Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/micron
Abstract
The oxidation state of iron oxide nanoparticles was determined using the two principally different technical realisations of energy filtering
TEM, in one case using the JEOL 3010 equipped with a LaB6 cathode and a post-column GIF and in the second, the newly designed LIBRA
200FE equipped with an corrected in-column 908 energy filter and a field emission gun (Schottky emitter). The samples studied were oxide-coated
iron nanoparticles, and iron oxide inclusions in feldspars in granites.
Five possible candidates exist for the iron-oxide phases: FeO, a-Fe2O3 (hematite), g-Fe2O3 (maghemite), Fe3O4 (magnetite) or a-FeO(OH)
(goethite). Fingerprinting the O K-edge ELNES allows to distinguish between oxide phases with the same stochiometry and enables to make a first
selection of possible candidates. The additional determination of the chemical composition allows unique identification of the phase present. For
the oxide coated iron nanoparticles the most probable iron oxide phase of the shell is maghemite, which was additionally confirmed by HRTEM
studies. The second studied system were iron oxide needles in alkali feldspar, where we obtained hematite as the most probable phase. There we
additionally demonstrated the drastic changes of the ELNES of the O K-edge for the alkali feldspar and iron oxide needle by spatially resolved
EELS.
q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS); Electron loss near edge structures (ELNES); Energy-filtering transmission electron microscope;
Fingerprinting; Spatially resolved EELS; Oxides, granites, nanoparticles
standard applications. With this tool it is possible to obtain the alkali feldspar (Boone, 1969), but up to now optical
spectra in nanosized samples, that allow the identification of petrography and microprobe analysis could not confirm this
phases through the comparison with results of O K-edge assumption.
ELNES investigations (Colliex et al., 1991; Paterson and
Krivanek, 1990) of known iron oxide phases.
The systems investigated in this work were artificial oxide- 2. Experiments, results and discussions
coated iron nanoparticles (NPs) and natural iron-bearing
precipitates in granitic rocks. Both systems dealt with iron The investigations were performed using two different
oxide minerals, where the near edge structure of the O K-edge TEMs. A conventional JEOL 3010 operating at 297 kV
and the Fe L-edge could be used to determine the oxidation equipped with a LaB6 cathode, postcolumn Gatan Imaging
state, the iron oxide phase, and the quantitative chemical Filter and a 1 K slow-scan CCD camera (Gatan) and a LIBRA
composition (Golla-Schindler et al., 2003). The possible 200FE operating at 200 kV, equipped with a field emission
candidates for the iron-oxide phases were FeO, a-Fe2O3 gun, a 4 K slow-scan CCD camera (Gatan) and a corrected 908
(hematite), g-Fe 2O 3 (maghemite), Fe3O 4 (magnetite), in-column Omega energy filter.
a-FeO(OH) (goethite). To optimize the signal to noise ratio (SNR) the experimental
Nanoparticles have been increasingly studied due to their conditions were chosen following the recommendations of
variety of applications for many different purposes, especially Berger and Kohl (1993). All images and spectra were gain and
in life sciences. Although they are used in several medical dark count-corrected. Image processing and analysis routines
applications (like UV-sun screening, magnetic resonance were written in the script language within Digital Micrograph
contrasting, drug delivery into the human body, etc.), there is and the quantitative analysis of the resulting spectra were
a lack of information about their shape and chemical performed using Gatan EL/P program packages and the
composition on the nanoscale. This may induce complications software IGOR (WaveMetrics).
in understanding their toxicological effects for wrong doses, For the TEM specimen preparation we used different
e.g. allergic reactions, inflammation and cell death. The NPs techniques for the two investigated systems. The TEM
investigated in this work were colloidal iron oxide NPs used for specimens of the iron oxide particles were prepared by using
medical purposes (Bomati-Miguel et al., 2005), consisting of two techniques a dry preparation powdering the NPS on a lacey
an oxidized rim and iron core. The major aim of the carbon grid or a wet preparation ultrasonically dispersing the
investigation is to determine the iron oxide phase of the rim. NPs in toluol and drop them onto a lacey carbon grid. The TEM
The second studied system consisted of iron-bearing specimens of the granitic rocks were obtained from thin section
inclusions in red clouded feldpars in granitic rocks. The by ion milling.
mineralogy of the investigated granites mainly consisted of Fig. 1(a) shows a conventional TEM image of an iron oxide
feldspars (albite, plagioclase and K-feldspar), quartz and nanoparticles agglomerate. Most of the particles show an
biotite. The reddish coloration of the rock is supposed to be almost spherical shape and are around 1520 nm wide. Rim
due to the existence of small hematite inclusions imbedded in and core are clearly distinguishable, because of the differences
80
60
40
20
0 A B C D
500 520 540 560 580
Energy Loss (eV)
(c) (d)
Fe L2,3-edge
1000
CCD counts x 103
800
Counts
600 O K-edge
400
200
0
500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Energy Loss (eV) Energy loss (eV)
Fig. 1. (a) Conventional TEM image of the iron based nanoparticles obtained with the JEOL 3010, (b) corresponding ELNES of the O K-edge and (c) exemplary
EELS spectrum used for the determination of the Fe/O ratio (d) reference EELS spectra for the most important oxides (Colliex et al., 1991).
