Professional Documents
Culture Documents
122 Almekhlafi
124 Almekhlafi
Following the same path, Noriko (2002) developed a language tutor pro-
gram to develop learners grammatical and sentence production skills in
Japanese language. The study revealed that students achievement improved
tremendously. To measure their attitude towards the program, the researcher
designed a questionnaire. The results indicated an enthusiastic student
response.
Likewise, Chikamatsu (2003) pointed out that CALL gains popularity
and is becoming standard in foreign language classrooms. The researcher
examined the effects of computers on writing efficiency and quality among
intermediate learners of Japanese. One of the findings was that accuracy
rates and number of kanji characters used were significantly different, indi-
cating that learners benefited from computer writing.
From previous research, it can be concluded that the use of CALL is very
beneficial for language learning and students attitudes toward CALL was
positive, particularly if CALL applications were well-designed and used. For
example, CALL effectiveness and students positive attitudes toward it was
documented in many research studies (Conrad, 1996; Vrtacnik et al.; 2000,
Ayres, 2002; Bayraktar, 2002; Jung, 2002; Noriko, 2002; Robert, 2002).
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
As the use of CALL in this study involved the use of technology and par-
ticipants attitude towards this use, Fishbeins (1963, 1967) Reasoned Action
Theory (RAT) and constructivism were used as the theoretical framework to
illuminate the results of the study. The RAT developed by Fishbein, is a cog-
nitive theory that is designed to predict and explain any human behavior that
is under volitional control. It deals with the relationships between beliefs,
attitudes, subjective norms, intentions, and behavior (Chitamun & Fin-
chilescu, 2003). It is usually used to investigate attitude toward an object or
some specific behavior toward that object (Almekhlafi, 2001). The theory
has been tested, validated, and used by many researchers (Pryor, 1990, 1994;
Trost et al., 2002; Zint, 2002; Chitamun & Finchilescu, 2003). Trost et al.
used RAT to evaluate the relative utility of the theory in explaining inten-
tions and physical activity behavior in white and African-American eighth-
grade girls. Similarly, Zint used RAT to predict science teachers' intention
to incorporate environmental risk education.
Constructivism refers to the idea that learners construct knowledge for
themselves building upon the foundation of their previous learning. Con-
structivism is being applied in different fields, one of which is in technolo-
gy rich classrooms. Collins (1991) pointed out that technology appeared to
be coming down on the side of constructivists, who have been trying to
change the prevailing societal view of education. According to Collins, stud-
ies show that in technology rich classrooms there are many observable
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:21 AM Page 126
126 Almekhlafi
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The study addressed the following questions:
1. Is there a significant difference in students achievement in EFL
between CALL users and nonusers due to treatment regardless of
instructor?
2. Is there a significant difference in students achievement in EFL
between participants due to instructor regardless of treatment?
3. Is there a significant difference in students achievement in EFL
between participants due to the interaction effects on achievement?
4. Does CALL have any effect on students achievement in EFL based
on their computer competency, years of computer experience, and
number of hours using the computer daily?
5. Does the use of CALL affect the students perceived knowledge
gain of EFL achievement?
6. Does the use of CALL affect students attitude toward, perceived
utility, and intention to use it in the future?
HYPOTHESES
Ho1: There is no significant difference in students achievement in
EFL between CALL users and nonusers due to treatment regard-
less of instructor?
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:21 AM Page 128
128 Almekhlafi
METHOD
Participants
Participants in the present study were 83 elementary-prep school students
with an age span of 11 to 13 years old. They were studying EFL in the aca-
demic year 2003-2004. These students were randomly chosen from Al-
Tamayoz elementary-prep school, located in Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi in the UAE.
Participants English language proficiency was intermediate as determined
by language tests conducted by their teachers who participated in the data
collection. One of the reasons could be because EFL is considered as one of
seven courses in the curriculum students study every academic year. EFL in
the UAE school is taught from 1st grade and aims at preparing students to be
able to communicate in English and join university programs that provide
content instruction in English. The overall content of EFL in the UAE takes
all language skills into account. On average, EFL is taught for one hour a
day of structured English instruction. In addition, English is not used as a
means of communication in everyday life.
The EFL syllabus used in the study is the syllabus mandated by the Min-
istry of Education and Youth, which is a series of textbooks chosen to be
used in UAE schools. The CALL material is the same materials in the text-
books as it was developed for that purpose.
