City Zoning Ordinances Can Be Improved With Images

By Rachel Carlson, LMC Staff Attorney, http://lmccodification.blogspot.com

When drafting the LMC Zoning Guide a few years ago, I included a section called
“suggestions for drafting a readable zoning ordinance.” My number one tip was “use
graphics, tables, maps and illustrations wherever possible.”

Describing sight triangles in legal language can be arduous. Explaining in text where to
begin measuring a fence can be complex. Often painstakingly detailed and accurate text
can leave even the most earnest readers still scratching their heads saying “now wait a
minute, I think I got it – but let me read it again.” Images and graphics can improve
readability for citizens and officials by a hundred fold.

Why is readability in ordinance language important? Readability – the use of clear

concise language – reduces staff time in explaining nuance. Readability also decreases
cases of accidental non-compliance. These are the cases of the sympathetic, well-
intentioned citizen who “thought they installed grandmother’s access ramp in the right
place.” But now it will cost them $10,000.00 to move everything. These types of cases
can demand extensive enforcement efforts from city staff and create difficult political
situations for city council members. It is much easier on the front end to take the time to
craft ordinances that are easy to understand. Images can help.

Sample Images Used in City Ordinances:

Here are some great examples of where a well placed diagram is worth a thousand
words:

1. City of Minnetonka, MN Zoning Code, Section 300.02, Definitions:

Building height” - the vertical distance above a reference datum measured to the
highest point of the coping of a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof or to the
average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. The reference datum
shall be selected by either of the following, whichever yields a greater building height:
a) the elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a five foot
horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building when such sidewalk or ground
surface is not more than 10 feet above lowest grade. (No. 1)
b) an elevation 10 feet higher than the lowest grade when the sidewalk or ground
surface described in item 1 above is more than 10 feet above lowest grade. (No. 2)
(Figure 3)

2. City of Minnetonka, MN Zoning Code, Section 300.02, Definitions:

“Cul-de-sac” - a street with a single means of ingress/egress and having a turnaround

at the end. A turnaround may be in the form of a circular “bubble” of pavement or an
internal “looped” street. (Figure 4)
3. City of Cary, North Carolina Zoning Code:
9.1.5 Computations
(A) Area Computation of Individual Signs
The area of a sign face (which is also the sign area of a wall sign or other sign with
only one face) shall be computed by means of the smallest rectangle that will
encompass the extreme limits of the writing, representation, emblem or other display,
together with any material or color forming an integral part of the background of the
display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or structure against which
it is placed, but not including any supporting framework, base, bracing or decorative
fence or wall when such fence or wall otherwise meets the regulations of this chapter
and is clearly incidental to the display itself. For a single wall on a single-occupant
building, all pieces of information or other graphic representations on that wall shall
be measured as though part of one (1) sign, encompassed within one (1) rectangle,
which may not exceed ten (10) percent of the total wall area to which the sign is
affixed. For a single wall on a multi-occupant building, the area of signs shall be
computed using these principles, and each individual sign shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total wall area to which the sign(s) is affixed.
Common Concerns Related to Adding Images

Two main concerns arise when dealing with images in ordinance text. First, it is
important to note that images and graphics shouldn’t replace or conflict with carefully
drafted text.

When incorporating maps and images into an ordinance, it is advisable to specify in a

separate ordinance provision that the text takes precedent in the event of conflict. For
example, “illustrations and „principles of interpretation‟ included in the code shall be
used in interpreting the relevant provisions, but where the text conflicts with an
illustration or 'stated principle,' the text shall control.” (See City of Cary, North Carolina
Code Appendix A, Chapter 9 § 1.4 (http://tinyurl.com/22w9y3l).

Secondly, cities who are eager to use images may encounter resistance from a surprising
source – their codifiers. This past April, when I attended the Government Training
Services Land Use lecture “So You Want to ReWrite Your Zoning Ordinance,” this was a
concern voiced by both the presenters and audience members. Some codifiers may be
using software that doesn’t have the capacity to incorporate images. This can be an
unfortunate surprise for a city, if this ocurs after it has drafted an ordinance or hired a
codifier.

As a result, when hiring a codifier, cities should directly ask their vendor if they have the
ability to incorporate images into codebooks. Even if the city isn’t interested in doing
this now, it may wish to at some point in the future. In addition, it may be helpful to ask
the codifier to provide samples of codebooks it has recently finished that incorporate
images. Not all codifiers approach this task in the same way. Cities may find that they
have pointed preferences for how images should be include. For example - should an
image be directly in the text? only available in an appendix? linked electronically?

Conclusion

A simple picture can go a long way in making complex ordinance provisions

understandable. Images simplify the regulatory process for all people involved – city
staff, council and residents. Some cities are doing innovative things with images in their
ordinances. I would particularly recommend reviewing the sign code provisions for the
City of Cary, North Carolina, as an example of great innovation. Cary uses LMC’s
codification partner, American Legal Publishing. The ordinance is available on the
American Legal website at this link: http://tinyurl.com/22w9y3l.

About the Author:

Rachel Carlson is an attorney with the League of Minnesota Cities. The League of
Minnesota Cities is a membership organization serving Minnesota cities since 1913.
LMC Codification is a specialized service to help our cities maintain complete, up to
date and affordable code books in a frequently changing legal landscape. The LMC
Codification blog can be found at: http://lmccodification.blogspot.com.