Is the division between economic policy and economic science, relevant today to

understand the dynamics of economic life?

INTRODUCTION

The definition of economic science tells us that it is the social science that studies:
production, exchange, distribution, consumption of goods and services, as well as the
means or means of satisfying human needs, but we understand and know that they
are not always used Economic knowledge in an efficient and optimal way with the
intention of obtaining the greatest social benefit, in the dynamics of economic life there
are many personal interests and ambitions set as a priority before making certain
decisions that relate to other people.

BODY

In the book "Essay on lucidity" we present an interesting episode where a group of

rulers make several political decisions through the different circumstances that are
presented, we undoubtedly understand that politics is diplomatic and also must keep
appearances always A good impression, is something that the book refers to. Analyzing
the situation already mentioned above we can also realize that for the decision-
making, the rulers of that capital of that country are using a basic method in
economics, called "Cost-Benefit Method", since on several occasions there are
differences where Ruler chooses to maintain his good name and reputation regardless
of the cost involved, since they were even able to put a bomb to destabilize the capital
of that state and thus people feel the need for rulers to regain power and authority Of
that town.
We clearly interpret that those rulers did not count on the support of their people in
that Capital, and they used aggressive strategies where they pressed the inhabitants
to the point where they had to feel the necessity to be governed by them.

That is why the inhabitants of a state should never disregard the decisions taken by
their rulers, they would be making a mistake because they are giving a group of
people the power enough to achieve the progress of a people as well as Achieve the
failure and the instability of a people, in addition the members that make up a certain
society will always have needs which is important to manifest them so that those
responsible for making the decisions of said society have them present as a priority
and also can identify the variables To be treated for the specific case of that company.
There are people who often say that they do not like politics, nor want to relate to
anything about politics, it is not appropriate to think in such a way because in other
words what you are saying is that you are indifferent to the future of social and
economic situation That is presented in the place that you are, so it is something that
will harm you as an inhabitant of that society if social and economic problems begin to
appear, then as citizens and inhabitants we are in our right to express opinions,
arguments, The well-being of each one of us.

It is important to mention that the actions of the members of that society must be
executed in time, otherwise it will be more difficult to find the stability of that people
when it has already entered a social crisis.

CONCLUSION

In the case of the capital mentioned by the book was a grave error of the inhabitants
of said capital to give minimal importance to the elections of state authorities, since as
a citizen it is your obligation and right to designate which person or group of people
you go To give him the power to make decisions on all the inhabitants of that State.

The example presented in the book refers to the low support of the inhabitants about a
well-defined political leader, in such case it is irresponsible to leave to luck the
assignment of the new ruler of the State, nevertheless the ideal for the situation was
that it Inhabitants to organize themselves to propose a leader that is to their liking and
acceptance. It is worth mentioning that the situation mentioned by "Essay on lucidity"
is fanciful because it is difficult to think that the inhabitants of a State will be
questioned and even violated by the lack of acceptance to the current authorities and
to the point of demanding an argument On the decision taken by each inhabitant to
pay, in this case referred specifically to the large number of blank votes that existed.