As the study was conducted in a model school, technology infrastructure
and access was granted for all students. The school had a computer lab with
a multimedia capability, a videoconferencing unit, a technology coordinator,
and a computer engineer.
Participants' computer literacy is good for the following reasons: First,
Al-Tamyooz is one of the models schools that pay special attention to tech-
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:21 AM Page 129
Materials
English as a foreign language (EFL) material was the focus of this study.
The syllabus covered in the study is the same syllabus used by UAE ele-
mentary-prep school for the EFL course. This material was available into
two forms: (a) hard copy for the control group, and (b) CALL in the form of
CD-ROM, EFL Skills DeveloperTM, that included video and sound clips, pic-
tures, and the feature of interactivity for the experimental group. The CALL
CD was designed and developed by an EFL teacher who was heavily
involved in technology integration in EFL settings and who is currently
working on a PhD degree, and by a computer science engineer, who had pre-
vious experience in computer programming and networking. EFL Skills
DeveloperTM was developed, tested and validated to insure its high quality
and appropriateness for the intended audience (see Appendix for samples of
materials used in the study).
Instruments
Pretest. The pretest consisted of a test of English proficiency as a foreign
language (EFL). It covered items that reflect overall understanding of the
language such as grammar items, comprehension items, and vocabulary
items, which are supposed to be covered in elementary-prep school curricu-
lum with different degrees of depth. According to the EFL curriculum taught
in UAE schools, students proficiency in these EFL skills are supposed to
increase as they go to higher grades.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:21 AM Page 130
130 Almekhlafi
The total test score was 100 points distributed among multiple choice and
open-ended test items. The aim of the pretest was to measure the participants
general knowledge and competency in EFL before beginning the experimen-
tal treatment of using CALL. The test was created by EFL instructors in Al-
Tamayooz elementary-prep school and validated by a number of EFL instruc-
tors and supervisors in Al-Ain school zone (district). In addition, it was vali-
dated by a number of professors of English and educational technology
majors from UAE University. A pilot study was conducted in the second
semester of the academic year 2001-2002 in the same school. The reliability
of the test, using alpha, was .85, while it was .87 using Guttman Split-half.
Posttests. The first part of posttest was identical to the pretest as it had the
same type of items, number, and structure. The aim of this part of the test
was to measure the difference of participants knowledge and competency in
EFL after the study was completed.
The second part of the posttest (distributed to the experimental group)
was a questionnaire using a 7-point bipolar probability and evaluative scales
to determine CALL users overall attitude towards CALL, (b) perceived util-
ity of using CALL, (c) perceived knowledge gain of EFL before and after
the use of CALL, and (d) intention to use CALL in the future. It also includ-
ed two open-ended questions about the advantages and disadvantages of
learning through CALL. This questionnaire had previously been validated
and used by other researchers including Almekhlafi (2001, 2003), and Pryor
(1990, 1994). It had an alpha reliability of .80.
Procedure
First, a meeting with the instructors was held to demonstrate the EFL
Skills DeveloperTM software and to discuss the procedures of the study. Both
teachers became proficient in the use of the software and knowledgeable
about the relationship between the content covered by the software as cor-
related with the textbook curriculum.
First, a pretest was given to all students in the four groups. After the
pretest, each participant in the experimental group was given the CALL CD,
EFL Skills DeveloperTM, with a set of instructions on use, roles and respon-
sibilities, and expectations to study independently at home according to a
plan set by the instructor. The experimental group participants were taken to
a computer lab to check their performance and give them directions on how
to best use the software. Each student in the control group was given the cor-
responding material to study independently according to the same timeline
provided to the experimental group.
All participants in all groups were instructed to prepare for the lesson by
reading it, doing certain exercises, and answering questions. CALL users
were instructed to prepare for the lesson by using EFL Skills DeveloperTM
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:21 AM Page 131
CD-ROM, while the control group prepared for the lesson using the hard
copy materials. The participants in both groups were required to spend at
least one hour daily, which was the estimated time to complete the exercis-
es needed for the next day lesson. However, CALL users might have spent
more time using CALL due to its interactivity and attractiveness.
As a check technique to make sure students did their work at home, the
teacher checks students preparation the next day. In class, each instructor
taught both groups using regular classroom procedures and materials.
Instruction lasted for three consecutive weeks (four sessions weekly). Two
additional weeks were used for preparatory demonstrations with teachers
and pre/post testing with students.
