TECHNIC OF COSCO SHIPPING HEAVY INDUSTRY

2 2017 9 2

37

0411-39229439


TECHNIC OF COSCO SHIPPING 1

HEAVY INDUSTRY
6
Suzemax
,, 8

13

22000DWT
Vol.1 No.2 2017 9 , 15

19

24

28

, , 32

()

 2 2017.9

( 116600)
LR
1A

[1]

[1]

1
168 m 36 m 12 m 6.5 m
[2]
10 m LR 1A
[3]
C

2
2.1
[4]

1

1
1
 2 2017.9

2.2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

3
2

2
1)
2)
10

10
3)



4)
2
 2 2017.9

5) 3

4
4.1

[5]
1
A
2
4

4
3
a) 30 m
760 mm
b)

c) / 10%

3
 2 2017.9

d) 5

5
e)

f)



4.2
4
1)


2)

3) 4.1
6

6
4)

4.3
4
 2 2017.9

1)

2) SOLAS II-2 1.25

3) SOLAS III



MaxETR
4) GNSS

5)
a) /
b) 121.5 MHz 123.1 MHz
c) TMAS

[1] . [J]. , 2016, 45(2): 37-39.

[2] LR. Provisional Rules for the Winterization of Ships[S]. 2015.
[3] . [S]. 2016.
[4] IMO. International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters[S]. 2015.
[5] . 8 23 [S]. 2016.

5
 2 2017.9

( 116600)

1
CAD

CAD

CAD
6
 2 2017.9

[1].[J].,2015(27)
[2],,.[J].,2015(17)
[3],,.AutoCAD [J].,2014(02)
[4].[J].,2014(05)
[5].[J].,2011(03)
[6],.[J].,2009(05)

7
 2 2017.9

Suzemax
,,
( 116600)
Suzemax
Suzemax

Suzemax
2

Suzemax DNV-GL COMF-C(3)V(3)

C(3)V(3)

8
 2 2017.9

1 Suzemax

2


1
1

5.64HZ 2
6.68HZ 3
7.85HZ 4
9.47HZ 5

2 5.64HZ

9
 2 2017.9

3 6.68HZ

4 7.85HZ

5 9.47HZ

3
Suzemax 6 NCR 83rpm 4
6
2

10
 2 2017.9

2
(%)
5.64HZ 8.3HZ 6 32%
5.53HZ 1.9%
11.06HZ 46.6%
6.68HZ 8.3HZ 6 19.5%
5.53HZ 20.8%
11.06HZ 39.6%
7.85HZ 8.3HZ 6 5.4%
5.53HZ 41.9%
11.06HZ 29.0%
9.47HZ 8.3HZ 6 14.1%
5.53HZ 71.2%
11.06HZ 14.4%

1000Pa, 2000Pa

4
Suzemax
1)
2) Y
3) X
4
NCR 83rpm 6 4
77rpm78rpm80rpm 83rpm
83rpm
78rpm 6 7.8HZ

11
 2 2017.9

77RPMX 78RPMX
3.00E+00 5.00E+00
2.50E+00

mm/s
mm/s
4.00E+00
2.00E+00 3.00E+00
1.50E+00
1.00E+00 2.00E+00
5.00E01 1.00E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00

HZ HZ

80RPMX 83RPMX
3.50E+00 3.50E+00
3.00E+00 3.00E+00
mm/s

mm/s
2.50E+00 2.50E+00
2.00E+00 2.00E+00
1.50E+00 1.50E+00
1.00E+00 1.00E+00
5.00E01 5.00E01
0.00E+00 0.00E+00

HZ HZ

6 4

5

6

12
 2 2017.9

116600

2
2.1

[1]

2.2

13
 2 2017.9

10MHz
[2]

2.3

[1]
EMI EMI
EMI

EMI
EMI

[1],.[J].,2012,(3):30-34.
[2],,.[J].,2010,(3):24-26+23.
[3].[J].,2015,(10):187-188+193.

