts 2. Shari’ah District courts 3. Shari’ah Appellate courts - All personal, family and property relations cases between muslims residing in the autonomous region of muslim mindanao H, What are military courts? Only service-oriented cases... Note: Read the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175) Read Disini Jr. vs. Secretary of Justice, Feb. 18, 2014, 716 SCRA RULE 110 — Prosecution of offenses A. Institution of Criminal Actions (Sec. 1) - how is criminal action instituted - when is it deemed instituted - who is qualified to institute it: a) by complaint, de parte b) by information, de oficio Read: Jimenez vs. Sorongon, 687 SCRA 151 B. Sufficiency of Complaint or Information (Sec. 6) ~ name of accused - name of offended party ~ name of offense - cause of accusation: qualifying and aggravating circumstances - place of commission - date of commission Read: People vs. Valdez, 663 SCRA 272 Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan; 675 SCRA 560 People vs. Soria, 685 SCRA 483 C. Amendment vs. Substitution (Sec. 14) - distinguish - compare with rule 10 D. Place where action is to be instituted (Sec. 15) - venue is jurisdictional in criminal cases Read: Union Bank vs. People, 667 SCRA 113 E. Intervention of the offended party (Sec. 16) - compare with rule 19RULE 111 — Prosecution of Civil Action A. Civil liability arising from the offense is deemed instituted (See. 1) - Exceptions: waiver, reservation, prior institution (WaRP) - on filing fees; counterclaim, cross-claim, 3" party complaint - compare with Secs. 7,8,11 of Rule 6 ~ peculiar nature of B.P. 22 Read: Solidum vs. People, 718 SCRA 263 Castillo vs. Salvador, July, 2014 B. Suspension of Civil Action (Sec. 2) - when suspended; consolidated - what is the Bar Rule in Amparo and Habeas Data Read: Lim vs. Kou Co Ping, 679 SCRA 114 C. Independent Civil Action (Sec. 3) ~ Articles 32,33,34 and 2176 Read: Casupanan vs. Laroya, 388 SCRA 28 D. Effect of death on the Civil Action (Sec. 4) ~ compare with Secs. 17, 18, an 20 of Rule 3 Read: People vs. Romero, 306 SCRA 90 E, Prejudicial Question (Secs. 6 and7) Read: Magistrado vs. People, 527 SCRA 125 Pimentel vs. Pimentel, 630 SCRA 436 J.M. Dominguez vs. Liclican, 764 SCRA 338 (7/28/15) RULE 112 — Preliminary Investigation A. Definition/Description - when a matter of right + distinguish from Preliminary Examination Read: Fenequito vs. Vergara, Jr., 677 SCRA 113 Burgundy Realty Corporation vs. Reyes, 687 SCRA 524 B. Who may conduct P. I. Read: Abanado vs. Bayona, 677 SCRA 595 Heirs of Nestor Tria vs. Obias, 635 SCRA 91 C. Procedure in Metro Manila vs. Outside Metro Manila Read: Uy vs. Javellana, 680 SCRA 13 D. Inquest, what is ~ when applied - waiver of Art. 125 of RPC Read: People vs. Valencia, 214 SCRA 89 E. Quantum of Evidence ~ probable cause vs. prima facie 1. PCGG vs. Navarro-Gutierrez, 773 SCRA 2. De Lima vs. Reyes,779 SCRA‘RULE 113 - Arrest A. Definition - how made; when; time, method = who may arrest B. Warrantless Arrests (Sec. 5) a. in flagrante delicto rule b. hot pursuit rule c. “escape” rule d. “absconding” rule (sec. 23, par. 2, rule 114 Procedure: delivery to the nearest police station/precinct Read: Saraum vs. People, 781 SCRA(1/25/16) Comerciante vs. People, 763 SCRA 587 Luz vs. People, 667 SCRA 421 Antiquera vs. People, 712 SCRA, 12/11/2013 People vs. Vasquez, 714 SCRA, 1/15/2014 Read: RA 7438 — The Rights of Persons Arrested RULE 114 - Bail A. Definition/Description B. Conditions/Requirements ~ effective upon approval and shall remain in force at all stages of the proceedings until promulgation of judgment by the RTC - when appearance is required C. When: - bail is a matter of right; a matter of discretion; - bail as a constitutional right D. Kinds: a. corporate surety ’. property bond ¢. cash bond 4. recognizance: is an obligation of record entered into before some court or magistrate duly authorized to take it, with the condition to do some particular act particularly the appearance of the accused for trial E. Amount of bail; guidelines F. Where to file bail - RTC; MTC exercising special jurisdiction G. Forfeiture vs. Cancellation of Bail - forfeiture: failure to appear; jumping bail - cancellation: death; conviction; acquittal; dismissal. Floresta vs. Ubiadas, 429 SCRA 270 Zuno vs. Cabebe, 444 SCRA 382 Govt of HK Spec. Adm. Region vs. Olalia, 521 SCRA . People vs. Sandiganbayan, 529 SCRA 764 Okabe vs. Gutierrez, 426 SCRA 685 5. Leviste vs. CA, 615 SCRA 619 7. Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, August 18, 2015 AWAWNE RULE 115 — Rights of the Accused ~ Distinguish the constitutional from statutory rights of the accused 1. Presumption of Innocence, Del Castillo vs. People, 664 SCRA 2. Right to be Heard, Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan, 675 SCRA 3. Right to Counsel, People vs. Lara, 678 SCRA;Sanico vs People, 754 4. Right Against Self-Incrimination, People vs. Ayson, 175 SCRA 216 5. Right to Speedy, Impartial and Public Trial, Villaruel vs. People 664 SCRA RULE 116 - Arraignment and Plea A. What is arraignment How; When, Where, Why B. Kinds of Plea: (2) conditional (b) unconditional (c) negative/indirect (refusal to plead) (d) inverted (pleads guilty with exculpatory evidence) (©) improvident plea (not knowing fully well) C. Plea of guilty to a capital offense vs. non-capital offense - requirements D. Presentation or Inspection of evidence in prosecution’s possession ~ modes of discovery (Rules 23-29) E, Suspension of arraignment a) when suffering from unsound mental condition ) prejudicial question ©) petition for review 4) absence of judicial personnel Read: 1. People vs. Estomaca~ 256 SCRA 421 2. People vs. Pangilinan — $18 SCRA 359 3. Daan vs. Sandiganbayan — 560 SCRA 233 4. People vs. Janjalani -639 SCRA 157 5. ABS-CBN Corp. vs. Gozon, 753 SCRA IF. Bill of Particulars Read: Enrile vs. People 766 SCRA 1, (8711/15) RULE 117 Motion to Quash A. Motion to Quash vs. Motion to Dismiss; Grounds B. When and How to move to quash C. Effects when motion is granted; denied D. Remedies against denial/grant of motion Read: 1. People vs. Lacson — 400 SCRA 267 2. Panaguiton vs. DOJ-571 SCRA 549 3. People vs. Dumlao — 580 SCRA 409 4. Soriano vs. People— 591 SCRA 244 5. Cerezo vs. People — 650 SCRA 222 6. Co. vs. New Prosperity Plastic Products, 727 SCRA 503 7. People vs. De Leon, 754 SCRA 147 RULE 118 Pre-Trial A. Pre-trial in civil cases vs. Pre-trial in criminal cases: Distinguish B, Non appearance at the pre-trial; effects C. The Pre-trial Order; when and how done; effect of lack of Order RULE 119 Trial A. The Speedy Trial Act/RA 8493 - the time requirement - exclusions - remedies B. Order of Trial - civil vs. criminal cases . C. Modes of Discovery in criminal cases D. The “State-Witness” rule; requirements E. Mistake in charging the proper offenses; effects F. Demurrer to Evidence G. Reopening vs. New Trial Read: 1. Salvanera vs. People ~ 523 SCRA 147 2. Vda de Manguerra vs. Risos — 563 SCRA 471 3. Jimenez vs. People, Sept. 17, 2014 4. People vs. De Grano— 588 SCRA 5505. Asistio vs. People, April 20, 2015 6. Cabador vs. People ~ 602 SCRA 760 7. People vs. Tan — 625 SCRA 388 8. Imperial vs. Joson— 635 SCRA 71 9. People vs. Sandiganbayan — 645 SCRA 726 10, Bangayan, Jr. vs. Bangayan — 659 SCRA 11. People vs. Jose Go, August 6, 2014 12. People vs. Pepino, 779 SCRA 170 RULE 120 - JUDGMENT 1, Nature of judgment in criminal cases vs. civil cases 2. Judgment of conviction vs. judgment of acquittal 3. Judgment for two or more offenses; accused 4. Promulgation, modification and entry of judgment Cases: 1. Llamas vs. CA — 601 SCRA 288 2. People vs. Monteclaros — 589 SCRA 320 3. Hipos Sr. vs. Bay — 581 SCRA 674 4. People vs. Lorenzo 619 SCRA 389 5. People vs. Baron— 621 SCRA 646 6. Abellana vs. People — 655 SCRA 683 7. People vs. Asis — 629 SCRA 250 8. Basilonia vs. Villaruz, 765 SCRA 489 9. Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA207 Rule 121 —- NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERA‘ ION 1. In civil cases vs. criminal cases. 2. Grounds; effect Cases: 1. Estino vs. People — 584 SCRA 304 2. Briones vs. People’ 588 SCRA 345 3. Saludaga vs. Sandiganbayan — 619 SCRA 364 4, Lumanog vs. People — 642 SCRA 248 5. Payumo vs.Sandiganbayan— 654 SCRA 277 Rules 122-125 - APPEALS 1. Appeals in Civil cases vs. appeals in criminal! cases 2. Similarities and differences. Cases: 4. Macapagal vs. People, 717 SCRA 425, 2/26/14 2. People vs. Morales — 616 SCRA 223 2. Quidet vs. People— 618 SCRA 1 3. Balaba vs. People — 593 SCRA 210 4. People vs. Olivo — 594 SCRA 77 5. Guasch vs. Dela Cruz — 589 SCRA 297 6. People vs. Taruc — 579 SCRA 682 7. Tiu vs. People — 586 SCRA 118 8 Colinares vs. People — 662 SCRA 266 (probation law) 9. Villareal vs. People, 743 SCRA 10, Dungo vs. People, 761 SCRA 375 11. Manansala vs. People, 777 SCRA 563 Rule 126-SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1. The constitutional provision on searches and seizures 2. Search Warrant vs. Warrant of Arrest 3, When searcties and seizures allowed without warrants 4. Motion to Quash Cases: 1. Miclat vs. People — 656 SCRA 539 2. People vs. Mariacos — 621 SCRA 327 3. People vs. Tuan — 628 SCRA 226 4. Esquillo vs. People — 629 SCRA 370 5. “The constitutional Validity of Warrantless Search And Seizures of Prohibited Drugs and Eventual Arrest” 610 SCRA 670 6. Marimla vs. People, 604 SCRA 57 (10/16/2009) 7. People vs. Punzalan, 774 SCRA 653 127 — PROVISIONAL REMEDIES 1, Relate to Rules 57-61 2. What provisional remedies are not applicable in criminal cases