U. Golla-Schindler et al. / Micron 37 (2006) 473477 475
Fig. 2. (a) High resolution image obtained with the LIBRA 200FE (b) magnified cutout of the interesting region of (a) and (c) the corresponding linescans for the
determination of the lattice distances.
in electron-density. The image shows that not all particles are Fe/O 0.75G0.05. It has to be taken into account that only the
ideally round and that there is a fluctuation in size. endmember maghemite has a defect spinel structure with an
Fig. 1(b) shows the ELNES fingerprinting of one exemplary average of 21/3 vacant sites per unit cell and that there exist a
NP of Fig. 1(a). The spectrum was taken when the beam was solid solution between magnetite and maghemite with
focused with the brightness knob to a spot and positioned as chemical compositions in between magnetite and maghemite.
good as possible at the rim of the particle. HRTEM images were taken to compare the lattice distances
There are four distinct positions for the O K-edge where with expected values for the two possible phases. Fig. 2(a)
peaks can appear or be absent, labelled A, B, C, D (Colliex shows a HRTEM image of the core-shell nanoparticles, where
et al., 1991; Paterson and Krivanek, 1990). The ELNES of the the continuous lattice fringes demonstrate that the shell is
iron oxide nanoparticles shows peaks at all of these positions. topotactical with the core. Fig. 2(b) shows the corresponding
Considering that the phases FeO, a-Fe2O3 (hematite) do not linescans. The lattice distances agree with expected values for
show a peak in position C, both phases can be excluded by this the oxide phase of g-Fe2O3 (maghemite) shown in Table 1,
fingerprinting technique. Additional information can be which is consistent with the quantitative result of the Fe/O
obtained from a quantification of the Fe/O ratio, which is ratio.
different for each remaining possible oxide phase. For
Table 1
this calculation we used experimentally and theoretically Comparison of available lattice fringes for different iron oxides
determined k factors (Golla and Putnis, 2001) and obtained
Profile Experimental Hematite Maghematite Magnetite
Fe/OZ0.74G0.12. This value eliminates a-FeO(OH)
d (A) d (A) d (A) d (A)
(goethite), leaving the possibilities of g-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4
1 2.24G0.04 2.29 (006) 2.23 (213) 2.10 (004)
with the by Colliex et al. (1991) experimentally determinated
2 2.41G0.02 2.52 (K210) 2.41 (222) 2.42 (222)
Fe/O ratios for maghemite, Fe/O 0.68G0.04 and magnetite,
476 U. Golla-Schindler et al. / Micron 37 (2006) 473477
(c)
(a) 80
O K-edge
3
CCD counts x 10
60
40
20
A B C D
0
500 520 540 560 580
Energy loss (eV)
(d)
(b) 400
3
CCD counts x 10
350 O K-edge
300
Fe L2,3-edge
250
200
150
500 550 600 650 700 750
Energy Loss (eV)
Fig. 3. (a) Image of the granitic rock, (b) conventional TEM images of an iron oxide needle in the alkali feldspar matrix obtained with the JEOL 3010,
(c) corresponding ELNES of the O K-edge and (d) EELS spectrum used for the determination of the Fe/O ratio.
Fig. 3(a) shows an optical image of a granite from Finland, excluded and only FeO, a-Fe2O3 (hematite) and a-FeO(OH)
where the pink coloured feldspar is clearly visible. TEM (goethite) remained. The calculation of the Fe/O ratio resulted
samples of the feldspar examined with EDS showed small iron in Fe/OZ0.63G0.11, which is in a good agreement with the
oxide needles associated with pore-spaces in the feldspar. One expected value for a-Fe2O3 (hematite)Z0.65G0.04. Selected
example of a typical shape is shown in Fig. 3(b). To determine area electron diffraction analysis confirmed this result (Putnis
which iron phase is present the ELNES fingerprinting et al., 2005).
technique of the O K-edge provided helpful information. An ideal technique for the precise study of the chemical
Fig. 3(c) show the ELNES of the O K-edge of the needle of shift and the ELNES peak positions at interfaces of different
Fig. 3(b), where at positions A, B, and D there is a peak while at mineral phases is spatially resolved EELS. To apply this
position C the peak is absent. Due to this fact the iron oxide technique the interface of interest has to be aligned parallel to
phases g-Fe2O3 (maghemite) and Fe3O4 (magnetite) could be the energy dispersive plane of the energy filter. This enables to
Fig. 4. (a) Conventional TEM image of an iron oxide needle in the alkali feldspar matrix with the LIBRA 200FE, (b) spectrum image of the O K-edge ELNES of the
selected area and (c) the corresponding linescans on the iron oxide needle and in the feldspar matrix.
U. Golla-Schindler et al. / Micron 37 (2006) 473477 477