14
 2 2017.9

22000DWT
,

, 116113
:22000DWTNK20172

0
22000DWT ,,
, ,,

1
22000DWT 155 36 11 708 ,
NK




SXD-MAN 7L32/40 SXD-MAN 8L16/24 GARIONI
VAVAL TH6000+2TH/EG, SCHOTTEL-119497/119498 461
TAIKO CSE-1500J

2
2.1
22000DW ,,
22000DWT ()

S E

29 565mm 2.5m
1007mm O

700KW 300KW

13 360
30mm ,
360
2.2
22000DWT GARIONI VAVAL 2 2
15
 2 2017.9

9167mm 2400mm 3787mm 1540mm

A B
2 2

2.3

1)

2)
a)
b)
c) 100
d)

3)
a)
b)
c)
d)
2
e)
f)
g)

4)

a) 15m30m

b)
c)
5) OCIMF
a)
b)
c) USCG

2.4
1)
2)
3)


a) 0.021MPa,
2m,30m/s
16
 2 2017.9

b) ,2m/s,2m

c) 0.007MPa1.5m
2.5
2.5.1
20000 60

2.5.2
1)
2) 8%
3)
4)
2.5.3
1)


2) ,
a) 25
b) SO2SO3), 90%95%
c) 90%
3)

4) /
5)
a)
25%
b) 50%
100% 50% 100%
2.5.4
4%5%
2.5.5
1)
2)

3)
a)
b)
4)
5)
6)

7)
17
 2 2017.9

8)
9)

10)

11)
12) 3
13)

3
22000DWT

22000DWT

18
 2 2017.9

116000
RANS k-
CFD Star CCM+

0
EEDI

[1]
Blendermann
[2]
OCIMF
[3]
/Isherwood
[4]
50
5
[5]

[6]

[7]
CFD CFD

[8]
CFD Navier-Strokes N-S
[9]
N-S N-S RANS

CFD

Star CCM+

1
1 3-8
10-20 5m/s10m/s15m/s20m/s
25m/s30m/s
5m 9m h=7m
4h 15h 3h
Star CCM+

3~5
1/4

19
 2 2017.9

900
890
880

Drag Force (N)

870
860
850
840
830
820
810
800
7 25 42 55 91

1 2 5m/s
5m/s 2
55 3

F 12 C SV C S V

4
CFD
35000

30000
25000
Drag Force (N)

20000

15000

10000

5000

-5000
5 10 15 20 25 30
Velocity (m/s)

4 5 5m/s
4

5

5m/s 48N
1983.3N 30m/s 30396.1N 4

[10]

1m 6

20
 2 2017.9

6 1 7 5m/s 1
5m/s 7

8 9 1

8 5m/s 9 5m/s 1
35000
40000
1 1
30000 35000
1
Drag Force (N)

25000 30000
Drag Force (N)

20000 25000

15000 20000

15000
10000
10000
5000
5000
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 0
5 10 15 20 25 30
5000 Velocity (m/s) Velocity (m/s)

10 1 11 1
10
23% 37%
8.5 16% 11
1
12 1

13

12 1 13 2
21
 2 2017.9

2 1 14 15
2 1
55.5%
5m/s 5.9% 15m/s
1 2
25000 60
2 2

1
1
50
2
Drag Force (N)

20000

40
15000
30

10000
20

5000 10

0
5 10 15 20 25 30
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Velocity (m/s) -10 Velocity (m/s)

14 1 2 15 2 1
1
5m/s 18.7% 13.6%
16.2% 2
13.7% 15m/s 9.2%
1

5m/s 10m/s 15 m/s 20 m/s 25 m/s 30 m/s

1 -18.7% -13.6% -16.2% -16.3% -16.3% -16.2%
2 13.7% 13.8% 9.0% 9.2% 9.3% 9.2%

16 30m/s 28412.8N
17

17b

40000
1
35000 2
Drag Force (N)

30000

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Velocity (m/s)

16 17 a

22
 2 2017.9

17 b 1 17 c 2

[1] Blendermann W. Schiffsform und Windlast : Korrelations- und Regressionsanalyse von Windkanalmessungen am Modell[J].
Technische Universitt Harburg, 1993.
[2] OCIMF. Prediction of wind loads and current loads on VLCCs.1994.
[3] Isherwood R M. Wind resistance of merchant ships[J]. R.i.n.a.supplementary Papers, 1973, 115.
[4] . [J]. , 1991(2):113-121.
[5] , . [J]. , 1982(4).
[6] , , . [C]. . 2014.
[7] , , ,. [J]. , 2015(7):18-21.
[8] . [M]. , 2004: 113-123
[9] H.K.Versteeg,Malalasekera, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Wiley, New York, 1995:
66-97.
[10] , . CFD [J]. , 2013, 46(2):33-36.

