Professional Documents
Culture Documents
solution
Cun Zhou, Fei Sun, and Xuzhao Liu
Abstract. The effects of cooling rate and pH on the potassium dihydrogen phosphate crystallization process were studied
by means of batch crystallization process. The experiment shows that with the increase of cooling rate, the metastable
zone width increase and the induction period decrease. When the pH is 3.0, the metastable zone width and induction
period are both the minimum, while the crystallization rate is the highest. The crystallization products were characterized
by scanning election microscope. Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate (KDP) is a kind of excellent nonlinear optical
materials, and belongs to tetragonal system, and ideal shape is aggregate of tetragonal prism and tetragonal dipyramid,
the (100) cone is alternating accumulation by double positive ions and double negative ions [1-4]. The crystals of
aqueous solution method to grow have large electro-optical nonlinear coefficient and high loser-damaged threshold, and
it is the only nonlinear optical crystal could be used in inertial confinement fusion (ICF), KDP crystals are the ideal
system to study the native defects of complex oxide insulating material [5-7]. With the development of photovoltaic
technology, KDP crystals growth and performance have become a research focus worldwide [8, 9]. The merits of the
crystallization process directly affect the quality of KDP products, so the study of the effect of crystallization conditions
has an important significance on industrial production. This paper studied the change rule of metastable zone width,
induction period, crystallization rate and particle size distribution in crystal process, and discussed the technical condition
of KDP crystallization.
Key words: Metastable zone width; Induction period; Crystallization rate; Particle size distribution; Crystal form.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
The saturated solution of KDP of 60 were added to beaker, and putting beaker in cooling tank, made the
solution keep the temperature for 10 min, which is above the saturation temperature 5, and then made the solution
constant speed cooling. Read the temperature of the first batch crystal nucleus appeared, the temperature difference
between the saturation temperature and the nucleation temperature is metastable zone width [10]. By changing
different factors such as cooling rate, pH value can be observed the impact on the metastable stability zone width.
In 400 ml beaker, preparation the KDP saturated solution of 60 saturated solution, under certain agitation rate,
cooling rate, made the solution cooling crystallization, when the temperature of solution was 30 [10], standing 10
020003-1
min then suction filtration, the filter cake washed by anhydrous ethanol, then put in the oven to drying, crystal
particle size determined by the norm sample sieve.
According to the following formula (1) calculate the average particle size of KDP [11].
L LV i i (1)
L
In the formula The average particle size (m), Li-The average particle size of each scale range (m), Vi-The
mass fraction of each scale range (%).
The Effect of Cooling Rate on Metastable Zone Width and Induction Period
The effect of cooling rate on the metastable zone width and induction period shown in figure 1, with the increase
of cooling rate, the metastable zone width increases and the induction period become shorter. This is because the
production of crystal nucleus needs fixed induction period. When a certain degree of supersaturation is formed in
solution, the time of crystal is detected include induction period and the time of crystal growth to the particle size
which can be detected. During this period, the solution is still cool down at a certain speed, the more the cooling rate,
the greater the drop in temperature of detect the crystal nucleus. So the metastable zone width increased.
Induction period/min
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Cooling rate/(/min)
FIGURE 1. The influence of cooling rate on the metastable zone width and induction period
020003-2
The Effect of Cooling Rate on Crystallization Rate
Figure 2 shows the influence of cooling rate on the crystallization rate, with the increase of cooling rate, the
crystallization rate of KDP gradually increase. This is due to the greater the cooling rate, the higher the falling
temperature of unit time, also making the temperature difference increase, the degree of supersaturation increase, the
crystallization rate increase. On the one hand, with the degree of supercooling increase, the crystal growth rate also
increase, on the other hand, the viscosity of the solution improvement, limits the motility of solute molecules,
making growth speed decrease. Therefore, the acceleration of cooling rate has a dual effect on KDP crystallization
rate. With the increasing of cooling rate, the degree of supersaturation of the solution increases, the heat of solution
need to disperse quickly, so that formation rate of crystal nucleus sharp increase, crystallization rate is increase.