DESIGN
This study was a pretest/posttest experiment/control group design. Using
SPSS 12.0, three main types of data analysis were used: (a) analysis of covari-
ance (ANOVA) to control for variability in initial students EFL level, (b)
paired and independent sample t-tests, and (c) descriptive statistics. Analysis of
variance was used to test the null hypothesis there is no differences between
groups in achievement as a result of CALL use. Pretest was entered as a
covariate while the posttest was entered as the independent variable. Paired t-
tests were used to examine any differences in CALL users perception of their
knowledge gain as a result of using CALL. Independent sample t-tests were
used to test any significant differences between CALL users based on comput-
er competency, years of experience, and daily hours using computer. Descrip-
tive statistics was used for 7-point bipolar scales investigating users attitude
towards and perception of the utility of CALL. For analysis of covariance and
independent sample t-tests, the .05 level of statistical significance was selected.
The responses to the open-ended questions in the questionnaire were cat-
egorized into topics and presented in a frequency table based on Webers
model (1990) for analogy and reporting qualitative data.
132 Almekhlafi
Table 1
Difference Between CALL Users and Nonusers in EFL Achievement
Source SS DF MS F p
Between groups 4585.82 1 4585.82 94.79 .00**
Between instructors 80.700 1 80.70 .67 .20
Group-instructor interaction 312.477 1 312.48 6.46 .01*
Error 3773.74 78 48.38
Total 391922.22 83
**p <.01 *p <.05
Table 2
Resource of Interaction between Group (Experimental vs. Control) and
Teacher (Teacher A vs. Teacher B)
Interaction
Group LS Mean E-A E-B C-A C-B
Experimental-teacher A (E-A) 70.7 __ 0.008** 0.00** 0.00**
Experimental-teacher B (E-B) 76.7 __ __ 0.00** 0.00**
Control-teacher A (C-A) 59.5 __ __ __ 0.38
Control-teacher B (C-B) 57.6 __ __ __ __
**p <.01
Table 3
Differences in Mean Scores of Posttest of CALL Users Based on Time,
Computer Competency, Years of Experience, and Daily Time Using Computers
134 Almekhlafi
CALL (experimental group) was tested using paired t-test. Result of the
analysis rejected the hypothesis indicating that users' perception of knowl-
edge gain as a result of using CALL was prevalent. There was a significant
difference (p <.01) between the mean score of participants before and after
use. Participants mean score of their perceived knowledge of EFL before
CALL use was 4.2 while it was 5.8 after use on a 7-point scale.
To answer question 6, Ho6 CALL use has no effect on users mean scores
in attitude towards, perceived utility of, and have intention to use CALL in the
future was tested. Descriptive statistics were run and showed high mean
scores on the above variables. CALL users mean scores were 5.3, 5.9, and 6.0
respectively in attitude, utility, and intention to use CALL (Table 4).
The data showed that CALL users had a positive attitude toward CALL,
perceived its utility for helping them learn EFL, and had a strong intention
to use it in the future. This is also supported by their high scores on Incli-
nation to use CALL because it increases interaction with the course con-
tent, Satisfaction with learning experience using CALL, and Liking
CALL being part of learning experience. This positive attitude and satis-
faction with CALL lead to high intention to use CALL in the future because
of the benefits users perceived, as predicted by the Fishbeins Attitude The-
ory, which was used as part of the theoretical framework. Results of study
were in agreement with other studies pertaining to attitude towards CALL
(Escalada & Zollman, 1997; Holmes, 1998; Klassen & Milton, 1999;
Robert, 2002; Vrtacnik et al., 2000; Noriko, 2002).
Table 4
CALL Users Mean Scores on Attitude, Utility, and Intention to Use It in
the Future and Other Related Variables
Variable Mean SD
Overall attitude toward CALL 5.3 1.8
Utility of CALL for understanding course content 5.9 1.4
Intent to use CALL in the future to learn about course content 6.0 1.4
Ease of use of CALL 5.9 2.0
Experience using computer-based CDs 6.1 1.7
Comfort using CALL to learn course content 6.2 1.1
Inclination to use CALL because of its educational benefits 6.0 1.3
Inclination to use CALL because of interaction increase 6.3 1.3
Satisfaction with learning experience using CALL 6.2 1.6
I like CALL being part of my learning experience 5.8 1.8
Note. The items were based on a 7-point bipolar probability and evaluative scales extending from extremely high or
positive (7) to extremely low or negative (1).