23
 2 2017.9

116000
:

3600TEU

0
3600TEU Odense Maritime
TechnologyOMT OMT
CHI
CHI OMT
OMT OMT

1
3600TEU

1 3600TEU

2
OMT
CHI
NAPA loading condition L12: 11.0t/TEU, Design Draft, Departure Condition.

>1
NAPAOMT OMT CHI 1

24
 2 2017.9

mm
t
X Y Z

NAPA 48438.4 93570 0 16300

OMT 48484.3 93673.5 -21.4 16097.7

CHI 48438.6 94076 -11.57 16281.4

CHI 48428.5 93962.2 -34.26 16080.3

3
NASTRAN Virtual Mass OMT

4 OMT OMT CHI

1) OMT 2
2) MSC PATRAN&NASTRAN CHI 3600TEU 3.1

3) MSC PATRAN&NASTRAN CHI 3600TEU 3.1

2 OMT CHI CHI

25
 2 2017.9

5

CHI OMT
CHI

6
OMT
1)
a) OMT OMT
2 13.344m
10m

2 OMT
b) OMT 3m

c) OMT
2)
a) OMT 2075
x=96400mm, y=0mm, z=18400mm 4.2

b) OMT 10855 7552 1623
x=35600, y=500, z=9300 4.3

6.2

26
 2 2017.9

OMT NAPA
Load
LRCCS

7
1) OMT OMT
2)
3)

27
 2 2017.9

116600

1.2 ~2.0
205W~305W, 142W/~183W/ 14%~18%
12 90%20 83%25 80%

$1 /

1)
2)


1) ,
2)

3) 10 ,
4)

2
1

28
 2 2017.9

1
1) ,


2) ,

3) , 12V 24V

4) ,
AC220V
AC110V
DC12V
DC24VDC48V AC220V
DC-AC

1) -
360

2) 60

3)

4
4.1

4.2 5000
5000
5000 2

29
 2 2017.9

2
40~ 100 3

3
18 6
1 100

295W 240 465.6

70.8KW 47% 78%
4

4
-

2~10

30
 2 2017.9

[1] . [J].2008.
[2] , . [M]. 2005.
[3] . [M]. 2007.
[4] . -[M]. 1997.

31
 2 2017.9

, ,
116600
IACS HCSR

HCSR

0
32.26 13 68
190230 IACS HCSR/

HCSR

1 HCSR
CH3 SEC6 6m 5.7m
CH3 SEC3 CH6 SEC1 CH9 SEC1
CH6 SEC1 CH9 SEC2
CH3 SEC3 CH6 SEC4 CH9 SEC1
CH9 SEC1 CH6 SEC2 CH9 SEC2 CH9
SEC2

2
2.1


1
8m

1
32
 2 2017.9

2.2

0.4LL

1


kg kg kg

1185.08 1679.34 -494.26

942.3 20292.6 -19350.3

49480.02 - 49480.02

A - 368.67 -368.67

B - 2579.78 -2579.78

- 26687.01

33
 2 2017.9

1
27
2.3

3

3
2.4
4
2

b
4
34
 2 2017.9

2


kg kg kg

2552.07 1737.37 814.7

2.5

5

b
5

3

1)
2)
3)

[1],.29000 [J].,2005,(3):10-14.
[2].[M].:,1999.
[3]Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers(2017)[M].IACS,2017,6.

35

TECHNIC OF COSCO SHIPPING HEAVY INDUSTRY

37
chuanwutechnic@cosco-shipyard.com
0411-39229439