Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investment Decisions
Most important of the three decisions functions.
Determine the total amount of assets needed to be held by the firm.
Assets that can no longer be economically justified may need to be reduced, eliminated or replaced.
What is the optimal firm size?
What specific assets should be acquired?
What assets (if any) should be reduced or eliminated?
Financing Decisions
Determine how the assets (LHS of balance sheet) will be financed (RHS of balance sheet).
Have large amount of debt or debt free.
Dividend payout ratio:
annual cash dividends divided by annual earnings
dividend per share divided by earning per share.
What is the best type of financing?
What is the best financing mix?
What is the best dividend policy?
How will the funds be physically acquired?
Profit Maximization
Maximizing a firms earnings after taxes.
Problems
Could increase current profits while harming firm (e.g., defer maintenance, issue common stock to buy T-bills,
etc.).
May result in a decrease in earning per share
Ignores changes in the risk level of the firm.
Takes account of: current and future profits and EPS; the timing, duration, and risk of profits and EPS; dividend
policy; and all other relevant factors.
Thus, share price serves as a barometer for business performance.
Role of Management
Agency Theory
Jensen and Meckling developed a theory of the firm based on agency arrangement known as the agency theory.
According to the Agency Theory the agents will make optimal decisions if appropriate incentives are given and
only if agents are monitored.
Principals must provide incentives so that management acts in the principals best interests and then monitor results.
Incentives include stock options, perquisites, and bonuses.
Monitoring involves auditing financial statements, reviewing management perquisites and limit management
decisions.
Social Responsibility
Wealth maximization does not preclude the firm from being socially responsible, such as protecting the
customer, paying fair wages to employees, fair hiring practices, safe working conditions, and becoming involved
in environmental issues like clean air and water.
Consider the interests of stakeholders other than shareholders.
Organizational Stakeholders
Debt vs Equity
Financial markets are split into debt and equity markets.
Debt titles are the most commonly traded security. In these arrangements, the issuer of the
title (borrower) earns some initial amount of money (such as the price of a bond) and the
holder (lender) subsequently receives a fixed amount of payments over a specified period of
time, known as the maturity of a debt title.
Debt titles can be issued on short term (maturity < 1 yr.), long term (maturity >10 yrs.) and
intermediate terms (1 yr. < maturity < 10 yrs.).
The holder of a debt title does not achieve ownership of the borrowers enterprise.
Common debt titles are bonds or mortgages.
Equity titles are somewhat different from bonds. The most common equity title is (common)
stock.
First and foremost, an equity instruments makes its buyer (lender) an owner of the borrowers
enterprise.
Formally this entitles the holder of an equity instrument to earn a share of the borrowers
enterprises income, but only some firms actually pay (more or less) periodic payments to
their equity holders known as dividends. Often these titles, thus, are held primarily to be sold
and resold.
Equity titles do not expire and their maturity is, thus, infinite. Hence they are considered long
term securities.
Liquidity
The existence of financial markets enables the owners of assets to buy and resell these assets.
Generally this leads to an increase in the liquidity of these financial instruments
Efficiency
The facilitation of financial transactions through financial markets lead to a decrease in
informational cost and transaction costs, which from an economic point of view leads to an
increase in efficiency.
Financial intermediaries are firms that collect the funds from lenders and channel those funds
to borrowers (Mishkin)
Financial intermediaries are firms whose primary business is to provide customers with
financial products and services that can not be obtained more efficiently by transacting
directly in securities markets (Z.Bodie &Merton)
Any classification of financial institutions is ultimately somewhat arbitrary, since financial
markets are subject to high dynamics and frequent innovation. Thus, we roughly use four
categories:
Brokers
Dealers
Investment banks
Financial intermediaries
Brokers are agents who match buyers with sellers for a desired transaction.
A broker does not take position in the assets she/he trades (i.e. does not maintain inventories
of those assets)
Brokers charge commissions on buyers and/or sellers using their services
Examples: Real estate brokers, stock brokers
Like brokers, dealers match sellers and buyers of financial assets.
Dealers, however, take position in their assets, their trading.
As opposed to charging commission, dealers obtain their profits from buying assets at low
prices and selling them at high prices.
A dealers profit margin, the so-called bid-ask spread is the difference between the price at
which a dealer offers to sell an asset (the asked price) and the price at which a dealer offers to
buy an asset (the bid price)
Examples: Dealers in U.S. government bonds, Nasdaq stock dealers
Investment Banks
Investment banks assist in the initial sale of newly issued securities (e.g. IPOs)
Investment banks are involved in a variety of services for their customers, such as advice,
sales assistance and underwriting of issuances
Examples: Morgan-Stanley, Goldman Sachs, ...Lehman Brothers ..(Before Crisis 2008)
Financial Intermediaries
Financial intermediaries match sellers and buyers indirectly through the process of financial
asset transformation.
As opposed to three above mentioned institutions. they buy a specific kind of asset from
borrowers usually a long term loan contract and sell a different financial asset to savers
usually some sort of highly-liquid short-run claim.
Although securities markets receive a lot of media attention, financial intermediaries are still
the primary source of funding for businesses.
Even in the United States and Canada, enterprises tend to obtain funds through financial
intermediaries rather than through securities markets.
Other than historic reasons, this prevalence results from a variety of factors.
Depository institutions accept deposits from savers and transform them into loans
(Commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks and credit
unions)
Contractual savings institutions acquire funds at periodic intervals on a contractual
basis (insurance and pension funds)
Investment intermediaries serve different forms of finance. They include finance
companies, mutual funds and money market mutual funds.
FINANCIAL REGULATION
Why regulate financial markets?
Financial markets are among the most regulated markets in modern economies.
The first reason for this extensive regulation is to increase the information available to
investors (and, thus, to protect them).
The second reason is to ensure the soundness of the financial system.
1. Increasing information available to investors
As mentioned above, asymmetric information can cause severe problems in financial markets
(Risk behavior, insider trades,....)
Certain regulations are supposed to prohibit agents with superior information from exploiting
less informed agents.
In the U.S. the stock-market crash of 1929 led to the establishment of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), which requires companies involved in the issuance of securities to
disclose certain information relevant to their stockholders. The SEC further prohibits insider
trades
Limits to Competition
An argument of politics rather than economics is that overly hard competition in the
banking sector increases the risk of bank failure. This belief has (especially in the past)
led to some restrictions in the commercial banking sectors
In the U.S. private banks e.g. were prohibited to open branches in different states
The empirical evidence for the benefits of limiting competition is weak and from an
economic point of view it appears more as an obstacle to risk diversification rather than
a useful regulation