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 135
OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES
The questionnaire included two open-ended items; one of which asked
CALL users to list the advantages of using CALL to learn the language, while
the other asked the participants to list the disadvantages of using CALL to learn
the language. Table 5 reports these advantages and disadvantages by frequen-
cy. The categories listed were created by the researcher using Weber's model
(1990), and based on responses from CALL users. The categories reflected
essential elements that were grouped according to meanings and given a label.
As can be seen from Table 5, multimedia elements such as pictures and
drawings, improving learning and comprehension, helping in doing
course assignments, and teaching reading and grammar were the most
prevalent advantages of CALL.
Study Limitations
1. Study sample was taken from Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi. Therefore, results
might be generalizable only to Abu Dhabi, UAE.
2. The study was conducted in an elementary-prep school. Thus,
results can not be generalized to all K-12 schools or higher educa-
tion institutions.
3. The study was conducted with EFL students whose mother tongue
is Arabic. Results might not be generalized to non-Arabic speakers.
4. The study focused on male students. Results might not be general-
ized to both male and female students.
Table 5
Frequency of the Advantages and Disadvantages of CALL as
Reported by Users
Advantages
Multimedia Elements (e.g., pictures, sound, drawings, colors) 18
Improving learning and comprehension 16
Helping in doing course assignments 12
Teaching reading and grammar 11
Helping in doing well in exams 9
Entertaining 5
Disadvantages
Computer problems 3
Difficult to use 3
Note. Themes were created by researcher based on participants responses to the open-ended items.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 136
136 Almekhlafi
Implications
Based on the results outlined, many implications can be concluded:
1. CALL could be a very useful tool for teaching EFL. It could be used
as a classroom instructional tool, the effect of which was docu-
mented in research (e.g., Almekhlafi, 2004) or as an independent
tool, the effect of which is documented in this study.
2. EFL teachers should be encouraged and given incentives to inte-
grate CALL in their teaching, and hence improve their students lan-
guage proficiency.
3. As the UAE is becoming an international market, where thousands
of companies are pouring into the country, the integration of CALL
in K-12 schools becomes important. Using CALL effectively will
result in improving students preparedness to deal with the new
demands that require fluency in international languages.
4. Using CALL in and outside the classroom will help teachers meet
individual differences in learning styles as technology can satisfy
visual learners, auditory learners, and audio-visual learners.
5. CALL can give the language teacher some change in her/his role as cer-
tain activities can be given to students to work on at home using CALL.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 137
Recommendations
However, to generalize the effects of CALL on learning, the following
recommendations for future research should be taken into consideration:
1. Research should be conducted to investigate the effect of CALL on
learning English in K-12 schools, both public and private, and high-
er education institutions such as colleges and universities. Conduct-
ing such research might give better ideas on the effect of CALL on
learning EFL, hence results will be more generalizable.
2. Further research is needed to study the use of CALL comparing
classroom use versus individual use. Conducting a research where
the whole class is using CALL as part of their daily lessons versus
an independent use of CALL might give a better understanding of
the best strategies to apply CALL in teaching and learning.
3. Further research is needed to study CALL taking gender into
account. Comparing male versus female CALL use might shed some
light on whether CALL effect on learning is affected by gender.
4. As this study was conducted with Arabic-speaking students. Further
research is needed to investigate the effect on CALL on non-Arabic
speaking students.
5. Qualitative research such as observing students using CALL is
needed. This kind of research might shed light on the best tech-
niques and strategies to use CALL. Due to the fact that this study
depended on quantitative data collection, conducting focus group
interviews or students observations while using CALL will increase
our understanding of CALL utility for learning EFL and the strate-
gies users follow to maximize their benefit.2
References
Almekhlafi, A. G. (2001). Instructional media for teachers preparation. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 28(2), 191-207.
Almekhlafi, A. G. (2003, July). A study of interrelationships between selected variables in a
web-based learning environment. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Tech-
nology in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Heidelberg, Germany.
Almekhlafi, A. G. (2004, April). The effect of interactive multimedia on learning English as a
second language. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual UAE University Research Conference (Vol.
2). Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Al-Sagheer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary
acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
Asay, D. (1995). Does it work? Evaluating the effectiveness of multimedia vocabulary tutor.
Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Symposium: Computer and Collaborative Learning (pp 14).