Because generate fine granular crystals are more suited to this purpose than coarse granular crystals.
1.2
Crystallization rate/(g/min)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Cooling rate/(/min)
The effect of the cooling rate on particle size distribution shows in table 1. With the increase of cooling rate, the
average particle size decrease. At the different cooling rate, crystal particle sizes are mainly distributed in 30-40
mesh. The mass fractions of the main particle gradually decrease with the increase of cooling rate. By the previous
experiment indicated, with the increase of cooling rate, the metastable zone width gradually increase, the degree of
supersaturation and the degree of supersaturation ratio also increase [12]. Form the nucleation rate formula (2), with
the increase of degree of supersaturation, the crystal nucleation rate increased, this means that the increase of the
number of crystal nucleus, making the average particle size were decrease. At the same time, the need of the crystal
heat removal is faster with the increase of cooling rate, so the crystallization process are more likely to produce fine
grained crystals instead of coarse crystals.
16 Esa3 Vm2 N a
B0 Z C exp 2 3 (2)
3vRT lnS2
0 Esa
In the formula: Sthe degree of supersaturation ratio; B nucleation rate, mesh/cm3s;
7 2 Vm Na
Apparent interfacial energy, 10 J / cm ; molar volumes; Avogadro constant; VNumber of
each molecular ions of the solute; Rgas constant.
020003-3
TABLE 1. The influence of cooling rate on the particle size distribution of KDP
Cooling rate/(/min) Main particle/Mesh Mass fraction/% The average particle/m Macro crystal form
0.3 30-40 70.56 525.28 Prismatic form
0.4 30-40 61.47 490.47 Prismatic form
0.5 30-40 57.18 460.35 Prismatic form
0.6 30-40 50.26 428.79 Prismatic form
0.7 30-40 45.28 412.65 Prismatic form
0.8 50-60 40.98 392.76 Prismatic form
Figure 3 panels a-c are the representative FE-SEM micrographs of KDP crystallization products obtained at
different cooling rate. Observation of FE-SEM reveals that the crystal form of KDP is an aggregate of tetragonal
prism and tetragonal dipyramid, and the crystal form and length-diameter ratio almost remained unchanged, the
length-diameter ratio is about 1.With the increase of cooling rate, the crystal would gather to form vug.
FIGURE 3. FE-SEM images of KDP in different cooling ratea. 0.3/min, b. 0.5/min, c. 0.7/min
020003-4
50 50
45 45
Metastable zone width
Induction period/min
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
1 2 3 4 5
pH value
FIGURE 4. The influence of pH value on the metastable zone width and induction period
By figure 5 can be seen that with the increase of pH value, the crystallization rate firstly increase and then
decrease; when the pH value is 3.0, the crystallization rate was maximum. Because the percentage of is
biggest in this moment, crystal particle density is the largest, the mean free path of adsorption particle is the shortest,
so the number of spread to the crystallization of glass particle more than other pH value in unit time, the
crystallization rate is the largest. When pH value is less than (more than) 3.0, with the decrease (increase) of pH
value, the crystallization rate decreases, the same as the metastable zone width and induction period, this is due to
the degree of supersaturation decrease, making crystallization rate decrease[14].
1.4
1.2
Crystallization rate/(g/min)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1 2 3 4 5
pH value
The effect of particle size distribution on pH value shown in table 2,when the pH was 1.0, the average particle
size is minimum, and the main particle in 50 to 60 mesh, with the increase of pH value, the average particle size
increases gradually, the quality of the main particle gradually increased.
020003-5
TABLE 2. The influence of pH value on the particle size distribution of KDP
The average
pH value Main particle/Mesh Mass fraction/% Macro crystal form
particle/m
1.0 50-60 42.37 326.79 Prismatic form
2.0 50-60 46.85 361.18 Prismatic form
3.0 40-50 52.93 412.65 Prismatic form
4.0 40-50 55.43 430.57 Prismatic form
5.0 30-40 58.21 455.27 Prismatic form
Figure 6 panels a-c show FE-SEM micrographs of KDP crystallization products obtained at different pH value.
