Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242188103
Article
CITATIONS READS
0 555
3 authors, including:
Han E H Meijer
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
477 PUBLICATIONS 7,794 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Han E H Meijer on 10 June 2017.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Why is polystyrene brittle and polycarbonate
tough and what can we do about it?
R.J.M. Smit, W.A.M. Brekelmans, H.E.H. Meijer
Eindhoven University of Technology,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
P.O. Box 513, NL 5600 MB Eindhoven
Introduction
90 MPa
84 MPa
On a macroscale, polystyrene (PS) is brittle and poly- strain of 1.1%, the notchtip 66 MPa
60 MPa
carbonate (PC) is tough. On a microscale, however, causes critical dilative stresses 54 MPa
48 MPa
craze craze fibrils (length scale nm) break after 300% (> 90MPa) PC crazes 42 MPa
36 MPa
strain in PS and 100% in PC1 . This contradictory PC, dilative stress 30 MPa
behaviour is elucidated and the toughening by the 2 PS is brittle because of high defect sensitivity
addition of cavitating rubbery particles is explained. 2 PC is tough because of low defect sensitivity
70
e 80 1. reduce yield stress: minimizes (unstable) strain
d
60
b
70
60
1. softening and reduces triaxial stresses
zz [MPa]
50
zz [MPa]
40
50 2. improve (stabilizing) strain hardening
40
30 150
30
20
20
10
a PC 10
PS
0 0
True stress [MPa]