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language
Learning Journal, 15(3), 241-249.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 138
138 Almekhlafi
Bailey, D.H. (1996). Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application; innovation and
transformation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(2), 161-165.
Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta analysis of computer assisted instruction in science education.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173-188.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2002). Attitudes toward integration as perceived by preservice
teachers enrolled in an integrated mathematics, science, and technology teacher education
program. Science Educator, 11(1), 32-40.
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International
Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895-935.
Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the
benefits. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 156-164.
Charischak, I. (2000). A look at technology's role in professional development of mathematics
teachers at the middle school level. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 349-354.
Chester, I. (2001). Technology teacher education at Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Technology Teacher, 60(5), 32-37.
Chikamatsu, N. (2003). The effects of computer use on L2 Japanese writing. Foreign Language
Annals, 36(1), 114-127.
Chitamun, S., & Finchilescu, G. (2003). Predicting the intention of South African female students
to engage in premarital sexual relations: An application of the theory of reasoned action.
South African Journal of Psychology, 33(3), 154-161.
Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition.
Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
Collins, A. (1991, September). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi
Delta Kappan, 73, 28-36.
Conrad, K.B. (1996). CALL-non English L2 instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16,
158-181.
Crosby, M. (1997). Guest editorial: CALL in L1. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10(4),
309-110.
Cushion, S., & Dominique, H. (2002). Applying new technological developments to CALL for
Arabic. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 501-508.
Egbert, J., Paulus, T.M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom
computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learn-
ing and Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
Escalada, L.T., & Zollman, D. A. (1997). An investigation on the effects of using interactive
digtal video in a physics classroom on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 34(5), 467-489.
Fenfang, H. (2003). Learners behaviors in computer-based input activities elicited through
tracking technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 5-29.
Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and
the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233-240.
Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in
attitude theory and measurement (pp. 477-492). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Frear, V., & Hirschbuhl, J. (1999). Does interactive multimedia promote achievement and higher
level thinking skills for todays science students. British Journal of Educational Technology,
30(4), 323-329.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 139
Gentile, J., Lonberger, R., Parana, J., & West, A. (2000). Preparing preservice teachers for the
technological classroom: A school-college partnership. Journal of Technology and Teacher
Education, 8(2), 97-109.
Holmes, B. (1998). Initial perceptions of CALL by Japanese university students. Computer
Assisted Language Learning, 11(4), 397-409.
Hayes, B., Taub, G., Robinson, III, E., & Sivo, S. (2003). An empirical investigation of the efficacy
of multimedia instruction in counseling skill development. Counselor Education & Supervi-
sion, 42(3), 177-188.
James, R. (1999). Navigating CD-ROMs: An exploration of children reading interactive narratives.
Children's Literature in Education, 30(1), 47-63.
Johnston, D.F., & Milne, L. (1995). Scaffolding second language communicative discourse with
teacher-controlled multimedia. Foreign Language Annals, 28(3), 315-329.
Jung, U.O. (2002). An international bibliography of computer-assisted language learning: Fifth
installment. System, 30(3), 349-398.
Klassen, J., & Milton, P. (1999). Enhancing English language skills using multimedia: Tried and
tested. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(4), 281-294.
Kulik, C.C., & Kulik, J.A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis.
Computer in Human Behavior, 7, 74-94.
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward
a new mindset. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41(3), 4-16.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer assisted language learning, context and conceptualization. Oxford,
UK: Clarendon Press.
Liou, H.C. (1995). Evaluation of interactive videodisc courseware: Effects of strategy
training and collaborative learning. Proceeding of the 1995 Annual Symposium: Computers
and Collaborative Learning (pp 112-115).
McKethan, R., Everhart, B., & Sanders, R. (2001). The effects of multimedia software instruction
and lecture-based instruction on learning and teaching cues of manipulative skills on pre-
service physical education teachers. Physical Educator, 58(1), 2-13.
Moore, D. (2000). A framework for using multimedia within argumentation systems. Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(2), 83-98.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in
computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated
pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177-213.
Nesselhauf, N., & Tschichold, C. (2002). Collocations in CALL: An investigation of vocabulary-
building software for EFL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15(3) 251-279.
Noriko, N. (2002). BANZI: An application of natural language processing to web-based
language learning. CALICO Journal, 19(30), 583-599.
Nutta, J., Feyton, C., Norwood, A., Meros, J., Yoshii, M., & Ducher, J. (2002). Exploring new
frontiers: What do computers contribute to teaching foreign language in elementary school?