Fig.6a is the representation FE-SEM image of the pH value is 1.0, crystal form is double cone and the length-
diameter ratio less than 1; Fig.6b is the representation FE-SEM image of the pH value is 3.0, the crystal form is a
aggregate of tetragonal prism and tetragonal dipyramid, the length-diameter ratio is about 2, and the crystals have
better dispersity and nearly no vug. Fig.6c is the representation FE-SEM image of the pH value is 5.0, as shown, the
liquidity of crystal particles are not good, it is difficult to disperse, the cluster of particle is obvious.
FIGURE 6. FE-SEM images of KDP in different pH value (a. pH=1.0, b. pH= 3.0, c. pH=5.0)
CONCLUSION
With the increase of cooling rate, the metastable zone width increase, the induction period and average particle
decrease; the change of cooling rate did not change the crystal form and length-diameter ratio of KDP, But with the
increase of cooling rate, Crystals can form vug. When the cooling rate is 0.3/min, the average particle size of
crystal biggest. When the pH is 3, the metastable zone width and induction rate is minimize, the crystallization rate
is maximum. The average particle size is increase with the increase of pH value. PH change has no impact on the
crystal form of KDP, but when the pH value is 3.0, the length-diameter radio is biggest. Comprehensive the above
consideration, in the process of KDP crystallization, control the agitation rate is 200 r/min, the cooling rate is 0.3
/ min, the pH value of the solution is 3.0, the above conditions are meet, making the KDP crystal particles are larger
and can effectively prevent the vug.
REFERENCES
1. Wang Kunpeng, Fang Changshui, Zhang Jianxiu. Research progress of KDP (KD*P) crystal structure [J].
Journal of synthetic crystals, 2004; 33(2): 262-265.
2. Bao Zeyao. Kinetic simulation of single crystal growth [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of technology, 2008: 29-
31.
3. Fu Youjun, Gao Zhangshou, Li Yiping, et al. Effects of anions on the growth habit of KDP crystals [J].Journal
of Inorganic Materials, 2000; 15 (3): 409-415.
4. Shengjun Zhu, Shenglai Wang, Jianxu Ding,et al. Rapid growth and optical studies of KDP crystals with
organic additives [J]. Journal of crystal growth. 402 (2014) 48-52.
5. I. Pritula, A. Kosinova, M. Kolybayeva, et al. Optical, structural and microhardness properties of KDP crystals
grown from urea-doped solutions [J]. Materials Research Bulletion. 43 (2008) 2778-2789.
020003-6
6. Wang Bo, Xu Xinguang, Wang Shenglai. Rapid growth of large scale KDP single crystal [J]. Journal of
synthetic crystals, 2003; 37(4): 1042-1043.
7. Congting Sun, Dongfeng Xue. Crystallization behaviors of KDP and ADP [J]. Optical materials, 36
(2014)1966-1969.
8. Campbell J H, Hawley Fedder R A, Stolz C J, etal. NIF optical materials fabrication technologies: An
overview [C]//Proc of SPIE. 2004, 5341: 84-101.
9. Zhang Kecong, Wang Ximin. Nonlinear optical crystal materials science [M]. 2nd edition. Beijing: Science
press, 1996: 93-102.
10. Tang Aili. Study on crystal growth behavior [D]. Guangzhou: South China University of technology, 2014: 43-
50.
11. Hu Xiuying. Study on crystallization process of potassium dihydrogen phosphate [D]. Chengdu: Sichuan
University, 2014: 17-22.
12. Zhang Xiaoguang. Research of crystallization process of sodium dihydrogen phosphate [J]. IM&P, 2013, (1):
13-16.
13. Zhong Degao, Teng Bing, Zhang Guohui. Influence of pH on solubility and solution stability of KDP crystal
[J]. Journal of Synthetic Crystals, 2006, 35(6): 1119-1213.
14. Cheng Min, Li Mingwei, Fu Dong. KDP crystal growth in differing pH value [J]. Journal of Chongqing
University, 2008, 31(7): 809-814.
020003-7