Foreign Language Annals, 35(3), 293-306.
Peterson, M. (1998). Guest editorial. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(4), 347-348.
Pryor, B. W. (1990). Predicting and explaining intentions to participate in continuing education:
An application of the theory of reasoned action. Adult Education Quarterly, 40, 146-157.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 140
140 Almekhlafi
Pryor, B. W. (1994, November). Using the attitude concept in evaluation: What to know
before you measure. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Evaluation Associa-
tion, Boston, MA.
Robert, A. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted
Language Learning , 15(3), 241-249.
Schnackenberg, H L., Luik, K., Nisan, Y. C., & Servant, C. (2001). A case study of needs
assessment in teacher in-service development. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2-
3), 137-160.
Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts
in computer assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 196-209.
Smith, S. M., & Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning
styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
Soboleva, O., & Tronenko, N. (2002). A Russian multimedia learning package for classroom use
and self study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 483-499.
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative
evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Edu-
cation, 41(1), 87-102.
Trost, S.G, Pate, R.R., Dowda, M., Ward, D.S., Felton, G., & Saunders, R. (2002). Psychosocial
correlates of physical activity in white and African-American girls. Journal of Adolescent
Health, 31(3), 226-233.
Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Li, H. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners
acquire English abstract words. Computers and Education, 39(4), 415- 428.
Vignola, M., Kenny, R., Andrews, B., & Schilz, M. (1999). Interactive multimedia and preservice
training of teachers of French as a second language: Formative evaluation. Canadian Mod-
ern Language Review, 56(1), 180-202.
Vichitvejpaisal, P., Sitthikongsak, S., Preechakoon, B., Kraiprasit, K., Parakkamodom, S., Manon,
C., et al. (2001). Does computer-assisted instruction really help to improve the learning
process? Medical Education, 35(10), 983-989.
Volk, K. S. (2000). Trends in U.S. technology teacher education programs: Home thoughts from
abroad. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(3), 115-126.
Vrtacnik, M., Sajovec, M., Dolnicar, D., Pucko, C., Glazar, A., & Brouwer, N. (2000). An interactive
multimedia tutorial teaching unit and its effects on student perception and understanding of
chemical concepts. Westminster Studies in Education, 23, 91-105.
Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Wikipedia (2005). Computer-assisted language learning. Retrieved June 05, 2005, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_assisted_language_learning
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Fielddependent and
fieldindependent cognitive styles and their educational research. Review of Educational
Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Wydra, E. W. (2001). The effectiveness of a self-care management interactive multimedia
module. ONF, 28(9), 1399-1407.
Zint, M. (2002). Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers'
intentions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 819-844.
JILR 17/2 page layout 1/30/06 11:22 AM Page 141
Notes
1
Field independent refers to learners who are generally analytical in their approach of the environment. They
tend to be intrinsically motivated and enjoy individualized learning. On the other hand, field dependent refers
to learners who are more global in their perceptions and have difficulty separating the part from the com-
plex organization of the whole (Witkin, Moore, Goodenough, & Cox, 1977).
2
The researcher is grateful to Professor AbdulMoneim Hassan, Professor Yousef El-Emam of United Arab
Emirates University, and to Professor Peggy Kelly of California State University, San Marcus for their valuable
ideas to improve the manuscript.
APPENDIX
Samples of Materials Used in the Study
142 Almekhlafi
ish men of mankind. The advanced, powerful nations exploit and oppress the
weaker and smaller countries. Also, science has broken up established institu-
tions. Therefore, it has not produced a better and happier world for everybody.
One has to admit that science is a doubleedged weapon. If it is directed
to the welfare of life it will be blessing, otherwise it will be a curse.
Answer the questions below and then click submit to send your answers.
A. Mark the following sentences True or False by clicking in the radio button :
1. Man nowadays lives in peace and welfare.
True False
2. Science failed to eliminate the difficulties of life.
True False
3. Science and technology have evil deeds and good deeds.
True False
4. Curing diseases are one of the merits of science.
True False
5. Science has brought more hope than fear.
True False
B. Fill in the missing information in the following sentences:
The earth has become a dangerous place because of many
Letter Writing
1. Write a letter to your friend , Rashid , in Qatar telling him about the importance
of the Internet.
Your name is Ahmed and your address is P.O. Box 896 Al- Ain .
Write in the window below, don't forget to use the proper layout.